Rachel E. Dubrofsky and Shoshana Amielle Magnet (eds), Feminist Surveillance Studies, Durham and London, Duke University Press, 2015, 304pp. Rachel Dubrofsky and Shoshana Magnet's introduction to Feminist Surveillance Studies begins with a description of an academic scene: At a recent roundtable of academics and privacy advocates discussing surveillance studies and inequality, the conversation variously turned to consumer surveillance, new technologies, and the weakened legislative climate on privacy in both the United States and Canada. While we share the interests of the discussants, we wonder at the place of feminist concerns about surveillance and issues of inequality (p1). I turn to the resulting book Feminist Surveillance Studies off the back of a similar scene--an academic symposium on transparency and secrecy--with similar questions. As Rachel Hall notes, in her chapter for Feminist Surveillance Studies on the use of full body scanners in US airports, transparency is a threshold concept for all those interrogating public practices of surveillance and governance. Hall writes that an 'aesthetics of transparency' can be defined as the forcing of 'a correspondence between interiority and exteriority on the objects of the preventative gaze, or better yet, to flatten the object of surveillance' (p127). What this new collection convincingly asserts is that the demand for transparency placed on people by governing regimes does not affect all equally; that 'correspondences' are forced and made in service of different ideological ends; and that the academic and activist methods we might have for analysing, interrogating and countering regimes of transparency and surveillance must be able to engage 'terms of gendered, sexualized, raced and classed representations of bodies' (p2). Feminist Surveillance Studies is a collection of eleven chapters that model different ways of doing Feminist Surveillance Studies. The chapters are varied, and include writing on surveillance as an apparatus for making colonial violence thinkable, and actionable; on surveillance and the work of anti-sex-trafficking advocacy in the mid-twentieth century; on the birth certificate as surveillance apparatus, as highlighted in the legal history of a transgender persons' right to have their birth certificate changed; on transnational surrogacy and new media communications; on police photos of 'the battered face of the popular U.S. singer Rihanna Fenty', and the way the police camera 'flash regulates skin colour to produce the subject of domestic abuse' (pp1078). Although the chapters vary by subject and methodology they speak to and across each other and together they model the precise and provocative benefits of a feminist intervention in surveillance studies. The collection is also committed to underscoring the historical, or rather foundational, aspect of surveillance. As Andrea Smith argues in her chapter on settler violence and surveillance, '[t]here is not a pure or benign state beyond its strategies of surveillance' (p35). This kind of critical insight runs throughout the collection and frequently stems directly from fields of discourse beyond the discipline of surveillance studies. This is particularly the case in chapters by Andrea Smith, Laura Hyun Yi Kang, Lisa Jean Moore and Paisley Currah and Kelli D. Moore which write through the intersections of anticolonial, legal, feminist and media frameworks. It is further evidenced in Yasmin Jiwani's chapter on killings and 'interlocking surveillance(s). In her analysis of a case of femicide in Canada in 2009 that was presented in the media and court as an killing, and so an exceptional event, Jiwani argues '[t]he mediated emphasis on honour killing as a particularly exotic variant of femicide contributed to the hypervisibility of the Shafia case against the unstated and muted backdrop of the everyday gendered violence that women experience, or of the prevalent femicide of specific groups of women' (p80). …
Read full abstract