95 Background: We sought to clarify the influence of a positive or close superficial or deep mastectomy margin on the risk of LRR. Methods: We reviewed the charts of 561 consecutive women who underwent mastectomy without radiation for newly diagnosed in situ or invasive breast cancer between 1998 and 2005. The study cohort consists of 167 of these women who had a positive or close (≤2 mm) superficial or deep surgical margin. LRR as the site of first recurrence (+/− simultaneous distant disease) and distant metastasis (DM) rates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The median age was 50 years. Forty-five (27%) had ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) only. Of the 122 women with invasive disease, 79% had T1, 18% T2, and 3% T3 tumors, and 25% had positive axillary nodes (range, 1-4; 68% 1 positive node). Twenty-nine (24%) of those with invasive disease had lymphovascular invasion. The superficial margin was positive in 61 (37%) and close in 69 (41%). The deep margin was positive in 28 (17%) and close in 51 (31%). Results: The median follow-up was 6.3 years (range, 1-12.4). The 5-year LRR rate was 5% (95% CI 2-10%) and the DM rate was 3% (95% CI 1-8%). Twelve patients had a LRR; this included the chest wall in 9 and the axilla in 4. Five of the 12 had positive nodes. Four of 92 (4%) with close margins had a LRR vs. 8/75 (11%) with positive margins (log-rank p=0.15). Of the 45 with pure DCIS, 1 (2%) had a LRR. Of those with invasive disease, LRR occurred in 1/28 (4%) who had invasive disease at (positive) or near (close) the superficial margin, 3/38 (8%) with DCIS at or near the superficial margin, 0/12 with invasive disease at or near the deep margin, and 1/12 (8%) with DCIS at or near the deep margin. Both margins were positive or close in 32/122 patients with invasive disease; 6 of these (19%) had a LRR. Conclusions: The risk of LRR in patients with a positive or close surgical margin after mastectomy is generally low. The benefit of post-mastectomy radiation in this population with otherwise favorable features is likely to be small. While there may be a higher risk of LRR in patients with disease at or close to both margins (likely representing extent of disease), numbers in these categories are small and these results should be interpreted with caution.
Read full abstract