Indole, unlike pyrrole, undergoes electrophilic substitution at C-3. For example, a Vilsmeier reaction of indole gives 3formylindole exclusively. On the other hand, the same reaction with pyrrole produces 2-formylpyrrole. If the introduction of a nucleophile at the C-2 of indole is desired, 4,5,6,7-tetrahydroindole should be employed as a starting material. An introduction of the substitution and a subsequent dehydrogenation of the tetrahydroindole should be carried out to complete the synthesis of the 2-substituted indole. For such purpose we previously reported the synthesis of 5-substituted 4,5,6,7-tetrahydroindoles from cyclohexanones with suitable substituents at 4-position of the cyclic ketone. As an extension of such a synthesis, we were interested in the preparation of N-aryl-4,5,6,7-tetrahydroindoles. One way of introducing the aryl group is to apply C-N bond formation reaction, which has been an active research area in the past decade. Numerous reports can be found in literature on the N-arylation of indole. However, there are a few reports on the direct arylation of 4,5,6,7-tetrahydroindoles. Bekolo reported the N-arylation of 4,5,6,7-tetrahydro-4oxoindole (3) to prepare the N-aryl-4,5,6,7-tetrahydro-4oxoindole (5) by the cross coupling of arylboronic acids, pZ-C6H4-B(OH)2 (Z = H, o-Me, p-t-Bu, p-OEt, p-Cl) in the presence of Cu(OAc)2 and ethyl diisopropylamine in dichloromethane solution at room temperature. But the yields were in the range of 43-70% after 6-14 days of reaction time. Nishio, et. al. prepared N-aryl-4,5,6,7-tetrahydroindoles (6f, 6g, 6h, 6i) from 1-aryl-1,4,5,6,7,7a-hexahydro-2H-indol-2ones by using Lawesson’s reagent [2,4-bis-(p-methoxyphenyl)-1,3-dithia-2,4-diphosphetane 2,4-disulfide] in 2755% yields. Olesen et al. reported the preparation of 6f, 6g, and 6i by the reactions of the corresponding cyclohexanone imines with 2-chloroacrylonitrile in 25-61% yields. Obviously, direct arylation of the tetrahydroindole (4) to synthesize the N-aryltetrahydroindole (6) requires a decent method for the preparation of 4. There are several reports for such preparations using cyclohexanone as starting material. It was converted to a dimethylhydrazone which was reacted with n-BuLi to give 1-dimethylamino-4,5,6,7-tetrahydroindole, but the removal of the dimethylamino group was not efficient. Alternatively, cyclohexanone was converted to an oxime, which was reacted with acetylene in KOH and DMSO. But the method suffers the disadvantage of the formation of N-vinyl derivatives of 4. An oxime prepared from O-(2-hydroxyethyl)hydroxylamine could be converted to 4 upon the exchange of the –OH with iodine and subsequent cyclization by t-BuOK in t-BuOH in good yield. Tetrahydroindole (4) itself is very unstable, requiring storage in a freezer under N2. 3 Furthermore, C-N bond formation is an additional step which requires the use of a transition metal catalyst. Therefore, a shorter procedure in which the N-aryl group was introduced in the earlier step is desirable. Here we report a three-step preparation of N-aryl4,5,6,7-tetrahydroindoles (6) from cyclohexane-1,3-dione (1). There are two reports of employing 1 for similar purpose. Martifnez et al. treated 1 with chloroacetone to prepare 2-(2oxo-1-propyl)-1,3-cyclohexanedione, which was converted to 2-methyl derivatives of 5. Piras et al. reacted 1 with ethyl bromopyruvate in the presence of EtOH/KOH under reflux conditions to prepare 4-oxo-4,5,6,7-tetrahydrobenzofuran-3-carboxylic acid, and then converted to 5a and 5g by heating with aniline and p-methoxyaniline, respectively, in 75% yield.
Read full abstract