HomeRadiologyVol. 266, No. 3 PreviousNext CommunicationsLetters to the EditorBreast Density LegislationFerris M. Hall Ferris M. Hall Author AffiliationsDepartment of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 300 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA 02215e-mail: [email protected]Ferris M. Hall Published Online:Mar 1 2013https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.12121953MoreSectionsFull textPDF ToolsImage ViewerAdd to favoritesCiteTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked In References1 Hooley RJ, Greenberg KL, Stackhouse RM, Geisel JL, Butler RS, Philpotts LE. Screening US in patients with mammographically dense breasts: initial experience with Connecticut Public Act 09-41. Radiology 2012;265(1):59–69. Link, Google Scholar2 Lee CI, Bassett LW, Lehman CD. Breast density legislation and opportunities for patient-centered outcomes research. Radiology 2012;264(3):632–636. Link, Google Scholar3 D’Orsi CJ, Sickles EA. To seek perfection or not? That is the question. Radiology 2012;265(1):9–11. Link, Google Scholar4 Hall FM. The radiology report of the future. Radiology 2009;251(2):313–316. Link, Google Scholar5 Hall FM. The rise and impending decline of screening mammography. Radiology 2008;247(3):597–601. Link, Google Scholar6 Berg WA, Blume JD, Cormack JBet al.. Combined screening with ultrasound and mammography vs mammography alone in women at elevated risk of breast cancer. JAMA 2008;299(18):2151–2163. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar7 Oweyssi N. Breast density legislation from a legal perspective. SBI News. Reston, Va: Society of Breast Imaging, Summer 2012; 6 Google Scholar8 Hall FM. Mammographic density categories [letter]. Radiology 2007;245(1):300–301; author reply 301–302. Link, Google Scholar9 Hall FM. Breast imaging and computer-aided detection. N Engl J Med 2007;356(14):1464–1466. Crossref, Medline, Google ScholarArticle HistoryPublished online: Mar 2013Published in print: Mar 2013 FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited ByCancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, Vol. 30, No. 10Contemporary Clinical Trials, Vol. 56American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vol. 212, No. 1Women's Health Issues, Vol. 24, No. 3ISRN Radiology, Vol. 2014Recommended Articles How Radiologists Can Improve Breast Cancer ScreeningRadiology2021Volume: 302Issue: 2pp. 295-297Machine Learning for Workflow Applications in Screening Mammography: Systematic Review and Meta-AnalysisRadiology2021Volume: 302Issue: 1pp. 88-104Contrast-enhanced Mammography: State of the ArtRadiology2021Volume: 299Issue: 1pp. 36-48Equalizing the Performance of Radiologists and Physician Extenders in Screening MammographyRadiology2022Volume: 0Issue: 0Digital Mammography Is Similar to Screen-Film Mammography for Women with Personal History of Breast CancerRadiology2021Volume: 300Issue: 2pp. 301-302See More RSNA Education Exhibits Artificial Intelligence in Breast Imaging: Past, Present, and FutureDigital Posters2020An Educational Perspective: Surveillance Following Breast Conservation TherapyDigital Posters2019Breast Health in the Elderly: Implications for ImagingDigital Posters2020 RSNA Case Collection Mucinous carcinoma of the breastRSNA Case Collection2020Hyperplastic Residual Breast TissueRSNA Case Collection2022Breast hemangioma RSNA Case Collection2022 Vol. 266, No. 3 Metrics Downloaded 778 times Altmetric Score PDF download