We have suggested that Rorschach's concept of inner creation operationalizes Bleuler's concept of autistic thinking. If we are correct, then Rorschach movement production should correlate with those phenomena Bleuler subsumed under his concept. Just as autistic and careless thought are non-overlapping, so are the tendencies to produce movement and poor form. If we are correct, then form-level should not distinguish high movement producers from low. If there is a close relation between autistic thinking and inner creation, on the one hand, and Werner's physiognomic perception on the other, Rorschach movement production should be higher in those “especially gifted in susceptibility to physiognomic experience” than in those who are not. Likewise, those especially gifted should score higher in measures of the phenomena Bleuler subsumed under autistic thinking. If autistic thinking, inner creation, and physiognomic perception have nothing as such to do with discovery and invention in science, etc., Rorschach movement and other measures of such cognition should not be higher in such discoverers and inventors than in their less creative colleagues. These measures should be higher, however, in all people demonstrated to be creative experiencers, i.e., who are known for their unusual ability to experience imaginatively. More specifically, they should be higher in people uncommonly prone to “Autistic thinking: thinking which is dominated by processes of the fantasy kind, rather than geared to reality, e.g., hallucination, hypnagogic imagery, etc.” (McKellar, 1957, p. 199).
Read full abstract