Control Of Cardiovascular Risk Factors Research Articles

The Impact of Anxiety and Depression Symptoms on Cardiovascular Risk Factor Control in Patients Without a History of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease.

Anxiety and depression by affecting lifestyle interfere with preventive actions aimed at eliminating or reducing modifiable risk factors for cardiovascular diseases (CVD). The objective of the study was to assess the impact of anxiety and depression on the achievement of therapeutic goals regarding CVD risk factors in patients without a history of atherosclerotic CVD. The study included 200 patients (median age 52.0 [IQR 43.0-60.5] years). Control of the basic risk factors was assessed: blood pressure, BMI, waist circumference, physical activity, smoking status, LDL cholesterol, triglycerides, and blood glucose. The data analysis included a comparison of the number of controlled risk factors and the percentage of subjects who achieved the therapeutic goal for each of the cardiovascular risk factors. The risk of CVD was assessed with SCORE2 and SCORE2-OP. Anxiety and depression were assessed using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). On both subscales (HADS Anxiety and HADS Depression), subjects could achieve normal, borderline, and abnormal scores. The median number of controlled CVD risk factors was 4.0 (IQR 3.0-5.0), and the median CVD risk assessed with SCORE2 and SCORE2-OP was 3.0% (IQR 1.5-7.0%). Median scores for HADS Anxiety were 3.0 (IQR 2.0-6.0) and for HADS Depression 3.0 (1.0-5.0). Patients with symptoms of anxiety and depression had significantly fewer controlled risk factors (HADS Anxiety p=0.0014; HADS Depression p=0.0304). Among subjects with anxiety and depression, there was a significantly lower percentage of those with a normal waist circumference (HADS Anxiety p=0.0464; HADS Depression p=0.0200) and regular physical activity (HADS Anxiety p=0.0431; HADS Depression p=0.0055). Among subjects with anxiety, there was a significantly lower percentage of those with a normal BMI (p=0.0218) and normal triglyceride concentrations (p=0.0278). The presence of anxiety and depression may affect the control of CVD risk factors in individuals without a history of atherosclerotic CVD. Assessment of anxiety and depression symptoms should be part of a comprehensive examination of patients with high CVD risk.

Incidence and Long-Term Outcomes of Acute Myocardial Infarction Among Survivors of Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest.

Despite the increasing long-term survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA), the risk of subsequent acute myocardial infarction (AMI) remains poorly understood. We aimed to determine the incidence, predictors, and long-term outcomes of AMI among survivors of OHCA. We assembled a retrospective cohort of 882 patients with OHCA who survived to 30 days or discharge from the hospital between 2010 and 2019. Survivors of OHCA had an increased risk of subsequent AMI, defined as AMI occurring 30 days after index OHCA or following discharge from the hospital after OHCA, compared with the general population when matched for age and sex (standardized incidence ratio, 4.64 [95% CI, 3.52-6.01]). Age-specific risks of subsequent AMI for men (standardized incidence ratio, 3.29 [95% CI, 2.39-4.42]) and women (standardized incidence ratio, 6.15 [95% CI, 3.27-10.52]) were significantly increased. A total of 7.2%, 8.3%, and 14.3% of survivors of OHCA had a subsequent AMI at 3 years, 5 years, and end of follow-up, respectively. Age at OHCA (hazard ratio [HR], 1.04 [95% CI, 1.02-1.06]) and past medical history of prior AMI, defined as any AMI preceding or during the index OHCA event (HR, 1.84 [95% CI, 1.05-3.22]), were associated with subsequent AMI, while an initial shockable rhythm was not (HR, 1.00 [95% CI, 0.52-1.94]). Survivors of OHCA with subsequent AMI had a higher risk of death (HR, 1.58 [95% CI, 1.12-2.22]) than those without. Survivors of OHCA are at an increased risk of subsequent AMI compared with the general population. Prior AMI, but not an initial shockable rhythm, increases this risk, while subsequent AMI predicts death. Preventive measures for AMI including cardiovascular risk factor control and revascularization may thus improve outcomes in selected patients with cardiac pathogenesis.

Primary Care Utilization and Cardiovascular Screening in Adult Survivors of Childhood Cancer

Cardiovascular disease is the leading noncancer cause of premature death among survivors of childhood cancer. Adult survivors of childhood cancer are largely managed by primary care practitioners (PCPs), and health care utilization patterns related to cardiovascular screening are not well described. To examine screening and health care utilization among survivors of childhood cancer at high risk for cardiovascular complications. This multicenter cross-sectional study included participants enrolled in a randomized clinical trial from 2017 to 2021. Abstracted documentation of participants' cancer history, cardiotoxic treatment exposures, and survivorship care plans were obtained from participants' PCPs spanning 2 years preceding trial enrollment. Participants were members of the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study cohort at elevated risk for ischemic heart disease or heart failure, enrolled in a randomized trial focused on improving cardiovascular risk factor control. Data were analyzed from November 2022 to July 2023. Outcomes of interest were numbers of PCP and specialist visits, cardiovascular risk factors (hypertension, dyslipidemia, and diabetes), risk factor screening, and cardiac testing. Multivariable logistic regression assessed characteristics associated with up-to-date cardiac testing at enrollment. Of 347 enrolled participants, 293 (84.4%) had evaluable medical records (median [range] age, 39.9 [21.5-65.0] years; 149 [50.9%] male) and were included in analyses. At baseline, 238 participants (81.2%) had a documented PCP encounter; 241 participants (82.3%) had undergone blood pressure screening, 179 participants (61.1%) had undergone lipid testing, and 193 participants (65.9%) had undergone diabetes screening. A total of 63 participants (21.5%) had echocardiography completed or planned. Only 198 participants (67.6%) had records referencing a cancer history. PCP documentation of prior cardiotoxic exposures was low compared with known exposures, including radiation therapy (103 participants [35.2%] vs 203 participants [69.3%]; P < .001) and anthracycline chemotherapy (27 participants [9.2%] vs 222 participants [75.8%]; P = .008). Few records referenced a need for cancer-related late effects surveillance (95 records [32.4%]). Independent factors associated with cardiac screening included documentation of increased cardiovascular disease risk (odds ratio [OR], 11.94; 95% CI, 3.37-42.31), a late-effects surveillance plan (OR, 3.92; 95% CI, 1.69-9.11), and existing cardiovascular risk factors (OR per each additional factor, 2.09; 95% CI, 1.32-3.31). This cross-sectional study of adult survivors of childhood cancer at increased risk of cardiovascular disease found low adherence to recommended cardiac testing and documentation of risk for these individuals. Improving accuracy of reporting of survivors' exposures and risks within the medical record may improve screening.

Aortic Arch Plaques and the Long-Term Risk of Stroke and Cardiovascular Events in the Statin Era.

Aortic arch plaques are associated with an increased risk of ischemic stroke in patients with cryptogenic stroke or prior embolic events. However, this relationship is unclear in the community. We investigated (1) the long-term risk of stroke and cardiovascular events associated with arch plaques and (2) whether statin therapy prescribed for any indication modified the association. A total of 934 stroke-free participants (72±9 years; 37% men) from the CABL study (Cardiovascular Abnormalities and Brain Lesion) were evaluated. Arch plaques were assessed by suprasternal transthoracic echocardiography; plaques ≥4 mm in thickness were classified as large plaques. The primary outcome was ischemic stroke; the secondary outcome was combined cardiovascular events (ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction, and cardiovascular death). The plaque-related risk of outcomes was also analyzed according to the presence of statin treatment. No plaque was used as a reference. Aortic arch plaques were present in 645 participants (69.1%), with large plaques in 114 (12.2%). During a mean follow-up of 11.3±3.6 years, 236 (25.3%) cardiovascular events occurred (76 ischemic strokes, 27 myocardial infarctions, and 133 cardiovascular deaths). Large arch plaques were independently associated with combined events (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.19 [95% CI, 1.40-3.43]) but not stroke alone (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.09 [95% CI, 0.50-2.38]). The association between large plaques and cardiovascular events was significant in participants receiving statins (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.57 [95% CI, 1.52-4.37]) but not in others; however, participants on statin treatment also had a worse risk profile (higher body mass index, greater frequencies of hypertension, diabetes, and coronary artery disease). Aortic arch plaques may be a marker of cardiovascular risk rather than a direct embolic stroke source in older adults without prior stroke. The efficacy of broader cardiovascular risk factors control, beyond cholesterol levels alone, for primary prevention of cardiovascular events in individuals with aortic arch plaques may require further investigation.

Baseline characteristics and study progress of the CITA GO‐ON Study. A FINGER‐like Multidomain Intervention to Prevent Cognitive Decline in Spain

AbstractBackgroundThe FINGER study demonstrated the efficacy of a non‐pharmacological multidomain intervention to prevent cognitive decline in at‐risk older adults. After a successful pilot feasibility study, in Q3 2021 we launched the CITA GO‐ON study, inspired by FINGER methodology to demonstrate the efficacy of a risk factor and lifestyles multimodal intervention to prevent cognitive decline in southern Europe. Here we describe the baseline characteristics of participants recruited in the study.MethodThe CITA GO‐ON study (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04840030) is a two‐year randomized, controlled trial. The primary aim is to reduce the risk of decline in cognitive functioning in the Neuropsychology Test Battery after two years by a multi‐modal intervention on risk factors and protective life‐styles as compared to standard health care. Inclusion criteria are: 60‐85 years old; CAIDE dementia risk score ≥ 6; cognitive frailty; no dementia. The multidomain intervention includes optimized control of cardiovascular risk factors; correction of polypharmacy; cognitive training; physical exercise program; socioemotional intervention; and promotion of adherence to the Mediterranean diet.ResultsTo date, 1964 individuals completed pre‐screening using self‐administered online survey in REDCap (Research Electronic Capture) and 874 (44.5%) fulfilled criteria for an in‐person screening visit. Screening was successful in 477 of participants. Mean (SD) age is 66.24 (4.99), 13.26 (4.43) years of education, MMSE 28.27 (1.78), CAIDE score 7.48 (1.36), and 235 (49%) are men. Based on CAIDE components, at baseline, 287 (60%) showed high systolic blood pressure, 165 (35%) low physical activity, 122 (26%) high BMI, and 101 (21%) with high cholesterol. Regarding cognitive frailty, 144 (31%) presented low performance on brief cognitive testing (Memory Alteration Test ≤ 40 and/or Fototest ≤ 35), 186 (39%) presented memory complaints (Cognitive Change Index ≥ 20), and 147 (30%) showed both criteria. Currently, 191 have been randomly assigned to the control and 192 to the Intervention groups. So far, adherence to intervention activities is high, ranging from 73% to 97%, depending on the modality.ConclusionCITA GO‐ON Study recruitment strategy includes participants with high risk of dementia based on modifiable factors and in situation of cognitive fragility, with might increase the probability of obtaining positive efficacy results.

Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Events in Cancer Patients Treated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are effective therapies for numerous cancers, but have been associated with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). This study aimed to identify predictors for ASCVD events among cancer patients treated with ICIs and the cardiovascular risk factor (CVRF) control of those who developed ASCVD. A single-centre retrospective study of 366 cancer patients who received ICIs from 2018 to 2020 was performed. Demographic, baseline CVRF, cancer history, and ICI regimen data were obtained from medical records. The primary end point of ASCVD events was defined as myocardial infarction, coronary revascularisation, ischaemic stroke, or acute limb ischaemia. Cox proportional multivariable modelling and competing risks analysis were performed to assess ASCVD predictors. Descriptive analysis was performed to describe CVRF management among those who developed ASCVD events. Over a median follow-up of 3.4 years (2.8-4.3), 26 patients (7.1%) experienced 27 ASCVD events (seven myocardial infarction, one coronary revascularisation, 13 ischaemic stroke, and six acute limb ischaemia events). There were 226 (61.8%) cancer-related deaths and no cardiac deaths. History of ASCVD before ICI initiation was independently associated with ASCVD events on traditional Cox modelling (hazard ratio [HR] 4.00; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.79-8.91; p<0.01) and competing risks analysis (HR 4.23; 95% CI 1.87-9.60; p<0.01). A total of 17 patients developed ASCVD events after ICI cessation (median 1.4 years). Among those with ASCVD events, 12 had prior ASCVD, 16 had hypertension, nine had hypercholesterolaemia, and four had diabetes, and nine were actively smoking. Variable prescription of cardiovascular preventative therapies was noted. History of ASCVD was associated with subsequent ASCVD events among patients treated with ICIs, which could occur even after active treatment was stopped. Identification and aggressive management of modifiable CVRFs should be considered throughout cancer survivorship in patients who received ICI treatment.

1830. Social determinants of cardiovascular disease risk factor control among people living with HIV

Abstract Background HIV is associated with an elevated risk of cardiovascular disease, yet hypertension and high cholesterol are often sub-optimally treated in people with HIV. The role of racial disparities and social determinants of health in the management of these cardiovascular risk factors is poorly understood. Average systolic blood pressures vs TIS score (hypertension treatment intensity), by Black race TIS (therapeutic intensity score) was calculated by dividing the patient’s antihypertensive medication dosage by the maximum daily dosage approved by the US Food and Drug Administration, then summing this proportion for each antihypertensive medication prescribed. For example, if a patient was prescribed two antihypertensive medications each at 75% of the maximum approved dosage, the TIS score would be calculated as 1.5 (0.75 + 0.75). Methods We performed a cross-sectional analysis of adult patients with HIV among three academic medical centers in the United States. We considered various social determinants of health including race, sex, measures of economic stability, education level, health insurance, health literacy, social deprivation index by zip code, and measures of psychosocial stress. We examined a hybridized outcome of risk factor control (poor or good) and treatment intensity (minimal or maximal) for two key cardiovascular risk factors, hypertension and hyperlipidemia. Multinomial logistic regressions were performed to identify factors associated with cardiovascular risk factor control and intensity, with “good control, maximal treatment” used as the reference group. Results Overall, 371 persons were included in the analysis. Participants were 23.5% female, 59.6% Black, 7.3% Hispanic/Latino, with a median age of 59 (interquartile range 53-64). Among study participants with hypertension, Black participants were more likely to have poor control despite maximal treatment (relative risk ratio [RRR] 2.95, 95% CI: 1.30-6.66). In our hyperlipidemia analysis, having the highest quartile of perceived stress was more common among participants with poor than good cholesterol control (27.0% vs 15.9%, p=0.032). Compared to participants with good control and maximal treatment of high cholesterol, participants with the highest quartile of perceived stress were more likely to have poor control with minimal (RRR: 2.80, 95% CI: 1.02-7.63) or maximal (RRR: 3.64, 95% CI: 1.20-11.1) treatment. Conclusion Race and social determinants of health, including perceived stress, appear to influence cardiovascular disease risk factors among persons with HIV. Disclosures Nwora Lance Okeke, MD MPH, Gilead Sciences: Advisor/Consultant

Cardiovascular Health of Middle-Aged U.S. Adults by Income Level, 1999 to March 2020 : A Serial Cross-Sectional Study.

Although cardiovascular mortality has increased among middle-aged U.S. adults since 2011, how the burden of cardiovascular risk factors has changed for this population by income level over the past 2 decades is unknown. To evaluate trends in the prevalence, treatment, and control of cardiovascular risk factors among low-income and higher-income middle-aged adults and how social determinants contribute to recent associations between income and cardiovascular health. Serial cross-sectional study. NHANES (National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey), 1999 to March 2020. Middle-aged adults (aged 40 to 64 years). Age-standardized prevalence of hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, obesity, and cigarette use; treatment rates for hypertension, diabetes, and hyperlipidemia; and rates of blood pressure, glycemic, and cholesterol control. The study population included 20 761 middle-aged adults. The prevalence of hypertension, diabetes, and cigarette use was consistently higher among low-income adults between 1999 and March 2020. Low-income adults had an increase in hypertension over the study period (37.2% [95% CI, 33.5% to 40.9%] to 44.7% [CI, 39.8% to 49.5%]) but no changes in diabetes or obesity. In contrast, higher-income adults did not have a change in hypertension but had increases in diabetes (7.8% [CI, 5.0% to 10.6%] to 14.9% [CI, 12.4% to 17.3%]) and obesity (33.0% [CI, 26.7% to 39.4%] to 44.0% [CI, 40.2% to 47.7%]). Cigarette use was high and stagnant among low-income adults (33.2% [CI, 28.4% to 38.0%] to 33.9% [CI, 29.6% to 38.3%]) but decreased among their higher-income counterparts (18.6% [CI, 13.5% to 23.7%] to 11.5% [CI, 8.7% to 14.3%]). Treatment and control rates for hypertension were unchanged in both groups (>80%), whereas diabetes treatment rates improved only among the higher-income group (58.4% [CI, 44.4% to 72.5%] to 77.4% [CI, 67.6% to 87.1%]). Income-based disparities in hypertension, diabetes, and cigarette use persisted in more recent years even after adjustment for insurance coverage, health care access, and food insecurity. Sample size limitations could preclude detection of small changes in treatment and control rates. Over 2 decades in the United States, hypertension increased in low-income middle-aged adults, whereas diabetes and obesity increased in their higher-income counterparts. Income-based disparities in hypertension, diabetes, and smoking persisted even after adjustment for other social determinants of health. National Institutes of Health.

Insufficient long-term LDL-cholesterol management in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia 5 years after an acute coronary syndrome

Abstract Background Long-term control of cardiovascular risk factors after an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is a cornerstone in preventing cardiovascular event recurrence. In patients with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) and ACS, long-term management of LDL-cholesterol has been poorly studied. Purpose To investigate the extent of LDL-c and other cardiovascular risk factor management 5 years after ACS in patients with and without FH. Methods We collected data from 3,201 patients with an ACS from a Swiss multicenter cohort study and with 5-years follow-up data. At hospital admission for ACS, clinical FH was defined based on personal and familial history of premature cardiovascular disease as well as LDL-c levels, using the Dutch Lipid Clinic and the Simon Broome definitions. At the 5-years follow-up visit after ACS, we assessed LDL-c levels, lipid-lowering drugs, and control of cardiovascular risk factors comparing patients with FH and without FH. Results At the time of ACS, mean age of the 3,201 patients was 61.6 years old (SD 12.2), 643 (20.1%) were female, and 740 (23.1%) were diagnosed with clinical FH. At 5-years follow-up post-ACS, mean age was 56.6 years for FH patients and 69.6 years for patients without FH. 5 years after ACS, 15.4% and 33.5% patients with FH had an LDL-cholesterol ≤ 1.4 mmol/l, respectively ≤ 1.8 mmol/l, compared with 21.0% and 44.3% of those without FH (p=0.01, respectively &amp;lt;0.001) (see Figure and Table). Use of statins was similar between groups, but patients with FH were more frequently using high-dose statins compared to patients without FH (51.0% vs 42.9%, p&amp;lt;0.001). Use of lipid-lowering therapy in general such as statins, ezetimibe, fibrates, or niacin was more frequent in patients with FH than in those without FH (91.0% vs 87.0%, p=0.01). Beside LDL-c management, 5-year control of other cardiovascular risk factors tended to be superior in FH patients as compared to patients without FH: 78.5% vs 69.0% p&amp;lt;0.001 for systolic blood pressure (BP) &amp;lt; 140 mmHg; 46.2% vs 38.9% p=0.4 for reaching HbA1c &amp;lt; 7% in patients with diabetes; 46.9% vs 42.7% p=0.27 for smoking cessation, and 28.2% vs 21.0% p=0.1 for reduction of alcohol consumption &amp;lt;14 units/week . Conclusion Five years after an ACS, patients with FH had less optimal control of LDL-c levels despite being younger and more frequently using high dose statins compared to patients without FH. Combination of lipid-lowering therapy needs to be studied for optimal long-term management of patients with ACS and FH.Figure:CVRF 5 years post-ACS FH/non-FHTable:CVRF 5 years post-ACS FH/non-FH

Health outcomes of an ambulatory exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation program across patient risk categories

Abstract Background Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation is recommended after an ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) to improve prognosis, quality of life and control of cardiovascular risk factors. Ambulatory training has been proposed as an alternative if in-hospital training is unavailable. Purpose To study the health outcomes of an ambulatory exercise-based Cardiac Rehabilitation Program (aCRP) in STEMI patients across different patient risk profiles. Methods A Phase 2 aCRP aimed to STEMI patients was implemented in our hospital in 2022. Conventional or cardiopulmonary exercise testing (C/CPET) was performed, patient risk was stratified as low risk or intermediate/high risk, and a 3-month, individualized aerobic and strength ambulatory training program was provided. C/CPET was repeated at the end of Phase 2 and peak oxygen consumption (peak VO2) was measured. Questionnaires were used to analyse quality of life (SF-36), depression (PHQ-2), anxiety (GAD-2), adherence to Mediterranean diet (PREDIMED) and weekly physical activity (IPAQ). Comparisons were performed between patients at low risk and patients at intermediate/high risk. A p&amp;lt;0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results The cohort comprised 41 patients who completed Phase 2 of aCRP (mean age 60.1±10.2 years, 82.9% male and 53.7% smokers) and were stratified as low risk (n=15, 36.6%) or intermediate/high risk (n=26, 63.4%). Reductions in systolic blood pressure (-7.9±15.7mmHg), LDL cholesterol (-59.5±35mg/dL), weight (-3±6.5kg) and body mass index (BMI, -1±2.2) were attained (all p&amp;lt;0.05). Smoking abstinence was accomplished in 90.9% of smokers and most patients achieved an LDL&amp;lt;55mg/dL target (75.6%). Quality of life improved (+8.4±23.7 points in SF-36, p=0.03) and anxiety symptoms diminished (-0.6±1.8 points in GAD2, p=0.04). A median 4.1±4.7ml/kg/min peak VO2 increase was achieved (+17.9% from baseline, p&amp;lt;0.001) and patients increased their reported weekly physical activity in 2681.1±3385.3 METS/week (+156.2% from baseline, p&amp;lt;0.001). No significant differences were noted between low risk and intermediate/high risk patients, except lower LDL&amp;lt;55mg/dL (65.4% vs. 93.3%, p=0.045) and higher weight loss and BMI reduction (-4.2±7.7 vs. -0.8±3kg, p=0.05 and -0.16±1.1 vs. -1.54±2.5, p=0.02, respectively) in intermediate/high risk patients. No readmissions for cardiovascular causes or complications of ambulatory training were registered. Conclusions In STEMI patients, a Phase 2 ambulatory Cardiac Rehabilitation Program can provide excellent control of cardiovascular risk factors, improve quality of life, and significantly increase functional capacity and reported weekly physical activity. Results are comparable in patients at low risk and intermediate/high risk of cardiac rehabilitation, which could support the inclusion of intermediate/high risk patients in ambulatory exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation programs if in-hospital supervised training is unavailable.Health outcomes of aCRP.

Abstract 15421: Cardiovascular Health of Middle-Aged US Adults by Income Level, 1999 to March 2020

Introduction: Cardiovascular mortality has increased among middle-aged US adults since 2011. Despite these alarming trends, it is unknown how the burden of cardiovascular risk factors has changed for this population by income level over the past two decades. Methods: We conducted a serial cross-sectional analysis of the NHANES to evaluate changes in the prevalence, treatment, and control of cardiovascular risk factors among low-income (&lt;200% federal poverty threshold) and higher-income middle-aged adults (ages 40-64) between 1999 and March 2020. Results: Among 20,761 middle-aged adults, the prevalence of hypertension, diabetes, and cigarette use was consistently higher among low-income adults between 1999 and March 2020. Low-income adults experienced a significant increase in hypertension (37.2% [95% CI: 33.5-40.9] to 44.7% [95% CI: 39.8-49.5]) over the study period, but no changes in diabetes or obesity. In contrast, higher-income adults did not experience a change in hypertension but had significant increases in diabetes (7.8% [5.0-10.6] to 14.9% [12.4-17.3]) and obesity (33.0% [26.7-39.4] to 44.0% [40.2-47.7]). Hyperlipidemia decreased in both groups. Cigarette use was high and stagnant among low-income adults (33.2% [28.4-38.0] to 33.9% [29.6-38.3]) but significantly decreased among their higher-income counterparts (18.6% [13.5-23.7] to 11.5% [8.7-14.3]). Income-based inequities in cardiovascular risk factors persisted in recent years even after adjustment for insurance coverage, health care access, and food insecurity. Treatment and control rates for hypertension were unchanged in both groups (&gt;80%), while diabetes treatment rates only improved among the higher-income group. Conclusions: The burden of several cardiovascular risk factors worsened among middle-aged adults (ages 40-64) over two decades with varying trends by income level. Income-based inequities in hypertension, diabetes, and smoking have not meaningfully narrowed.

Abstract 14786: Disparities in Composite Cardiovascular Risk Factor Control in US Adults With Diabetes in the NIH Precision Medicine Initiative All of Us Research Program

Background/Objective: There are limited contemporary data in real-world populations on composite cardiovascular risk factor (RF) control in adults with diabetes mellitus (DM). We studied the proportions of patients with DM at target for individual and multiple cardiovascular RFs including HbA1c, LDL-C, BMI, blood pressure, and smoking status. Methods: We included adults ≥18 years of age with DM from the NIH Precision Medicine Initiative All of Us Research Program 2018-2022. RFs and target values were defined as 1) HbA1c (&lt;7% w/ atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) or &lt;8% w/o ASCVD), 2) LDL-C (&lt;55mg/dL w/ ASCVD or &lt;70mg/dL w/o ASCVD), 3) blood pressure (&lt;130/80 mmHg), 4) BMI (&lt;25 kg/m 2 ), and 5) smoking status (never or former smoker). We investigated the proportion (%) of patients at target for individual RFs, ≥3 RFs, ≥4 RFs, and mean number at target by sex, race/ethnicity, and ASCVD status. Results: Individual and composite cardiovascular RF control was found to be low among the 83,093 participants with DM. Control of &gt; 3 RFs and ≥ 4 RFs was only 25% and 5% overall, respectively, with fewer than 1% at target for all 5 RFs; female sex, Asian race/ethnicity, and those with prior ASCVD were more likely to have multiple RFs at target. Non-Hispanic black participants had the lowest proportion of RFs at target. In a multiple logistic regression, higher income, higher education level, employment, female sex, and Non-Hispanic White &amp; Asian race/ethnicity positively predicted control of ≥ 4 RFs with p-value &lt; 0.001. Conclusions: Individual and composite RF control remains suboptimal in many patients with DM, with disparities across certain demographic subsets. Further efforts are required to address social determinants that may be responsible for continuing gaps in adequate RF control and to educate clinicians and patients on the importance of controlling key RFs that impact ASCVD and other outcomes in those with DM.

Abstract 156: Incidence and Long-Term Outcomes of Acute Myocardial Infarction Among Survivors of Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Introduction: Despite the increasing long-term survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA), the risk of subsequent acute myocardial infarction (AMI) remains poorly understood. We aimed to determine the incidence, predictors, and long-term outcomes of AMI among OHCA survivors. Methods: We assembled a retrospective cohort of patients with OHCA who survived to 30 days or discharge from hospital regardless of time from index event between 2010-2019 by linking the Pan-Asian Resuscitation Outcomes Study (Singapore participants), Singapore Myocardial Infarction Registry, and the Singapore Registry of Births and Deaths. We calculated the risk of subsequent AMI defined as AMI occurring 30 days after index OHCA or following discharge from hospital post-OHCA, among OHCA survivors compared to the general population using age- and sex-specific standardised incidence ratios (SIR) and the cumulative incidence of subsequent AMI among OHCA survivors. We investigated predictors of subsequent AMI among OHCA survivors and whether AMI predicted mortality using Cox regression hazard ratios for time-to-event analyses. Results: In total, 882 OHCA survivors were analysed. OHCA survivors had an increased risk of subsequent AMI compared to the general population when matched for age and sex (SIR 4.64, 95% CI: 3.52-6.01). Age-specific risks of subsequent AMI for males (SIR 3.29, 95%CI: 2.39-4.42) and females (SIR 6.15, 95%CI: 3.27-10.52) were significantly increased. 7.2%, 8.3%, and 14.3% of OHCA survivors had subsequent AMI at 3 years, 5 years, and end of follow-up respectively. Age at OHCA (HR 1.04, 95%CI: 1.02-1.06) and past medical history of prior AMI, defined as any AMI preceding or during the index OHCA event (HR 1.84, 95%CI: 1.05-3.22), were associated with subsequent AMI. OHCA survivors with subsequent AMI had a higher risk of mortality (HR 1.58, 95%CI: 1.12-2.22) than those without. Conclusion: Long-term OHCA survivors have an increased risk of subsequent AMI, compared to the general population. Prior AMI significantly increases this risk and subsequent AMI predicts mortality. Intensive cardiovascular risk factor control and revascularisation may improve outcomes in selected patients with a cardiac etiology.

Prevalence of Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Spain: A Systematic Review.

Cardiovascular diseases are the leading cause of death in Spain, according to data from the National Institute of Statistics, with the lack of control of cardiovascular risk factors (CVRF) being the main contributing factor. The CVRFs of greatest clinical interest are high blood pressure (HBP), smoking, diabetes mellitus (DM2), overweight, obesity, hypercholesterolaemia, and sedentary lifestyle. The main objective of this review was to compare the prevalence of the different CVRFs according to population-based studies carried out in Spain. For this, a systematic review based on publications assessing CVRFs in the adult population and estimating their national prevalence was conducted. Pubmed and Dialnet databases were consulted, and the selected articles were analysed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme Español (CASPe) tool for cohort studies and the Berra et al. tool for cross-sectional studies. A total of 33 studies were obtained from the autonomous regions of Andalusia, the Canary Islands, Castilla-Leon, Castilla-La Mancha, Catalonia, Extremadura, the Balearic Islands, Madrid, Murcia, and Navarra. In all the population-based studies, there was a greater representation of women in the sample. The most prevalent CVRFs differed across the studies according to the autonomous region targeted, with dyslipidaemia, sedentary lifestyle, high blood pressure, hypercholesterolaemia, overweight, and obesity standing out. Numerous differences exist between the studies included in this review, such as the age range, the CVRFs analysed and their prevalence, and remarkable aspects such as the over-representation of the female sex in all cases. It can be concluded that, based on the presented results, the prevalence of CVRFs in Spain varies according to the autonomous region, the sex of the individual, and the studied age range.

Cardio-Oncology Rehabilitation for Cancer Survivors With High Cardiovascular Risk

Cardiovascular disease is a leading cause of morbidity in cancer survivors, which makes strategies aimed at mitigating cardiovascular risk a subject of major contemporary importance. To assess whether a center-based cardiac rehabilitation (CBCR) framework compared with usual care encompassing community-based exercise training (CBET) is superior for cardiorespiratory fitness improvement and cardiovascular risk factor control among cancer survivors with high cardiovascular risk. This prospective, single-center, randomized clinical trial (CORE trial) included adult cancer survivors who had exposure to cardiotoxic cancer treatment and/or previous cardiovascular disease. Enrollment took place from March 1, 2021, to March 31, 2022. End points were assessed at baseline and after the 8-week intervention. Participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to 8 weeks of CBCR or CBET. The combined aerobic and resistance exercise sessions were performed twice a week. The powered primary efficacy measure was change in peak oxygen consumption (V̇o2) at 2 months. Secondary outcomes included handgrip maximal strength, functional performance, blood pressure (BP), body composition, body mass index (BMI; calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared), lipid profile, plasma biomarker levels, physical activity (PA) levels, psychological distress, quality of life (QOL), and health literacy. A total of 75 participants completed the study (mean [SD] age, 53.6 [12.3] years; 58 [77.3%] female), with 38 in the CBCR group and 37 in the CBET group. Participants in CBCR achieved a greater mean (SD) increase in peak V̇o2 than those in CBET (2.1 [2.8] mL/kg/min vs 0.8 [2.5] mL/kg/min), with a between-group mean difference of 1.3 mL/kg/min (95% CI, 0.1-2.6 mL/kg/min; P = .03). Compared with the CBET group, the CBCR group also attained a greater mean (SD) reduction in systolic BP (-12.3 [11.8] mm Hg vs -1.9 [12.9] mm Hg; P < .001), diastolic BP (-5.0 [5.7] mm Hg vs -0.5 [7.0] mm Hg; P = .003), and BMI (-1.2 [0.9] vs 0.2 [0.7]; P < .001) and greater mean (SD) improvements in PA levels (1035.2 [735.7] metabolic equivalents [METs]/min/wk vs 34.1 [424.4] METs/min/wk; P < .001), QOL (14.0 [10.0] points vs 0.4 [12.9] points; P < .001), and health literacy scores (2.7 [1.6] points vs 0.1 [1.4] points; P < .001). Exercise adherence was significantly higher in the CBCR group than in the CBET group (mean [SD] sessions completed, 90.3% [11.8%] vs 68.4% [22.1%]; P < .001). The CORE trial showed that a cardio-oncology rehabilitation model among cancer survivors with high cardiovascular risk was associated with greater improvements in peak V̇o2 compared with usual care encompassing an exercise intervention in a community setting. The CBCR also showed superior results in exercise adherence, cardiovascular risk factor control, QOL, and health literacy. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05132998.

Impact of AfterAMI Mobile App on Quality of Life, Depression, Stress and Anxiety in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease: Open Label, Randomized Trial.

mHealth solutions optimize cardiovascular risk factor control in coronary artery disease. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of mobile app AfterAMI on quality of life in patients after myocardial infarction. 100 participants were randomized (1:1 ratio) into groups: (1) with a rehabilitation program and access to afterAMI or (2) standard rehabilitation alone (control group, CG). 3 questionnaires (MacNew, DASS21 and EQ-5D-5L) were used at baseline, 1 month and 6 months after discharge. Median age was 61 years; 35% of patients were female. At 1 month follow up patients using AfterAMI had higher general quality of life scores both in MacNew [5.78 vs. 5.5 in CG, p = 0.037] and EQ-5D-5L [80 vs. 70 in CG, p = 0.007]. At 6 months, according to MacNew, the app group had significantly higher scores in emotional [6.09 vs. 5.45 in CG, p= 0.017] and physical [6.2 vs. 6 in CG, p = 0.027] aspects. The general MacNew quality of life score was also higher in the AfterAMI group [6.11 vs. 5.7 in CG, p = 0.015], but differences in EQ-5D-5L were not significant. There were no differences between groups in the DASS21 questionnaire. mHealth interventions may improve quality of care in secondary prevention, however further studies are warranted.

Longitudinal Progression of White Matter Hyperintensity Severity in Chronic Stroke Aphasia

ObjectiveTo determine whether longitudinal progression of small vessel disease in chronic stroke survivors is associated with longitudinal worsening of chronic aphasia severity. DesignA longitudinal retrospective study. Severity of white matter hyperintensities (WMHs) as a marker for small vessel disease was assessed on fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) scans using the Fazekas scale, with ratings for deep WMHs (DWMHs) and periventricular WMHs (PVHs). SettingUniversity research laboratories. ParticipantsThis study includes data from 49 chronic stroke survivors with aphasia (N=49; 15 women, 34 men, age range=32-81 years, >6 months post-stroke, stroke type: [46 ischemic, 3 hemorrhagic], community dwelling). All participants completed the Western Aphasia Battery-Revised (WAB) and had FLAIR scans at 2 timepoints (average years between timepoints: 1.87 years, SD=3.21 years). InterventionsNot applicable. Main Outcome MeasuresChange in white matter hyperintensity severity (calculated using the Fazekas scale) and change in aphasia severity (difference in Western Aphasia Battery scores) were calculated between timepoints. Separate stepwise regression models were used to identify predictors of WMH severity change, with lesion volume, age, time between timepoints, body mass index (BMI), and presence of diabetes as independent variables. Additional stepwise regression models investigated predictors of change in aphasia severity, with PVH change, DWMH change, lesion volume, time between timepoints, and age as independent predictors. Results22.5% of participants (11/49) had increased WMH severity. Increased BMI was associated with increases in PVH severity (P=.007), whereas the presence of diabetes was associated with increased DWMH severity (P=.002). Twenty-five percent of participants had increased aphasia severity which was significantly associated with increased severity of PVH (P<.001, 16.8% variance explained). ConclusionIncreased small vessel disease burden is associated with contributing to chronic changes in aphasia severity. These findings support the idea that good cardiovascular risk factor control may play an important role in the prevention of long-term worsening of aphasic symptoms.

Impact of Nonsurgical Periodontal Treatment on Blood Pressure: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Arterial hypertension and periodontitis are two of the most common diseases worldwide and recent evidence supports a causal relationship between them. Despite all antihypertensive strategies, an important number of patients are undiagnosed and a large number of the diagnosed fail to achieve optimal blood pressure (BP) measurements. Some studies point out that periodontal treatment could have positive effects on BP levels. The aim of this study is to determine if nonsurgical periodontal treatment can help BP level control in prehypertensive patients with periodontitis. Thirty-five patients were included in the study and received nonsurgical periodontal treatment according to necessity. Clinical data, periodontal data, and BP measurements were taken at baseline, periodontal re-evaluation visit (4-6 weeks after treatment), and 6-month follow-up. Periodontal treatment caused a statistically significant reduction (p < 0.05) of systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) at re-evaluation visit of 4.7 (p = 0.016) and 3.4 mm Hg (p = 0.015), respectively. The effect was maintained at 6-month follow-up visit with a reduction in SBP and DBP of 5.2 (p = 0.007) and 3.7 (p = 0.003) mm Hg, respectively. Despite the limitations of this study, it suggests that nonsurgical periodontal treatment can be effective in lowering BP levels in patients with prehypertension and periodontitis. Moreover, it highlights the importance of dentists in prevention, detection, and control of this important cardiovascular risk factor.

Aspirin for primary prevention in patients with high cardiovascular risk: insights from CORE-Thailand registry

Aspirin may be considered for primary prevention in non-elderly patients with high cardiovascular risk. However, contemporary management aimed at aggressive cardiovascular risk factor control may alter benefit-risk ratio of aspirin. Therefore, we aimed to examine the effect of aspirin for primary prevention on the long-term MACEs in a large cohort registry. Cohort Of patients with high Risk for cardiovascular Events (CORE-Thailand) registry is a prospective, multicenter, observational, longitudinal study of Thai patients with high atherosclerotic risk. Patients with established atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases were excluded. Among 4259 patients with multiple cardiovascular risk factors, 1945 (45.7%) patients used aspirin. After propensity score matching, there were 3228 patients remained in post-matching analysis. During the median follow-up period of 58.2 months, we demonstrated that aspirin use increased risk of long-term MACEs in pre-matching cohort (unadjusted HR 1.76, 95% CI 1.43–2.17, P < 0.001) and post-matching cohort (HR 1.66 (1.31–2.10), P < 0.001). In addition, patients taking aspirin had a higher risk of bleeding than non-aspirin users in pre-matching cohort (unadjusted HR 2.28, 95% CI 1.09–4.75, P = 0.028). We demonstrated that aspirin was associated with increased risk of long-term MACEs in patients with multiple cardiovascular risk factors. Due to the non-randomized design, our results should be interpreted with caution.

Poor control of modifiable cardiovascular risk factors among Congolese patients in the acute and sequelae phase of stroke : A cross-sectional study

PurposeTo assess the level of the control of the cardiovascular risk factors in patients with a history of stroke in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. MethodsThe level of the control of arterial hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and dyslipidemias was analyzed in two hundred and seventy-four (274) patients followed for stroke. ResultsAmong 188 patients with a prior diagnosis of arterial hypertension, only 100 (53.2%) were treated, 27 (27.0%) had their blood pressure well controlled [12.3% in acute stroke vs. 46.5% in sequelae phase; p = 0.0002]. Among 42 (71.2%) diabetics treated, 23 (63.9%) had glycaemia levels > 200 mg/dl, 60.0% in acute phase and 83.3% in sequelae phase (p = 0.28). Finally, 87.0% of the patients had a non-HDL-C > 85 mg/dl. ConclusionsThis study shows a poor control of modifiable cardiovascular risk factors in patients with very high cardiovascular risk due to stroke. There is a need for an effective program to combat non-communicable diseases in our environment.