Correction Of Anterior Vaginal Prolapse Research Articles

An alternative technique in surgical correction of anterior compartment prolapse; Iliococcygeal fixation of the pubocervical fascia by native tissue repair

AimTo present ‘bilateral iliococcygeal fixation of the pubocervical fascia’ as an alternative vaginal surgical technique for anterior compartment repair with native tissue and the surgical outcomes of 30 cases. Materials-MethodsThe consecutive 30 cases who admitted to urogynecology clinic with anterior vaginal prolapse/cystocele and underwent anterior compartment repair by bilateral iliococcgeal fixation of the pubocervical fascia by native tissue were included to the study. All cases attended to the postoperative follow-up visits at the sixth and the twelfth months. ResultsThere were no major or minor intraoperative complications. Overall, in 28 (93.3 %) patients surgical success was achieved at the postoperative 12th month when it was defined as the maximum descent of the anterior segment was proximal to the hymen. During the study period, none of the patients requested or admitted for re-treatment for anterior compartment prolapse. Subjective cure that was assessed by the absence of bulge symptoms was achieved in 29 cases (96.7 %) at first year follow-up. Lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) were found to be significantly lower at the first-year postoperative visit compared to pre-operative evaluation. A clinically significant improvement in the quality of life parameters were also noted (mean PFIQ-7 scores = 8.5, 5.6 and 50.8, respectively). ConclusionBilateral iliococcygeal fixation of the pubocervical fascia seems to be effective in surgical correction of anterior vaginal prolapse according to our post-operative follow-up results. It is an easy to learn procedure with low complication rates and associated with high patient satisfaction.

Treatment of Anterior Vaginal Wall Prolapse Using Transvaginal Anterior Mesh With Apical Fixation: A Prospective Multicenter Study With up to 2 Years of Follow-up.

PurposeTo evaluate the safety and efficacy of a surgical polypropylene mesh for correction of anterior vaginal prolapse, with or without apical defects, by providing simultaneous reinforcement at the anterior and apical aspects of the vagina with a single-incision approach.MethodsThis was a prospective, multicenter, single-arm study involving women with baseline stage ≥2 anterior and/or apical vaginal wall prolapse according to the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) system. The primary endpoint was defined as achievement of POP-Q stage ≤1 status. Additionally, patient-reported outcomes were assessed using the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Vaginal Symptoms (ICIQ-VS). The device under evaluation was Calistar A, which is fixed posteriorly to the sacrospinous ligaments with a novel tissue-anchoring system (TAS) and anteriorly to the obturator internus muscles. Postoperative follow-ups were scheduled at 7 days and at 6, 12, and 24 months.ResultsNinety-seven women were treated and assessed for the primary outcome. They were followed for up to 2 years (n=43), with a median of 12 months. Objective cure was achieved in 86 of the 97 patients (88.7%) (P<0.0005). The mean reduction in the ICIQ-VS scores was in the range of 70%–90% for every time point (P<0.05). No bleeding or surgical revision was reported. Mesh exposure occurred in 7 patients (7.2%), urinary retention in 5 (5.2%), de novo dyspareunia in 3 (3.1%), and urinary tract infections in 7 (7.2%).ConclusionsThis midterm follow-up showed that apical and anterior vaginal reinforcement with a polypropylene implant fixed with a TAS provided good anatomical correction, with no major complications.

The use of grafts for anterior vaginal prolapse repair: pros and cons

To review the advantages and disadvantages of ungrafted and grafted methods of anterior vaginal prolapse repair. Successful correction of anterior vaginal prolapse remains one of the most challenging aspects of pelvic reconstructive surgery. Anterior colporrhaphy is associated with an unacceptably high recurrence rate. Paravaginal repairs are technically more difficult to perform and may be associated with more complications. The low success rate has consequently led to more frequent use of grafts in anterior vaginal prolapse repair. Although retrospective case series of graft-reinforced anterior vaginal prolapse repair shows promising short-term success rates, mesh-related complications are of concern. The goal of pelvic surgery should be restoration of anatomic support without deleterious effects on visceral and sexual function. Limited data are available on quality of life and sexual function following both traditional and graft-reinforced anterior vaginal prolapse surgery. Although mesh-reinforced repair is associated with lower short-term anatomic recurrence, the long-term durability and safety of mesh-reinforced repair is unknown. Further research is required to determine whether surgical technique and type of graft used impact surgical outcome and complications.