Continued Statin Use Research Articles

Persistence to statin treatment: A cohort study in Lithuania.

Cardiovascular diseases are the main causes of death, and statins can reduce the risk of major vascular events. Lithuania is among the European countries with the highest cardiovascular mortality despite a rapidly increasing use of statins. Previous reviews have shown the problem of poor patient adherence, but there are limited studies from Eastern European countries. The aim of this study was to evaluate treatment persistence in new users of statins in Lithuania and to investigate factors associated with persistence. Dispensed prescriptions from patients aged >18 years old initiated on statins in 2018-2019 were included, and data were obtained from a national health insurance fund. Persistence was assessed by the proportion of patients who still had statins dispensed 1year after the first dispensing. Factors associated with persistence were assessed using logistic regression. A total of 104 726 patients (41.3% men) were initiated on statin treatment. Only 41% of them continued statin use 1year after initiation. Factors associated with higher persistence rate were older age, higher dose of statin, use of other medicines and use of statins as secondary prevention. Low persistence to statin therapy needs to be recognized by healthcare workers, pharmacists and policy makers to address this problem.

Do statins decrease testosterone in men? Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Statins are one of the most prescribed classes of drugs worldwide to treat hypercholesterolemia and dyslipidemia. By lowering the level of cholesterol, the use of statin could cause a reduction in testosterone levels. The objective was to evaluate whether the continued use of statins in patients with hypercholesterolemia causes a deficiency in testosterone and other sex hormones. Systematic Review with Meta-analysis, performed in Embase, Medline and Cochrane databases, until May 2023; PROSPERO CRD42021270424protocol. Selection performed by two independent authors with subsequent conference in stages. Methodology based on PRISMA statement. There were selected comparative studies, prospective cohorts (CP), randomized clinical trials (RCT) and cross-sectional studies (CSS) with comparison of testosterone levels before and after statin administration and between groups. Bias analysis were evaluated with Cochrane Tool, The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS), and using the Assess the Quality of Cross-sectional studies (AXIS) tool. There were found on MedLine, Embase and Cochrane, after selected comparative studies, 10CP and 6RCT and 6CSS for the meta-analysis. In the Forrest plot with 6CSS, a correlation between patients with continuous use of statins and a reduction in total testosterone was evidenced with a statistically significant reduction of 55.02ng/dL (95%CI=[39.40,70.64],I²=91%,p<0.00001).In the analysis with 5RCT, a reduction in the mean total testosterone in patients who started continuous statin use was evidenced, with a statistical significance of 13.12ng/dL (95%CI=[1.16,25.08],I²=0%,p=0.03). Furthermore, the analysis of all prospective studies with 15 articles showed a statistically significant reduction in the mean total testosterone of 9.11 ng/dL (95%CI=[0.16,18.06],I²=37%,p=0.04). A reduction in total testosterone has been shown in most studies and in its accumulated analysis after statin use. However, this decrease was not enough to reach levels below normal. Statins use causes a decrease in total testosterone, not enough to cause a drop below the normal range and also determines increase in FSH levels. No differences were found in LH, Estradiol, SHBG and Free Testosterone analysis.

The impact of pre-ictal statin use on vasospasm and outcome in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage

BackgroundPleiotropic effects of statins may be beneficial in alleviating cerebral vasospasm (VS) and improving outcome after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). Initiation of statin treatment at aSAH is not recommended; however, the effect of pre-ictal and continued statin use is not fully investigated.MethodsRetrospective study comparing aSAH patients admitted in 2012 to 2021 with pre-ictal statin use versus those not using statins. Patient entry variables, radiological/sonological VS, symptomatic VS, and radiologically documented delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) were registered. Outcome was scored in terms of mortality, modified Rankin score, Glasgow outcome score extended, and levels of fatigue. Patients were compared on group level and in a case–control design.ResultsWe included 961 patients, with 204 (21.2%) statin users. Statin users were older and had more often hypertension. Severe radiological/sonological VS, symptomatic VS, and DCI were less frequent in statin users, and their length of stay was shorter. Mortality, functional outcome, and levels of fatigue were similar in both groups. When analyzing 89 pairs of statin users and non-statin users matched for age, aSAH severity, gender, and hypertension, we confirmed decreased radiological/sonological and symptomatic VS as well as shorter length of stay in statin users. They also had more often a favorable functional outcome and lower levels of fatigue.ConclusionsPatients with pre-ictal and continued use of statins have a reduced occurrence of radiological/sonological and symptomatic VS, shorter length of stay, and more often favorable functional outcome, whereas mortality is similar to non-statin users. Even though larger multicenter studies with common, strict protocols for prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of vasospasm are needed to finally establish the value of statins in aSAH, continuation of pre-ictal statin use seems worthwhile.

Effect of statin therapy patterns on readmission and mortality in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage.

There is limited and inconsistent evidence for the association of statin therapy and statin treatment patterns with the risk of recurrent intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) in patients with prior ICH. To assess the association of statin therapy and its intensity, type, initiation time, and discontinuation with the risk of recurrent ICH and mortality in Chinese patients with ICH. Patients with newly diagnosed ICH in the Beijing Employee Medical Claims Data database from 2010 to 2017 were included. Post-ICH statin users (post-diagnosis only) and nonusers (never), statin discontinuers (pre-diagnosis only) and continuers (pre- and post-diagnosis) were matched on a 1:1 propensity score, respectively. Adjusted Cox proportional risk models were used to estimate the risk ratios for ICH readmission and mortality under various statin patterns. A total of 2668 post-ICH statin users and 2668 nonusers without a history of statin use were enrolled. Post-ICH statin users had a lower risk of ICH readmission (HR, 0.57; 95% CI 0.48, 0.69) and all-cause death (0.56: 0.49, 0.63) than nonusers. Low/moderate-intensity treatment was associated with a 63% lower risk of recurrent ICH compared with nonusers (0.37: 0.29, 0.46), whereas high-intensity treatment did not reduce the risk (0.93: 0.74, 1.16). Both low/moderate-intensity (0.42: 0.36, 0.48) and high-intensity statins (0.57: 0.48, 0.69) were associated with a lower risk of all-cause mortality. The risk of ICH readmission was 53% (0.47: 0.30, 0.74) lower with adherence to rosuvastatin than with atorvastatin. Only starting medication within 30days of the first diagnosis of ICH reduced the risk of ICH readmission (0.49: 0.40, 0.60). Among patients with a history of statin use, 1807 discontinuing and 1,807 continuing users of statins were included. The risk of ICH readmission (4.00: 3.32, 4.80) and the risk of all-cause death (4.01: 3.57, 4.50) were substantially increased in statin discontinuation compared with continued statin use. Statin therapy after ICH was associated with lower risks for ICH readmission and all-cause mortality compared with non-statin therapy, especially at low/moderate intensity and early initiation of statins after ICH. Adherence to rosuvastatin was associated with a lower risk of recurrence of ICH than atorvastatin. Among patients with a statin history prior to ICH, discontinuation of statins after ICH was associated with increased risk of ICH recurrence and death.

Modeling of an alternative reimbursement method for palliative care.

Patient and Caregiver Support for Serious Illness (PACSSI), a per-member per-month (PMPM) alternative reimbursement structure for palliative care (PC) services, has been described as overly generous by HHS. We developed a modified version, PACSSI-Flexible (PACSSI-F), by modeling reimbursement for PC based on the changes in patient functional status. We estimated reimbursement for the first year that an organization might implement the PACSSI-F for PC services. Secondary analysis using data from the Statin Discontinuation in Advanced Illness Trial. We evaluated the PACSSI vs the PACSSI-F in 3 phases. In the first phase, we calculated variable-appropriate frequencies/relative frequencies or means/SDs for the study population's available demographics and comorbidities, focusing on age, Charlson Comorbidity Index score, race and ethnicity, gender, and continued statin use. Exploratory analyses specific to reimbursement were conducted in a second phase. For each payment structure, we calculated the (1) mean (SD) total reimbursement and (2) number of weeks that a health care system would receive reimbursement, with both weekly and PMPM (4-week) averages. The third phase was designed to quantify any within-person (paired) differences in reimbursement between the original PACSSI and the PACSSI-F. PACSSI-F provides reimbursement for sustainable PC services and was cost-advantageous over PACSSI by $69.92 PMPM for 28.6% of the seriously ill population. Modeling of the PACSSI-F using secondary data provides a novel example of economic forecasting for alternative reimbursement structures in PC. Alternative reimbursement payment policies are necessary to expand PC for the seriously ill population.

Do statins cause testosterone deficiency in men? Systematic review and meta analysis

ABSTRACT Introduction Statins are one of the most prescribed classes of drugs worldwide to treat hypercholesterolemia and dyslipidemia. By lowering the level of cholesterol, the precursor of the steroidogenesis pathway, the use of statin could cause a reduction in testosterone levels. Testosterone is essential in biological functions and its reduction can cause negative effects, such as symptoms of hypogonadism. Objective Evaluate whether the continued use of statins causes testosterone deficiency in men. Methods Systematic Review with Meta-analysis, performed in Embase, Medline and Cochrane databases, until April 2021; protocol was submitted to PROSPERO. Selection performed by two independent authors with subsequent conference in stages. There were selected comparative studies, prospective cohorts or clinical trials with comparison of testosterone levels before and after the use of statin. Bias analysis were evaluated with Cochrane Tool. Results Threre found 717 papers on MedLine, 1352 on Embase and 143 on Cochrane. After removal of duplicates, 833 articles remained. Comparative studies, 10 prospective cohorts and 6 randomized clinical trials were selected for meta-analysis. In the forrest plot with the 16 articles, a reduction in the mean testosterone in patients after the use of statins of 13.61 (95% CI=3.99-23.23, I²=41%, p=0.006) was evidenced, demonstrating statistical significance. In the sub-analysis with the Clinical Trials, a reduction in the mean testosterone levels in patients after the use of statins of 27.45 (95% CI=13.85-41.06, I²=14%, p&amp;lt;0.0001) was evidenced, demonstrating statistical significance. On the other hand, in the sub-analysis of the Prospective Cohorts, an increase in the mean testosterone in patients after the use of statins of 0.25 was evidenced, without statistical significance, of 0.25 (95% CI=-13.87-13.36 I²=38%, p=0.97). A reduction in total testosterone was evaluated in all studies after statin use. However, with the exception of Kannat 2009, all studies showed testosterone levels above the normal level (normal up to 300). In the Kannat study, testosterone levels below this value were already presented before the use of the statin. Conclusion Statins cause a decrease in total testosterone, not enough to cause a significant deficiency. Disclosure Work supported by industry: no.

Post-Diagnostic Statin Use Reduces Mortality in South Korean Patients with Dyslipidemia and Gastrointestinal Cancer.

Background: Statins play a role in lowering serum cholesterol and are known to have pleiotropic effects in a variety of diseases, including cancer. Despite the beneficial effects of statins in dyslipidemia patients, the treatment rate for dyslipidemia in Korea remains low, and evidence supporting the continued use of statins is lacking. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of continued statin use and dosage on patient mortality after diagnosis of dyslipidemia and gastrointestinal (GI) cancer. Methods: We used data from the National Health Insurance Sampling (NHIS) cohort to evaluate patients diagnosed with dyslipidemia from 2002 to 2015. A total of 901 GI cancer patients with dyslipidemia and 62,727 non-cancer dyslipidemia patients were included in the study. During the study period, each patient’s medication possession ratio (MPR) after diagnosis was evaluated as a measure of continued statin use. Statin dosage was measured based on a defined daily dose (DDD). Finally, we used Cox-proportional hazard ratios to identify associations between the continual use of statins and mortality in patients with dyslipidemia and GI cancer. Results: In our study, mortality decreased with increasing MPR and reached significance in MPRs exceeding 50% for GI cancer patients and 75% for dyslipidemia patients compared to patients that did not use statins. Moreover, patients with high MPRs had significantly reduced 5-year mortality compared to non-users, and cause-specific mortality analyses revealed that high MPR was associated with decreased colorectal cancer death. We did not find a significant dose–response relationship between statins and mortality. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that continued statin use after diagnosis is associated with reduced patient mortality. Altogether, these results support the continued use of statins in dyslipidemia patients with and without GI cancer and highlight the importance of patient education by healthcare providers.

Do cholesterol levels and continuity of statin use affect colorectal cancer incidence in older adults under 75 years of age?

IntroductionColorectal cancer(CRC) is 3rd most common cancer and has a relatively high mortality rate. Currently, the relationships between CRC and serum cholesterol or statin treatment, especially in older adults under 75 years of age, remain questionable due to a lack of data. The present study evaluated the association between serum cholesterol levels and statin treatment continuity and CRC risk in older adults under 75 years of age.MethodsThis study used senior cohort data obtained from the National Health Insurance Service of South Korea. The selected cohort contains 131,266 participants who were enrolled from 2009 to 2011 and followed for up to 5 years. Serum cholesterol levels were classified as categorical variables, and continuity of statin treatment was evaluated based on dyslipidemia diagnosis and average medication possession ratio. We used Cox regression analysis to evaluate the associations between CRC risk and serum cholesterol level or statin use.ResultsA low level of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol(HDL-C) was significantly associated with high CRC risk compared to an HDL-C level in the normal range(hazard ratio [HR]: 1.197, 95% CI: 1.040–1.377). A high level of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol(LDL-C) was associated with increased CRC risk compared to a normal LDL-C level, but not statistically significant. Statin use was associated with decreased CRC risk, and high medication compliance was inversely associated with CRC risk in patients with and without dyslipidemia.ConclusionsStatin use was associated with decreased CRC risk, and high medication compliance was inversely associated with CRC risk in patients with and without dyslipidemia compared to non-use of medication. Regular health examinations can help identify individuals who are vulnerable to CRC, and continued statin use may be associated with a reduced risk of CRC. This is particularly important in patients with diabetes and dyslipidemia.

Statin Use Is Associated with Decreased Risk of Invasive Mechanical Ventilation in COVID-19 Patients: A Preliminary Study

COVID-19 disproportionately affects patients with medical comorbidities such as cardiovascular disease (CVD). Patients with CVD are widely prescribed 3-hydroxy-3-methyl-glutayl-CoA (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors (statins), a class of lipid-lowering medications known for their pleiotropic anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory effects. However, the relationship between statin use and COVID-19 outcomes is not fully understood. In this preliminary study, we explored the association between statin use and severe COVID-19 outcomes in hospitalized patients, including intensive care unit (ICU) admission, the need for invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV), and in-hospital death. We performed a retrospective cohort study of 249 patients hospitalized with COVID-19 from 3 March 2020 to 10 April 2020 in Rhode Island, USA. Patient demographics, past medical history, current medications, and hospital course were recorded and analyzed. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted to examine associations. After adjusting for age, sex, race, cardiovascular disease, chronic pulmonary disease, diabetes, and obesity, statin use was significantly associated with decreased risk for IMV (adjusted Odds Ratio (aOR) = 0.45, 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 0.20–0.99). Our results support the continued use of statins among COVID-19 patients and could have implications for future prospective studies on the management of COVID-19.

Effect of atorvastatin on muscle symptoms in coronary heart disease patients with self-perceived statin muscle side effects: a randomized, double-blinded crossover trial.

AimsTo estimate the effect of atorvastatin on muscle symptom intensity in coronary heart disease (CHD) patients with self-perceived statin-associated muscle symptoms (SAMS) and to determine the relationship to blood levels of atorvastatin and/or metabolites.Methods and resultsA randomized multi-centre trial consecutively identified 982 patients with previous or ongoing atorvastatin treatment after a CHD event. Of these, 97 (9.9%) reported SAMS and 77 were randomized to 7-week double-blinded treatment with atorvastatin 40 mg/day and placebo in a crossover design. The primary outcome was the individual mean difference in muscle symptom intensity between the treatment periods, measured by visual-analogue scale (VAS) scores. Atorvastatin did not affect the intensity of muscle symptoms among 71 patients who completed the trial. Mean VAS difference (statin-placebo) was 0.31 (95% CI: −0.24 to 0.86). The proportion with more muscle symptoms during placebo than atorvastatin was 17% (n = 12), 55% (n = 39) had the same muscle symptom intensity during both treatment periods whereas 28% (n = 20) had more symptoms during atorvastatin than placebo (confirmed SAMS). There were no differences in clinical or pharmacogenetic characteristics between these groups. The levels of atorvastatin and/or metabolites did not correlate to muscle symptom intensity among patients with confirmed SAMS (Spearman’s rho ≤0.40, for all variables).ConclusionRe-challenge with high-intensity atorvastatin did not affect the intensity of muscle symptoms in CHD patients with self-perceived SAMS during previous atorvastatin therapy. There was no relationship between muscle symptoms and the systemic exposure to atorvastatin and/or its metabolites. The findings encourage an informed discussion to elucidate other causes of muscle complaints and continued statin use.

Predictors of ceasing or reducing statin medication following a large increase in the consumer copayment for medications: a retrospective observational study.

Previous Australian research has shown that following the 21% increase in patient copayments for medications on the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) in 2005, the use of lipid-lowering therapy declined by 5%. This study aimed to determine the demographic and clinical characteristics of individuals who continued, reduced or ceased their use of statin medication in 2005. Retrospective observational study using routinely collected administrative data. We used pharmaceutical claims, hospital separations and mortality records from 2000 to 2005 for the Western Australian population. The cohort comprised stable users of statin medication in 2004. Based on changes in statin use between 2004 and 2005, we identified individuals who: 1) continued using statins; 2) reduced their use by ≥20%; or 3) ceased therapy for at least the first 6 months in 2005. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to determine whether the demographic and clinical characteristics of the three groups differed. There were 205 924 statin users identified in Western Australia as of December 2004. After the January 2005 Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) copayment increase, 3.2% of users ceased their regular statin therapy, 12.9% reduced statin use and 83.9% continued statin use. This represented a 2.1% increase in statin users reducing or ceasing therapy compared to 2004. Predictors of cessation and reduction of statin therapy included younger age, greater socio-economic disadvantage, residing in very remote areas, having general beneficiary status, being a new statin user, having no prior history of ischaemic heart disease, having no prior history of a coronary artery revascularisation procedure, taking no other cardiovascular medication or diabetic medication, taking an increased number of medications, and having a lower level of adherence to statin medication in 2004. Compared to 2004, an additional 2.1% of statin users reduced or discontinued medication use in 2005, which may be attributed to an increase in the medication copayment. Individuals with general beneficiary status, and younger and healthier people were at particular risk of cessation or reduction in statin use in 2005.

New drug candidates for bipolar disorder-A nation-wide population-based study.

Drug repurposing is an increasingly promising idea in many fields of medicine. We systematically used Danish nation-wide population-based registers to investigate whether continued use of non-aspirin non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), low-dose aspirin, high-dose aspirin, statins, allopurinol, and angiotensin agents decrease the rate of incident mania/bipolar disorder. A nation-wide population-based longitudinal study using Poisson regression analyses including all persons in Denmark who purchased the exposure medication of interest and a random sample of 30% of the Danish population. The follow-up period comprised a 10years period from 2005 to 2015. Two different outcome measures were included, (1) a diagnosis of mania/bipolar disorder at a psychiatric hospital contact as inpatient or outpatient and (2) a combined measure of a diagnosis of mania/bipolar disorder or initiation of lithium use. A total of 1,605,365 subjects were exposed to one of the six drugs of interest during the exposure period from 2005 to 2015, median age 57years [quartiles: 43;69], and female proportion of 53.1%. Continued use of low-dose aspirin, statins, and angiotensin agents were associated with decreased rates of incident mania/bipolar disorder on both outcome measures. Continued uses of non-aspirin NSAIDs as well as high-dose aspirin were associated with an increased rate of incident bipolar disorder. There were no statistically significant associations for allopurinol. The study supports the potential of agents acting on inflammation and the stress response system in bipolar disorder and illustrates that population-based registers can be used to systematically identify drugs with repurposing potentials.

Statin use among Veterans with dialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease.

The benefits of statin medications in patients receiving maintenance dialysis remains controversial and clinical trials overall have shown no benefit. Potential side effects of statin medications include myalgias, myopathy, and memory loss and risk of side effects associated with statin medications increase with higher statin doses. We examined statin use and statin dose among Veterans with dialysis dependent CKD. Such information may help clinicians modulate medication use and reduce pill burden in appropriate patients. This cross-sectional analysis ascertained medication utilization by linking records from the U.S. Department of Veteran's Affairs (VA) Managerial Cost Accounting Pharmacy National Data Extracts and Medicare Part D during calendar year 2013 for Veterans with dialysis-dependent CKD enrolled in and/or using VA healthcare. The venue of dialysis and patient characteristics were ascertained by linking VA Medical SAS datasets, VA Fee Basis datasets (for non-VA care paid for by VA), Medicare claims and the United States Renal Data Systems patient core files. We identified 18,494 Veterans with dialysis-dependent CKD who were enrolled in and/or used VA healthcare, had no history of kidney transplantation, and were alive on January 1, 2014. More than half (58.1%) of Veterans with dialysis-dependent CKD used statins and 35.7% of statin utilization was high dose. Statins were the third most commonly prescribed medication after beta blockers (64.8%) and phosphate binders (64.5%). Statins are a commonly prescribed medication among Veterans receiving maintenance dialysis and approximately one-third of statin utilization is high dose in this population. Future studies should examine patient preferences, comorbidities, and dialysis characteristics that impact the risks and benefits of statin use in order to identify those patients who will or will not benefit from continued statin use.

Impact of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and statins on viral pneumonia

Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and statins may potentially benefit patients with viral infections and pneumonia. Our study aimed to evaluate the impact of ACE inhibitors and statins on the rates of intubation and death in viral pneumonia. We retrospectively studied 1055 adult patients admitted to a tertiary care center in central Texas with a positive respiratory viral polymerase chain reaction test. Of these, 539 had clinical presentation and imaging consistent with pneumonia. We collected information on demographic characteristics, microbiology, comorbid conditions, medication use, and outcomes. ACE inhibitors given prior to admission were associated with an increased risk of death or intubation (odds ratio [OR] = 3.02; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.30–7.01), whereas statin use prior to admission did not change rates of death or intubation. Lower rates of death and intubation were noted with continued use of ACE inhibitors (OR =0.25; 95% CI, 0.09–0.64) and statins (OR =0.26; 95% CI, 0.08–0.81) throughout the hospital stay. We added further evidence of the beneficial effect of continued use of ACE inhibitors and statins in viral pneumonia.

Optimal duration for continuation of statin therapy in bacteremic patients.

Evidence suggests statins may improve survival in patients with bloodstream infections. However, there is no consensus on optimal timing and duration of exposure. To quantify statin therapy duration associated with decreased mortality in bacteremic statin users. We conducted a case-control study using OptumClinformatics™ with matched Premier hospital data (1 October 2009-31 March 2013). Cases who died during the hospitalization were matched 1:1 to survivors on disease risk scores (DRSs). Post-admission statin therapy duration was evaluated in patients with at least 90 days of pre-admission continuous statin use. Classification and regression tree (CART) analysis was conducted to identify the optimal duration of statin continuation which provided the lowest inpatient mortality. Logistic regression was used to calculate the odds of mortality. We included 58 DRS matched pairs of cases and controls: 47 patients (41%) continued statin therapy during the hospital admission, 15 (32%) cases and 32 (68%) controls. The CART analysis partitioned the continuation of statin therapy at ⩾2 days, representing lower mortality for patients who continued statins for 2 days or more and higher mortality for patients who did not continue or remained on statins for only 1 day. Inpatient mortality was 76% lower among those with at least 2 days of continued statin use (odds ratio 0.24, 95% confidence interval 0.11-0.55). Among matched cases and controls with at least 90 days of baseline statin use prior to the admission, the continuation of statins for at least 2 days after admission demonstrated a survival benefit among bacteremic patients.

Improved survival with continuation of statins in bacteremic patients.

Objectives:Varying statin exposures in bacteremic patients have different impacts on mortality. Among patients with adherent statin use, we sought to evaluate the impact of statin continuation on inpatient mortality in bacteremic patients.Methods:A retrospective cohort study was conducted using Optum ClinformaticsTM with matched Premier Hospital data (October 2009–March 2013). Patients with a primary diagnosis of bacteremia and 6 months of continuous enrollment prior to the admission, receiving antibiotics at least 2 days of antibiotics during the first 3 days of admission, were selected for inclusion. Furthermore, patients demonstrating adherent statin use based on 90 days of continuous therapy prior to admission were included. We then compared those continuing statin therapy for at least the first 5 days after admission and those not continuing during the admission.Results:Simvastatin (53.2%) and atorvastatin (33.8%) were the most commonly used statins among the 633 patients who met our inclusion and exclusion criteria. Propensity score adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression models demonstrated significantly lower inpatient mortality among those continuing statin therapy compared with those not continuing (n = 232 vs 401, adjusted hazard ratio 0.25, 95% confidence interval 0.08–0.79).Conclusion:Among patients adherent to their statin therapy prior to a bacteremia hospitalization, continued statin use after admission increased survival by 75% compared with those not continuing.

Use of Statins and Outcomes in Intracerebral Hemorrhage Patients.

Statin use may be associated with improved outcome in intracerebral hemorrhage patients. However, the topic remains controversial. Our analysis examined the effect of prior, continued, or new statin use on intracerebral hemorrhage outcomes using the ERICH (Ethnic/Racial Variations of Intracerebral Hemorrhage) data set. We analyzed ERICH (a multicenter study designed to examine ethnic variations in the risk, presentation, and outcomes of intracerebral hemorrhage) to explore the association of statin use and hematoma growth, mortality, and 3-month disability. We computed subset analyses with respect to 3 statin categories (prior, continued, or new use). Two thousand four hundred and fifty-seven enrolled cases (mean age, 62 years; 42% females) had complete data on mortality and 3-month disability (modified Rankin Scale). Among those, 1093 cases were on statins (prior, n=268; continued, n=423; new, n=402). Overall, statin use was associated with reduced mortality and disability without any effect on hematoma growth. This association was primarily driven by continued/new statin use. A multivariate analysis adjusted for age and major predictors for poor outcome showed that continued/new statins users had good outcomes compared with prior users. However, statins may have been continued/started more frequently among less severe patients. When a propensity score was developed based on factors that could influence a physician's decision in prescribing statins and used as a covariate, continued/new statin use was no longer a significant predictor of good outcome. Although statin use, especially continued/new use, was associated with improved intracerebral hemorrhage outcomes, this effect may merely reflect the physician's view of a patient's prognosis rather than a predictor of survival.

Patterns of statin initiation and continuation in patients with breast or colorectal cancer, towards end-of-life

PurposeCross-sectional studies show that statins, used in cardiovascular disease prevention, are often discontinued approaching death. Studies investigating associations between statin exposure and cancer outcomes, not accounting for these exposure changes, are prone to reverse causation bias. The aim of this study was to describe longitudinally the changes in statin initiation and continuation prior to death in patients with breast or colorectal cancer, thus establishing an appropriate exposure lag time.MethodsThis study was carried out using linked cancer registry and prescribing data. We identified patients who died of their cancer (cases) and cancer survivors were used as controls. The probability of initiating or continuing statin use was estimated up to 5 years prior to death (or index date). Conditional binomial models were used to estimate relative risks and risk differences for associations between approaching cancer death and statin use.ResultsCompared to controls, the probability of continued statin use in breast cancer cases was significantly lower 3 months prior to death (RR 0.86 95% CI 0.79, 0.94). Similarly, in colorectal cancer cases, the probability of continued statin use was significantly lower 3 months prior to colorectal cancer death (RR 0.77 95% CI 0.68, 0.88).ConclusionA significant proportion of patients will cease statin treatment in the months prior to a colorectal or breast cancer death.

Drug treatment and adherence of subjects

Background and aimsWe aimed at describing the therapeutic approach in young adult patients diagnosed with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH) and their adherence and persistence to treatment. MethodsFrom regional administrative databases, individuals aged ≤40 years, who received exemption for HeFH between January 1, 2003 and December 31, 2011, and concomitantly started statin treatment, were identified. Within the first year of treatment, we evaluated therapeutic changes, adherence as MPR (medication possession ratio), persistence as continuous drug coverage without gaps ≥60 days, and influencing factors using log binomial models. ResultsOf 1404 patients, 42.4% were initially treated with a high-efficacy statin. 23.4% of patients showed at least one treatment change. Mean MPR was 68.7% (29.9), and patients showing continued statin use were 47.0%. Therapy modification was significantly associated with a past cardiovascular event (relative risk, RR [95% confidential interval] 2.28 [1.69–3.09]) and at least one lipid test (RR 1.82 [1.31–2.53]). MPR ≥80% was significantly associated with the first statin prescribed (atorvastatin RR 1.28 [1.09–1.51] and rosuvastatin RR 1.21 [1.01–1.44], vs. simvastatin), a past cardiovascular event (RR 1.33 [1.12–1.59]), at least one therapy change (RR 1.28 [1.15–1.43]), at least a lipid test (RR 1.26 [1.07–1.49]). A similar pattern was observed for persistence. ConclusionsThis analysis of young adult HeFH patients showed that therapy change was quite frequent, and probably reflected adjustments according to individual response. Adherence and persistence were inadequate, even in this population at high cardiovascular risk, and they need to be improved through proper patient education and shared treatment decision-making approach.

Abstract 17830: Statin Use is Associated With a Reduced Risk of Intracerebral Hemorrhage Recurrence: A Population-based Cohort Study

Background: The safety of statin use in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is an unsettled issue of critical importance during stroke management. To assess the benefits and risks of statin use in ICH patients, we analyzed the big data from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD) collected from a population known to have a higher ICH incidence than the Westerners. Methods and Results: A random sample of 1,000,000 subjects representative of the 23-million population registered in the NHIRD from 1997 to 2010 was used for this retrospective cohort study. The cumulative risks of ICH, ischemic stroke, and transient ischemic attack (TIA) were analyzed among three ICH cohorts: non-statin (NS; no statin use before or after ICH), statin (S; continued or initiated statin use after ICH), and statin-withdrawal (SW; statin use discontinued after ICH). A total of 2408 ICH patients (age 63.4±14.2 years, 62.5% male) were identified between 2000 and 2005 and followed for an average of 7.0 years. A Cox proportional hazard regression model was applied to estimate the hazard ratios (HRs) with adjustment for potential confounders. Compared to NS, S had a 71% (HR 0.29, CI 0.19-0.43; P&lt;0.001) reduction in ICH recurrence (Figure). The risk of ICH recurrence decreased as a function of the increment of cumulative defined daily doses (P trend &lt;0.0001). In contrast, SW had a 1.5-fold increase in ICH recurrence (HR 1.55, CI 1.09-2.22; P=0.016) and a 2-fold increase in ischemic stroke or TIA development (HR 2.01,CI 1.30-3.11; P=0.002). Conclusions: Based on this large database, continuation or initiation of stain use in ICH patients is associated with a reduced risk of ICH recurrence in a dose-dependent manner; discontinuation of statin use confers significant risks for both ICH recurrence and ischemic stroke/TIA development. Mechanistic studies are warranted to further validate the significance of this observation.