The purpose of this study is to establish a quantitative relationship between network congestion and travel-time reduction benefits of a real-time route guidance user service. The approach of the study is to employ the INTEGRATION traffic simulation model and a 2,000 link network based on the Detroit, Michigan roadway system in a series of experiments. While holding the capacity of the roadway fixed, the value of route guidance is evaluated over a range of increasing demand levels. Network demand patterns and trip characteristics are comparable to current national averages. Measures of congestion such as average system commute speed either match or exceed current national averages. Congestion metrics measured for the lightest demand scenario match most current empirical national average data, while the heaviest demand scenario appears roughly comparable with 1994 Tokyo conditions. Results from this study indicate that route-guided vehicles benefit regardless of level of congestion, however, the amount of trip time savings achieved is highly dependent on network congestion conditions. Average benefits for route guided vehicles over unguided vehicles in the A.M. peak period range between 8–26% depending on overall traffic volume. The results indicate a two-part linear relationship between route guidance benefit and network congestion. As congestion increases in the network, benefits of route guidance increase until average network speed drops below 20mph. Beyond that point, benefits decline (but remain positive). This 20mph threshold in our network is the point where the dynamically growing and shifting mass of queued vehicles around bottlenecks begins to impede access to alternative routes for guided vehicles network-wide. In a related experiment, route guided vehicles that receive reliable data on network conditions (including incidents or demand variation) gain 3–9% travel time savings over unguided vehicles that follow optimal routes based on average time-variant network congestion conditions. Route guided vehicles may exploit information about unexpected delays in the network related to incidents as well as variability in daily traffic patterns. This experiment was conducted to isolate the value of route guidance with respect to experienced commuter traffic, rather than an aggregated model of driver behavior including both familiar and unfamiliar drivers. The preliminary results of this study have implications for ITS benefit assessment. First, the benefits of route guidance are directly related to the level of recurrent congestion in a network. Thus, a near-term poor market for route guidance may evolve over time into a good market for these services. Likewise, a good market for a route guidance user service may deteriorate if overall network congestion reaches very high levels. Second, a route guidance user service provides benefits compared to both a model of aggregated unguided traveler behavior and a model of experienced commuter behavior, regardless of congestion levels. Third, route guided vehicles are demonstrated to gain benefit by avoiding the worst congestion in the network. This minimization in day-to-day variability in commute time may be the most significant benefit of the route guidance system for the familiar driver.
Read full abstract