Introduction: An early invasive strategy has become the standard of care for pts at high-risk of NSTE-ACS in the latest guidelines, however the optimal timing of coronary intervention in this pts is still a matter of debate. Hypothesis: To compare the prognosis between pts at high-risk of NSTE-ACS submitted an early (<24h) versus a delayed invasive strategy (24-72h). Methods: A retrospective multicenter observational study including 6722 pts at high-risk NSTE-ACS (established diagnosis of NSTE-ACS based on cardiac troponins OR dynamic ST/T-changes OR GRACE score>140). Low, intermediate and very high-risk of NSTE-ACS pts were excluded, such as pts with an invasive strategy >72h. Pts were divided into two groups: group 1 - pts at high-risk of NSTE-ACS submitted an early invasive strategy (<24h) (n=3351,49.9%); group 2 - pts at high-risk of NSTE-ACS submitted a delayed invasive strategy (24-72h) (n=3371,50.1%). Primary endpoint was the occurrence of death at 1 year. Results: The sample was formed by 74.5% men and 25.5% women, with mean age of 65±12 years. Group 2 pts had a higher prevalence of hypertension (69.4% vs 73.0%,p=0.001), dyslipidaemia (63.1% vs 66.7%,p=0.002), CKD (3.2% vs 4.9%,p<0.001), previous MI (19.9% vs 24.3%, p<0.001) and HF (2.4% vs 3.4%, p=0.012). On admission, group 1 pts had more chest pain (96.9% vs 95.7%, p=0.010) compared to group 2 pts that had more dyspnea (1.1% vs 1.9%,p=0.007) and presented more to a non-PCI center (36.0% vs 46.3%,p<0.001). During hospitalization, group 2 had more often HF (3.3% vs 4.5%,p=0.013) and LVEF≤40% (5.9% vs 7.6%,p=0.042). Group 1 pts were more likely to have coronary revascularization (78.9% vs 74.6%,p<0.001), with the culprit artery being less identified in group 2 (20.8% vs 25.2%,p<0.001). In multivariate analysis and after adjusting for different baseline characteristics, pts at high-risk of NSTE-ACS submitted an early strategy had the same risk of 1-year mortality compared to those submitted a delayed invasive strategy [OR0.76,p=0.280]. Conclusion: In Portugal, only half of patients at high risk of NSTE-ACS undergo an early invasive strategy. However the early invasive coronary evaluation did not improve overall long-term clinical outcome compared with delayed invasive strategy.
Read full abstract