C ANCER of the breast is not new. In the first century A.D. Leonides112 operated upon the breast for cancer, using a red hot iron to sear the remaining surfaces. AntyIIus’ also operated upon the breast in the third century. In 1804 Benjamin Bell’ insisted that local operations were of no avaiI and urged that wider operations were necessary and suggested that the pectoral muscIes and axillary lymph nodes be removed. Up to this time aImost IOO per cent of patients had recurrences and died. CharIes Moore’ in 1867 emphasized that neck dissection be performed en masse and in continuity. Sir Mitchell Banks’ in 1882 taught that removal of the axillary lymph nodes was necessary whether they seemed enlarged or not. HaIsted3 and WiIIy Meyer4 in 1894 separately described an operation which has been the basis for our surgery to date. Halsted removed the breast first, followed by the axillary dissection. Meyer reversed this order. Halsted removed a large amount of skin, necessitating skin grafting in most cases. He later described a more radical operation, entering the neck and removing the lymph nodes in the posterior triangle. L. McLane Tiffany5 in 1901 drew attention to the intercostat spaces where nodes could sometimes be found and removed. Sampson HandIey in 1904~ and again in 1921~ emphasized that the spread of cancer was by Iymphatics which coursed chiefly in the fascia1 planes. He stated that wide areas of fascia therefore should be removed, incIuding the fascia over the epigastrium and the upper part of the rectus abdominus muscle. He believed that since cancer did not spread along the skin, it was not necessary to remove wide areas. We are indebted to him for the rule that at least 6 inches of skin, centered over the tumor, pIus IO inches of deep fascia, incIuding that over the rectus muscle and epigastrium, shouId be removed. In 1895 Roentgen2 discovered x-rays and soon after that a patient with a Iarge cancer of the face was treated with roentgen rays. The tumor shrank away rapidly and disappeared. Marie and Pierre Curie2 discovered radium and later this was made available for therapeutic use against cancer. Soon a technic was developed for a combination of surgery plus radiation. Radium was used but gave way to x-ray preoperativeIy, postoperativeIy, or both. Radiation combined with radical surgery was considered better than either aIone. We had now reached a stage where it was beIieved that the treatment of cancer of the breast had become standardized. However, our tranquility did not Iast long. New and conflicting ideas emanate from so many authoritative sources that we are now in a state of uncertainty. In a recent article Charles Eckert and William B. Seaman8 summarize their ideas on radiation therapy as follows: “ Irradiation offers definite palliation, prolongation of life and occasionaIIy even five-year survivals are seen in the group of primary inoperabIe cases. Preoperative radiation serves to surround the cancer cells with a fibrous tissue barrier. If surgery foIIows, it effectiveIy breaks down this barrier so that life is often shortened over what it wouId be from x-ray therapy alone.” They aIso state that postoperative radiation is not caIIed for unIess there are very high nodes in the axilla and the surgeon believes he has probably Ieft some Iymph nodes or extension which he cannot reach. This view is held aIso by Haagenson” and others. However, Janes’O and Jones” both report satisfactory results in a smaI1 number of cases treated preoperatively. Janes reported two advanced cases treated by preoperative radiation. Both patients are alive and free from recurrence eleven and six years, respectively. A. Nohrman’? reports a series of 1,042 cases in which there appeared to be an improvement in prognosis in the most unfavorable cases. The author has used preoperative x-ray therapy in a number of cases and has noted marked clinical improvement. In many cases the
Read full abstract