Cooperative Model Think Research Articles

Application of Think Pair Share and Numbered Head Together Model on Mathematics Learning Outcomes

Based on events in the field, learning mathematics is still carried out conventionally so that students feel bored and less interested in learning mathematics; one solution is to apply a cooperative learning model, namely think pair share and numbered heads together. This study aims to compare mathematics learning outcomes among students whose learning is through the application of the type cooperative model Think Pair Share (TPS) and Numbered Head Together (NHT) type in class VII of an Islamic Junior High School in Central Java, Indonesia, with the selection of class VII B as experimental class 1 with 31 students and VII E as experimental class 2 with 31 students. This type of research was experimental research. Data collection techniques in the study were through observation, documentation, and test techniques. Data analysis in this study used descriptive and inferential analysis, including a normality test, homogeneity test, and Independent Sample t-Test with a significant level of 5%. Calculation of the independent sample t-test obtained a significance value (2-tailed) of 0.000 0.005, and the calculation of the gain score received a value of 0.7009. The result of this study indicates that the Think Pair Share (TPS) learning model is better than the application of learning outcomes using the Numbered Head Together (NHT) learning model on the mathematics learning outcomes with the category of “High” improvement.

Effect of Using Cooperative Model Think Talk Write Type and Think Pair Share Type with Talking Stick Strategy on Student Learning Outcomes

Purpose of the study: This study aims to determine the effect of using the cooperative model of the think talk write type and the think pair share type with the talking stick strategy on the geography learning outcomes of students in class X IPS SMA N 1 Banyudono in the 2016/2017 academic year (subject matter of inland waters and their potential). Methodology: This research is a quasi-experimental research (Quasi Experiment) with Posttest only control design. The population in this study was class X IPS SMA N 1 Banyudono in the 2016/2017 academic year. The research sample was taken using the Cluster Random Sampling technique with three times taking from the population and obtained class X IPS 4 as the experimental class 1 (defined as the TTW Learning Method with the TS strategy), class X IPS 2 as the experimental class 2 (defined as the TPS Learning Method with the TS strategy ), and class X IPS 5 as the control class (defined as Group Discussion Method). Data collection techniques using tests, documentation and observation. The data analysis technique is parametric inferential statistics with hypothesis testing using one way Anava (one way Anava) and followed by a post Anava test (Scheffe' test) with a significant level of 5%. Main Finding: There are differences in geography learning outcomes between the use of the TTW type cooperative learning model and the TS strategy, the TPS type and the TS strategy and group discussions with a mean score ratio of 20.69; 19.39; 18.12 and proven by the one-way anava test with a significant level of 5% obtained Fcount>Ftable (6.22706>3.08). The TTW type of cooperative learning model with the TS strategy (20.69) is better than the TPS type with the Talking Stick strategy (19.39). The TTW type cooperative learning model with the TS strategy (20.69) is better than group discussions (18.12). TPS type cooperative learning model with TS strategy (19.39) is better than group discussion (18.12). The three learning models have different qualities, the learning model that has the greatest influence is the TTW model with the TS strategy, followed by the TPS model with the TS strategy and group discussions. Novelty/Originality of this study: The cooperative model of the think talk write type and the think pair share type with the talking stick strategy on the learning outcomes of students' geography.

Penerapan Model Kooperatif Tipe Think Pair Share (TPS) Pada Pembelajaran Tematik Terpadu di Kelas IV Sekolah Dasar

This study aims to get a real picture of the implementation of the cooperative model Think Pair Share (TPS) by the teacher in integrated thematic learning for fourth grade students of elemtary school. The TPS learning steps used by the teacher in integrated thematic learning, as well as the efforts made by the teacher to overcome the obstacles that arise in the TPS model for the implementation of integrated thematic learning. This research is a descriptive study with a qualitative approach. The research subjects were fourth grade teachers and fourth grade students of elemtary school. The analysis technique used in this research is a descriptive analysis model consisting of data collection, data organizing, data management, data verification and interpretation, and conclusions. Then the data validity technique used is the method and source triangulation technique. Based on the research that has been done, it is found that the cooperative model of the Think Pair Share type is very effective in the integrated thematic learning process seen from the use of learning steps consisting of Thinking, Pairing and Sharing where this model uses groups. learning in pairs which provides opportunities to think and provides opportunities for students to exchange opinions.

Koneksi Matematik Siswa SMP Melalui Pendekatan Contextual Teaching and Learning Melalui Model Kooperatif Tipe Think Pair Share

This study will look at differences in the ability of mathematical connections and self-regulated learning of junior high school students who obtain mathematics learning using the Contextual Teaching and Learning approach through the Cooperative Type Think Pair Share model, one of the causes of the low mathematical connection ability of students lies in the approach factor and the learning model when teaching. Based on the description of these problems, improvements can be made to improve students' mathematical connections with the Think Pair Share Cooperative Model. the population and sample in the study focused on eighth grade students, the method used in this study was a quasi-experimental method. Data collection techniques are by giving intrusion of learning and working on problems, then grouping grades based on the results of student performance in working on mathematical problems, arranged based on group distribution data to more specific value distribution into the mean median mode and graphs in order to know the results of applying the Type Cooperative model Think Pair Share is expected to improve students' mathematical connections.

Upaya Meningkatkan Aktivitas dan Hasil Belajar Siswa Melalui Model Kooperatif Tipe Think Pair Share dengan Permainan Puzzle Kebersamaan Pada Pembelajaran Tematik di Kelas IIB SD Negeri 20 Kota Bengkulu

The study aims to improve the activity and learning outcomes of students using the Think Pair Share Cooperative Share model with a puzzle game togetherness on thematic learning. Classroom Action Research, implemented two cycles. Instruments used were observation sheets and test sheets. The test data were analyzed by using the average formula and the percentage of learning mastery, on the affective and psychomotor observations using the affective and psychomotor percentage formula, the observational data using the average formula score and value range. The result of research are: (1) cycle I score of activity of teacher 34 with good category, student activity score 33,75 with good category. Student learning outcomes cycle I measured by the evaluation at the end of the learning of Mathematics 87.94 with the completion percentage of classical learning that is Mathematics 91.17. The highest affective aspect assessed 29 persons with 85.29% percentage and the lowest aspect responded to 21 people with a percentage of 61.76%. Psychomotor highest aspect imitate and articulate 34 people with 100% percentage and lowest aspect manipulate 30 people with 88.23% percentage. (2) cycle II score of teacher activity 35,5 with good category, student activity score 35 with good category. The result of student learning cycle II is measured using evaluation test at the end of learning that is Mathematics 88,23 with percentage of complete learning of classical that is Mathematics 94,11. The highest affective aspects of living and receiving 34 people with 100% percentage, lowest aspect responding 27 people with 79.41% percentage and psychomotor aspects of articulation, manipulating and imitating 33 people with 100% percentage. Based on the results of this study can be concluded that the application of Thematic model of cooperative model Think Pair Share type through the game togetherness puzzle Class II B SD Negeri 20 Kota Bengkulu can increase activity and learning outcomes.

KEMAMPUAN MENULIS CERPEN MENGGUNAKAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPETHINK PAIR SHARE

Short story writing ability cooperative model types using Think Pair Shareclass XII SMAN 2 Ciamis. This research is motivated low ability students inwriting short stories in class XIISMAN 2 Ciamis. The limited vocabulary ofthe students is also difficult for them in expressing their ideas into written formas well as the lack of variety of learning models used by the teacher. This studyaimed to describe the ability to write a short story using cooperative learningmodel Think Pair Share class XII SMAN 2 Ciamis.This type of research isquantitative research. The methods used in processing the data of this study isdescriptive method. Total smaple of 26 students. Sampling was done byproportional random sampling, research instruments is sheets of testperformance. Data collection techniques can be done in a way; 1) observation,2) understand the curriculum, 3) developing or designing learning scenarios,4) develop an assessment rubric, 5)implement the learning according to theRPP, and 6) carry out performance teste to write short stories.The resultsshowed that the ability to write a short story by using the type cooperativemodel Think Pair Share class XII SMAN 2 Ciamis overall quite good. It wasseen on the average value of students as follows; 1) the average grade writingshort stories with the aspect of character and characterzation are 92,12;2) theaverage value of writing a short story by observing the grooves is 81; 3)average value of writing a short story by observing the background is 65,58.The average value of short story writing skills class XII SMAN 2 Ciamis, afterusing the type cooperative model Think Pair Share overall was 79,27 withqualifying well. The observations in class XII SMAN 2 Ciamis research foundadvantages and disadvantages of cooperative learning model Think PairShare. The advantages of this model are; 1) group more easily and quicklyshape it; 2) enhance creativity and active participation of students towardslearning; 3) the acceptance of greater individual. Whileshortcomings/weaknesses of this model is the number of groups that formed somany members of the group are reported and nedd to be monitored.Keywords:model types using Think Pair Share