Continuous Thermodilution Cardiac Output Measurement Research Articles

Lithium dilution, pulse power analysis, and continuous thermodilution cardiac output measurements compared with bolus thermodilution in anaesthetized ponies

This study compares cardiac output (CO) measurements obtained by lithium dilution (LiDCO), pulse power analysis (PulseCO), and continuous thermodilution (CTD) with bolus thermodilution (BTD) in ponies. Eight isoflurane-anaesthetized Shetland ponies received xylazine, ketamine, and midazolam infusions (0.3, 1.2, and 0.018 mg kg(-1) h(-1), respectively). CO was measured with BTD, CTD, LiDCO, and PulseCO. Lithium was injected into the jugular vein and blood was sampled from the facial artery for lithium detection and this artery was also used for PulseCO. Measurements were obtained during four stable haemodynamic conditions in the following order: isoflurane 1% (end-tidal concentration), isoflurane 2%, isoflurane 1%, and isoflurane 1%+dobutamine 5 µg kg(-1) min(-1). The bias (2 sd) was 2.5 (2.1) and 0.5 (2.9) litre min(-1) for LiDCO-BTD and for CTD-BTD comparisons, respectively. The limits of agreement were wider than ±30%; therefore, interchangeability was rejected for both comparisons. A possible error in LiDCO might explain the bias observed because CTD-BTD comparison showed less bias. Changes in PulseCO did not correlate with those of BTD and a weak correlation (r(2)=0.23; P=0.018) and concordance (Pc=0.42) was found between CTD and BTD. This is the first study to show a large bias for LiDCO-BTD comparison in animals receiving xylazine, ketamine, and midazolam infusions. The trending abilities of neither PulseCO nor CTD were reliable. Further studies are needed to elucidate possible influences of drugs on the accuracy of the LiDCOplus system.

Comparison of Uncalibrated Arterial Pressure Waveform Analysis with Continuous Thermodilution Cardiac Output Measurements in Patients Undergoing Elective Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery

Comparison of Uncalibrated Arterial Pressure Waveform Analysis with Continuous Thermodilution Cardiac Output Measurements in Patients Undergoing Elective Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery

Comparison of Uncalibrated Arterial Pressure Waveform Analysis with Continuous Thermodilution Cardiac Output Measurements in Patients Undergoing Elective Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery

Monitoring of cardiac output is required during anesthesia for off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) surgery. Recently, FloTrac, a new device for arterial pressure waveform analysis for cardiac output (APCO) monitoring without external calibration, was developed. The authors have compared APCO with STAT-mode continuous cardiac output (SCCO) in patients undergoing OPCAB surgery. A clinical study. A university hospital (single institution). Thirty consecutive patients undergoing elective OPCAB surgery. Arterial pressure measurement with FloTrac, pulmonary arterial catheter insertion. APCO and SCCO measurements were recorded after pulmonary artery catheter insertion (T1), after sternotomy (T2), after heart positioning for left anterior descending artery anastomosis (T3, T4), after heart positioning for obtuse marginal artery anastomosis (T5, T6), after heart positioning for posterior descending artery anastomosis (T7, T8), and after sternal closure (T9). APCO and SCCO were compared using the Bland-Altman method and the percentage error by Critchley's criteria. SCCO and APCO ranged from 2.1 to 6.9 L/min and 1.2 to 7.4 L/min, respectively, and showed low correlation (r = 0.29). The overall bias by the Bland-Altman method between SCCO and APCO was -0.23 L/min, with a precision of -1.4 to 0.9 L/min, and the overall limits of agreement were -2.5 to 2.0 L/min. The overall mean CO was 4.0 ± 0.95 L/min. The overall percentage error between SCCO and APCO measurements was 57%. Uncalibrated APCO values do not agree with thermodilution SCCO and significantly overestimated the SCCO in patients undergoing OPCAB surgery. Further evaluation is required to verify the clinical acceptance of FloTrac APCO in OPCAB surgery.

Cardiac arrhythmias related to continuous thermodilution cardiac output measurement in an anaesthetized sheep

A case of cardiac arrhythmias related to continuous thermodilution cardiac output (CCO) is reported. A sheep anaesthetized for experimental purpose was instrumented with a special Swan-Ganz catheter-type to be used for CCO measurements. One hour after starting the CCO monitoring, isolated ventricular extrasystoles were noticed on the electrocardiogram with an increasing frequency. Subsequently bursts of extrasystoles occurred. Atrioventricular dissociation was also observed. The peaks of temperature of the thermal filament were within the normal range and their presence was noticed when arrhythmias appeared. Mean blood pressure and cardiac output did not change during this episode. When the CCO was switched off, no more arrhythmias were observed. The CCO Swan-Ganz by itself did not generate any arrhythmia. The sheep recovered uneventfully. When arrhythmias occur during anaesthesia where CCO is used, a thermal filament induced origin of the arrhythmia must be considered.

Analysis of the accuracy of continuous thermodilution cardiac output measurement

To evaluate the accuracy of cardiac output measurement obtained by a new continuous thermodilution cardiac output (CCO) pulmonary artery catheter compared to intermittent thermodilution (TCO) and the direct Fick method. Prospective open trial. University hospital, intensive care unit. 23 patients (15 surgical, 8 non-surgical) were monitored with the Intellicath pulmonary catheter. Cardiac output was evaluated by the three methods every 4 to 6 h as long as the pulmonary artery catheter was necessary (8–96h). The correlation coefficient between CCO and TCO was 0.92, no systematic bias was observed, and the relative error increased from 13.9% for a cardiac output of 1 l/min to 23.7% for an output of 10 l/min. When comparing CCO and Fick, the correlation coefficient was 0.89, no bias was detected, and the relative error increased from 20.4% for outputs of 2 l/min to 27.2% for outputs of 10 l/min. CCO provides clinically acceptable measurements. At high cardiac outputs, the difference with other methods increases and the results must be cautiously interpreted.

Continuous versus intermittent cardiac output measurement in cardiac surgical patients undergoing hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass

Continuous thermodilution cardiac output (CCO) measurement was clinically evaluated in patients who underwent coronary revascularization using hypothermic low-flow, low-pressure cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Prospective study. University hospital setting. 30 cardiac surgical patients. CCO was correlated to standard bolus thermodilution cardiac output (ICO) obtained at end-expiration. Measurements were taken at selected time points (n = 18) before anesthesia induction, before CPB, and 5 minutes to 12 hours after CPB. A total of 540 data pairs were thus obtained. ICO ranged from 1.9 to 9.9 L/min, CCO from 1.5 to 9.9 L/min. Correlation between ICO and CCO was highly significant (r = 0.872; p < 0.01), accompanied by an excellent accuracy (bias -0.0213 L) and precision (0.59 L) before CPB and more than 45 minutes after CPB. However, during the first 45 minutes after CPB, there was no correlation (r = 0.273) between ICO and CCO, and ICO tended to be relatively high, whereas CCO measurements showed relatively low values. During the first 45 minutes after hypothermic CPB, but not during the ensuing time period, central blood temperature decreased, which may be interpreted as a lack of thermal equilibration between central and peripheral compartments. It is hypothesized that thermal instability in combination with increased respiratory variations in pulmonary artery blood temperature caused inhomogenous rewarming of different body sites and might be the main reason for the lack of correlation between ICO and CCO. Despite an excellent correlation, accuracy, and precision between CCO and ICO before CPB and more than 45 minutes after hypothermic CPB, a lack of correlation in the early phase after CPB has been found. Further investigation is needed to elucidate the underlying cause of these findings and to clarify whether ICO or CCO or both fail to represent the real cardiac output up to 45 minutes after weaning from hypothermic CPB.

Continuous thermodilution cardiac output measurement in sheep

A technique has been developed to continuously measure cardiac output by means of the principles of thermodilution. Pulmonary artery catheters were modified by placing a 10 cm filament near the usual injectate port. Small amounts of heat were infused according to a randomly repeating binary on-off sequence. The distal blood temperature was recorded and cross-correlated with the heat waveform to produce a dilution curve and calculate cardiac output. The technique was compared with bolus thermodilution in seven sheep. Cardiac output ranged from 1.5 to 13.2 L/min, and heart rate varied from 59 to 180 beats/min. The linear regression between the data obtained by the two methods is represented by the equation y = 1.00x + 0.13; the correlation coefficient, R, is 0.97, and the p value is less than 0.0001.

Continuous thermodilution cardiac output measurement in intensive care unit patients

A new continuous thermodilution cardiac output measurement technique and companion flow-directed pulmonary artery catheter were evaluated in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Continuous cardiac output was monitored for 6 hours in each patient, and, at selected intervals, a series of bolus thermodilution cardiac output determinations was made and averaged for comparison. A total of 222 data pairs was obtained in 54 patients. The cardiac outputs ranged from 2.8 to 10.8 L/min. The linear regression is represented by the following equation: continuous thermodilution = 0.99 bolus thermodilution + 0.02. The correlation coefficient r was 0.94, the S yx was 0.54. The mean relative error was 0.3%, and the standard deviation of the relative error was 11.5%. The absolute measurement bias was 0.02 L, and the 95% confidence limits were 1.07 and −1.03 L. The results demonstrated that the new continuous thermodilution cardiac output measurement technique provided acceptable accuracy and was considerably easier to use in the clinical situations studied in the ICU.