Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound Liver Imaging Reporting Research Articles

Evaluation of combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma using CEUS LI-RADS: correlation with pathological characteristics.

To explore the factors that influence the contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) classification of combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-ICC). Between September 2014 to July 2020, the CEUS features of 58 patients with pathologically confirmed cHCC-ICC were retrospectively evaluated and assigned according to the CEUS LI-RADS (version 2017). The pathological characteristics of nodules categorizing as different CEUS LI-RADS categories were compared. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted to explore potential factors that may influence the CEUS LI-RADS classification of cHCC-ICC. According to CEUS LI-RADS, 32.8% (19/58), 63.8% (37/58), and 3.4% (2/58) were categorized as LR-5, LR-M, and LR-TIV, respectively. There was significant difference between the LR-M and LR-5 groups with regard to the pathological grade, nodule size, and HCC/ICC-component ratio of cHCC-ICC. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified tumor size and the relative proportions of hepatocellular carcinomas (HCC) and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas (ICC) components as the independent influencing factors. Tumor size and the relative proportion of HCC and ICC components within the nodule had a significant impact on the CEUS LI-RADS classification of cHCC-ICC.

The Value of CEUS LI-RADS combined with AFP in early diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in low- and high-risk patients.

We found that the occurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has increased significantly in non-cirrhotic individuals, with HCC being frequently overlooked or misdiagnosed. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) is known to have a high diagnostic quality in high-risk HCC patients. Therefore, we aimed to compare the detection accuracy of CEUS LI-RADS for HCC between low- and high-risk individuals, to confirm its value in low-risk patients at increased risk of HCC, but not yet included in the high-risk groups of LI-RADS. In addition, since CEUS LR-4 and LR-M categories contain a relatively high proportion of HCC, and serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) is the most commonly used biomarker for HCC, and the clinically valid, we attempted to further improve the early diagnostic capability of CEUS LI-RADS for HCC in the low-risk and high-risk patients by combining CEUS LR-4 and LR-M categories with AFP. We defined high-risk groups (HR)-included in the high-risk patients of LI-RADS, low-risk groups (LR)-not included in the high-risk patients of LI-RADS and enrolled 189 HCC patients with LR and HR settings in a retrospective study. All lesions were confirmed histopathologically. The CEUS LI-RADS accuracy for detecting HCC in these two patients was compared. In addition, the diagnostic algorithm in our study was proposed (for CEUS LR-4 and LR-M patients with AFP>20 ng/ml). we analyzed the ability of CEUS LI-RADS as a valid method of establishing the early diagnosis of HCC in LR and HR patients by combining LR-4 and LR-M categories with AFP. Through comparative analysis, the specificity of the CEUS LR-5 category for HCC in the HR group was 78.4%, whereas in the LR group, it was 94.2%. Meanwhile, the sensitivity (63.2% vs. 63.0%) and positive predictive value (PPV) (75.0% vs. 88.7%) did not differ between the LR and HR groups ( P = 0.990, P = 0.299). It is noteworthy that there were the high proportion of HCC in CEUS LR-4 and LR-M categories in our cases and when we combined CEUS LR-4 and LR-M categories with AFP significantly improved the sensitivity by 21.0% (84.2%) in the LR group, and by 16.0% (79.0%) in the HR group, with statistically difference in sensitivity after combination in the HR group ( P = 0.014). The CEUS LR-5 category has real meaningful utility in the diagnosis of HCC in both LR and HR patients. The early detection power of the CEUS LI-RADS category for HCC patients was further increased when the CEUS LR-4 and LR-M categories were combined with elevated AFP.

The American College of Radiology contrast-enhanced ultrasound Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System and its modified version in diagnosing hepatocellular carcinoma via Sonazoid: a meta-analysis.

The American College of Radiology (ACR) developed the contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) for pure blood contrast agents, but Sonazoid was not included. Modifications to LI-RADS have been proposed for Sonazoid. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to identify and compare the diagnostic efficacy of the two LI-RADS algorithms of Sonazoid. We searched the PubMed, MEDLINE, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases from databases inception to August 31, 2023, to find original studies on the ACR LI-RADS and/or modified LI-RADS algorithm with Sonazoid used as the contrast agent in patients with high-risk hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). A bivariate random-effects model was used. Data pooling, meta-regression, and sensitivity analysis were performed for meta-analysis. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2) tool was used to assess the methodological quality, and the Deeks funnel plot asymmetry test was used to evaluate the publication bias. A meta-analysis of 10 studies with 1,611 observations was conducted. The pooled data for ACR LI-RADS category 5 (LR-5) and modified LR-5 were respectively as follows: pooled sensitivity, 0.70 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.64-0.75] and 0.81 (95% CI: 0.76-0.86) (P<0.05); pooled specificity, 0.90 (95% CI: 0.82-0.94) and 0.87 (95% CI: 0.81-0.91) (P>0.05); and pooled area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.84 and 0.91. The diagnostic performance of LI-RADS category M (LR-M) of the two algorithms was comparable. Study heterogeneity was observed. The results indicated that modified LR-5 algorithm demonstrated improved diagnostic sensitivity compared with the ACR LR-5 algorithm of Sonazoid, with differences observed between the different versions. Further research is needed to validate and explore the optimal diagnostic criteria for HCC using Sonazoid. Before the database search was conducted, this study was registered on PROSPERO (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews; CRD42023455220).

Clinical impact of CEUS on non-characterizable observations and observations with intermediate probability of malignancy on CT/MRI in patients at risk for HCC

BackgroundHepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a unique cancer allowing tumor diagnosis with identification of definitive patterns of enhancement on contrast-enhanced imaging, avoiding invasive biopsy. However, it is still unclear to what extent Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) is a clinically useful additional step when Computed tomography (CT) or Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are inconclusive.MethodsA prospective international multicenter validation study for CEUS Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) was conducted between January 2018 and August 2021. 646 patients at risk for HCC with focal liver lesions were enrolled. CEUS was performed using an intravenous ultrasound contrast agent within 4 weeks of CT/MRI. Liver nodules were categorized based on LI-RADS (LR) criteria. Histology or one-year follow-up CT/MRI imaging results were used as the reference standard. The diagnostic performance of CEUS was evaluated for inconclusive CT/MRI scan in two scenarios for which the AASLD recommends repeat imaging or imaging follow-up: observations deemed non-characterizable (LR-NC) or with indeterminate probability of malignancy (LR-3).Results75 observations on CT or MRI were categorized as LR-3 (n = 54) or LR-NC (n = 21) CEUS recategorization of such observations into a different LR category (namely, into one among LR-1, LR-2, LR-5, LR-M, or LR-TIV) resulted in management recommendation changes in 33.3% (25/75) and in all but one (96.0%, 24/25) observation, the new management recommendations were correct.ConclusionCEUS LI-RADS resulted in management recommendations change in substantial number of liver observations with initial indeterminate CT/MRI characterization, identifying both non-malignant lesions and HCC, potentially accelerating the diagnostic process and alleviating the need for biopsy or follow-up imaging.ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03318380.

The efficacy of modified contrast-enhanced ultrasound Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (CEUS LI-RADS) using Sonazoid in diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

The contrast-enhanced ultrasound Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (CEUS LI-RADS) is an algorithm for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in high-risk populations. Previous studies have shown the algorithm to have high specificity and moderate sensitivity. Nevertheless, it is designated for utilization solely with blood pool contrast agents. Sonazoid, a contrast agent that combines blood pools and Kupffer cells properties, has recently gained approval for marketing in an increased number of countries. Enhanced sensitivity in diagnosing HCC may be achieved through the distinctive Kupffer phase (KP) exhibited by Sonazoid. Certain academics have suggested the modified CEUS LI-RADS using Sonazoid. The main criteria of mild and late (≥60 seconds) washout in CEUS LI-RADS LR-5 were replaced by KP (>10 minutes) defects as the primary criteria. The purpose of this research was to evaluate the effectiveness of the modified CEUS LI-RADS using Sonazoid in diagnosing HCC. Original studies on Sonazoid and CEUS LI-RADS were searched in the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases until 13 July 2023, with no restrictions on language. We enrolled studies that applied Sonazoid for CEUS in patients at high risk of HCC and modified CEUS LI-RADS for the diagnosis of intrahepatic nodules. Meta-analyses, evaluations, case studies, correspondences, remarks, and summaries of conferences were excluded. Additionally, studies that fell outside the scope of this study and contained data on the same patients were also excluded. We evaluated the quality of research by employing the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2) tool. A bivariate mixed effects model was utilized to conduct a meta-analysis, summarizing the sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of HCC. The investigation of potential factors contributing to study heterogeneity was conducted using meta-regression analysis. Out of the 103 studies screened, 6 studies (835 lesions) were included in the final results. Modified CEUS LR-5 exhibited a sensitivity of 0.77 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.70-0.82; I2=71.98%; P=0.00] and a specificity of 0.88 (95% CI: 0.83-0.92; I2=0.00; P=0.47) for HCC diagnosis, with heterogeneity in sensitivity. The presence of heterogeneity in the study was found to have a significant association with factors such as the study design, the number of image reviewers, the proportion of cirrhosis, the proportion of other non-HCC malignancies (OM) cases, and the type of reference standard (P≤0.05). The modified CEUS LI-RADS LR-5 categorization demonstrates a reasonable level of sensitivity 0.77, but an insufficient level of specificity 0.88 when diagnosing HCC. KP defects cannot be used as a primary feature in the diagnosis of HCC by CEUS LI-RADS, perhaps as an ancillary feature.

Diagnostic Performance of Modified Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System in Patients Without Risk Factors for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Comparison With World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology Guideline

The aim of this study was to assess the ability of the modified contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) to distinguish malignancy in patients without known hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) risk factors and compare diagnostic accuracy with that of the World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology (WFUMB) guideline across radiologists with different levels of CEUS experience. A total of 848 individuals with no hepatitis infection presenting with 870 lesions in non-cirrhotic livers were included and divided into the Testing and Validation groups. The modified CEUS LI-RADS was proposed, including downgrading of focal nodular hyperplasia with typical features. Diagnostic performance of the modified CEUS LI-RADS was assessed in the Testing group. In the Validation group, two radiologists with more than 9 y of CEUS experience (Experts) and two radiologists with less than 6 mo of CEUS experience (Novices) used both the modified CEUS LI-RADS and the WFUMB guideline to evaluate performance in diagnosis of the lesions. LR-5+M (combination of modified LR-5 and modified LR-M) revealed optimal performance with a sensitivity, specificity and area under the curve (AUC) of 99.3%, 81.6% and 0.904, respectively. Novices using the modified CEUS LI-RADS outperformed those using the WFUMB guideline (AUC: 0.858 vs. 0.767, p=0.005). Additionally, the sensitivity, specificity and AUC of Novices were comparable to those of Experts using the modified CEUS LI-RADS (94.1%, 77.6% and 0.858 vs. 96.1%, 77.6% and 0.868 for experts, respectively). The modified CEUS LI-RADS is a valuable method for distinguishing hepatic malignancy in patients without HCC risk factors. This is particularly beneficial for radiologists with limited CEUS expertise.

Differences between CEUS LI-RADS and CECT LI-RADS in the diagnosis of focal liver lesions in patients at risk for HCC

ObjectivesTo compare the inter-modality consistency and diagnostic performances of the contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) and contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) LI-RADS in patients at risk for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), so as to help clinicians to select a more appropriate modality to follow the focal liver lesions (FLLs).MethodsThis retrospective study included untreated 277 FLLs from 247 patients who underwent both CEUS and CECT within 1 month. The ultrasound contrast medium used was SonoVue. FLL categories were independently assigned by two ultrasound physicians and two radiologists using CEUS LI-RADS v2017 and CECT LI-RADS v2018, respectively. The diagnostic performances of CEUS and CECT LI-RADS were evaluated using sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value. Cohen’s Kappa was employed to evaluate the concordance of the LI-RADS category.ResultsThe inter-modality consistency for CEUS and CECT LI-RADS was 0.31 (p < 0.001). HCC was more frequently observed in CECT LR-3 and LR-4 hepatic lesions than in CEUS (7.3% vs. 19.5%, p < 0.001). The specificity and PPV of CEUS and CECT LR-5 for the diagnosis of HCC were 89.5%, 95.0%, and 82.5%, 94.4%, respectively. The sensitivity of CEUS LR-5 + LR-M for the diagnosis of hepatic malignancies was higher than that of CECT (93.7% vs. 82.7%, p < 0.001). The specificity and PPV of CEUS LR-M for the diagnosis of non-HCC malignancies were lower than those of CECT (59.7% vs. 95.5%, p < 0.001; 23.4% vs. 70.3%, p < 0.001).ConclusionsThe inter-modality consistency between the CEUS and CECT LI-RADS categories is fair. CEUS LI-RADS was more sensitive than CECT LI-RADS in terms of identifying hepatic malignancies, but weaker in terms of separating HCC from non-HCC malignancies.

Feeding artery: a valuable feature for differentiation of regenerative nodule, dysplastic nodules and small hepatocellular carcinoma in CEUS LI-RADS.

To investigate whether the feeding artery (FA) feature can aid in discriminating small hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) using the contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) from precancerous lesions. Between June 2017 and May 2021, a total of 347 patients with 351 precancerous liver lesions or small HCCs who underwent CEUS were enrolled. Two independent radiologists assigned LI-RADS categories to all lesions and assessed the presence of the FA feature, which was used as an ancillary feature to either upgrade or downgrade the LI-RADS category. The diagnostic performance of CEUS LI-RADS, both with and without the FA feature, was evaluated based on accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value. The FA feature was found to be more prevalent in HCC (85.54%, p < 0.001) than in regenerative nodules (RNs, 29.73%), low-grade dysplastic nodules (LGDNs, 33.33%), and high-grade dysplastic nodules (HGDNs, 55.26%). Furthermore, the presence of arterial phase hyperenhancement (APHE), washout (WO), and FA in liver nodules was associated with a higher expression of GPC-3 and Ki-67 compared to the group without these features (p < 0.001). After adjusting, the sensitivity and accuracy of LR-5 for HCC improved from 68.67% (95%CI: 62.46%, 74.30%) to 77.51% (95%CI: 71.72%, 82.44%) and from 69.23% (95%CI: 64.11%, 74.02%) to 73.79% (95%CI: 68.86%, 78.31%), respectively. The FA feature is a valuable feature for distinguishing small HCC and precancerous lesions and could be added as a possible ancillary feature in CEUS LI-RADS which was backed up by biomarkers. The presence of a feeding artery is a valuable imaging feature in the differentiation of HCC and precancerous lesions. Incorporating this characteristic in the CEUS LI-RADS can enhance the diagnostic ability. • Feeding artery is more frequent in HCC than in regenerative nodules, low-grade dysplastic nodules, and high-grade dysplastic nodules. • Feeding artery feature is a valuable ancillary feature for CEUS LI-RADS to differentiate regenerative nodules, low-grade dysplastic nodules, high-grade dysplastic nodules, and HCC. • The existence of feeding artery, arterial phase hyperenhancement, and washout is associated with more GPC-3 positive expression and higher Ki-67 expression than the group without these features.

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound liver imaging reporting and data system: clinical validation in a prospective multinational study in North America and Europe.

The objective of this study is to determine the diagnostic accuracy of the American College of Radiology Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System LR-5 characterization for HCC diagnosis in North American or European patients. A prospective multinational cohort study was performed from January 2018 through November 2022 at 11 academic and nonacademic centers in North America and Europe. Patients at risk for HCC with at least 1 liver observation not previously treated, identified on ultrasound (US), or multiphase CT or MRI performed as a part of standard clinical care were eligible for the study. All participants were examined with CEUS of the liver within 4 weeks of CT/MRI or tissue diagnosis to characterize up to 2 liver nodules per participant using ACR CEUS Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System. Definite HCC diagnosis on the initial CT/MRI, imaging follow-up, or histology for CT/MRI-indeterminate nodules were used as reference standards. A total of 545 nodules had confirmed reference standards in 480 patients, 73.8% were HCC, 5.5% were other malignancies, and 20.7% were nonmalignant. The specificity of CEUS LR-5 for HCC was 95.1% (95% CI 90.1%-97.7%), sensitivity 62.9% (95% CI 57.9%-67.7%), positive predictive value 97.3% (95% CI 94.5%-98.7%), and negative predictive value 47.7% (95% CI 41.7%-53.8%). In addition, benign CEUS characterization (LR-1 or LR-2) had 100% specificity and 100% positive predictive value for nonmalignant liver nodules. CEUS Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System provides an accurate categorization of liver nodules in participants at risk for HCC.

Contrast enhanced ultrasound combined with serology predicts hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence: a retrospective observation cohort study.

To construct a novel model based on contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and serological biomarkers to predict the early recurrence (ER) of primary hepatocellular carcinoma within 2 years after hepatectomy. A total of 466 patients who underwent CEUS and curative resection between 2016.1.1 and 2019.1.1 were retrospectively recruited from one institution. The training and testing cohorts comprised 326 and 140 patients, respectively. Data on general characteristics, CEUS Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) parameters, and serological were collected. Univariate analysis and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression model were used to evaluate the independent prognostic factors for tumor recurrence, and the Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound Serological (CEUSS) model was constructed. Different models were compared using prediction error and time-dependent area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). The CEUSS model's performances in ER prediction were assessed. The baseline data of the training and testing cohorts were equal. LI-RADS category, α-fetoprotein level, tumor maximum diameter, total bilirubin level, starting time, iso-time, and enhancement pattern were independent hazards, and their hazards ratios were 1.417, 1.309, 1.133, 1.036, 0.883, 0.985, and 0.70, respectively. The AUCs of CEUSS, BCLC,TNM, and CNLC were 0.706, 0.641, 0.647, and 0.636, respectively, in the training cohort and 0.680, 0.583, 0.607, and 0.597, respectively, in the testing cohort. The prediction errors of CEUSS, BCLC, TNM, and CNLC were 0.202, 0.205, 0.205, and 0.200, respectively, in the training cohort and 0.204, 0.221, 0.219, and 0.211, respectively, in the testing cohort. The CEUSS model can accurately and individually predict ER before surgery and may represent a new tool for individualized treatment.

Surveillance for malignant progression of LI-RADS version 2017 category 3/4 nodules using contrast-enhanced ultrasound.

To identify the risk factors for predicting the malignant progression of LR-3/4 observations on the baseline and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS). In total, 245 liver nodules assigned to LR-3/4 in 192 patients from January 2010 to December 2016 were followed up by baseline US and CEUS. The differences in the rate and time of progression to hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) among subcategories (defined as P1-P7) of LR-3/4 in CEUS Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) were analyzed. The risk factors to predict progression to HCC were analyzed by univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard model analysis. A total of 40.3% of LR-3 nodules and 78.9% of LR-4 nodules eventually progressed to HCC. The cumulative incidence of progression was significantly higher for LR-4 than LR-3 (p < 0.001). The rate of progression was 81.2% in nodules with arterial phase hyperenhancement (APHE), 64.7% in nodules with late and mild washout, and 100% in nodules with both characteristics. The overall progression rate and median progression time of subcategory P1 nodules (LR-3a) were lower (38.0% vs. 47.6-100.0%) and later (25.1months vs. 2.0-16.3months) than those of other subcategories. The cumulative incidence of progression of LR-3a (P1), LR-3b (P2/3/4), and LR-4 (P5/6/7) categories were 38.0%, 52.9%, and 78.9%. The risk factors of HCC progression were Visualization score B/C, CEUS characteristics (APHE, washout), LR-4 classification, echo changes, and definite growth. CEUS is a useful surveillance tool for nodules at risk of HCC. CEUS characteristics, LI-RADS classification, and changes in nodules provide useful information for the progress of LR-3/4 nodules. CEUS characteristics, LI-RADS classification, and nodule changes provide important predictions for LR-3/4 nodule progression to HCC, which may stratify the risk of malignant progression to provide a more optimized and refined, more cost-effective, and time-efficient management strategy for patients. • CEUS is a useful surveillance tool for nodules at risk of HCC, CEUS LI-RADS successfully stratified the risks that progress to HCC. • CEUS characteristics, LI-RADS classification, and changes in nodules can provide important information on the progression of LR-3/4 nodules, which may be helpful for a more optimized and refined management strategy.

Comparison of the Feasibility and Diagnostic Performance of ACR CEUS LI-RADS and a Modified CEUS LI-RADS for HCC in Examinations Using Sonazoid.

The present study aimed to determine the feasibility of the American College of Radiology's (ACR) contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) (version 2017) in examinations using Sonazoid and compare its diagnostic performance with that of modified LI-RADS in patients at high risk of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This retrospective study's sample population consisted of 137 participants with a total of 140 nodules who underwent CEUS with Sonazoid and pathological confirmation via surgery or biopsy from January 2020 to February 2022. The lesions were evaluated and classified based on the reference standards (ie, ACR CEUS LI-RADS and modified LI-RADS). The overall diagnostic capabilities of the two systems were evaluated in terms of accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The participants had a median age of 51 years and an interquartile range of 43-58 years. Regarding LR-5 as a predictor of HCC, the accuracy results of the ACR LI-RADS and modified LI-RADS algorithms were 72.9 and 71.4%, respectively (P = .50). The sensitivity of both systems was the same (69.7%; 95% CI: 60.7-77.8%). Regarding LR-M as a predictor of non-HCC malignancy, the diagnostic performance of the algorithms was the same, with accuracy and sensitivity results of 76.4 and 73.3%, respectively (95% CI: 44.9-92.2%). The findings indicate that modified LI-RADS had a moderate level of diagnostic performance for HCC in examinations using Sonazoid, which was comparable to ACR LI-RADS.

Response to Letter to the Editor Regarding the Article "Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System in Diagnosing Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Diagnostic Performance and Interobserver Agreement" by Zhou and Collaborators.

Thanks Stefanini and your colleagues for positive comments on our recent study of applying CEUS LI-RADS in eastern countries with emphasis on diagnostic performance and interobserver agreement [1]. We agree that the specificity of CEUS LR-5 is high enough (range:92.7–100.0 % in cirrhotic patients in our study) to rule out non-hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC) lesions. And we also agree that inconsistency of interpreting objective CEUS features, especially ancillary features, significantly hinder the general application of CEUS LI-RADS in targeted high-risk population. Even after years of CEUS LI-RADS learning and training, ancillary features are still deemed as failure to make additional value in final decision. Therefore, we fully approve removing current ancillary features (mosaic and nodule-in-nodule pattern) from CEUS LI-RADS workup as Stefanini demonstrated.

Letter to the Editor Regarding the Article "Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System in Diagnosing Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Diagnostic Performance and Interobserver Agreement" by Zhou and Collaborators.

N/A.

Combining serum AFP and CEUS LI-RADS for better diagnostic performance in Chinese high-risk patients.

To evaluate and compare the diagnostic performance of revised contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System version by combining LR-M category and serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) under different cut-off values. This retrospective study enrolled 152 high-risk patients with 152 histology-proven nodules. For revised LI-RADS, nodules in LR-M with different elevated AFP thresholds have been reclassified as the LR-5 category. The diagnostic performances of original and revised CEUS LI-RADS were evaluated and compared. To compare with the original version, the sensitivity of revised LR-5 (adjusted with AFP value > 200ng/ml or 400ng/ml) for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) improved from 52.5 to 69.2% or 65.0%, respectively (both p < 0.001) without compromising specificity (87.5% vs. 71.9% or 78.1%, respectively, both p > 0.05). For the diagnosis of non-HCC malignancy, the specificity of the LR-M after reclassification was improved (69.6% vs. 84.4% or 80.7%, respectively, both p < 0.001) with a non-significant sensitivity reduction (100.0 vs. 70.6% or 82.4%, respectively, both p > 0.05). After modification, the sensitivity of LR-5 also increased to 69.1% or 64.9% (both p < 0.001), while the specificity and PPV did not change (both p > 0.05) for larger nodules (> 20mm). The diagnostic performance of CEUS LI-RADS can be further improved by reclassifying LR-M nodules with elevated AFP thresholds to LR-5.

CEUS LI-RADS for diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in individuals without LI-RADS-defined hepatocellular carcinoma risk factors

PurposeThis study evaluated the performance of the contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) in patients without LI-RADS-defined hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) risk factors (RF−).MethodsPatients with LI-RADS-defined HCC risk factors (RF+) and RF− were enrolled in a retrospective study. Additionally, a prospective evaluation in the same centre was performed as a validation set. The diagnostic performances of the CEUS LI-RADS criteria in RF+ and RF− patients were compared.ResultsOverall, we included 873 patients in the analyses. In the retrospective study, the LI-RADS category (LR)-5 specificities for diagnosing HCC did not differ between the RF+ and RF− groups (77.5% [158/204] vs 91.6% [196/214], P = 0.369, respectively). However, the positive predictive value (PPV) of CEUS LR-5 was 95.9% (162/169) and 89.8% (158/176) in the RF+ and RF− groups, respectively (P = 0.029). In the prospective study, the PPV of LR-5 for HCC lesions was significantly higher in the RF+ group than in the RF− group (P = 0.030). The sensitivity and specificity did not differ between the RF+ and RF− groups (P = 0.845 and P = 0.577, respectively).ConclusionsThe CEUS LR-5 criteria shows clinical value for diagnosis of HCC in patients with and without risks.

Performance of Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System LR-5 in the Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma:A Meta-analysis

Objective To evaluate the performance of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS) LR-5 in the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Methods The clinical research reports with the application of CEUS LI-RADS in the diagnosis of HCC were collected from PubMed,Embase,Cochrane Library,CNKI,and Wanfang Data from inception to November 14,2021.Two researchers respectively screened the literature and extracted relevant information.The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS) was used to evaluate the quality of all the included articles.RevMan 5.4,Meta disc 1.4,and Stata 16.0 were employed to analyze the diagnostic performance of LR-5 for HCC in high-risk patients. Results Twenty original studies were included,involving a total of 6131 lesions,of which 5142 were HCC.The results of meta-analysis showed that the LR-5 in CEUS LI-RADS for diagnosing HCC in the high-risk population had the overall sensitivity of 0.72 (95%CI=0.66-0.77),the overall specificity of 0.93 (95%CI=0.87-0.96),the overall positive likelihood ratio of 9.89 (95%CI=5.31-18.41),the overall negative likelihood ratio of 0.30 (95%CI=0.25-0.37),and the area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.88 (95%CI=0.85-0.91).There was heterogeneity among the included studies (I2=95.31,P<0.001).The funnel plot indicated the existence of publication bias (P=0.04). Conclusion The CEUS LI-RADS can effectively diagnose HCC in high-risk patients based on the LR-5 criteria.

Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System in Hepatocellular Carcinoma ≤5 cm: Biological Characteristics and Patient Outcomes

Introduction: The present study aimed to evaluate the influence of biological characteristics of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) on the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) v2017 category of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in patients with high risk and compare the outcomes among different categories after radical resection. Methods: Between June 2017 and December 2020, standardized CEUS data of liver nodules were prospectively collected from multiple centers across China. We conducted a retrospective analysis of the prospectively collected data on HCCs measuring no more than 5 cm, as diagnosed by pathology. LI-RADS categories were assigned after thorough evaluation of CEUS features. Then, CEUS LI-RADS categories and major features were compared in different differentiation, Ki-67, and microvascular invasion (MVI) statuses. Differences in recurrence-free survival (RFS) among different LI-RADS categories were further analyzed. Results: A total of 293 HCC nodules in 293 patients were included. This study revealed significant differences in the CEUS LI-RADS category of HCCs among differentiation (p < 0.001) and levels of Ki-67 (p = 0.01) and that poor differentiation (32.7% in LR-M, 12% in LR-5, and 6.2% in LR-4) (p < 0.001) and high level of Ki-67 (median value 30%) were more frequently classified into the LR-M category, whereas well differentiation (37.5% in LR-4, 15.1% in LR-5, and 11.5% in LR-M) and low levels of Ki-67 (median value 11%) were more frequently classified into the LR-4 category. No significant differences were found between MVI and CEUS LI-RADS categories (p > 0.05). With a median follow-up of 23 months, HCCs assigned to different CEUS LI-RADS classes showed no significant differences in RFS after resection. Conclusions: Biological characteristics of HCC, including differentiation and level of Ki-67 expression, could influence major features of CEUS and impact the CEUS LI-RADS category. HCCs in different CEUS LI-RADS categories showed no significant differences in RFS after resection.

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System: Lights and shadows in hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiocellular carcinoma diagnosis.

BACKGROUNDContrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is considered a secondary examination compared to computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), due to the risk of misdiagnosing intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). The introduction of CEUS Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (CEUS LI-RADS) might overcome this limitation. Even though data from the literature seems promising, its reliability in real-life context has not been well-established yet.AIMTo test the accuracy of CEUS LI-RADS for correctly diagnosing HCC and ICC in cirrhosis.METHODSCEUS LI-RADS class was retrospectively assigned to 511 nodules identified in 269 patients suffering from liver cirrhosis. The diagnostic standard for all nodules was either biopsy (102 nodules) or CT/MRI (409 nodules). Common diagnostic accuracy indexes such as sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were assessed for the following associations: CEUS LR-5 and HCC; CEUS LR-4 and 5 merged class and HCC; CEUS LR-M and ICC; and CEUS LR-3 and malignancy. The frequency of malignant lesions in CEUS LR-3 subgroups with different CEUS patterns was also determined. Inter-rater agreement for CEUS LI-RADS class assignment and for major CEUS pattern identification was evaluated.RESULTSCEUS LR-5 predicted HCC with a 67.6% sensitivity, 97.7% specificity, and 99.3% PPV (P < 0.001). The merging of LR-4 and 5 offered an improved 93.9% sensitivity in HCC diagnosis with a 94.3% specificity and 98.8% PPV (P < 0.001). CEUS LR-M predicted ICC with a 91.3% sensitivity, 96.7% specificity, and 99.6% NPV (P < 0.001). CEUS LR-3 predominantly included benign lesions (only 28.8% of malignancies). In this class, the hypo-hypo pattern showed a much higher rate of malignant lesions (73.3%) than the iso-iso pattern (2.6%). Inter-rater agreement between internal raters for CEUS-LR class assignment was almost perfect (n = 511, k = 0.94, P < 0.001), while the agreement among raters from separate centres was substantial (n = 50, k = 0.67, P < 0.001). Agreement was stronger for arterial phase hyperenhancement (internal k = 0.86, P < 2.7 × 10-214; external k = 0.8, P < 0.001) than washout (internal k = 0.79, P < 1.6 × 10-202; external k = 0.71, P < 0.001).CONCLUSIONCEUS LI-RADS is effective but can be improved by merging LR-4 and 5 to diagnose HCC and by splitting LR-3 into two subgroups to differentiate iso-iso nodules from other patterns.

Diagnostic value of CEUS LI-RADS and serum tumor markers for combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma

PurposeTo analyze the contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) manifestations of combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (CHC) and to investigate the diagnostic value of the 2017 version of the CEUS Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) and serum tumor markers in CHC. MethodsA total of 66 pathologically confirmed CHC nodules were retrospectively analyzed. We summarized the CEUS manifestations of CHC and analyzed the relationship between serum tumor markers and the enhancement pattern of CHC. We also classified CHC according to CEUS LI-RADS criteria. The Kappa test was used to assess the interreader agreement of CEUS LI-RADS between radiologists. ResultAccording to the results, 52 of 62 (83.9%) patients had elevated alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), 19 of 61 (31.1%) had elevated carbohydrate antigen 199 (CA 199), and 13 of 61 (21.3%) had both elevated AFP and CA 199. Of the 66 CHC nodules, 64 (97.0%) were identified as malignant lesions by CEUS, 13 (19.7%) showed a hepatocellular carcinoma-like enhancement pattern, and 21 (31.8%) showed a cholangiocarcinoma-like enhancement pattern. For the CEUS LI-RADS categories, 39 of 53 (73.6%) CHC nodules were classified as LR-M, 12 (22.6%) were classified as LR-5, and 2 (3.8%) were classified as LR-4. The interreader agreement for the LI-RADS categories was 0.60. ConclusionsAlthough CHC lacks specific CEUS features, CEUS LI-RADS and serum tumor markers can be useful tools for reducing the misdiagnosis of CHC. In addition, due to the relative complexity of the CEUS features involved in CHC, it is necessary for beginning radiologists to learn more about CEUS features.