Lumbar Degenerative Disease Research Articles

Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion Combined With Anterolateral Fixation and Cement Augmentation for the Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Diseases in the Elderly Population: A Retrospective Study.

Cage subsidence is a common complication of oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF), particularly in elderly patients with osteoporosis or osteopenia. While bilateral pedicle screw fixation (BPS) is effective in reducing subsidence, it is associated with longer operative times, increased blood loss, and greater tissue trauma. In contrast, anterolateral fixation (AF) is less invasive but linked to higher subsidence rates. Ensuring both minimal invasiveness and adequate stability in OLIF-assisted fixation remains a significant challenge. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of combining AF with cement augmentation (AF + CA) in reducing cage subsidence and improving clinical outcomes compared with AF and BPS. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 138 elderly patients with degenerative lumbar diseases treated with OLIF. Patients were divided into three groups: AF + CA (32 patients), AF (32 patients), and BPS (74 patients). Clinical and radiographic outcomes were compared among the groups, and logistic regression analyses were performed to identify risk factors for cage subsidence after OLIF. At 1 year postoperatively, the disc height of the AF + CA group was significantly greater than that of the AF group. The cage subsidence rate in the AF + CA group was 24.3%, significantly lower than that in the AF group (48.8%, p < 0.05) and comparable to the BPS group (30.4%). Survivorship curve analysis showed better outcomes in reducing cage subsidence in theAF + CA group compared with the AF group, with no significant difference between the AF + CA and BPS groups. Compared with the AF + CA and BPS groups, the AF group had significantly higher grades and severity of cage subsidence. Fusion rates at 1 year were 91.9% in the AF + CA group, 90.2% in the AF group, and 95.1% in the BPS group, with no significant differences. The AF + CA group had significantly shorter operative times, less intraoperative blood loss, lower VAS scores at 3 days and 1 year postoperatively, and lower ODI scores at 3 days and 3 months compared with the BPS group. Multivariate regression analysis revealed that AF was a significant risk factor for cage subsidence, with an odds ratio of 3.399 compared with AF + CA. AF + CA effectively reduces cage subsidence in OLIF surgeries, offering results comparable to BPS while providing advantages such as shorter surgical time, reduced blood loss, and improved early postoperative outcomes. AF + CA is a viable alternative, especially for elderly patients with comorbidities who may not tolerate the longer operative durations or greater blood loss associated with BPS.

Comparison of clinical and radiologic outcomes between biportal endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and posterior lumbar interbody fusion

Biportal endoscopic spinal surgery has become increasingly popular, and indications have expanded. Among these, biportal endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (BE-TLIF) has yielded good results. Herein, we compared the clinical and radiological outcomes of 155 patients treated with BE-TLIF and open posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) for single-level lumbar degenerative diseases. Clinical outcomes included the visual analog scale for the back (VAS-back) and leg (VAS-leg), Oswestry Disability Index, and EuroQol 5-Dimensions. Radiological parameters and fusion rates were evaluated, and postoperative complications were recorded. In this cohort 68 and 87 patients were treated with BE-TLIF and PLIF, respectively. Both groups showed significant improvements in all clinical parameters compared with baseline, but BE-TLIF exhibited a more significant improvement in VAS-back at 1 and 6 months postoperatively. There were no significant differences in the radiological parameters or fusion rates. BE-TLIF had a significantly longer operation time, whereas PLIF exhibited a significantly higher estimated blood loss and surgical drainage, but no significant differences in postoperative complications. Compared to PLIF, BE-TLIF showed similarly good clinical and radiologic outcomes, with better results in terms of early postoperative outcomes. Thus, BE-TLIF is a viable alternative to PLIF with less back pain at 1 and 6 months postoperatively.

Hidden blood loss of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion of lumbar degenerative diseases in patients with osteoporosis: a retrospective study.

To compare hidden blood loss (HBL) of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (Mis-TLIF) of lumbar degenerative diseases in patients with or without osteoporosis (OP) and identify the risk factors for HBL with OP. The data from 156 patients with lumbar degenerative diseases, who underwent Mis-TLIF between January 2018 and December 2021, were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into the Osteoporosis and Non-osteoporosis groups. We recorded demographic characteristics and blood-related parameters in each group. Blood loss was measured by quantifying visible blood loss and calculating HBL using preoperative hematocrit (Hctpre) and postoperative hematocrit (Hctpost). Pearson or Spearman correlation analysis was used to investigate the association between OP patient's characteristics and HBL. Multivariate linear regression analysis was used to confirm independent risk factors of HBL in patients with OP. The mean HBL of the Osteoporosis and Non-osteoporosis groups was 608.27 ± 175.23 and 173.04 ± 67.55ml, respectively. There were significant differences in age, BMI, subcutaneous fat thickness, muscle thickness, Hctpost, average hematocrit of preoperative and postoperative (Hctave), visible blood loss, HBL and volume of allogeneic blood transfusions between the two groups (P < 0.05). Multivariate linear regression analysis showed that Hctpost, T-score, use of tranexamic acid (TXA) and preoperative regular anti-osteoporosis treatment were independent risk factors for HBL in patients with OP. There was significant perioperative HBL in patients with OP. Hctpost, T-score, use of TXA and preoperative regular anti-osteoporosis treatment were independent risk factors for HBL in patients with OP. More attention should be paid to the perioperative period to ensure the safety of patients with OP.

An in vitro biomechanical evaluation of integrated lateral plate combined with oblique lateral interbody fusion in different bone conditions

Oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) is a minimally invasive surgery for the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases (LDD). Under normal bone mass(NB), supplemental with lateral plate (LP) fixation has been proven to provide stability and reduce complications. However, it is unclear whether OLIF combined with LP fixation can achieve satisfactory fixation effects in cases of osteoporosis(OP) or osteopenia (OS)? In this study, Eighteen L3-5 spinal specimens from 3 to 6 months old fresh calves were equally divided into 3 groups: group A (NB), group B (OS) and group C (OP). A load control scheme was adopted and evaluated using multidirectional nondestructive moments (± 7.5 N·m). An electronic universal tester and a tensile/torsion tester were simulated to generate 6 degrees of freedom of motion, and a VIC-3D three-dimensional optical full-field strain measurement system dynamically tracked the surgical segmental displacement. Each spine was evaluated under the following conditions at the L4-5 level: intact (INT); OLIF stand-alone (SA); cage supplemented with LP, cage supplemented with unilateral pedicle screws (UPS), and cage supplemented with bilateral pedicle screws (BPS). The current data show that With NB and OS models, LP fixation significantly reduced ROM in the LB and AR directions, with slightly less stability than BPS fixation and comparable to UPS. In the case of OP, LP fixation may increase the risk of internal fixation failure, and it is more preferable to choose BPS fixation with stronger stability.

Minimally Invasive Unilateral Pedicle Combined with Contralateral Translaminar Facet Joint Screw Fixation for single-segment Lumbar Degenerative Disease: A 10-year follow-up Study.

This retrospective study compared unilateral pedicle screw combined with contralateral translaminar facet joint screw (UPS+TFS) fixation with bilateral pedicle screw (BPS) fixation in patients undergoing minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) for single-segment lumbar degenerative disease. To assess the long-term clinical efficacy of UPS+TFS fixation and BPS fixation in MIS-TLIF. Limited research exists on the long-term clinical outcomes of UPS+TFS fixation in MIS-TLIF. This study addresses this gap by comparing UPS+TFS with the more common BPS fixation technique. A retrospective analysis of 151 patients with single-segment lumbar degenerative disease treated with MIS-TLIF at XXX Hospital (March 2011-December 2012) was conducted. Propensity score matching (1:1) resulted in 32 patients per group (UPS+TFS and BPS). Basic demographic characteristics, preoperative functional scores, perioperative indicators, and postoperative complications were compared between the groups. Lumbar and leg Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores up to 10 years postoperatively were also compared. The surgical outcomes of both groups were evaluated using the MacNab criteria at the final follow-up. The UPS+TFS group had significantly lower lumbar VAS scores at three months postoperatively (P<0.05) with less intraoperative blood loss, shorter surgery time, and reduced hospital stay compared to the BPS group (P<0.05). No significant differences were found in the JOA or ODI scores between the two groups at 3 months and 1, 3, 5, and 10 years post-surgery (P>0.05). UPS+TFS and BPS fixation during MIS-TLIF can achieve favorable clinical outcomes with no difference in long-term clinical efficacy. UPS+TFS demonstrates perioperative advantages such as reduced intraoperative blood loss, shorter operation time, reduced postoperative hospital stay, and less iatrogenic injury. Therefore, MIS-TLIF with UPS+TFS fixation is a reliable treatment for single-segment lumbar degenerative disease.

Efficacy and Safety of Vuong Hoat Natural Health Supplement in Managing Low Back Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

This clinical study aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of Vuong Hoat (VH) natural health supplement for reducing the negative impact of low back pain, improving the quality of life, and enhancing functional activities in patients with lumbar degenerative disc disease (LDD). The open-label, randomized, controlled clinical trial involved 60 patients suffering from low back pain caused by LDD. The participants were randomly assigned to either a study group (SG) comprising 30 subjects or a control group (CG) comprising 30 subjects. Patients in the CG received treatment with electro-acupuncture, while those in the SG were administered VH in conjunction with the same electro-acupuncture protocol for 28 days. The clinical progression and tolerability of both groups were compared based on seven objective measurements: visual analog scale index, Schober test, fingertip-to-floor distance, spinal flexion, spinal extension, spinal tilt, and spinal rotation. After 14 days of treatment, the SG showed a significant improvement in overall outcomes compared to the CG. Specifically, 43.3% of SG patients achieved very good results, 53.3% had good results, and 3.4% had moderate results, whereas corresponding figures for the CG were 6.7%, 76.7%, and 16.6%, respectively (P < .05). After 28 days of treatment, both groups demonstrated a shift toward very good results, with the SG continuing to show better outcomes than the CG (P < .05). In the SG, the very good results increased to 76.7%, good results decreased to 20%, and moderate results were 3.3%. On the other hand, the CG had 46.7% very good results, 43.3% good results, and 10% moderate results. Notably, no side effects were reported from the VH treatments during the study. The findings of this study indicate that VH health supplement is a safe and effective approach for managing low back pain and limited spinal movement in patients with LDD.

Comparison of three sacral screw internal fixation techniques in the treatment of L4-S1 lumbar degenerative disease with osteoporosis: a retrospective observational study.

Patients with L4-S1 lumbar degenerative disease (LDD) with osteoporosis are prone to sacral-screw loosening during spinal internal fixation. We aimed to compare the clinical efficacy and imaging results of sacral bicortical, tricortical, and polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA)-augmented pedicle-screw fixation in the treatment of L4-S1 LDD with osteoporosis. This is a retrospective study, 72 patients were enrolled and divided into three groups according to the S1-screw fixation method: PMMA-augmented pedicle-screw fixation (Group A, n = 26), bicortical fixation (Group B, n = 22), and tricortical fixation (Group C, n = 24). The visual analog scale (VAS) and Oswestry disability index (ODI) were recorded preoperatively and at the last follow-up, and the postoperative complications, screw-loosening rate, and fusion rate were compared between the three groups. Upon the last follow-up, the VAS and ODI scores of the three groups were significantly improved compared with those recorded preoperatively. The VAS and ODI scores of Group A were significantly smaller than those of Groups B and C (P < 0.05), with no significant difference between Groups B and C. Moreover, the screw-loosening rate of Group A was significantly lower than that of Groups B and C (P < 0.05), with no significant difference between Groups B and C. No significant difference was noted in postoperative complications, bone-cement leakage rates, and intervertebral fusion rates among the three groups. Furthermore, we found that osteoporosis and change of lumbar lordosis(LL) value were independent risk factors for sacral-screw loosening in patients with L4-S1 LDD with osteoporosis. When patients with L4-S1 LDD with osteoporosis undergo lumbosacral fusion and fixation, the use of S1 pedicle screws with PMMA augmentation has better stability and less screw loosening. Furthermore, we recommend this surgery for patients with osteoporosis, and the LL should be increased as much as possible during the operation to restore the matching of lumbar and pelvic parameters.

The Effect of L5 Morphology on Prevention of L5-S1 Degeneration Following Floating Fusion for Degenerative Spine Disorders.

Retrospective Study. The selection of floating fusion or lumbosacral fusion arises when treating patients with instability or stenosis of the lower lumbar spine concomitantly radiographic degeneration of L5-S1. This study aimed to investigate the preoperative anatomical or morphological factors affecting the survivorship of the L5-S1 after floating fusion. This study included 77 patients who had undergone floating fusion surgery through the TLIF approach. Preoperative radiographic parameters were evaluated using anteroposterior and lateral lumbar spine radiographs. The patients were divided into two groups according to the Modified Pfirrmann Grading and total endplate score. Multivariable regression analysis was performed to explore the relationships between the anatomical or morphological characteristics of L5 and the degeneration of L5-S1. The disc degeneration group exhibited a smaller height ratio of the iliac crest (Hi) and a less L5 deep position. Furthermore, the right/left height of L4 (Hr/Hl) and the right/left width of transverse process of L5 (CRt/CLt) were significantly higher in the disc and endplate degeneration groups. Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that Hi and CRt were independently associated with L5-S1 disc degeneration, whereas Hr was a significant risk factor for L5-S1 endplate degeneration. Anatomical and morphological characteristics of L5, such as smaller Hi, higher CRt and Hr, were associated with an increased risk of L5-S1 degeneration in patients after floating fusion. These findings may indicate the fusion level when addressing lower lumbar degenerative diseases and the concurrent radiographic degeneration of L5-S1.

A Novel Unilateral Bi/Multi-Portal Endoscopic Transforaminal Interbody Fusion Utilizing Uniaxial Spinal Endoscope Instead of Arthroscope: Technical Note and Preliminary Clinical Results.

Currently, traditional UBE surgery, which is based on arthroscope, has been increasingly employed for complex lumbar degenerative diseases. However, this approach is associated with complications such as intraoperative dural sac tears, nerve root injuries, and postoperative epidural hematomas. In response to these challenges, we propose a novel technique utilizing uniaxial spinal endoscope to replace arthroscope-Unilateral Bi/Multi-Portal Endoscopy (UME). This new method has successfully treated complex lumbar disc herniation and spinal stenosis, resulting in improved postoperative outcomes and a reduction in complications. Based on the previous findings, we utilized uniaxial spinal endoscopy as the primary operating method, with the assistance of multi-portal endoscopic techniques (UME-TLIF), to perform transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. The feasibility and preliminary clinical results have been presented in this paper. A total of 18 patients (8 men and 10 women, aged 52.6 ± 15.29 years) diagnosed with lumbar degenerative diseases, such as giant lumbar disc herniation, severe lumbar spinal stenosis, or lumbar spondylolisthesis, were included in this study from January 2022 to March 2023. Various parameters including operation time, ambulatory time, intraoperative fluoroscopy times, hospitalization days, and complications were recorded during the perioperative period. Clinically relevant symptoms were evaluated and documented 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. Visual analogue scale (VAS) scores for lower back pain and leg pain, as well as the Oswestry disability index (ODI), were measured. The extent of lumbar interbody fusion was assessed using lumbar X-ray and CT scans at the 12-months follow-up. MRI was performed to assess the degree of nerve decompression in patients at the same time points. The paired t-test or Wilcoxon signed-rank test were used as statistical methods. The single-segment UME-TLIF procedure had an average operation time of 211 ± 53.3 min, and the average number of X-rays taken during the operation was 11.78 ± 5.32. Patients were able to walk and perform functional exercises approximately 35.11 ± 8.41 h post-surgery, and the average duration of hospital stay was 8.5 ± 2.27 days. The VAS and ODI values at each time point post-surgery were significantly lower than the respective pre-surgery values (p < 0.05). Two patients developed postoperative sensory disturbances which significantly improved with conservative treatment. Furthermore, a follow-up CT scan conducted 12 months post-surgery showed 100% fusion rate of the surgical segments in all patients. UME-TLIF is an endoscopy-assisted fusion procedure that minimizes muscle damage in patients and allows early rehabilitation. This technique broadens the surgical applications of uniaxial spinal endoscope as a surgical tool, particularly benefitingpatients diagnosed with severe lumbar disc herniation and lumbar instability.

The role of spinal injections towards optimizing patient selection for spinal surgery: A proof-of-concept study in 176 lower back pain patients

BackgroundManaging degenerative lumbar diseases is challenging due to the complexity of identifying symptom causes, especially when multiple pathologies coexist. This study evaluated the impact of patient-specific lumbar spine infiltrations on therapeutic strategies in patients with multiple spinal pathologies (MSP) or specific spinal pathologies (SSP).MethodsA retrospective cohort of 176 patients treated for subacute or chronic lumbar pain with targeted spinal infiltrations was analyzed. Patients were categorized based on the presence of MSP or SSP. The primary endpoint was the relief of lumbar spine-specific symptoms following each infiltration. Secondary endpoints included epidemiological factors and comorbidities, while tertiary endpoints focused on post-treatment recommendations and performed treatments.ResultsHigh rates of spinal pain (97.1% in both groups) and radiating symptoms (88.2% in SSP and 92.3% in MSP) were reported. Psychological conditions were significantly more prevalent in female patients (19.4% vs. 7.7%, p = 0.0307), whereas hip osteoarthritis was more common in male patients (20.5% vs. 9.2%, p = 0.0490). Among all infiltration types, lumbar transforaminal injections were the most effective, leading to pain reduction in 80.1% of SSP patients and 72.2% of MSP patients. Facet joint and sacroiliac joint infiltrations also frequently resulted in pain reduction in both groups. Overall, conservative treatment was recommended for most patients (73.3%), while only 22.7% of all evaluated patients were recommended for surgical intervention. Additionally, seven patients received a hip prosthesis.ConclusionsPatient-specific lumbar spine infiltrations effectively relieve pain, support therapeutic decision-making, and tend to favor conservative treatment approaches. These findings highlight the role of infiltration therapies in managing both mixed and specific lumbar spine pathologies, suggesting their potential to reduce the need for surgical interventions.

Unilateral biportal endoscopic vs. open surgery in the treatment of young obese patients' lumbar degenerative diseases: a retrospective study.

Obesity accelerates the development of lumbar disease and increase the risk during surgery. Unilateral biportal endoscopic discectomy (UBE) is a newly developed minimally invasive technique, which refers to the spinal surgery under unilateral double-channel endoscopic surgery. Therefore, the purpose of this study is whether UBE decompression alone can bring good clinical results to young obese patients with lumbar degenerative diseases. The patients with lumbar diseases who underwent UBE and open surgery (open discectomy) in our hospital from February 2020 to February 2022 were selected as young (age ≤ 44 years old) and obesity (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2). The patients were evaluated with VAS, ODI, JOA and modified Macnab score before operation, 1 month, 6 months and 12 months after operation. Nerve root function sensation, muscle strength and tendon reflex were evaluated. The operation time, estimated blood loss, postoperative hospital stay, incidence of postoperative complications and reoperation rate were recorded. MRI quantitative lumbar multifidus muscle (LMM) comparison was performed 12 months after operation. 77 patients were included, and the scores of VAS, ODI and JOA were similar in the two groups during the last follow-up. There were no difference in nerve root function sensation, muscle strength or tendon reflex. However, one month after operation, the VAS back score and ODI improvement in the UBE group were significantly better than those in the open group, which were 2.44 ± 0.97, 33.10 ± 6.78 and 2.93 ± 0.79 and 36.13 ± 5.84, respectively, with a statistically significant difference (p = 0.020 and 0.038). According to the modified Macnab criteria, UBE group, the excellent and good rate was 97.2%. The excellent and good rate of open group was 97.6%. The estimated blood loss and postoperative hospital stay in UBE group (36.81 ± 17.81, 3.92 ± 1.32) were significantly better than those in open group (104.88 ± 31.41, 6.41 ± 1.94), with a statistically significant difference (p = 0.010). There was no significant difference in operation time between the two groups (p = 0.070). The number of complications in UBE group was 2 (5.6%) and open group was 4 (9.8%). The fat infiltration rate of 19.3%+11.0% in UBE group was significantly lower than that of 27.0%±13.9% in open group (p = 0.010). UBE has the advantage of early recovery in the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases in young obese patients, and reduces the damage to LMM, so it has a good clinical effect.

Comparison posterior lumbar stabilization with dynamic rod system and rigid rod system for lumbar degenerative disease.

This research aims to assess the clinical and radiological outcomes of both dynamic rod system (PLSDR) and rigid rod system (PLSRR) when treating lumbar degenerative disease (LDD). A retrospective review of 98 patients who underwent posterior stabilization surgery with a posterior approach in our clinic between 2018 and 2023 was conducted. The patients were divided into two groups based on the type of implant used: Those with PLSRR (Group 1) and those with PLSDR (Group 2). In a comparative study, Group 1 had a higher prevalence of discopathy (49% vs. 24.5%, p = 0.012). Differences in surgical operation levels existed, and notably, only Group 1 had five-level surgeries (8.2%, p = 0.033). Pfirrmann disk degeneration grades differed significantly (p < 0.001), with Group 2 mainly in Grade I (77.6% vs. 36.7% in Group 1). Stenosis (57.1% vs. 28.6%, p = 0.004) and facet hypertrophy (71.4% vs. 47%, p = 0.014) were higher in Group 1. Group 1 also showed a greater adjacent segment degeneration (ASD) incidence (81.6% vs. 51%, p = 0.001). Both groups had primarily proximal ASD degeneration (p = 0.202). Compression fractures were absent. Follow-up durations were similar (p = 0.183). In treating LDD, the PLSDR shows potential advantages over PLSRR, including preservation of degeneration in adjacent segments.

Observation of the effect of single dose intravenous infusion of tranexamic acid on white blood cell, erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein after double segmental posterior lumbar interbody fusion

To observe the safety and effectiveness of single dose intravenous infusion of tranexamic acid (TXA) in dual level posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF), and to explore the changes and trends in perioperative white blood cell (WBC), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and C-reactive protein (CRP). Between October 2020 and September 2022, 46 patients with lumbar degenerative disease were treated with dual level PLIF, including 18 males and 28 females, with an average age of (60.24±10.68) years old, from 34 to 80 years old. They were divided into observation group and control group according to different treatment methods. There were 28 patients in the observation group, including 12 males and 16 females, with an average age of (61.04 ± 9.03) years old. There were 3 cases with lumbar disc herniation (LDH), lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) 18 cases, lumbar spondylolisthesis (LS) 7 cases. TXA (1 g/100 ml) was administered intravenously 15 min before skin incision after general anesthesia. The control group consisted of 18 patients, including 6 males and 12 females, with an average age of (59.00±13.04) years old. There were 5 cases with LDH, LSS 9 cases, LS 4 cases, and TXA was not used. The operation time, intraoperative bleeding volume, postoperative drainage volume, postoperative deep vein thrombosis (DVT), postoperative hospital stay, postoperative activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), prothrombin time (PT), thrombin time (TT), fibrinogen (FIB), platelet (PLT), red blood cell (RBC), hemoglobin (HB), hematocrit (HCT), the first day, the fourth day, the seventh day and the last tested after operation WBC, ESR and CRP were recorded. The postoperative wounds of the patients healed well and there was no DVT. 46 patients were followed up from 3 to 6 months. The intraoperative blood loss was 400.0 (300.0, 500.0) ml and the postoperative drainage was 260.0 (220.0, 450.0) ml in the observation group, which were lower than the control group[600.0(400.0, 1000.0) ml, 395.0 (300.0, 450.0) ml], P<0.05. There was no significant difference between the two groups in operation time, postoperative hospital stay, postoperative APTT, PT, TT, FIB, PLT, RBC, HB, HCT, and postoperative WBC, ESR and CRP at different times (P>0.05). Single dose intravenous infusion of TXA can reduce the blood loss of bi-segmental PLIF, and has no significant effect on WBC, ESR and CRP after operation.

Postoperative early initiation of sequential exercise program in preventing persistent spinal pain syndrome type-2 after modified transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a prospective randomized controlled trial.

This prospective randomized controlled trial aimed to investigate the impact of early postoperative sequential motor control (starting first day post-operatively) and core stabilization training (starting fifth week post-operatively) compared to conventional exercise (starting fifth weeks post-operatively) on the risk of developing persistent spinal pain syndrome type-2 (PSPS-T2). 395 patients with lumbar degenerative diseases (LDDs) undergoing modified transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and a 12-week postoperative exercise program (sequential vs. conventional exercise: 214 vs. 181) were evaluated for low back pain (LBP) intensity, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), pressure pain threshold (PPT), temporal summation (TS), fatty infiltration of paraspinal muscles, transversus abdominis (TrA) activation capacity and Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ) pre-operatively, 3 months post-operatively, and 1 year post-operatively. At 3-month postoperative assessment, LBP in sequential exercise group were lower than those in conventional exercise group (P < 0.05), and sequential-exercise patients had greater local-area PPTs, lower TS, lower TrA activation capacities and less fatty infiltration of erector spinae than did the conventional-exercise patients (P < 0.05). At 1-year postoperative assessment, fewer sequential-exercise patients had PSPS-T2 compared with conventional-exercise patients (11/214 vs. 20/181; P < 0.05). LBP at rest and FABQ were lower in sequential-exercise patients than conventional-exercise patients (P < 0.05). Furthermore, both PPT and TS at 1-year postoperative assessment were associated with these measurements at 3-month postoperative assessment in patients with PSPS-T2 (P < 0.05). Postoperative sequential exercise has more positive effects to avoid PSPS-T2 than conventional exercise in patients with LDDs possibly because of its advantages in improving central and peripheral sensitization.

Increased Risk of Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures Following Epidural Steroid Injections in Patients with Lumbar Degenerative Disease: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Background/Objectives: Lumbar degenerative disease is a common age-related condition, with epidural steroid injection (ESI) being a widely employed conservative treatment approach. However, the potential effect of ESI on osteoporosis and fracture risk remains unclear. This study investigated the risk of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs) in patients with lumbar degenerative disease who underwent ESI treatment. Methods: A cohort of 64 patients who received ESI treatment and a control group of 256 patients were included in this study. Demographic data, clinical characteristics, and follow-up information were collected. Cox proportional hazards models were used to analyze risk factors for OVCF, and subgroup analyses were conducted. Results: OVCF was more common in the ESI group than in the control group (hazard ratio [HR]: 3.49, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.06-11.43, p = 0.039). After confounding factors were adjusted for, ESI remained an independent risk factor for OVCF (HR: 4.60, 95% CI: 1.01-20.89, p = 0.048). In a subgroup analysis, lower socioeconomic status was associated with higher OVCF risk (HR: 11.82, 95% CI: 1.06-131.26, p = 0.044). The ESI group had improved short-term pain relief, with nonsignificant long-term effects. Conclusions: Patients with lumbar degenerative disease receiving ESI treatment are at an increased risk of OVCF, particularly those with lower socioeconomic status. These findings underscore the importance of regular bone density monitoring and fracture prevention following ESI treatment. Clinicians should carefully weigh the short-term benefits of ESI against the long-term risks and develop individualized follow-up plans for high-risk patients.

Association between acute pain trajectory and patient-reported outcomes at 6-months following lumbar surgery for patients with lumbar degenerative disease.

To investigate the association between acute pain trajectory over one week and patient-reported outcomes (PRO) at 6-months following lumbar surgery in patients with lumbar degenerative disease (LDD). Two hundred and fifty-five subjects with LDD who received surgical treatment at our hospital between April 2019 and March 2022. Acute pain trajectory was measured using a pain trajectory calculator to determine an approximate line using the linear least squares method based on pain intensity on postoperative days 1, 3, 5, and 7. The pain trajectory-slope, which represents the change in postoperative pain intensity of the calculated approximation line, was evaluated as the main exposure for the present study. The PRO was assessed using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) measured at 6 ± 1 months postoperatively. Poor PRO scores in this study were defined using a threshold of an ODI of 22% or greater, which represents the patient acceptable symptomatic state after lumbar spine surgery. Multivariable logistic regression analysis including covariates was performed to investigate the association between pain trajectory-slope and PRO at 6-months following lumbar surgery. In this study, 101 (39.6%) had poor PRO scores. Multivariable logistic regression analysis adjusted for covariates showed that pain trajectory-slope was associated with the poor PRO scores (odd ratios; 1.203, 95% confidence intervals; 1.130-1.288). The results of this study show that acute pain trajectory is significantly associated with poor PRO scores 6-months after lumbar surgery. Patients with slower pain relief or worsening pain were associated with poor PRO scores.

Does Bone Density Affect Outcomes in Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion? A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of Preoperative Hounsfield Units.

Background: This study aimed to assess whether preoperative Hounsfield unit (HU) values differ in short-term clinical outcomes after lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) surgery. Methods: In a retrospective analysis, 109 patients undergoing LLIF for lumbar degenerative diseases (LDD) were reviewed. Preoperative Computed Tomography (CT) scans measured HU values at the L1-L4 vertebrae, dividing patients into low and high HU groups. After conducting a cluster analysis of preoperative Hounsfield unit (HU) values, patients were categorized into low and high HU groups using propensity score matching (PSM). The outcomes measured one-year post-surgery included pain intensity (Numeric Rating Scales for Low Back Pain (NRSLBP), Leg Pain (NRSLP), and Leg Numbness (NRSLN)) and quality of life (Japanese Orthopedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire: JOABPEQ). Results: After PSM, there were 26 patients in each group. Significant improvements were noted in both low and high HU groups post-surgery, with the low HU group showing a decrease in NRSLBP from 6.2 to 3.7, NRSLP from 7.4 to 2.5, and NRSLN from 6.4 to 3.0. The high HU group exhibited similar improvements (NRSLBP: 6.5 to 3.6, NRSLP: 6.3 to 2.5, NRSLN: 6.2 to 2.4). JOABPEQ scores improved significantly in both groups across all domains, with no significant differences observed. Preoperative HU values have little correlation with the short-term outcomes of pain and quality of life in LLIF surgery. Conclusions: This study suggests reconsidering the role of HU values following indirect decompression via LLIF, particularly in evaluating pain and patient-reported outcome measures in patients with LDD.

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) improves outcomes in elderly patients undergoing short-level lumbar fusion surgery: a retrospective study of 333 cases

BackgroundDegenerative lumbar disease significantly impairs the quality of life in elderly individuals, with short-segment lumbar degenerative disease being particularly prevalent. When conservative treatment proves ineffective, surgical intervention becomes the optimal choice for managing lumbar disease. The implementation of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) in spinal surgery has been progressively refined, leading to greater patient benefits. However, age and the associated decline in physiological function remain critical factors influencing surgical decision-making. Currently, there is a paucity of research focused on elderly patients undergoing lumbar fusion surgery to substantiate that advanced age does not diminish the benefits derived from ERAS in this demographic.MethodsThis is a retrospective cohort study of prospectively collected data. Patients who underwent short-segment (1 or 2 segments) transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) under the care of the same surgical team at our institution were recruited, and divided into no-ERAS-elder, ERAS-elder, and ERAS-younger groups. Subsequently, time to physiological function recovery and other outcomes were compared.ResultsThe outcomes of the ERAS-elder group (n = 113) and the no-ERAS-elder group (n = 120) were compared. The overall physiological function recovery was significantly faster (6.71 ± 2.6 days vs. 8.6 ± 2.67 days, p = 0.01) in the ERAS-elder group. Next, the outcomes of the ERAS-elder group (n = 113) were compared with those of the ERAS-younger group (n = 100), and no significant difference in total physiological function recovery was found between the two groups (6.71 ± 2.6 days vs. 6.14 ± 1.63 days, p = 0.252).ConclusionsThis study shows that the implementation of the ERAS program can effectively shorten the recovery time of physiological function in elderly patients after short-segment lumbar surgery, reduce the incidence of some complications, alleviate pain, and significantly shorten the length of hospital stay. ERAS enables elderly patients to achieve outcomes comparable to those of younger patients.

Development and validation of a nomogram to predict the risk of adjacent segment disease after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in patients with lumbar degenerative diseases

BackgroundAdjacent segment disease (ASD) is a common and serious complication that can develop in the mid- to long-term after lumbar fusion surgery. However, the underlying mechanisms of ASD are not yet fully understood. This study aimed to develop and validate a risk prediction model for ASD in patients who underwent transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) for lumbar degenerative diseases.MethodsPatients with lumbar degenerative disease who underwent TLIF between January 2015 and December 2016 were included in the retrospective study. The participants were divided into two groups: ASD and non-ASD. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify factors influencing ASD after TLIF surgery. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, calibration curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to evaluate the model’s discrimination, calibration and clinical value, respectively.ResultsA total of 11.5% (59/513) of patients developed ASD. Higher BMI, lower BMD, higher disc grade, and reduced disc height were identified as independent risk factors for ASD after TLIF. The model demonstrated good discrimination in both the training and validation sets, with calibration and Hosmer-Lemeshow tests confirming accuracy, and DCA demonstrating clinical applicability.ConclusionsThe nomogram model demonstrated promise in predicting ASD in patients who underwent TLIF, aiding clinicians in selecting the most suitable surgical approach and optimizing surgical decisions.

Expert consensus on the clinical application of cortical bone trajectory for lumbar pedicle screws: results from a modified Delphi study.

A modified Delphi study. This study sought to establish expert consensus on the use of cortical bone trajectory (CBT) for lumbar pedicle screws. The CBT technique is widely used in the treatment of various degenerative lumbar diseases because it reduces surgical time, soft tissue exposure, and blood loss; improves biomechanical stability; and allows for faster patient recovery. However, as an emerging surgical technique, CBT remains controversial in terms of preoperative evaluation methods, key surgical techniques, complication prevention and treatment, postoperative follow-up, and other aspects, resulting in unclear indications and contraindications for some doctors and posing great challenges to the steady promotion of this technique. From May 2021 to August 2021, panelists were chosen to collect expert feedback using the modified Delphi method, and 74 spine surgeons from across China agreed to participate. Four rounds were conducted: one in-person meeting and three subsequent survey rounds. Each question received at least 70.0% agreement, indicating a consensus. The grade A, B, and C recommendation were defined as having ≥90.0%, 80.0%-89.9%, and 70.0%-79.9% agreement on each question, respectively. The panelist group consisted of 74 experts, and 72, 70, and 69 questionnaires were collected in three rounds, respectively. In total, 24 questions with 59 options reached consensus after the Delphi rounds, including indications (adjacent vertebral diseases after lumbar internal fixation) and contraindications (previous surgery or bone destructive diseases lead to the destruction or absence of bone in the lamina or isthmus); advantages (intraoperative traction of paravertebral soft tissue is small) and disadvantages (not three-column fixation.); preoperative evaluation; complications; and postoperative follow-up evaluation, of CBT. The modified Delphi method achieved expert consensus on the clinical use of CBT for lumbar pedicle screws. This consensus document establishes clear guidelines for indications, contraindications, surgical techniques, and postoperative management, thereby enhancing clinical decision-making and promoting the safe and effective use of CBT. While the initial study focused on Chinese surgeons, future research will seek to validate and expand these findings from a broader international perspective.