CDK4/6 Inhibitors Research Articles

Treatment sequences and survival outcomes in advanced HR + HER2- breast cancer patients: a real-world cohort.

Palliative treatment options for HR + HER2- advanced breast cancer (ABC) patients have increased, but data is lacking about the optimal treatment sequence. We used real-world data from a comprehensive cancer center to describe applied treatment sequences and we determined treatment-related and survival outcomes. Patients aged 18 years and older with HR + HER2- ABC treated with systemic treatment were included in this historic cohort study. Sequential treatment schedules, time to treatment discontinuation, time to chemotherapy, and overall survival (OS) were determined, stratified by first-line treatment. 202 patients were included. They received a total of 650 treatment lines (median 3; range: 1-11). 91 (45%), 25 (12%), 24 (12%), 28 (14%), 22 (11%) and 12 (6%) patients started first-line treatment with non-steroidal aromatase inhibitors (NSAI), NSAI + cyclin dependent kinase 4/6-inhibitors (CDK4/6i), fulvestrant + CDK4/6i, tamoxifen, chemotherapy and other treatment, respectively. 10, 13, and 14 different treatment regimens were given in first, second and third-line, respectively. Of the patients who started first-line NSAI monotherapy (n = 91), 3 (3%) died before receiving second-line treatment. In this real-world cohort, we observed a wide variety of different treatment sequences applied in daily clinical practice, some of which were in discordance with the current guidelines. Fear that patients may never get around to treatment with CDK4/6i if a patient did not start with a CDK4/6i was not supported by our study results.

Double-Faced Immunological Effects of CDK4/6 Inhibitors on Cancer Treatment: Challenges and Perspectives

Cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs) are generally involved in the progression of cell cycle and cell division in normal cells, while abnormal activations of CDKs are deemed to be a driving force for accelerating cell proliferation and tumorigenesis. Therefore, CDKs have become ideal therapeutic targets for cancer treatment. The U.S FDA has approved three CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6is) for the treatment of patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+) or human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2−) advanced or metastatic breast cancer, and these drugs showed impressive results in clinics. Besides cell-cycle arrest, there is growing evidence that CDK4/6is exert paradoxical roles on cancer treatment by altering the immune system. Indeed, clinical data showed that CDK4/6is could change the immune system to exert antitumor effects, while these changes also caused tumor resistance to CDK4/6i. However, the molecular mechanism for the regulation of the immune system by CDK4/6is is unclear. In this review, we comprehensively discuss the paradoxical immunological effects of CDK4/6is in cancer treatment, elucidating their anticancer mechanisms through immunomodulatory activity and induction of acquired drug resistance by dysregulating the immune microenvironment. More importantly, we suggest a few strategies including combining CDK4/6is with immunotherapy to overcome drug resistance.

A comprehensive luminal breast cancer patient-derived xenografts (PDX) library to capture tumor heterogeneity and explore the mechanisms of resistance to CDK4/6 inhibitors.

Breast cancer (BC) is marked by significant genetic, morphological and clinical heterogeneity. To capture this heterogeneity and unravel the molecular mechanisms driving tumor progression and drug resistance, we established a comprehensive patient-derived xenograft (PDX) biobank, focusing particularly on luminal (estrogen receptor, ER+) and young premenopausal patients, for whom PDX models are currently scarce. Across all BC subtypes, our efforts resulted in an overall success rate of 17% (26 established PDX lines out of 151 total attempts), specifically 15% in luminal, 12% in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 positive (HER2+) and 35% in triple negative BC. These PDX mirrored morphologic and genetic features of BC from which they originated, serving as a reliable tool to investigate drug resistance and test therapeutic strategies. We focused on understanding resistance to CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i), which are crucial in the treatment of patients with advanced luminal BC. Treating a sensitive luminal BC PDX with the CDK4/6i palbociclib revealed that, despite initial tumor shrinkage, some tumors might eventually regrow under drug treatment. RNA sequencing, followed by gene set enrichment analyses, unveiled that these PDXs have become refractory to CDK4/6i, both at biological and molecular levels, displaying significant enrichment in proliferation pathways, such as MTORC1, E2F and MYC. Using organoids derived from these PDX (PDxO), we observed that acquisition of CDK4/6i resistance conferred cross-resistance to endocrine therapy and that targeting MTORC1 was a successful strategy to overcome CDK4/6i resistance. Considered together, these results indicate that our PDX models may serve as robust tools to elucidate the molecular basis of BC disease progression and, by providing the possibility to simultaneously test different therapies on the same tumor, to surmount treatment resistance. While this approach is of course not feasible in the clinic, its exploitation in PDX may expedite the identification and development of more successful therapies for patients with advanced luminal BC. © 2024 The Author(s). The Journal of Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.

Disparities in receipt of 1-st line CDK4/6 inhibitors with endocrine therapy for treatment of hormone receptor positive, HER2 negative metastatic breast cancer in the real-world setting

ObjectiveThis study used real-world observational data to compare profiles of patients receiving different first-line treatment for hormone receptor positive (ER+), HER2 negative, metastatic breast cancer (MBC): CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) in combination with endocrine therapy (ET) versus ET alone.MethodFrom a nationwide electronic health record-derived Flatiron Health de-identified database including 280 US cancer clinics, we identified patients with hormone receptor positive, HER2 negative, metastatic breast cancer receiving 1st -line therapy with ET alone or CDK4/6i plus ET between February 2015 and November 2021. Patient sociodemographic status, MBC treatment regimen and outcomes were the focus of this analysis. Patient characteristics were compared using t-tests and chi-square tests. Logistic regression analysis was performed to examine the association of patient characteristics with the likelihood of receiving 1st -line CDK4/6i plus ET vs. ET alone. Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards were used to test the impact of 1st -line treatment regimen on real-world progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Baseline characteristics were balanced using inverse probability weighting (IPW).ResultsThe study population included 3,917 patients receiving CDK4/6i plus ET (n = 2170) and ET alone (n = 1747) for their MBC. Compared to patients receiving ET alone, those receiving CDK4/6i plus ET were younger (mean age 66.8 vs. 68.6, p < 0.001), more likely to present with de novo MBC (p < 0.001), had better performance status (50.2% vs. 40.5% patients with ECOG value 0, p = 0.001) and lower number of comorbidities (29.7% vs. 26.6% ≥ 1 comorbidity, p < 0.001). Logistic regression revealed increased odds of CDK4/6i plus ET in individuals aged 50–64 (OR: 3.42, 95% CI [2.41, 4.86]) and 65–74 (OR: 3.18, 95% CI [1.68, 6.02]) versus those aged 18–49 years of age. Black individuals had lower odds of CDK4/6i plus ET (OR: 0.76, 95% CI [0.58, 1.00]) compared to White individuals. Other characteristics associated with lower odds of CDK4/6i plus ET included patients with stage III disease (OR: 0.69, 95% CI [0.52, 0.92]), lower performance status (OR: 0.50, 95% CI [0.40, 0.62]), and Medicare insurance (OR: 0.73, 95% CI [0.30, 1.78]) compared to those with commercial and Medicaid insurance. After IPW adjustment, use of CDK4/6i plus ET as 1st -line treatment was associated with significantly longer median PFS compared to ET alone (27 vs. 17 months; hazard ratio [HR] = 0.61, p < 0.001). Median OS was 52 months in the CDK4/6i plus ET group and was 42 months with ET alone (HR = 0.74, p < 0.001).ConclusionIn this real-world database, disparities in receiving 1st -line CDK4/6 inhibitors were seen by age, diagnosis stage, baseline performance status, comorbidity, and insurance status. In adjusted analysis, the use of 1st -line CDK4/6i plus ET yielded better PFS and OS rates than ET alone. Further efforts are essential to enhance equitable use of and access to this crucial drug class.

Real-world outcomes in patients with brain metastases secondary to HR+/HER2- MBC treated with abemaciclib and local intracranial therapy.

Real-world data are limited for patients with brain metastases secondary to metastatic breast cancer (MBC) and treated with cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i). This study describes real-world outcomes in patients with hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor 2-negative (HR+/HER2-) MBC with brain metastases diagnosis before abemaciclib initiation. A nationwide electronic health record-derived de-identified MBC database (January 2011-December 2021) was assessed retrospectively. Patients with HR+/HER2- MBC who were treated with abemaciclib (monotherapy or in combination) following diagnosis of brain metastases were included. Real-world best response reflected clinician-documented response assessment of the brain imaging (intracranial) and change in disease burden following radiographic imaging (extracranial); these were reported descriptively. Time to treatment discontinuation (TTD), real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS), and overall survival (rwOS) were assessed using Kaplan-Meier methods from abemaciclib initiation (index date). Among 82 included patients (mean age 57.0 years; 98.8% female), 22.0% and 19.5% received CDK4/6i and chemotherapy before abemaciclib initiation, respectively, and the majority (80.5%) received radiation/local surgery to the brain before abemaciclib initiation. Patients mostly received abemaciclib as monotherapy (n = 6) or in combination with endocrine therapy (n = 68). Median TTD was 7.1 (95% CI 4.6-11.3) months, rwPFS was 9.2 (95% CI 6.0-11.6) months, and rwOS was 20.8 (95% CI 13.9-26.0) months. Intracranial and extracranial objective response rates, as determined by treating physicians, were 45.1% (n = 23/51) and 56.7% (n = 34/60), respectively. Intracranial and extracranial clinical benefit rates were 62.7% (n = 32/51) and 70.0% (n = 42/60), respectively. In this real-world study of patients diagnosed with brain metastases and initiating abemaciclib, most patients received radiation/local surgery to the brain before abemaciclib initiation. Although the outcomes in this real-world study are encouraging, it is unclear if the benefit was due to local therapy, abemaciclib, or the combination, and causality cannot be inferred. Further prospective clinical studies are needed to confirm the clinical benefit of this approach.

The efficacy and safety of CDK4/6 inhibitors combined with endocrine therapy versus endocrine therapy alone in the adjuvant treatment of patients with high-risk invasive HR+/HER2-early breast cancer: A comprehensive updated meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

BackgroundThis paper aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of incorporating CDK 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) into ET for the adjuvant treatment of HR + HER2-resected early-stage breast cancer (ESBC) patients, employing meta-analysis. MethodsIn this paper, we compiled randomized clinical trials focusing on CDK4/6i used in the adjuvant treatment of high-risk invasive HR-positive and HER2-ESBC patients. A meta-analysis was performed in line with the PRISMA guidelines. ResultsWe identified four clinical trials that met our inclusion criteria and were published between 2020 and 2024. These trials involved a combined sample size of 17,749 patients diagnosed with breast cancer. The data obtained from the pooled analysis revealed a remarkable beneficial trend in terms of invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) for the use of ET in combination with CDK4/6i compared to the group receiving ET alone (HR = 0.81, 95 % CI: 0.67–0.98, p = 0.03). Of note, CDK4/6 inhibitors demonstrated a notably beneficial effect in both grade 2 (HR = 0.69, 95 % CI: 0.59–0.81, p < 0.001) and grade 3 (HR = 0.76, 95 % CI: 0.65–0.89, p < 0.001). Significant improvements were noted in terms of distant relapse-free survival (dRFS) in the groups treated with abemaciclib and ribociclib (HR = 0.65, 95 % CI: 0.56–0.76, p < 0.001; HR = 0.72, 95 % CI: 0.58–0.89, p = 0.003, respectively). CDK4/6i didn't yield a statistically significant difference in overall survival (OS) (HR = 0.96, 95 % CI: 0.77–1.19, p = 0.69). The use of CDK4/6i with ET was associated with an increased risk of adverse events, particularly anemia and neutropenia, compared with ET alone (OR = 9.12, 95 % CI = 5.04–16.48, p < 0.001). ConclusionThe findings of this paper demonstrate a significant improvement in iDFS when ET is combined with CDK4/6i, compared to ET alone. Specifically, treatments with abemaciclib and ribociclib showed notable enhancements in dRFS.

Impact of low HER2 expression on response to CDK4/6 inhibitor treatment in advanced HR + /HER2- breast cancer: a multicenter real-world data analysis.

CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) represent the first-line therapy approach of choice for patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer (HR + /HER-ABC). Approximately 50% of HR + /HER2-ABC displays low HER2 expression (HER2 low). Recent data emerging from the DESTINY-Breast04 trial demonstrated practice-changing efficacy of the antibody-drug conjugate trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) in patients with low HER2 expression. Here, we aimed to analyze the impact of low HER2 expression on CDK4/6i therapy response in a well-characterized multicenter HR + /HER-ABC cohort. Patients diagnosed with HR + /HER2-ABC who were treated with CDK4/6i in clinical routine between November 2016 and December 2020 at four certified German Breast Cancer Centers were retrospectively identified. The cohort was stratified according to graduation of positivity in HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC; HER2 zero = IHC score 0 and HER2 low = IHC score 1 + , 2 + /fluorescence in situ hybridization negative). Subgroups were analyzed with regard to progression-free survival (PFS) following CDK4/6i initiation. The study cohort comprised n = 448 patients. For n = 311 patients, HER2 status from the metastatic site was available. n = 91 (29.3%) cases were HER2 zero and n = 220 cases (70.7%) were HER2 low. There was no significant difference in PFS between the two groups (PFS: 17months versus 18months, log-rank p = 0.42). Further, we examined the influence of HER2 expression changes between primary and metastatic tissue (n = 171; HER2 gain/HER2 loss/HER2 stable expression) on CDK4/6i treatment response. Again, there was no significant difference between these three groups, respectively (PFS: 16months versus 13months versus 17months, log-rank p = 0.86). In our analysis, HER2 status did not have a significant impact on treatment response to CDK4/6i.

Fasting-mimicking diet potentiates anti-tumor effects of CDK4/6 inhibitors against breast cancer by suppressing NRAS- and IGF1-mediated mTORC1 signaling

AimsAcquired resistance to cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) frequently emerges, and CDK4/6i-containing therapies in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) remain to be determined. MethodsRNA-sequencing, cell viability analysis, immunoblotting, siRNA transfection et al. were used to investigate and verify the resistance mechanism. BALB/c nude mice xenograft models and spontaneous MMTV-PyMT models were used to explore in vivo efficacy. ResultsThe mTOR pathway was activated in acquired CDK4/6i-resistant cells and inhibition of mTORC1 restored the sensitivity. While fasting-mimicking diet (FMD) enhances the activity of anticancer agents by inhibiting the mTORC1 signaling, we assessed FMD and found that FMD restored the sensitivity of CDK4/6i-resistant cells to abemaciclib and potentiated the anti-tumor activity of CDK4/6i in TNBC. The anti-tumor effects of FMD and/or CDK4/6i were accompanied by the downregulation of S6 phosphorylation. FMD cooperated with CDK4/6i to suppress the levels of IGF1 and RAS. The combination of FMD and abemaciclib also led to a potent inhibition of tumor growth in spontaneous transgenic MMTV-PyMT mouse models. ConclusionsOur data demonstrate that FMD overcomes resistance and potentiates the anti-tumor effect of CDK4/6i by inhibiting mTORC1 signaling via lowering the levels of IGF1 and RAS, providing the rationale for clinical investigation of a potential FMD-CDK4/6i strategy in breast cancer.

Implementing a drug interaction protocol for oral systemic anti-cancer therapy with focus on CDK4/6 inhibitors.

302 Background: Oral anti-cancer therapies (OACTs) are being increasingly used. Despite their convenience, OACTs introduce challenges with adherence, prescribing errors, and high incidence of drug-drug interactions (DDIs). Currently, there are limited guidelines for DDI checking. Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) have revolutionized the management of metastatic ER+/HER2- breast cancer. While an overall survival benefit has been demonstrated with Ribociclib, its use can be problematic due to frequent DDIs and the risk of QTc prolongation. DDIs are routinely checked in our center with two interaction checkers, but they are not always documented due to a lack of a standardized protocol. This study aims to evaluate current DDI checking practices, identify common DDIs, and implement a systematic DDI protocol. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted on patients (pts) prescribed CDK4/6i in our center from Jan 2023 to Apr 2024. Data on pt demographics, treatment, DDI documentation, toxicity, and survival were collected. Retrospective DDI checks using Lexi-Interact and Drugs.com were performed. Results: A total of 65 pts were included, with 38 on Ribociclib and 27 on Palbociclib. The median follow-up was 11.6 months (range: 1-71). The median age of pts on Ribociclib was 54 (range: 35-77), compared to 61 (range: 44-82) on Palbociclib. The median number of medications was three with Ribociclib and five with Palbociclib. Seven pts (26%) were prescribed Palbociclib due to contraindications to Ribociclib, including cardiac disease (n=2), QTc-prolonging medications (n=4), and advanced age (n=1). DDI checks were documented in 46% of Ribociclib and 14% of Palbociclib pts (p=0.0063). There was a weak negative correlation between DDI documentation and toxicity, stronger in the Palbociclib arm (-0.079 for Ribociclib vs. -0.335 for Palbociclib). Retrospective checks revealed DDIs in 50% of Ribociclib and 52% of Palbociclib pts. Major DDIs were identified in 21% of Ribociclib and 7% of Palbociclib pts (p=0.133). Common major DDIs involved opioids and QTc-prolonging medications, most frequently antidepressants. Grade ≥3 toxicity occurred in 49% of Ribociclib vs. 64% of Palbociclib pts (p=0.21). Ribociclib caused more rash, liver toxicity, and diarrhea, while Palbociclib had significantly more grade ≥3 neutropenia (48% vs. 21%, p=0.042). No QTc prolongation was observed. Dose reductions were more common with Palbociclib (48% vs. 32%, p=0.27). There was no significant difference in survival data. Conclusions: Our findings highlight the importance of systematic DDI checks in pts receiving OACTs. Implementing a standardized protocol could reduce adverse interactions and improve pt outcomes. Further studies are needed to validate these findings and develop DDI guidelines. A standardized DDI protocol has now been developed for our center, with plans to re-audit after implementation.

Treatment patterns and clinical outcomes in HER2-low metastatic breast cancer, 2018–2023: A retrospective observational study.

398 Background: Current treatment options for patients (pts) with hormone receptor–positive (HR+) human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–low (HER2-low) (immunohistochemistry [IHC] 1+, IHC 2+/in situ hybridization–negative) metastatic breast cancer (mBC) who progress after endocrine therapy (ET) with or without targeted therapy, including CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) or inhibitors of the PIK3CA/AKT/mTOR pathway, have been limited to chemotherapy (CT).In this study, we assessed recent treatment patterns and clinical outcomes in US pts with HR+/HER2-low mBC. Methods: This was a retrospective observational study using the nationwide Flatiron Health electronic health record-derived de-identified database. Pts aged ≥18 years with no prior cancer (excluding non-melanoma skin cancer), de-novo or recurrent HR+/HER2-low mBC diagnosed between January 2018 and December 2022, and who received any line of treatment (LOT) for mBC (excluding clinical trials) were included. Demographic and clinical characteristics were captured prior to and at the index date (date of mBC diagnosis). Pts were followed up from index date to death, last activity date, or end of the study (September 30, 2023). Real-world overall survival (rwOS) from mBC diagnosis and real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS) from the start of each LOT was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: A total of 2692 pts were eligible. Median follow up from mBC diagnosis was 38.3 months (interquartile range [IQR] 24.4, 53.4) and median age at mBC diagnosis was 65.0 years (IQR 56.0, 73.0); 45.3% of pts had de-novo mBC. Median LOT was 2.0 (IQR 1.0, 3.0) up to the end of the study (55.1% of pts received second-line [2L], 28.9% third-line [3L], 15.2% fourth-line [4L], and 7.2% fifth-line [5L] therapy). Serial ET cycles accounted for 65.7% of 2L, 45.2% of 3L, 27.9% of 4L, and 18.5% of 5L therapy. The most common drug categories by LOT are shown in the Table. Median rwOS was 43.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 40.0, 46.0). rwPFS was 20.5 months (95% CI 19.0, 22.3) in first-line [1L] therapy, 15.6 months (95% CI 14.0, 18.9) in 2L, 17.1 months (95% CI 13.5, 22.8) in 3L, and 13.4 months (95% CI 9.9, not estimable) in 4L. Conclusions: Treatment of HR+/HER2-low mBC has been heterogenous by LOT and mainly characterized by initial use of ET-based therapy followed by higher CT use in later lines. This is associated with diminishing effectiveness, highlighting a need for new treatments. Top five drug categories by LOT, n (%). 1L (n=2692) 2L (n=1484) 3L (n=778) 4L (n=408) 5L (n=195) ET + CDK4/6i 1537 (57.1) 694 (46.8) 217 (27.9) 76 (18.6) 25 (12.8) Endocrine monotherapy 684 (25.4) 202 (13.6) 126 (16.2) 52 (12.8) 21 (10.8) ET + mTORi 9* 61 (4.1) 55 (7.1) 25 (6.1) 17 (8.7) ET + CT 50 (1.9) 74 (5.0) 45 (5.8) 29 (7.1) 22 (11.3) CT alone 269 (10.0) 270 (18.2) 210 (27.0) 161 (39.5) 82 (42.1) CDK4/6i alone 69 (2.6) 29* 8* 3* 3* *Not a top five drug category in the specified LOT.

Quantification of Letrozole, Palbociclib, Ribociclib, Abemaciclib, and Metabolites in Volumetric Dried Blood Spots: Development and Validation of an LC-MS/MS Method for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) may be beneficial for cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6is), such as palbociclib, ribociclib, and abemaciclib, due to established exposure–toxicity relationships and the potential for monitoring treatment adherence. Developing a method for quantifying CDK4/6is, abemaciclib metabolites (M2, M20), and letrozole in dried blood spots (DBS) could be useful to enhance the feasibility of TDM. Thus, an optimized LC-MS/MS method was developed using the HemaXis DB10 device for volumetric (10 µL) DBS collection. Chromatographic separation was achieved using a reversed-phase XBridge BEH C18 column. Detection was performed with a triple quadrupole mass spectrometer, utilizing ESI source switching between negative and positive ionization modes and multiple reaction monitoring acquisition. Analytical validation followed FDA, EMA, and IATDMCT guidelines, demonstrating high selectivity, adequate sensitivity (LLOQ S/N ≥ 30), and linearity (r ≥ 0.997). Accuracy and precision met acceptance criteria (between-run: accuracy 95–106%, CV ≤ 10.6%). Haematocrit independence was confirmed (22–55%),with high recovery rates (81–93%) and minimal matrix effects (ME 0.9–1.1%). The stability of analytes under home-sampling conditions was also verified. Clinical validation supports DBS-based TDM as feasible, with conversion models developed for estimating plasma concentrations (the reference for TDM target values) of letrozole, abemaciclib, and its metabolites. Preliminary data for palbociclib and ribociclib are also presented.

A Novel AKT1, ERBB2, ESR1, KRAS, PIK3CA, and TP53 NGS Assay: A Non-Invasive Tool to Monitor Resistance Mechanisms to Hormonal Therapy and CDK4/6 Inhibitors.

Background: Patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/HER2- metastatic breast cancer (mBC) generally receive hormonal therapy (HT) combined with CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i). Despite this treatment, resistance mechanisms to CDK4/6i emerge and the majority of these patients experience disease progression (PD). This highlight the necessity to uncover the resistance mechanism to CDK4/6i through the identification of specific biomarkers. The primary objective is to assess the accuracy and feasibility of a novel multi-gene target panel NGS assay on circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) to detect molecular alterations of AKT1, ERBB2, ESR1, KRAS, PIK3CA, and TP53 genes in women with BC undergoing HT plus CDK4/6i treatment. Secondarily, the study aims to explore the relationship between genomic profiling and clinical outcomes. Materials and Methods: Plasma samples were collected from 16 patients diagnosed with advanced/locally advanced HR+/HER2- BC at 2 time points: T0 (baseline) and at T1 (3 months after CDK4/6i treatment). Starting from 2 mL of plasma, ctDNA was isolated and libraries were set up using the Plasma-SeqSensei (PQS)® Breast Cancer IVD Kit, sequenced on Nextseq 550 and analyzed using the Plasma-SeqSensei™ IVD Software®. Results: Among the five patients who presented PD, three had PIK3CA mutations and, of these, two showed a higher mutant allele frequency (MAF) at T1. In three patients with stable disease and in eight patients with partial response, the MAF of the detected alterations decreased dramatically or disappeared during CDK4/6i treatment. Conclusions: Based on our findings, the liquid biopsy analysis using the PQS panel seems to be both feasible and accurate, demonstrating a strong sensitivity in detecting mutations. This exploratory analysis of the clinical outcome associated to the mutational status of patients highlights the potential of molecular analysis on liquid biopsy for disease monitoring, although further validation with a larger patient cohort is necessary to confirm these preliminary observations.

PLK1 Inhibitor Onvansertib Enhances the Efficacy of Alpelisib in PIK3CA-Mutated HR-Positive Breast Cancer Resistant to Palbociclib and Endocrine Therapy: Preclinical Insights.

Endocrine therapy (ET) combined with cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) is the preferred first-line treatment for hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/HER2- metastatic breast cancer. Although this is beneficial, acquired resistance leads to disease progression, and patients harboring PIK3CA mutations are treated with targeted therapies such as the PI3Kα inhibitor, alpelisib, alongside ET. Drug-associated resistance mechanisms limit the efficacy of alpelisib, highlighting the need for better combination therapies. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of combining alpelisib with a highly specific PLK1 inhibitor, onvansertib, in PIK3CA-mutant HR+ breast cancer preclinical models. We assessed the effect of the alpelisib and onvansertib combination on cell viability, PI3K signaling pathway, cell cycle phase distribution and apoptosis in PI3K-activated HR+ breast cancer cell lines. The antitumor activity of the combination was evaluated in three PIK3CA-mutant HR+ breast cancer patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models, resistant to ET and CDK4/6 inhibitor palbociclib. Pharmacodynamics studies were performed using immunohistochemistry and Simple Western analyses in tumor tissues. The combination synergistically inhibited cell viability, suppressed PI3K signaling, induced G2/M arrest and apoptosis in PI3K-activated cell lines. In the three PDX models, the combination demonstrated superior anti-tumor activity compared to the single agents. Pharmacodynamic studies confirmed the inhibition of both PLK1 and PI3K activity and pronounced apoptosis in the combination-treated tumors. Our findings support that targeting PLK1 and PI3Kα with onvansertib and alpelisib, respectively, may be a promising strategy for patients with PIK3CA-mutant HR+ breast cancer failing ET + CDK4/6i therapies and warrant clinical evaluation.

Clinical benefit and safety profile of cross-line therapy with CDK4/6 inhibitors: a retrospective study of HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer.

CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6is) in combination with endocrine therapy have secured a central role in the treatment of hormone receptor (HR)-positive advanced breast cancer (ABC) and have transformed the therapeutic landscape. Cross-line CDK4/6i therapy in which another CDK4/6i is continued after progression on a prior CDK4/6i may still offer advantageous therapeutic effects. Cross-line CDK4/6i therapy is an area of active investigation in the ongoing pursuit to improve outcomes for patients with HR+/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)- ABC. This retrospective study enrolled 82 patients with HR+/HER2- ABC who were treated with cross-line CDK4/6is (abemaciclib, palbociclib, ribociclib, and dalpiciclib) after progression with another CDK4/6i. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) according to version 1.1 of the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. Secondary endpoints included toxicity, objective response rate, disease control rate, and overall survival. Adverse events (AEs) were graded according to version 5.0 of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, as promulgated by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Eighty-two HR+/HER2- ABC patients who received cross-line CDK4/6i therapy from January 2022 to February 2024 were enrolled. The median age of the patients was 60 years. The median PFS of all patients was 7.6 months (95% CI, 5.9-9.2). Cox regression analysis identified lung metastasis and a switch to endocrine therapy following prior CDK4/6i therapy as independent predictive factors for PFS. Notably, patients who previously received abemaciclib and switched to palbociclib upon disease progression had a median PFS of 10.7 months. The strategy of transitioning to chemotherapy after progression on a prior CDK4/6i, then to a subsequent CDK4/6i merits further investigation. Hematologic toxicity was the most common grade ≥ 3 AEs. No instances of fatal safety events were observed. Cross-line CDK4/6i therapy is associated with significant clinical benefits and manageable safety profiles in patients with HR+/HER2- ABC, which underscores cross-line CDK4/6i therapy potential as an effective treatment strategy.

Myrtleciclib, a CDK4/6/9 Inhibitor for the Treatment of Aggressive Cancers.

Selective Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) have revolutionized the treatment of breast cancer and have potential in other cancers, being manageable drugs yet with some bone marrow toxicity. Selective CDK9 inhibitors (CDK9i) never advanced into clinical use, partly due to side effects, including gastrointestinal toxicity, and a small window between activity and cytotoxicity, which results in a narrow therapeutic index (TI). To overcome the drawbacks of CDK4/6 and CDK9 inhibitors, we have developed myrtleciclib, a selective CDK4/6/9 inhibitor with few non-critical molecular off-targets. Myrtleciclib appears to bind to an allosteric site, unlike all other CDK4/6i and CDK9i acting by an ATP-competitive mechanism, which supports target specificity. Myrtleciclib's anti-proliferative effects are greater and its Therapeutic Index (TI) is broader than CDK9 and CDK4/6-only inhibitors. This can be explained by a moderate target inhibition, resulting in limited cytotoxicity. Moreover, we documented a synergy between CDK9 and CDK4/6 pathways inhibition, justifying increased drug efficacy, yet such synergy can only be achieved when the inhibition of both CDK9 and CDK4/6 is embedded within the same molecule and balanced within a certain ratio, as it is the case with myrtleciclib. Unlike CDK4/6i, myrtleciclib also induces cell death and apoptosis selectively on cancer cell lines, not on bystander cells. Synergy between myrtleciclib and other drugs with complementary Mechanism of Action (MoA) has also been documented. CDK4/6/9i might represent a new frontier in cancer treatment to overcome the limitations of CDK4/6i and CDK9i for the treatment of cancers, including aggressive cancers with high unmet needs.

Determining Clinicopathologic Factors That Influence Treatment in Advanced Breast Cancer in Argentina After CDK4/6 Inhibitors.

The optimal treatment sequence for hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer (ABC) after progression on first-line cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor (CDKi) and endocrine therapy is unclear. Clinical and biological factors influencing treatment choices and outcomes in the second-line setting need to be elucidated. This is a retrospective analysis of a real-world cohort including patients with HR+/HER2- ABC who received CDKi and endocrine therapy in the first-line setting and progressed, requiring second-line treatment. Clinical and biological factors were analyzed to evaluate their association with daily treatment decisions and the prognostic role of progression-free survival (PFS) in the second-line setting. Two hundred thirty-five patients were included. Second-line treatments were hormone therapy (HT) based in 60% and chemotherapy based in 40% of patients. The second-line median PFS was 6.6 months, with no difference between treatment types. In multivariable analysis, postmenopausal status, lower Ki-67 expression, and non-de novo stage IV disease were associated with improved second-line (2L) PFS. Menopausal status significantly interacted with treatment type, with reduced PFS in premenopausal patients receiving HT-based treatments (4.7 v 8.7 months, P = .00045). In our study, treatment decisions reflected the current algorithm incorporated in our clinical guidelines, and prior treatment response was the most relevant factor to determine 2L treatment decision. Menopausal status interacted with the subsequent therapy efficacy in this setting. Hence, we consider that menopausal status should be routinely evaluated in the subgroup analysis of clinical trials.

Tumor suppressor heterozygosity and homologous recombination deficiency mediate resistance to front-line therapy in breast cancer.

The co-occurrence of germline and somatic oncogenic alterations is frequently observed in breast cancer, but their combined biologic and clinical significance has not been evaluated. To assess the role of germline-somatic interactions on outcomes in routine practice, we developed an integrated clinicogenomic pipeline to analyze the genomes of over 4,500 patients with breast cancer. We find that germline (g) BRCA2 -associated tumors are enriched for RB1 loss-of-function mutations and manifest poor outcomes on standard-of-care, front-line CDK4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i) combinations. Amongst these tumors, g BRCA2 -related homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) as well as baseline RB1 LOH status promote acquisition of RB1 loss-of- function mutations under the selective pressure of CDK4/6i, causing therapy resistance. These findings suggest an alternative therapeutic strategy using sequential targeting of HRD in g BRCA- associated breast cancers through PARP inhibitors prior to CDK4/6i therapy to intercept deleterious RB1 -loss trajectories and thus suppress the emergence of CDK4/6 inhibitor resistance. More broadly, our findings demonstrate how germline-somatic driven genomic configurations shape response to systemic therapy and can be exploited therapeutically as part of biomarker-directed clinical strategies.

Effect of Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4/6 Inhibitors on Circulating Cells in Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer.

The combination of cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) with endocrine therapy (ET) is the standard-of-care for estrogen receptor (ER)-positive, HER2-negative (ER+/HER2- advanced/metastatic breast cancer (mBC). However, the impact of CDK4/6i on circulating immune cells and circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in patients receiving CDK4/6i and ET (CDK4/6i+ET) remains poorly understood. This was a prospective cohort study including 44 patients with ER+/HER2- mBC treated with CDK4/6i+ET in either first or second line. Peripheral blood samples were collected before (baseline) and 3 months (t2) after therapy. Immune cell's subsets were quantified by flow cytometry, and microfluidic-captured CTCs were counted and classified according to the expression of cytokeratin and/or vimentin. Patients were categorized according to response as responders (progression-free survival [PFS] ≥ 6.0 months; 79.1%) and non-responders (PFS < 6.0 months; 20.9%). CDK4/6i+ET resulted in significant changes in the hematological parameters, including decreased hemoglobin levels and increased mean corpuscular volume, as well as reductions in neutrophil, eosinophil, and basophil counts. Specific immune cell subsets, such as early-stage myeloid-derived suppressor cells, central memory CD4+ T cells, and Vδ2+ T cells expressing NKG2D, decreased 3 months after CDK4/6i+ET. Additionally, correlations between the presence of CTCs and immune cell populations were observed, highlighting the interplay between immune dysfunction and tumor dissemination. This study provides insights into the immunomodulatory effects of CDK4/6i+ET, underscoring the importance of considering immune dynamics in the management of ER+/HER2- mBC.

Rationale for the Initiation, Outcomes, and Characteristics of Chemotherapy Following CDK4/6 Inhibitors in Breast Cancer: A Real-World Cohort Study.

The standard therapy for hormone-receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced breast cancer includes the use of cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) with endocrine therapy. The optimal post-CDK4/6i treatment sequence is unclear. This cohort study evaluated the initiation, characteristics, and outcomes of chemotherapy following CDK4/6i-based treatment. Among the 227 patients who began CDK4/6i therapy, 114 completed it. Seventy-nine female patients received further treatment, including 55 receiving chemotherapy. The average age was 60.1 years. Post-CDK4/6i chemotherapy was typically (69.1%) first-line due to an impending visceral crisis. The median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 3.0 months (range 0.5-18.9), and the median overall survival (mOS) was 8.3 months (0.5-26.1). The median OS from the end of CDK4/6i treatment was 12.4 months (1.5-26.8). In univariate analysis, neither mPFS nor mOS was associated with age, tumor grade, receptor status, Ki67 status, time from diagnosis to CDK4/6i cessation, therapy line, or CDK4/6i type. Dose reduction occurred in 12 patients (21.8%), and chemotherapy was ceased due to adverse events in 8 patients (14.6%). Chemotherapy showed limited benefit regardless of the regimen. The role of chemotherapy may evolve with broader CDK4/6i use in adjuvant treatment.

Comparative effectiveness analysis of survival with first-line palbociclib or ribociclib plus AI in HR + /HER2- advanced breast cancer (CEPRA study): preliminary analysis of real-world data from Thailand

BackgroundThe current standard first-line treatment for hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative (HR + /HER2 −) advanced breast cancer (ABC) is a combination of aromatase inhibitor (AI) plus CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i). Direct comparison trials of different CDK4/6i are scarce. This real-world study compared the effectiveness of first-line AI plus ribociclib versus palbociclib.MethodsThis multicenter retrospective cohort study, conducted in six cancer centers in Thailand, enrolled patients with HR + /HER2 − ABC treated with first-line AI, and either ribociclib or palbociclib. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), time to chemotherapy (TTC), and adverse events.ResultsOf the 250 patients enrolled, 134 patients with ribociclib and 49 patients with palbociclib were captured after PSM. Baseline characteristics were well-balanced between groups. Median PFS in patients receiving ribociclib and palbociclib were 27.9 and 31.8 months, respectively (hazard ratio: 0.87; 0.55–1.37). The median OS in the AI + ribociclib arm was 48.7 months compared to 59.1 months in the AI + palbociclib arm (hazard ratio: 0.55; 0.29–1.05). The median TTC in the AI + palbociclib group was 56 months, but not reached in the AI + ribociclib group (p = 0.42). The ORR of AI + ribociclib and AI + palbociclib were comparable (40.5% vs. 53.6%, p = 0.29). Patients receiving palbociclib demonstrated a higher proportion of neutropenia compared to those receiving ribociclib, despite a similar dose reduction rate (p = 0.28). Hepatitis rate was similar between the ribociclib (21%) and palbociclib groups (22%). Additionally, a low incidence of QT prolongation was observed in both the ribociclib (5%) and palbociclib groups (4%).ConclusionThis preliminary analysis of a real-world study demonstrated the comparable effectiveness of ribociclib and palbociclib with AI as an initial therapy for HR + /HER2 − ABC. No statistically significant difference in PFS, OS, and TTC was found in patients treated with AI combined with palbociclib or ribociclib. Longer follow-up and further prospective randomized head-to-head studies are warranted.