Dry matter intakes (DMI) and methane (CH4) emissions from steers grazing alfalfa/(Medicago sativa L)/meadow bromegrass (Bromus biebersteinii Roem & Schult.)/Russian wild ryegrass [Psathyrostachys juncea (Fisch.) Nevski] at 1.1 and 2.2 steers ha-1 in continuous and rotational grazing systems at Brandon, Manitoba, during the 1994 grazing season were predicted using the GrassGro decision support tool and compared with those reported from a field experiment. Observed DMI (13.82 ± 0.39 kg d-1) did not differ significantly (P = 0.052) from predicted DMI (12.10 ± 0.19 kg d-1). Mean predicted CH4 (278.5 ± 2.2 g d-1) was greater (P < 0.002) than field observations (195.8 ± 9.7 g d-1). This difference may reflect the difficulty of ensuring total collection of all CH4 emitted in a field experiment. GrassGro predicted that feeding a barley supplement to the steers while at pasture would cause a small though significant increase (P < 0.001) in mean daily emissions of CH4 (287.8 ± 1.9 g d-1) compared with unsupplemented steers (274.1 ± 2.9 g d-1). However, when CH4 emissions were compared as g kg-1 liveweight gain (LWG), they were less (P < 0.0001) for supplemented (133.2 ± 6.4 g kg-1 LWG) than unsupplemented steers (199.1 ± 5.9 g kg-1 LWG). In addition, supplementing barley at pasture would reduce (P < 0.0001) the total emissions of CH4 (38.7 ± 2.1 kg) compared with backgrounding at pasture and finishing in a feedlot (54.4 ± 1.1 kg). This would also reduce (P < 0.001) the metabolizable energy intake (MEI) required for liveweight gain (68.3 ± 1.94 vs. 87.2 ± 1.20 MJ MEI kg-1 liveweight gain). We conclude that finishing cattle at pasture will reduce the total emissions of CH4 and increase the efficiency of conversion of feed energy to liveweight gain when compared with backgrounding at pasture and finishing in a feedlot. Key words: Methane, steers, grass, alfalfa, pasture, barley, feedlot, metabolizable energy intake
Read full abstract