Outpatient Visit Costs Research Articles

Estimating the cost of asthma: moderating effect of race/ethnicity on the relationship between asthma severity and the direct cost

Objective Marginalized racial/ethnic populations showed higher rates of asthma prevalence and high-cost healthcare utilization for asthma. However, few studies investigated the disproportionate financial burden of asthma among the underrepresented racial/ethnic groups. This study aims to estimate the direct cost of asthma by severity and race/ethnicity and examine the moderating effects of race/ethnicity on the relationship between asthma severity and the cost. Methods This study employs a retrospective study design to estimate the direct cost of asthma for hospitalizations, ED visits, and outpatient visits. Nevada claims data were used from Q4 2015 to Q4 2021. Generalized linear models (GLMs) were used to estimate the direct cost of asthma and test the moderating effects of race/ethnicity. Results The direct cost increased as asthma severity intensified across the three settings. The direct cost rose from $42148 (Hospitalizations), $4291 (ED visits), and $2177 (Outpatient visits) among those with mild asthma to $60464, $10857, and $7116 among those with severe asthma. The direct cost increased if patients were older, African Americans, or diagnosed with severe asthma. The incremental cost was greater among African American and Asian patients for ED visits, indicating the moderating effect of race/ethnicity. Conclusions We found an incremental cost for severe asthma and the moderating effect of race/ethnicity on the relationship between asthma severity and the cost of ED and outpatient visits. The higher incremental costs among marginalized racial/ethnic groups imply that the financial burden of asthma increases on a larger scale among those racial/ethnic groups than among White patients.

Early specialised treatment for bipolar disorder: Long-term follow-up from the early intervention in affective disorders (EIA) randomised controlled trial.

It is unclear whether treatment early after onset in bipolar disorder may improve the long-term illness course. The early intervention in affective disorders (EIA) randomised controlled trial found that 2-years treatment in a specialised mood disorder clinic combining evidence-based pharmacological treatment with group psychoeducation improved clinical outcomes compared with standard treatment in patients with bipolar disorder discharged after their 1st, 2nd, or 3rd hospital admission. We aimed to assess the 16 years long-term outcomes after randomisation of the participants in the EIA trial. Data were obtained by linking nation-wide Danish population-based registers. All 158 participants of the EIA trial (Trial Registration Number NCT00253071) were followed from time of randomisation (2005-2009) to end of study (31 December 2021). The primary outcome was risk of psychiatric readmission. Secondary outcomes were total admissions and costs, medication use, intentional self-harm or suicide attempt or suicide, and socio-economic measures. The absolute mean risk of psychiatric readmission was 49.3% in the intervention group and 59.8% in the control group, with no statistically significant difference between the groups (b = -0.10, 95% CI: -0.26 to 0.047, p = 0.18). Compared with the control group, patients in the intervention group had numerically fewer total admission days (mean (SD) 44 (77) versus 62 (109)), lower total cost of psychiatric hospital admissions and hospital-based outpatient visits (mean (SD) 22,001 (36793) euros versus 29,822 (52671) euros) and higher use of lithium and antipsychotics, but the differences were not statistically significant. Fewer patients in the intervention group had an event of intentional self-harm or suicide attempt or suicide during follow-up (OR 0.25, 95% CI: 0.15-0.40, p < 0.001) compared with the control group and more patients in the intervention group used antiepileptics (OR 2.21, 95% CI: 1.08-4.60, p = 0.031). Analyses of very long-term outcomes of the EIA trial may potentially indicate a beneficial effect of the intervention at the long term but were likely underpowered to detect a more subtle effect and for most outcomes the differences between groups were not statistically significant.

Tele-Assisted Home-Based Palliative Care Reduces Health Care Costs for Terminal Cancer Patients: Real-World Evidence From a Regional Hospital in Taiwan.

Background: Tele-assisted home-based palliative care (THPC) usually fulfills the desire of terminal patients to pass away at home. The overall costs of such a service deserve evaluation. Objectives: This study aims to determine health care utilization and costs for cancer patients at the end of life, stratified by THPC service. Design: Patients who received THPC were matched 1:1 based on age, gender, year of death, and propensity score with those who did not receive THPC. Setting/Subjects: A total of 773 cancer patients passed away in a regional hospital in Taiwan during the period of 2012-2020, of which 293 received THPC. Measurements: We measured the rates and costs of outpatient clinic visits, emergency department (ED) visits, hospitalizations, and intensive care unit (ICU) admissions during the last week, the last two weeks and the last month before death. In addition, we estimated the driving times and expenses required for transportation from each cancer patient's home to the hospital using Google Maps. National Health Insurance (NHI) reimbursements and out-of-pocket expenses were also calculated. Results: In comparison with patients without THPC, those who received THPC had a 50% lower likelihood of visiting the ED or being hospitalized, a more than 90% reduced chance of ICU admission, but were four times more likely to obtain their medicines from outpatient clinics. THPC patients had similar out-of-pocket expenditures, approximately half of the NHI costs, and lower rates and costs for ambulance transportation to the ED. Conclusions: THPC reduced health care costs for terminal cancer patients in the last week, the last two weeks, and the last month before death, while also increasing the likelihood of patients being able to rest and pass away at home.

Understanding racial disparities in health care expenditures for cervical cancer.

Cervical cancer demonstrates a notable efficacy in treatment, evidenced by a 92% 5-year survival rate among cases diagnosed at a localized stage. In 2020, the estimated annual national expenditure for cervical cancer care amounted to $2.3 billion in the United States. Limited real-world data are available for racial disparities in health care expenditures for cervical cancer. To evaluate racial disparities associated with annual health care expenditures among patients diagnosed with cervical cancer in the United States. A retrospective observational cohort study of annual health care expenditures in patients with cervical cancer diagnosed during 2014-2019 was performed using the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey data. In addition to the descriptive weighted analysis, an unadjusted analysis of the annual health care expenditure was conducted. An adjusted linear regression model with log transformation of the outcome variable was used to evaluate the total annual health care expenditure as well as expenditures by category across the racial groups. Overall, 826 patients with cervical cancer were identified from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey during 2014-2019. The majority were classified as White patients (81.2%) and in the age group of 45-64 years (44.65%). On average, the total annual health care expenditure was $11,537 (95% CI = $9,887-$13,186) among the White cohort, $10,659 (95% CI = $6,704-$14,614) among the African American cohort, and $8,726 (95% CI = $6,113-$11,340) among the Hispanic cohort. After adjusting for covariates, the average total annual health care expenditure for the Hispanic cohort was 35% of the total health care expenditure of the White cohort (P < 0.001) and 46% of the African American cohort's health care expenditure (P = 0.02). Specifically, adjusted costs of office-based and outpatient visits for the Hispanic cohort were 47% (P = 0.009) and 57% (P = 0.005) lower than for the White cohort, respectively. The total annual home health care expenditure for the African American cohort was 49% lower than White patients (P = 0.03), and the Hispanic cohort's total expenditure, excluding prescription medicines, was 57% lower than African American patients (P = 0.02). This study provides valuable information regarding the health care disparities that need to be addressed among certain minority races. Reducing the disparities in health care spending across racial groups should be included as a crucial element in tackling well-established health care inequities.

Health care resource utilization and direct costs incurred over 24 months after initiating galcanezumab or standard-of-care preventive migraine treatments in the United States.

Health care resource utilization (HCRU) and direct costs incurred over 12 months following initiation of galcanezumab (GMB) or standard-of-care (SOC) preventive migraine treatments have been evaluated. However, a gap in knowledge exists in understanding longer-term HCRU and direct costs. To compare all-cause and migraine-related HCRU and direct costs in patients with migraine initiating GMB or SOC preventive migraine treatments over a 24-month follow-up. This retrospective study used Optum deidentified Market Clarity Data. The study included adults diagnosed with migraine, with at least 1 claim for GMB or SOC preventive migraine therapy (September 2018 to March 2020), with continuous enrollment for 12 months before and 24 months after (follow-up) the index date (date of first GMB or SOC claim). Propensity score (PS) matching (1:1) was used to balance cohorts. All-cause and migraine-related HCRU and direct costs for GMB vs SOC cohorts were reported as mean (SD) per patient per year (PPPY) over a 24-month follow-up and compared using a Z-test. Costs were inflated to 2022 US$. After PS matching, 2,307 patient pairs (mean age: 44.4 years; female sex: 87.3%) were identified. Compared with the SOC cohort, the GMB cohort had lower mean (SD) PPPY all-cause office visits (17.9 [17.7] vs 19.1 [18.7]; P = 0.023) and migraine-related office visits (2.6 [3.3] vs 3.0 [4.7]; P = 0.002) at follow-up. No significant differences were observed between cohorts in other all-cause and migraine-related events assessed including outpatient visits, emergency department (ED) visits, inpatient stays, and other medical visits. The mean (SD) costs PPPY were lower in the GMB cohort compared with the SOC cohort for all-cause office visits ($4,321 [7,518] vs $5,033 [7,211]; P < 0.001) at follow-up. However, the GMB cohort had higher mean (SD) PPPY all-cause total costs ($24,704 [30,705] vs $21,902 [28,213]; P = 0.001) and pharmacy costs ($9,507 [12,659] vs $5,623 [12,605]; P < 0.001) compared with the SOC cohort. Mean (SD) costs PPPY were lower in the GMB cohort for migraine-related office visits ($806 [1,690] vs $1,353 [2,805]; P < 0.001) compared with the SOC cohort. However, the GMB cohort had higher mean (SD) PPPY migraine-related total costs ($8,248 [11,486] vs $5,047 [9,749]; P < 0.001) and migraine-related pharmacy costs ($5,394 [3,986] vs $1,761 [4,133]; P < 0.001) compared with the SOC cohort. There were no significant differences between cohorts in all-cause and migraine-related costs for outpatient visits, ED visits, inpatient stays, and other medical visits. Although total costs were greater for GMB vs SOC following initiation, changes in a few categories of all-cause and migraine-related HCRU and direct costs were lower for GMB over a 24-month follow-up. Additional analysis evaluating indirect health care costs may offer insights into further cost savings incurred with preventive migraine treatment.

Health care resource use and costs in patients with food allergies: a United States insurance claims database analysis

Aims Food allergies impose a large clinical and financial burden on patients and the health care system. However, little is known about the factors associated with health care resource use and costs. The aim of this study was to investigate health care resource use and costs in individuals with food allergies utilizing health care in the United States. Methods We conducted a retrospective analysis of insurance claims data from the Merative MarketScan Research Databases (indexed from 1 January 2015 to 30 June 2022). All-cause and food allergy-related health care resource use, direct medical, and out-of-pocket costs for medical services were estimated for 12 months post-index using International Classification of Diseases [ICD] codes. Results Of 355,520 individuals with food allergies continuously enrolled in a health insurance plan for ≥12 months pre- and post-index, 17% had a food allergy-related emergency department visit and 0.9% were hospitalized. The top patient characteristic associated with all-cause and food allergy-related hospitalizations, all-cause costs, and food allergy-related outpatient visit costs was a Charlson Comorbidity Index score of ≥2. Food allergy-related direct medical and out-of-pocket costs were high among patients with a food allergy-related visit. Out-of-pocket cost per patient per year for outpatient visits, emergency department visits, and hospitalizations had an estimated mean of $1631 for patients with food allergy-related visits, which is ∼11% of the total costs for these services ($14,395 per patient per year). Limitations Study limitations are primarily related to the nature of claims databases, including generalizability and reliance on ICD codes. Nevertheless, MarketScan databases provide robust patient-level insights into health care resource use and costs from a large, commercially insured patient population. Conclusion The health care resource use of patients with food allergies imposes a burden on both the health care system and on patients and their families, especially if patients had comorbidities.

Economic burden of varicella in Bangkok, Thailand: A multicenter medical chart review study.

Our multicenter, medical chart review, cost-of-illness study used a micro-costing approach to evaluate the economic burden associated with varicella in Bangkok, Thailand, from a societal perspective. We reviewed medical charts of adults and children with a primary diagnosis of varicella (2014-2018) from 4 hospitals in Bangkok. Reported healthcare resource utilization and missed school or workdays were extracted from medical charts. Mean direct, indirect, and total costs per patient were estimated for overall, adult, and pediatric patients (2020 USD). Of the 200 children and 60 adults, 99.6%, 5.4%, and 5.4% had a varicella-related outpatient visit, emergency department visit, and hospitalization, respectively. The mean direct medical cost was 33 USD for pediatric and adult patients. The mean cost of outpatient visits (8 vs 13 USD, P<0.001) and medications (7 vs 9 USD, P<0.001) was significantly lower among pediatric patients. Forty-eight children reported a mean of 5.8 school days lost, and 32 adult patients reported a mean of 7.4 workdays lost. The mean total cost per varicella patient was 89 USD, with the mean total cost higher for adult than pediatric patients (145 vs 72 USD, P<0.001). Indirect cost accounted for 63% of the total cost per patient (54% for pediatric patients and 77% for adult patients). There is a substantial economic burden associated with patients seeking varicella-related healthcare in Thailand, including considerable indirect costs.

Treatment patterns and healthcare resource utilization in patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer and nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer in China: a real-world observational study

Aim This study assessed the treatment patterns, healthcare resource utilization (HRU), costs, and annual prevalence and incidence of metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) and nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) in China. Methods A retrospective study was conducted using electronic medical records (EMR) of patients with prostate cancer from three tertiary-care hospitals in China between January 2014 and March 2021. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze study outcomes. Results In total, 1086 patients with mHSPC and 679 patients with nmCRPC were included. From 2015 to 2020, the annual percentage of prevalent and incident cases of mHSPC decreased from 22.4% to 20.0% and 11.1% to 6.9%, respectively; for nmCRPC, these increased from 3.8% to 13.6% and 3.3% to 8.4%. Androgen-deprivation therapy and first-generation antiandrogens (bicalutamide or flutamide) were the most frequently prescribed prostate cancer–related medications at baseline and follow-up in patients with mHSPC. Bicalutamide was the most frequently prescribed prostate cancer–related medication during follow-up in patients with nmCRPC. For mHSPC, inpatient admission costs were the highest, with the median (interquartile range) costs per person-month being USD 403.00 (USD 85.50–1226.20), whereas outpatient visit costs were the highest for nmCRPC (USD 372.60 [USD 139.50–818.50]). Limitations EMR-based study design did not capture treatment patterns, HRU and associated costs, and healthcare encounters that occurred outside of participating hospitals, which could have led to underestimation of the true disease burden. Conclusions A contrasting trend of a decline in the prevalence and incidence of mHSPC and an increase in these for nmCRPC was observed between 2015 and 2020 in China. Androgen-deprivation therapy and first-generation antiandrogens were the most frequently prescribed prostate cancer–related medications. Healthcare resource utilization was driven by inpatient costs in mHSPC and outpatient costs in nmCRPC.

Assessing socio-economic damage caused by coxarthrosis in the population

Background. About 40 % of patients diagnosed with coxarthrosis annually seek medical help and receive social support due to this disease. Increased use of an expensive surgery for treatment of coxarthrosis and projected growth of its prevalence in the population determine the relevance of socio-economic analysis. The aim of the study. To assess the value and structure of economic damage caused by the delivering health and social care to patients with coxarthrosis at the state level of the Russian Federation. Methods. To assess economic damage, we used the average annual number of various categories of patients and disabled people with coxarthrosis in the Irkutsk region for 2008–2017. Three main categories were identified: patients who visited the outpatients’ clinic; patients with total hip replacement; disabled people due to coxarthrosis. For each category, we calculated weighted average damage per 1 conventional patient, taking into account direct and indirect costs and subsequent multiplication by the average annual number of individual categories of patients. Calculations were performed in 2017 prices. Results. The average annual socio-economic damage from coxarthrosis amounted to 1.39 (1.34÷1.43) billion rubles or 0.1 % of the gross regional product. The most of the damage (64.4 %) were indirect costs associated with disability due to coxarthrosis, 22.2 % of the total amount were the costs of hip replacement surgery, 13.4 % were the costs of outpatient visits. Indirect economic losses due to disability in patients of working age were 4.2 times higher than losses due to disability of oldage pensioners. Conclusion. The results of the study confirm the economic feasibility of surgical treatment of coxarthrosis, especially in patients of working age.

Unit costs for allopathic and AYUSH outpatient care in public facilities in Urban Delhi, India.

The National Health Policy, 2017, suggests pluralism in health care with the integrated delivery of AYUSH and allopathic care at public facilities. Information on unit cost of outpatient visits for both types of care at public facilities is useful to guide the policies on health-care delivery. The costs in 2019-20 were estimated for each type of care at allopathic urban primary health center (UPHC) and AYUSH facilities using top-down methodology and adding out-of-pocket expenditures (OOPE) incurred to reflect true costs. Data from national health survey, annual government budgets, and reports were used. The average cost of an outpatient visit for allopathic care was ₹325 at a UPHC and ₹189 in a homeopathic dispensary and ₹692 in an Ayurvedic dispensary. While OOPE per visit at UPHC was ₹177, no OOPE was incurred at AYUSH facilities. The government expenditure per visit for allopathic care at UPHC at ₹148 was the lowest compared to any type of AYUSH care. The cost per facility for allopathic UPHC was higher than both Ayurvedic and homeopathic dispensaries. Unani dispensaries were least cost-effective, both in terms of cost per visit and cost per facility. Costs per visit at a facility are impacted by footfalls. For Ayurveda, despite lower facility costs as compared to UPHC, per visit costs were higher due to low utilization. Improving evidence-based utilization of AYUSH care is critical for the success of the government policy of mainstreaming AYUSH care at low cost.

Real-world treatment patterns and economic burden of post-cataract macular edema

BackgroundPost-cataract macular edema (PCME) is a condition that can occur in patients following cataract surgery without risk factors and complications. Although 80% of patients experience spontaneous resolution after 3 to 12 months, in persistent cases, it can lead to permanent vision loss if left untreated. There are currently no standardized treatment guidelines for PCME, and there have been limited studies showing the impact of PCME on annual Medicare spending and ophthalmology-related outpatient visits per case compared to those without the complication. This study aims to evaluate real-world treatment patterns and the economic burden of patients with PCME.MethodsThis retrospective claims analysis identified patients from the IBM® MarketScan® Commercial and Medicare Supplemental databases. Patients with (n = 2430) and without (n = 7290) PCME 1 year post cataract surgery were propensity score matched 1:3 based on age, geographic region, diabetes presence, cataract surgery type, and Charlson Comorbidity Index. Treatment pattern analysis for each PCME patient summarized the distribution of medications across lines of therapy. Economic burden analysis compared the mean number and costs of eye-related outpatient visits, optical coherence tomography imaging scans, and ophthalmic medications between the 2 groups using linear regression models.ResultsTreatment pattern analysis found 27 different treatment combinations across 6 treatment lines. The most common first-line treatments were topical steroid drops (372 [30%]), topical nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug drops (321 [27%]), and intraocular or periocular injectable steroids (189 [15%]). Compared to match controls, PCME patients averaged 6 additional eye-related outpatient office visits (95% CI: 5.7–6.2) resulting in an additional $3,897 (95% CI: $3,475 - $4,319) in total costs. Patients filled 3 more ophthalmology-related outpatient prescription medications (95% CI: 2.8–3.2), adding $371 in total cost (95% CI: $332 – $410).ConclusionsPCME treatment patterns showed wide clinical variability in treatments and time, specifically regarding injectable treatments and combination therapy. Additionally, significantly higher healthcare resource use and economic burden were found for both patients and payers when comparing PCME patients to non-PMCE controls. These results highlight the need for treatment standardization and demonstrate that interventions targeted at preventing PCME may be valuable.

The 2023 Impact of Inflammatory Bowel Disease in Canada: Direct Health System and Medication Costs.

Healthcare utilization among people living with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in Canada has shifted from inpatient management to outpatient management; fewer people with IBD are admitted to hospitals or undergo surgery, but outpatient visits have become more frequent. Although the frequency of emergency department (ED) visits among adults and seniors with IBD decreased, the frequency of ED visits among children with IBD increased. Additionally, there is variation in the utilization of IBD health services within and between provinces and across ethnocultural and sociodemographic groups. For example, First Nations individuals with IBD are more likely to be hospitalized than the general IBD population. South Asian children with Crohn's disease are hospitalized more often than their Caucasian peers at diagnosis, but not during follow-up. Immigrants to Canada who develop IBD have higher health services utilization, but a lower risk of surgery compared to individuals born in Canada. The total direct healthcare costs of IBD, including the cost of hospitalizations, ED visits, outpatient visits, endoscopy, cross-sectional imaging, and medications are rising rapidly. The direct health system and medication costs of IBD in Canada are estimated to be $3.33 billion in 2023, potentially ranging from $2.19 billion to $4.47 billion. This is an increase from an estimated $1.28 billion in 2018, likely due to sharp increases in the use of biologic therapy over the past two decades. In 2017, 50% of total direct healthcare costs can be attributed to biologic therapies; the proportion of total direct healthcare costs attributed to biologic therapies today is likely even greater.

A conceptual framework for asthma self-management in Ecuadorian children and adolescents: A qualitative study

Asthma symptoms can be controlled through proper self-management, medication adherence, and avoidance of triggers, thus avoiding high costs for multiple hospitalizations, emergency or outpatient visits. This article seeks to develop a conceptual framework of the factors that influence asthma self-management in a pediatric population living in the Andean urban area of Cuenca-Ecuador. A phenomenological study was carried out (February-April 2021) in 10 children and adolescents from 7 to 17 years old with asthma attending public and private hospitals. In-depth interviews were applied using open questions created after reviewing the literature. Factors influencing asthma self-management include individual (attitudes, self-education, seeking medical attention, managing crisis triggers) and environmental (health system, school/family support). The interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analyzed by two independent researchers. Our results show that the pediatric population identifies individual and environmental influences that affect asthma self-management, with age and socioeconomic status moderating the influential factors. The participants described the beliefs, attitudes, practices, perceptions, and specific experiences in the family, school, and health system contexts as relevant to comply with asthma self-management. In addition, problems or barriers that hinder the self-management of the disease, mainly related to adherence to treatment, were identified. In conclusion, our analysis highlights the need to empower the pediatric population in asthma self-management. When delivering patient-centered education for effective asthma management, future interventions must consider children´s age and socioeconomic status influences in individual and environmental factors.

The Impact of a Digital Weight Loss Intervention on Health Care Resource Utilization and Costs Compared Between Users and Nonusers With Overweight and Obesity: Retrospective Analysis Study.

The Noom Weight program is a smartphone-based weight management program that uses cognitive behavioral therapy techniques to motivate users to achieve weight loss through a comprehensive lifestyle intervention. This retrospective database analysis aimed to evaluate the impact of Noom Weight use on health care resource utilization (HRU) and health care costs among individuals with overweight and obesity. Electronic health record data, insurance claims data, and Noom Weight program data were used to conduct the analysis. The study included 43,047 Noom Weight users and 14,555 non-Noom Weight users aged between 18 and 80 years with a BMI of ≥25 kg/m² and residing in the United States. The index date was defined as the first day of a 3-month treatment window during which Noom Weight was used at least once per week on average. Inverse probability treatment weighting was used to balance sociodemographic covariates between the 2 cohorts. HRU and costs for inpatient visits, outpatient visits, telehealth visits, surgeries, and prescriptions were analyzed. Within 12 months after the index date, Noom Weight users had less inpatient costs (mean difference [MD] -US $20.10, 95% CI -US $30.08 to -US $10.12), less outpatient costs (MD -US $124.33, 95% CI -US $159.76 to -US $88.89), less overall prescription costs (MD -US $313.82, 95% CI -US $565.42 to -US $62.21), and less overall health care costs (MD -US $450.39, 95% CI -US $706.28 to -US $194.50) per user than non-Noom Weight users. In terms of HRU, Noom Weight users had fewer inpatient visits (MD -0.03, 95% CI -0.04 to -0.03), fewer outpatient visits (MD -0.78, 95% CI -0.93 to -0.62), fewer surgeries (MD -0.01, 95% CI -0.01 to 0.00), and fewer prescriptions (MD -1.39, 95% CI -1.76 to -1.03) per user than non-Noom Weight users. Among a subset of individuals with 24-month follow-up data, Noom Weight users incurred lower overall prescription costs (MD -US $1139.52, 95% CI -US $1972.21 to -US $306.83) and lower overall health care costs (MD -US $1219.06, 95% CI -US $2061.56 to -US $376.55) per user than non-Noom Weight users. The key differences were associated with reduced prescription use. Noom Weight use is associated with lower HRU and costs than non-Noom Weight use, with potential cost savings of up to US $1219.06 per user at 24 months after the index date. These findings suggest that Noom Weight could be a cost-effective weight management program for individuals with overweight and obesity. This study provides valuable evidence for health care providers and payers in evaluating the potential benefits of digital weight loss interventions such as Noom Weight.

The effects of special nursing units in nursing homes on healthcare utilization and cost: A case-control study using propensity score matching

BackgroundMost nursing homes in South Korea lack professional nursing services, resulting in transporting residents to hospitals for mild health problems and nursing treatment needs. While the number of nursing homes has increased, the number of registered nurses working in nursing homes has declined. In 2019, the Korean Ministry of Health and Welfare and the National Health Insurance Service launched the Special Nursing Units in Nursing Homes, a pilot nurse-led model, to resolve the lack of health and nursing services in nursing homes by mandating registered nurses' minimum staffing levels and protecting their scope of practice. ObjectiveThis study explored the effects of the Special Nursing Units model in Nursing Homes on healthcare utilization and cost among nursing home residents. DesignA comparative effectiveness research design using propensity score matching. Setting(s)Eighteen nursing homes were selected based on the region and number of beds. ParticipantsThere were 323 matched-pairs of residents from the case and control groups. MethodsNursing homes with more than 30 beds were recruited nationwide, with 18 nursing homes being selected based on the region and number of beds. The case group included 323 older adults receiving professional nursing services by registered nurses under the Special Nursing Units model in Nursing Homes for more than six months consecutively in 18 nursing homes between April and December 2019. We matched control participants using propensity score matching with health insurance and long-term care data. We analyzed the differences in healthcare utilization and cost changes between the case and control groups using generalized estimating equations. ResultsThe groups were not statistically different in baseline demographic or health-related characteristics. There were 26 (8.1%) and 30 (9.3%) deaths in the case and control groups, respectively, during the six months of the model, which was not statistically different (p = .576). The case group showed statistically significant decreases in healthcare utilization and costs, including hospitalization frequency (p = .008), length of stay (p = .002), and hospitalization costs (p = .003); outpatient visit frequency (p = .003) and costs (p < .001); and home healthcare frequency (p < .001) and cost (p < .001) than the control group. ConclusionsProfessional nursing services by registered nurses under the Special Nursing Units model in Nursing Homes decreased healthcare utilization and costs. A nurse-led model in nursing homes, which includes mandating the minimum staffing levels of registered nurses and protecting their scope of practice, promises to improve resident health outcomes.

Direct economic burden 1 year postoperation in Chinese adult patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps

ABSTRACT Background Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) remains a common and challenging clinical entity, and its economic burden has not been well described in China thus far. Methods A total of 101 CRSwNP patients who underwent endoscopic sinus surgery were included to investigate direct costs in the first year post-surgery. Costs for outpatient visits, medication use, and examination costs were obtained from the Hospital Information System, and differences were compared between subgroups. Multiple linear regression analysis was adopted to investigate the main influencing factors on annual total direct costs for CRSwNP patients. Results Ninety-two subjects completed the study. The individual mean total direct cost for a CRSwNP patient 1 year post-surgery was $742.4. The largest contributors were pharmacy costs ($580.2), followed by examination costs ($108.1) and outpatient visits ($54.1). Total direct costs were higher in subgroups of patients with uncontrolled clinical status, asthma comorbidity, and eosinophilic CRSwNP compared to their counterparts. The main influencing factors were clinical control status (P = 0.016) and asthma comorbidity (P = 0.035). Conclusions The individual mean total direct cost of CRSwNP in 1-year post-surgery was $742.4. Clinical control status and asthma comorbidity influence these costs and are therefore important in guiding health resources allocation for CRSwNP management.

Societal costs and health related quality of life in adult atopic dermatitis

BackgroundCost-of-illness studies are widely used for healthcare decision-making in chronic conditions. Our aim was to assess the cost-of-illness of adult atopic dermatitis (AD) from the societal perspective in Hungary.MethodsWe conducted a multicentre, cross-sectional questionnaire survey between February 2018 and January 2021. Data was collected from consecutive AD patients aged ≥ 18 years and their physicians at dermatology departments in Hungary. We calculated direct and indirect costs, including costs for treatments, outpatient visits, hospital admissions, informal care, travel costs and productivity loss. To assess indirect costs, the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) questionnaire was used to collect data, and costs were estimated with the human capital approach. Generalized linear model was used to analyse predictors of total, direct and indirect costs.ResultsAltogether 218 patients completed the survey (57.8% female) with an average age of 31.3 (SD = 11.7). Patients’ average Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) score was 13.5 (SD = 8.5). According to Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) score, 2.3% (n = 5), 21.2% (n = 46), 54.4% (n = 118) and 22.1% (n = 48) had clear, mild, moderate, and severe AD, respectively. We found that the average total, direct medical, direct non-medical and indirect annual costs per patients were €4,331, €1,136, €747, and €2450, respectively, with absenteeism and presenteeism being the main cost drivers, accounting for 24% and 29% of the total cost of AD. A one-year longer disease duration led to, on average, 1.6%, and 4.2% increase in total and direct non-medical costs, respectively. Patients with worse health-related quality of life (higher DLQI score) had significantly higher total, direct medical, direct non-medical costs, and indirect costs.ConclusionsOur results indicate a substantial economic burden of AD from a societal perspective, mainly driven by productivity losses.

Healthcare Costs and Utilization for Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus in China: A National Claims Database Study

ObjectivesThis study aimed to describe the healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and healthcare costs associated with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) management in China from the patient’s and the payer’s perspective. MethodsHCRU and medical costs (2017 US dollar [USD]) between January 1 and December 31, 2017, were extracted from the national medical insurance claims database, China Health Insurance Research Association (consisting of claims from all public health insurance schemes in China), for adults with ≥ 1 SLE-related claim. The main analysis group comprised all adults with an SLE diagnosis and claim during 2017 (overall group); the annual subgroup (SLE diagnosis and claim in January 2017) informed annual HCRU and costs. ResultsThe overall group consisted of 3645 adults with ≥ 1 SLE-related claim. Outpatient visits constituted 86.9% of healthcare visits. SLE-related healthcare outpatient costs were USD 433 per outpatient, and inpatient costs were USD 2072 per inpatient. Medication costs accounted for 75.0% (USD 42/56) of total costs for outpatient visits and 44.3% (USD 456/1030) for inpatient hospitalizations. Notably, 35.4% of patients had a severe SLE flare; mean SLE-related cost per severe flare was USD 1616. HCRU and costs were similar in the annual subgroup. Female sex, SLE flares, tertiary hospitals, renal involvement, and utilization of anti-infective drugs were associated with higher SLE-related patient costs. ConclusionsSLE in China is associated with considerable HCRU and medical costs, especially for patients experiencing severe SLE flares. Preventing organ involvement, infections, flares, and associated hospitalizations may reduce the burden on patients and healthcare providers in China.

Assessing the Health Economic Outcomes from Commercially Insured Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis Patients Who Switched from Other Disease-Modifying Therapies to Teriflunomide, in the United States.

Assess patient characteristics, healthcare resource utilization (HCRU), and relapses in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) who switched to teriflunomide from other disease-modifying therapies (DMTs). Retrospective study of US Merative™ MarketScan® claims database (Jan 1, 2012-July 31, 2020,) including HIPAA-compliant, deidentified data. Patients ≥18 years with MS diagnosis (based on ICD-9/ICD-10 codes), receiving ≥1 DMT prior to teriflunomide and ≥12 months continuous enrollment pre and post index (date of teriflunomide initiation). Outcomes included inpatient and emergency room claims coinciding with MS diagnosis, MS-related healthcare costs, and annualized relapse rates (ARRs) (indirectly assessed using hospitalization/outpatient claims and steroid use coinciding with MS diagnosis). The analyzed cohort (N=2016) was primarily female (79%); age (mean ± standard deviation) 51.4 ± 9.3 years; MS duration 4.7±2.8 years (at index). The majority (89.2%) were treated with one DMT before switching to teriflunomide. Use of outpatient services (event rate/100 person-years) increased post vs pre index; however, MRI visits significantly reduced over the same period (both P<0.0001). Costs for MS-specific outpatient visits decreased by $371 per patient per year (PPPY) after switching to teriflunomide. Despite an increase in use post index (0.024 to 0.033 rate/100 person-years; P<0.0001), costs for MS-specific laboratory services reduced (pre-index: $271 vs $248 PPPY post-index; P=0.02). Fewer patients had relapses after switching (pre-index: n=417 [20.7%]; post-index: n=333 [16.5%]). ARR was significantly lower after switching (pre-index: 0.269 vs post-index: 0.205; P=0.000). Switching to teriflunomide from existing DMTs in patients with relapsing MS resulted in a reduction in outpatient HCRU in this analysis of US claims data. The real-world effectiveness of teriflunomide was generally consistent with efficacy reported in clinical trials, showing a reduction in relapse following a switch to teriflunomide.

Introduction of a New Method to Monitor Patient-Relevant Outcomes and Costs: Using a Quality Improvement Project in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Care as an Example.

Routine outcome monitoring is becoming standard in care evaluations, but costs are still underrepresented in these efforts. The primary aim of this study was therefore to assess if patient-relevant cost drivers can be used alongside clinical outcomes to evaluate an improvement project and to provide insight into (remaining) areas for improvement. Data from patients who underwent transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) between 2013 and 2018 at a single center in the Netherlands were used. A quality improvement strategy was implemented in October 2015, and pre- (A) and post-quality improvement cohorts (B) were distinguished. For each cohort, clinical outcomes, quality of life (QoL), and cost drivers were collected from the national cardiac registry and hospital registration data. The most appropriate cost drivers in TAVI care were selected from hospital registration data using a novel stepwise approach with an expert panel of physicians, managers, and patient representatives. A radar chart was used to visualize the clinical outcomes, QoL and the selected costs drivers. We included 81 patients in cohort A and 136 patients in cohort B. All-cause mortality at 30 days was borderline significantly lower in cohort B than in cohort A (1.5% vs 7.4%, P = .055). QoL improved after TAVI for both cohorts. The stepwise approach resulted in 21 patient-relevant cost drivers. Costs for pre-procedural outpatient clinic visits (€535, interquartile range [IQR] = 321-675, vs €650, IQR = 512-890, P < .001), costs for the procedure (€1354, IQR = 1236-1686, vs €1474, IQR = 1372-1620, P < .001), and imaging during admission (€318, IQR = 174-441, vs €329, IQR = 267-682, P = .002) were significantly lower in cohort B than in cohort A. Possible improvement potential was seen in 30-day pacemaker implantation and 120-day readmission. A selection of patient-relevant cost drivers is a valuable addition to clinical outcomes for use in evaluation of improvement projects and identification of room for further improvement.