Continuation Of Aspirin Research Articles

An Evidence-Based Algorithm for Determining Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis After Degenerative Spinal Surgery.

Although venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a potentially serious and life-threatening complication, there is no widely accepted protocol to guide VTE prophylaxis in adult degenerative spinal surgery, and pharmacologic overtreatment may result in hemorrhagic complications. Previously, we published the VTE Prophylaxis Risk/Benefit Score, an evidence-based algorithm that balances the risk and consequences of thrombotic versus hemorrhagic complications by taking consideration of patient-related risks, procedure-related risks, and the risk of neurological compromise to guide VTE prophylaxis. To objective of this study was to validate the VTE Prophylaxis Risk/Benefit Score. From January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2017, VTE Prophylaxis Risk/Benefit Scores and corresponding prophylaxes were prospectively assigned. When indicated, chemoprophylaxis was dosed 24 to 36 hours postoperatively to allow for adequate surgical hemostasis. Patients were retrospectively evaluated for immediate and short-term complications. The Fisher exact test compared incidence of complications by VTE prophylaxis. Multinomial logistic regression modeled the probability of complication by prophylaxis type, demographics, and comorbidities. Significance was set at P < .05. Of the 266 patients who met inclusion criteria, 79.3% were given mechanical prophylaxis alone and 20.7% were given combined mechanical and chemical prophylaxis. Complications including VTE (0.38%), delayed wound healing or infection (2.26%), and hematoma (0.75%) were observed at rates similar to or lower than previously published studies with increased utilization of chemoprophylaxis. Use of chemoprophylaxis and continuation of perioperative aspirin were significantly associated with the development of a hemorrhagic complication. No patient developed persistent neurologic deficit from hematoma or pulmonary embolism. The VTE Prophylaxis Risk/Benefit Score comprehensively considers the risk of thrombotic, wound, and bleeding complications and is an effective tool for determining appropriate thromboprophylaxis in adult degenerative spinal surgery. 3.

A Comprehensive Update on Aspirin Management During Noncardiac Surgery.

Aspirin is considered critical lifelong therapy for patients with established cardiovascular (CV) disease (including coronary artery, cerebrovascular, and peripheral arterial diseases) and is consequently one of the most widely used medications worldwide. However, the indications for aspirin use continue to evolve and recent trials question its efficacy for primary prevention. Although one third of patients undergoing noncardiac surgery and at risk for a major adverse CV event receive aspirin perioperatively, uncertainty still exists about how aspirin should be optimally managed in this context, and significant practice variability remains. Recent trials suggest that the risks of continuing aspirin during the perioperative period outweigh the benefits in many cases, but data on patients with high CV risk remain limited. We performed a comprehensive PubMed and Medline literature search using the following keywords: aspirin, aspirin withdrawal, perioperative, coronary artery disease, cerebrovascular disease, peripheral artery disease, and CV disease; we manually reviewed all relevant citations for inclusion. Patients taking aspirin for the primary prevention of CV disease should likely discontinue it during the perioperative period, especially when there is a high risk of bleeding. Patients with established CV disease but without a coronary stent should likely continue aspirin during the perioperative period unless undergoing closed-space surgery. Patients with a history of coronary stenting also likely need aspirin continuation throughout the perioperative period for nonclosed space procedures. Perioperative clinicians need to balance the risks of ceasing aspirin before surgery against its continuation during the perioperative interval using a patient-specific strategy. The guidance on decision-making with regard to perioperative aspirin cessation or continuation using currently available clinical data from studies in high-risk patients along with nonclinical aspirin studies is conflicting and does not enable a simplified or unified answer. However, pertinent guidelines on CV disease management provide a basic framework for aspirin management, and large trial findings provide some insight into the safety of perioperative aspirin cessation in some contexts, although uncertainty on perioperative aspirin still exists. This review provides an evidence-based update on perioperative aspirin management in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery with a focus on recommendations for perioperative clinicians on continuing versus holding aspirin during this context.

Current evidence and issues of endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric neoplasms during antithrombotic therapy

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for gastric neoplasms is a useful treatment globally. However, postoperative bleeding after gastric ESD is a serious, and sometimes life-threatening complication in patients receiving antithrombotic drugs, because antithrombotic drugs are considered to increase the risk of postoperative bleeding after gastric ESD. In contrast, withdrawal of antithrombotic drugs during the perioperative period increases the risk of thrombotic complications. Guidelines for the management of antithrombotic drugs during the periendoscopic period have been published by different countries, and recent guidelines place greater emphasis on the risk of thromboembolism with the discontinuation of antithrombotic drugs than on the risk of bleeding with the continuation of antithrombotic drugs. Several studies have reported on the validity of these guidelines, and clinical evidence is being established. Most studies reported that gastric ESD under continuation of aspirin or cilostazol did not increase the risk of bleeding, whereas heparin replacement was strongly associated with a higher risk of bleeding. However, the data regarding some clinical issues about the management of antithrombotic drugs, such as the safety of gastric ESD under continuation of thienopyridine, administration of multiple antithrombotic drugs including dual antiplatelet and anticoagulants (warfarin and direct oral anticoagulant), and effective prophylactic methods for postoperative bleeding after gastric ESD are lacking. Larger clinical data are needed to resolve the remaining issues in the future.

Continued Aspirin Treatment May Be a Risk Factor of Delayed Bleeding after Gastric Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection under Heparin Replacement: A Retrospective Multicenter Study.

Objective Gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) under heparin replacement (HR) of warfarin reportedly has a high risk of delayed bleeding (24-57%). It is possible that the delayed bleeding risk may have changed over the years. We evaluated the current risk of delayed bleeding after gastric ESD under HR of anticoagulant agents. Methods We retrospectively reviewed the delayed bleeding rate and analyzed the risk factors for delayed bleeding. Patients Consecutive patients who underwent gastric ESD under HR of anticoagulant agents from July 2015 to June 2017. Results A total of 32 patients with a solitary early gastric cancer and taking anticoagulant agents were analyzed, including 24 patients on warfarin (the warfarin group) and 8 patients on direct oral anticoagulants (the DOAC group). Three (9.4%) patients experienced delayed bleeding: three (12.5%) patients in the warfarin group and no patients in the DOAC group. Continued aspirin treatment was identified to be a risk factor of delayed bleeding (p=0.01). Conclusion Careful management may be required for patients undergoing gastric ESD under continued aspirin treatment in addition to HR of anticoagulant agents; although the delayed bleeding risk after gastric ESD under HR of anticoagulant agents might have decreased over the years.

P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy versus aspirin monotherapy after short-term dual antiplatelet therapy for percutaneous coronary intervention: Insights from a network meta-analysis of randomized trials

A number of trials have assessed the efficacy and safety of short-term dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in patients who undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, whether to continue aspirin or a P2Y12 inhibitor after a short course of DAPT is actively debated. PUBMED and EMBASE were searched through March 2020 for randomized controlled trials evaluating short-term DAPT (≤6 months) when compared with longer-term (≥12 months) DAPT among patients undergoing PCI. The ischemic outcomes were all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, and stroke. The safety outcome was major and/or clinically relevant bleeding. The primary objective was to investigate the outcomes with aspirin monotherapy (Aspirin group) versus P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy (P2Y12i group) after short-term DAPT. Our search identified 17 eligible trials enrolling a total of 54,625 patients comparing different DAPT duration. Either of the 2 monotherapy groups did not increase the risk of ischemic outcomes when compared with the long-term DAPT group, without difference between the Aspirin versus the P2Y12i groups. However, both monotherapy groups significantly reduced bleeding when compared with long-term DAPT (Aspirin group: hazard ratio [95% CI]: 0.62 [0.45-0.86], P=.004 and P2Y12i group: 0.68 [0.50-0.93], P=.015). There was no difference in bleeding between the Aspirin versus P2Y12i groups (hazard ratio=0.91 [0.58-1.43], P=.70). Among patients undergoing PCI, short-term DAPT with continuation of either aspirin or P2Y12i reduced bleeding without increasing ischemic outcomes when compared with long-term DAPT. The choice of antiplatelet therapy after short-term DAPT should be evaluated in well-powered trials.

Impact of perioperative aspirin continuation on bleeding complications in laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery: a propensity score-matched analysis.

In laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer (CRC) for patients who receive antiplatelet therapy (APT), it remains unclear whether APT should be continued or temporarily withdrawn. We investigated the safety of perioperative aspirin continuation, specifically focused on bleeding complications. We performed retrospective analysis utilizing propensity score-matching (PSM). In total, 789 patients satisfied the inclusion criteria, and were divided into two groups. Patients in the continued aspirin monotherapy (cAPT) group continued treatment perioperatively with not more than 2days of withdrawal (n = 140). Patients with more than 3days withdrawal of aspirin or who did not receive APT at all were assigned to the non-cAPT group (n = 649). After 1:1 PSM, 105 patients were extracted from each group. Perioperative APT management was determined based on our institutional committee-approved guidelines for antithrombotic management. In PSM cohorts, all patient demographics were comparable between the groups. Regarding intraoperative outcomes, we found no significant difference in operation duration (p = 0.969), blood loss (p = 0.068), and blood transfusion (p = 0.517). Postoperative overall morbidity was 20.0% and 13.3% in the cAPT and non-cAPT groups, respectively (p = 0.195). The incidence of bleeding complications was also comparable between the groups (2.9% vs. 1.0%, p = 0.317). Assessing the 14 cases with bleeding complications overall in the full cohort, all 7 cases in the non-cAPT group had anastomotic bleeding, which was generally observed shortly after surgery [median postoperative day (POD) 1]. All 7 cases in the cAPT group received additional antithrombotics other than aspirin; bleeding occurred at various sites relatively later (median POD 7), mostly after reinstitution of additional antithrombotic agents. For patients receiving APT, perioperative continuation of aspirin monotherapy could be safe in laparoscopic CRC surgery; however, careful consideration is required at reinstitution of additional antithrombotics where multiple antithrombotic agents are used.

Impact of preoperative aspirin continuation on bleeding complications during or after liver resection: Propensity score-matched analysis.

There is insufficient evidence concerning the effect of preoperative continuation of antiplatelet therapy (APT) on intraoperative and postoperative bleeding during liver resection. This study investigated the efficacy and safety of preoperative aspirin continuation on bleeding complications during or after liver resection using propensity score matching (PSM). Between 2005 and 2018, 425 patients who underwent liver resection were enrolled in this study. Patients were divided into two groups; the cAPT group received continued aspirin monotherapy preoperatively (n=63) and the control group did not (n=362). Propensity score matching was performed based on the preoperative clinical parameters. Intraoperative and postoperative complications, including bleeding complications, were compared between groups. After propensity score matching, 126 patients were included in the analysis (cAPT group, n=63 and control group, n=63). There were no differences in patients' background characteristics, and intraoperative blood loss was identical between the groups (200 vs 180mL, P=.54). The frequency of postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo class 2 or higher, 13/63 [20.6%] vs 13/63 [20.6%], P=1.00) and postoperative hemorrhagic complication (3/63 [4.8%] vs 3/63 [4.8%], P=1.00) was also similar between the groups; no difference was observed in the length of postoperative stay (11days vs 14days, P=.08). Preoperative continuation of aspirin monotherapy does not affect intraoperative or postoperative bleeding in patients receiving liver resection. Either open or laparoscopic liver resection can be safely performed in patients with continued aspirin therapy.

Effects of Aspirin on Postoperative Bruising and Bleeding Complications in Upper Eyelid Surgery.

We evaluated the effects of aspirin versus placebo in patients undergoing upper eyelid blepharoplasty and/or levator advancement or plication blepharoptosis repair in this randomized, prospective study. Patients who presented between October 2017 and April 2019 requiring blepharoptosis repair and/or upper eyelid blepharoplasty who were taking 81 mg aspirin were randomized to receive 1 week of aspirin tablets or 1 week of placebo tablets prior to surgery. Postoperative complications, such as bleeding, hematoma, or hemorrhage, were noted as well as perioperative thromboembolic complications. Photos were obtained at the patient's first postoperative visit and later judged on bruising severity. The 2 groups were subsequently compared. A total of 48 patients and 89 eyelids were evaluated in this study. Fifty-two eyelids were included in the aspirin group and 37 eyelids were included in the placebo group. There was no statistically significant difference in bruising rating between groups. There was no statistically significant difference in the number of patients who experienced mild postoperative bleeding. No patients experienced vision loss. No patients experienced a thromboembolic event. There were no patients who experienced hemorrhage, hematoma, or retrobulbar hemorrhage. Continuation of aspirin does not appear to effect outcomes with respect to postoperative bruising in patients undergoing upper eyelid blepharoplasty or blepharoptosis repair. The study was not powered to determine statistical significance with regard to bleeding complications and would require a significantly higher sample size. We suggest changing the current guidelines to recommend routine continuation of low dose 81 mg aspirin before upper eyelid surgery.

Efficacy of vonoprazan for the prevention of bleeding after gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection with continuous use of antiplatelet agents.

Background Post-procedural bleeding, after gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for high risk thromboembolic cases that require continuous antiplatelet therapy, is challenging. Its incidence rate is > 20 % among those using conventional antacids. We evaluated the efficacy of perioperative management with vonoprazan to prevent post-ESD bleeding. Materials and methods This was a multicenter prospective interventional trial conducted at 10 Japanese referral centers. Patients who regularly used antiplatelet agents (aspirin or thienopyridine derivatives, etc.) and who required continuous antithrombotic medication due to high thromboembolic risk were enrolled. They underwent gastric ESD with continuous aspirin therapy. Oral administration of vonoprazan (20 mg daily) was started from the day of ESD and continued for 28 days. The primary end point was the incidence of post-ESD bleeding. The sample size was 50 patients, and vonoprazan was considered to be effective when the upper threshold of the 95 % confidence interval (CI) for post-ESD bleeding did not exceed 20 %. Results Although 50 patients were enrolled, one patient withdrew consent. Therefore, 49 patients were included in the analysis. One patient who used aspirin and clopidogrel experienced bleeding 11 days after ESD. The overall post-ESD bleeding rate was 2.0 % (1/49; 95 %CI 0.4–10.7 %). Thromboembolic events were not observed. One case of ESD-associated adverse events (perforation) and one case of drug-associated adverse events (drug eruption, possibly due to vonoprazan) were observed. Conclusions Vonoprazan may be efficacious for preventing post-ESD bleeding in patients using continuous antiplatelet therapy, warranting further comparative study to definitively test the effectiveness of the drug.

Risk of postoperative thromboembolic complication after major digestive surgery in patients receiving antiplatelet therapy: Lessons from more than 3,000 operations in a single tertiary referral hospital

BackgroundAlthough recent studies have suggested that the continuation of preoperative antiplatelet therapy with aspirin does not affect intraoperative or postoperative bleeding in patients undergoing digestive surgery, its preventive effect against thromboembolic complication remains largely unknown. MethodsA total of 3,072 patients who underwent major digestive surgery (esophago-gastrointestinal and hepatobiliary-pancreatic resection for malignancy) between 2005 and 2018 at our institution were enrolled in this study. The patients were divided into 3 groups: patients continuing to receive preoperative antiplatelet therapy with aspirin (continued-antiplatelet therapy group, n = 425), those discontinuing preoperative antiplatelet therapy (discontinued-antiplatelet therapy group, n = 549), and those who were not receiving antiplatelet therapy (non-antiplatelet therapy group, n = 2,117). The CHADS2 and the CHA2DS2-VASc scoring system were used to assess potential thromboembolic risk. Surgical outcomes were compared between the groups and the risk factors for thromboembolic complication, bleeding complication, and operative mortality were determined by multivariate analysis. ResultsThere was no difference between the discontinued-antiplatelet therapy and continued-antiplatelet therapy groups in the rate of high risk patients categorized by CHADS2 and CHA2DS2-VASc scores; however, the occurrence of thromboembolic complication in the discontinued-antiplatelet therapy group was significantly higher compared with the continued-antiplatelet therapy group (2.8% vs 0.5%; P = .006). In a multivariate analysis using the whole cohort, discontinuation of antiplatelet therapy (odds ratio = 4.39; P < .001), poor performance status (odds ratio = 4.14; P = .001), and hypertension (odds ratio = 3.46; P = .005) were the independent risk factors for thromboembolic complication. In the groups of patients receiving antiplatelet therapy, multivariate analysis showed that preoperative aspirin continuation had a significant negative impact (odds ratio = 0.10, P = .029) on the occurrence of thromboembolic complication, but did not affect either postoperative bleeding complication or operative mortality. ConclusionDiscontinuation of antiplatelet therapy during major digestive surgery is the most significant risk factor for thromboembolic complication, and the continuation of preoperative aspirin therapy significantly reduces the occurrence of thromboembolic complication in patients receiving antiplatelet therapy. It is suggested that the preoperative continuation of aspirin monotherapy is one of the preferred options to prevent severe thromboembolic events during major digestive surgery in patients receiving antiplatelet therapy.

Incidence and Predictors of Aspirin Discontinuation in Older Adult Veteran Nursing Home Residents at End of Life.

Continuation of aspirin for secondary prevention in persons with limited life expectancy (LLE) is controversial. We sought to determine the incidence and predictors of aspirin discontinuation in veterans with LLE and/or advanced dementia (LLE/AD) who were taking aspirin for secondary prevention at nursing home admission, stratified by whether their limited prognosis (LP) was explicitly documented at admission. Retrospective cohort study using linked Veterans Affairs (VA) and Medicare clinical/administrative data and Minimum Data Set resident assessments. All VA nursing homes (referred to as community living centers [CLCs]) in the United States. Older (≥65 y) CLC residents with LLE/AD, admitted for 7 days or longer in fiscal years 2009 to 2015, who had a history of coronary artery disease and/or stroke/transient ischemic attack, and used aspirin within the first week of CLC admission (n = 13 844). The primary dependent variable was aspirin discontinuation within the first 90 days after CLC admission, defined as 14 consecutive days of no aspirin receipt. Independent variables included an indicator for explicit documentation of LP, sociodemographics, environment of care characteristics, cardiovascular risk factors, bleeding risk factors, individual markers of poor prognosis (eg, cancer, weight loss), and facility characteristics. Fine and Gray subdistribution hazard models with death as a competing risk were used to assess predictors of discontinuation. Cumulative incidence of aspirin discontinuation was 27% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 26%-28%) in the full sample, 34% (95% CI = 33%-36%) in residents with explicit documentation of LP, and 24% (95% CI = 23%-25%) in residents with no such documentation. The associations of independent variables with aspirin discontinuation differed in residents with vs without explicit LP documentation at admission. Just over one-quarter of patients discontinued aspirin, possibly reflecting the unclear role of aspirin in end of life among prescribers. Future research should compare outcomes of aspirin deprescribing in this population. J Am Geriatr Soc 68:725-735, 2020.

Effects of continuing use of aspirin on blood loss in patients who underwent unilateral total knee arthroplasty.

Concerning the ongoing debate on the effects of continuing aspirin therapy on blood loss in knee arthroplasty, we conducted a retrospective investigation to test the hypothesis that continuation of aspirin prior total knee arthroplasty (TKA) will not cause more blood loss. From a database of patients who underwent unilateral TKA between 2011 and 2016, we identified two groups: the aspirin group (patients continued aspirin during perioperative period) and the nonaspirin group (patients had no current or recent history of aspirin usage). We extracted and compared patient demographic information, comorbidity index, baseline serum hemoglobin (Hb), and creatinine level between the two groups. We also compared our primary outcomes, including the total blood loss, transfusion requirement, and length of hospitalization between the two groups. A multivariate logistic regression for analyzing the risk factors of requiring transfusion was performed. We found that apart from preoperative serum creatinine level, there was no difference in the baseline Hb level, perioperative change in Hb, total blood loss, or length of hospitalization between the two groups. The percentage of transfusion utilization was also comparable between the two groups. Our regression analysis shows that the risk of requiring transfusion after TKA is not significantly associated with patients taking aspirin therapy before operation. Patients who underwent TKA with continuation of low-dose aspirin did not result in more blood loss. Current blood loss management has provided sufficient reduction of blood loss to accommodate aspirin therapy perioperatively. We suggest that it is safe to continue aspirin prior to TKA.

Long-Term Aspirin Use and 5-Year Survival in Healthy Adults: A Population-Based Cohort Study in South Korea.

PurposeWe investigated whether long-term aspirin use is associated with 5-year all-cause mortality.Materials and MethodsParticipants were individuals aged ≥40 years who were registered in the 2010 sample cohort database of the National Health Insurance Service in South Korea. Aspirin users were divided into three groups: continuous users (2006–2010), previous users (2006–2009), and new users (2010). Individuals with a history of coronary artery disease and cerebrovascular disease were excluded. Five-year all-cause mortality was defined as mortality due to any cause from January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2015. Data were analyzed by multivariable Cox regression.ResultsIn total, 424444 individuals were included. Five-year all-cause mortality was 9% lower in continuous aspirin users than in unexposed individuals [hazard ratio (HR): 0.91, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.86–0.97; p=0.003]. Five-year all-cause mortality rates in the new aspirin users (HR: 1.00, 95% CI: 0.90–1.11; p=0.995) and previous aspirin users (HR: 1.01, 95% CI: 0.94–1.09; p=0.776) were not significantly different from that in unexposed individuals. In the 40–60-year age group, 5-year all-cause mortality in the continuous aspirin users was 24% lower (HR: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.64–0.90; p=0.002) than that in unexposed individuals. However, in the >60-year age group, there was no significant association between aspirin use and 5-year all-cause mortality (HR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.90–1.02; p=0.199).ConclusionLong-term aspirin use is associated with reduced 5-year all-cause mortality in healthy adults, especially those aged <60 years.

Comparative Histological and immunohistochemical study on the effect of curcumin and wild honey versus omeprazole on a rat model of gastric ulcer

Background and objectives: Gastric ulcers are among the most common diseases affecting humans. Omeprazole, a proton pump inhibitor, is widely used in the treatment of peptic ulcer. Wild honey alone, or in combination with other natural products, has been used to treat gastric ulcer. This study aimed to investigate the possible curative role of curcumin combined with wild honey in comparison to omeprazole on aspirin- induced gastric mucosal damage in adult male albino rats.Methods and Results: Thirty adult male albino rats were divided into: Group1 (control group), group2 (ulcer group) (received 200mgkg BW aspirin orally). On day 6, rats of group2 were equally subdivided into; subgroup 2a (continued Aspirin), subgroup 2b (received combined curcumin and honey) and subgroup 2c (received 20mgkg BW omeprazole orally). All rats were sacrificed at day 11. Fundic specimens were processed for H &E, PAS, and immunohistochemical stain for COX-2, followed by morphometric assessment and statistical analysis. Aspirin-induced ulcer was evidenced by sloughing of surface epithelium, widened fundic glands, vacuolated surface and mucous neck cells and some vacuolated or shrunken oxyntic with pyknotic nuclei, in addition to significant increase in COX-2 immunoexpression. Combined curcumin and honey improved these histological alterations with a significant decrease in COX-2 immunoreactivity.Conclusion: the combination of curcumin and wild honey healed most of the deleterious morphological changes of aspirin-induced gastric ulcer, with a comparable effect to omeprazole. This offers an alternative treatment of peptic ulcer to avoid adverse drug reactions.

Pregnancy after direct cerebral bypass for moyamoya disease.

Moyamoya disease (MMD) disproportionately affects young to middle-aged women. The main treatment for this challenging disease is cerebral bypass surgery. Vascular neurosurgeons often need to counsel women regarding pregnancy following bypass for MMD, but there is a paucity of data. The authors set out to examine neurological and obstetric outcomes in an extensive cohort of MMD patients who had pregnancies following cerebral revascularization at the Stanford Medical Center. The authors identified all patients at their institution who underwent cerebral bypass for MMD from 1990 through 2018 and who later became pregnant. Some of these patients also had pregnancies prior to undergoing bypass surgery, and the authors examined these pregnancies as well. They performed a chart review and brief telephone survey to identify obstetric complications, transient ischemic attacks (TIAs), and strokes. Neurological and obstetric outcomes were compared to published rates. They also compared pre- and post-bypass pregnancy complication rates using logistic regression techniques. There were 71 pregnancies among 56 women whose mean age was 30.5 years. Among 59 post-bypass pregnancies, there were 5 (8%) perinatal TIAs. There were no MRI-confirmed strokes or strokes with residual deficits. Among 12 pre-bypass pregnancies, there were 3 (25%) TIAs and 2 (17%) MRI-confirmed strokes. There were no hemorrhagic complications in either group. In the generalized estimating equations analysis, performing cerebral revascularization prior to pregnancy versus after pregnancy was associated with lower odds of perinatal stroke or TIA (OR 0.15, p = 0.0061). Nine pregnancies (13%) were complicated by preeclampsia, and there was one (1%) instance of eclampsia. The overall rate of cesarean delivery was 39%. There were 2 miscarriages, both occurring in the first trimester. There were no maternal deaths. The authors present neurological and obstetric outcomes data in a large cohort of MMD patients. These data indicate that post-bypass pregnancy is accompanied by low complication rates. There were no ischemic or hemorrhagic strokes among post-bypass pregnant MMD patients. The rate of obstetric complications was low overall. The authors recommend close collaboration between the vascular neurosurgeon and the obstetrician regarding medical management, including blood pressure goals and continuation of low-dose aspirin.

Effet de l’acide tranexamique en injection locale dans l’arthroplastie totale de hanche chez les patients sous aspirine continue : une étude randomisée

BackgroundDue to differences in pharmacological mechanism of action, the effect of tranexamic acid (TA) on aspirin-related bleeding remains unknown. We therefore conducted a prospective randomized study to elucidate (1) the effect of topical TA administration on blood loss and transfusion rate in total hip arthroplasty (THA) patients receiving continuous aspirin for prevention of cardiovascular or cerebrovascular events; (2) 90-day complications of topical TA administration; (3) possible variables contributing to blood transfusion. HypothesisTopical TA administration reduces blood loss and transfusion rate in THA patients receiving continuous aspirin. Patients and methodsA total of 102 consecutive THA patients taking continuous aspirin were enrolled and randomized into two groups. In the topical TA (TTA) group (n=55), topical TA was administered at three points during THA; in the control group (n=47), the patients received saline solution as placebo. Based on drop in hemoglobin concentration, total estimated blood loss was calculated as the main assessment criterion. Secondary assessment criteria included transfusion rate and 90-day complications. Finally, a multivariate regression model was used to assess possible predictive factors for blood transfusion. Results(1) Significantly lower total blood loss was observed in the TTA group than in the control group (897±177ml vs. 1153±345ml, P<0.001). Furthermore, lower transfusion rate was observed in the TTA group than in the control group (34.0% vs. 10.9%, P=0.005). (2) No significant difference was observed between the two groups regarding 90-day complications. (3) We identified higher preoperative hemoglobin level (OR=0.675, P=0.002) and topical TA administration (OR=0.002, P=0.012) as negative predictive factors for blood transfusion. DiscussionTopical application of TA was safe and beneficial in THA patients receiving continuous aspirin for prevention of cardiovascular or cerebrovascular events, to reduce blood loss and transfusion rate, without increasing the risk of 90-day complications.

P1931Effect of de-escalated switching dual antiplatelet therapy after acute myocardial infarction in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: real-world data from a nationwide cohort study

Abstract Background Recently, both unguided (platelet function testing independent) and guided (platelet function testing dependent) DAPT de-escalation strategies have been investigated in different clinical studies but the data is still limited and conflicting. The aim of this study was to examine the effect of switching dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) on the major vascular risk after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) by using Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database. Methods In total, 1,903 and 4,059 patients defined as switched to aspirin and clopidogrel (switched DAPT) and continuation of aspirin and ticagrelor (unswitched DAPT) cohort, respectively who had received PCI during AMI hospitalization, on aspirin and ticagrelor initially and without occurring adverse events at 3 months were evaluated between 2013 and 2015. An inverse probability treatment of weighted approach was adopted to balance the baseline differences between two groups and Cox proportional hazard regression and competing risk regression were used to evaluated the effect of switching DAPT on death, AMI readmission, major bleeding and non-major clinically relevant bleeding. Results The incidence rates (per 100 person-year) of death and AMI readmission were 3.97 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 3.19–4.84) and 3.84 (95% CI = 3.09–4.73) in switched cohort and 1.83 (95% CI = 1.47–2.24) and 2.23 (95% CI = 1.82–2.68) in unswitched cohort, respectively. After adjustment for patients' clinical variables, switched cohort had higher risk of death (adjusted hazard ratio = 2.18, 95% CI = 1.62–2.93, P&lt;0.001), and AMI readmission (adjusted sub-distribution ratio = 1.72, 95% CI = 1.27–2.34, P&lt;0.001) compared to these in unswitched cohort; however, there was no difference in the risk of bleeding. Subgroup analysis showed a similar findings in many specific groups, except the patients who were younger age and had lower comorbidity score. Conclusion Switching DAPT might increase the risk of death and AMI readmission among patients with AMI undergoing PCI.

Effect of topical tranexamic acid in total hip arthroplasty patients who receive continuous aspirin for prevention of cardiovascular or cerebrovascular events: A prospective randomized study

BackgroundDue to differences in pharmacological mechanism of action, the effect of tranexamic acid (TA) on aspirin-related bleeding remains unknown. We therefore conducted a prospective randomized study to elucidate: (1) the effect of topical TA administration on blood loss and transfusion rate in total hip arthroplasty (THA) patients receiving continuous aspirin for prevention of cardiovascular or cerebrovascular events; (2) 90-day complications of topical TA administration; (3) possible variables contributing to blood transfusion. HypothesisTopical TA administration reduces blood loss and transfusion rate in THA patients receiving continuous aspirin. Patients and MethodsA total of 102 consecutive THA patients taking continuous aspirin were enrolled and randomized into two groups. In the topical TA (TTA) group (n=55), topical TA was administered at three points during THA; in the control group (n=47), the patients received saline solution as placebo. Based on drop in hemoglobin concentration, total estimated blood loss was calculated as the main assessment criterion. Secondary assessment criteria included transfusion rate and 90-day complications. Finally, a multivariate regression model was used to assess possible predictive factors for blood transfusion. Results(1) Significantly lower total blood loss was observed in the TTA group than in the control group (897±177ml vs. 1153±345ml, p<0.001). Furthermore, lower transfusion rate was observed in the TTA group than in the control group (10.9% vs. 34.0%, p=0.005). (2) No significant difference was observed between the two groups regarding 90-day complications. (3) We identified higher preoperative hemoglobin level (OR=0.675, p=0.002) and topical TA administration (OR=0.002, p=0.012) as negative predictive factors for blood transfusion. DiscussionTopical application of TA was safe and beneficial in THA patients receiving continuous aspirin for prevention of cardiovascular or cerebrovascular events, to reduce blood loss and transfusion rate, without increasing the risk of 90-day complications.

Pregnancy After Cerebral Bypass for Moyamoya Disease

Abstract INTRODUCTION Moyamoya disease (MMD) disproportionately affects young to middle age women. Vascular neurosurgeons are often needed to counsel women regarding pregnancy following bypass for MMD, but there is a paucity of data. We set out to examine neurological and obstetric outcomes in an extensive cohort of MMD patients who had pregnancies following cerebral revascularization at the Stanford Medical Center. METHODS We identified all patients who underwent cerebral bypass for MMD and later became pregnant from 1990 through 2018. Some of these patients also had pregnancies prior to bypass, and we examined these pregnancies as well. We performed a chart review and a brief telephone survey to identify obstetric complications, transient ischemic attack (TIA), and stroke. Neurological and obstetric outcomes were compared to published rates. We also compared pre- and postbypass pregnancy complication rates using logistic regression techniques. RESULTS There were 71 pregnancies among 56 women with mean age 30.5. Among 59 postbypass pregnancies, there were 5 (8%) perinatal TIAs. There were no magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) confirmed strokes or strokes with residual deficits. Among 12 prebypass pregnancies, there were 3 (25%) TIAs and 2 (17%) MRI-confirmed strokes. There were no hemorrhagic complications in either group. In the multivariable logistic regression analysis, performing cerebral revascularization prior to pregnancy versus postpregnancy was associated with lower odds of perinatal stroke or TIA (OR 0.13, P = .007). The overall rate of cesarean delivery was 39%. CONCLUSION We present neurological and obstetric outcomes in a large cohort of MMD patients. These data indicate that postbypass pregnancy is accompanied by low complication rates. There were no ischemic or hemorrhagic strokes among postbypass, pregnant MMD patients. Obstetric complications were low overall. We recommend a close collaboration between the vascular neurosurgeon and the obstetrician regarding medical management, including blood pressure goals and continuation of aspirin.

Is laparoscopic colorectal surgery with continuation of antiplatelet therapy safe without increasing bleeding complications?

PurposeThe number of patients on antiplatelet therapy (APT) who need surgery is increasing; however, it is unclear whether APT should be continued for abdominal surgery, particularly laparoscopic colorectal surgery. We investigated the safety of continuing APT for patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery.MethodsWe collected retrospective data from 529 patients who underwent laparoscopic colorectal surgery at Hiroshima University between January, 2013 and December, 2018. We analyzed information related to APT. Thirty-six pairs were matched by the propensity score method between patients on APT (APT+) and those not on APT (APT−). We compared the surgical outcomes of both groups.ResultsAmong 463 patients eligible for the study, 48 were on APT for cerebrovascular or cardiovascular disease, and 36 continued to take aspirin. In the case-matched comparison, the amount of intraoperative blood loss in the APT+ group was not significantly higher than that in the APT− group, and the incidences of bleeding complications, thromboembolic complications, and other complications were not significantly different between the groups.ConclusionIn a case-matched comparison, continuation of aspirin during laparoscopic colorectal surgery did not increase perioperative complications. In laparoscopic colorectal surgery, continuation of aspirin is an acceptable strategy for patients with thromboembolic risk caused by interruption of APT.