Studies of homograft valves in the past two decades have suggested that "viable" valves, i.e., those maintaining chemical and structural integrity of their leaflet intercellular matrix, have a better long-term function than nonviable valves. The most effective qualitative methods of assessing leaflet viability involve destruction of the valve leaflets; thus, these methods have been limited to random use in selected valves. A study was conducted in swine in an attempt to establish a control tissue which could be tested in place of the homograft leaflets, thereby determining viability levels of every valve clinically implanted and correlating the results with long-term clinical function. Thirty samples each of the aortic and pulmonary artery wall and tricuspid leaflet were compared with aortic and pulmonary leaflets. Utilizing the technique of C14-proline uptake, viability was assessed at procurement, following sterilization, and following cryopreservation and short-term storage. The tricuspid leaflet was found to retain the same level of viability as the aortic and pulmonary leaflets before and after the cryopreservation period. It was concluded that the tricuspid leaflet could be utilized as the control tissue.