Conflict Monitoring Theory Research Articles

Observation of conflict triggers conflict adaptation.

The conflict monitoring theory posits that the simultaneous activation of incompatible responses in the current trial leads to response conflict. Conflict occurrence signals to enhance attention to the target stimulus, reduce attention to distracting stimuli, and ultimately lead to conflict adaptation (i.e., reduced interference effect after conflict trials compared to nonconflict trials). However, this theory does not explicitly assume whether the involvement of response execution is necessary in the process of conflict occurrence. Research on the negative emotion theory suggests that even in the absence of response execution, incompatible response representations can induce conflict. Our present study aimed to provide direct behavioural evidence regarding whether conflict activated without response execution is sufficient to trigger conflict adaptation. In a word-colour Stroop task, this study employed the LOOK-to-DO transition design, in which participants refrained from responding in half of the trials (LOOK trials) and responded with key presses in the other half (DO trials). Across three experiments, we controlled for feature integration and contingency learning and manipulated the stimulus presentation duration in the previous trial. The results indicated a significant conflict adaptation effect in reaction time when the stimulus presentation duration was shorter in the previous trial. This finding suggested that in a confounding-minimal design with no response execution in the previous trial, conflict triggers control adjustments and leads to conflict adaptation. This finding aligns with and further elaborates on the original conflict monitoring theory by demonstrating that response execution is not a necessary condition for the generation of response conflict. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

Cognitive control adjustments are dependent on the level of conflict

The congruency sequence effect (CSE) is one of the most investigated effects in the cognitive control literature. The conflict monitoring theory suggests that the CSE is the result of adjustments in cognitive control based on perceived conflict. A recent paper by Zhang and colleagues, has investigated whether the manipulation of conflict level by changing distractor incompatibility in a flanker task affects the amount of adjustments in cognitive control. Their study produced mixed findings, somewhat supporting the original conflict monitoring theory, but also suggesting other explanations, such as the repetition expectancy account. We replicated the experimental design in a multisite online study (N = 347), with Hungarian, Italian, and Singaporean participants. Our results supported the prediction that changes in the level of conflict trigger conflict adaptation, revealing that increasing conflict levels induced stronger adaptive control. Bayesian hypothesis testing indicated a monotonic reduction in congruency effects as a function of previous conflict strength. This finding is in line with the extension of the traditional conflict monitoring theory, as well as other theories like affective signaling and expected value of control, implying that the relationship between conflict and interference effects is gradual, rather than a binary function.

Neural correlates of adaptive cognitive control in working memory.

Conflicts in working memory (WM) can occur when retrieval cues activate competing items, which impairs the efficiency of retrieval. It has recently been shown that WM retrieval adapts similarly to these conflicts as predicted by conflict monitoring theory for selective attention tasks. Here, we utilized event-related potentials (ERPs) to investigate whether conflict and adaptive control in WM are reflected by the same neural markers that have previously been described for selective attention tasks. In our task, participants encoded two differently colored memory lists that contained four digits each (i.e., 2 5 7 1 and 4 5 9 1), and had to recognize whether a probe item from a specific list and position was correct or incorrect. Conflict during retrieval emerged when digits at corresponding positions (e.g., 2 and 5 at the first position) were different (incongruent), but not when these digits were the same (congruent). In behavioral data, we found a congruency sequence effect, that is, responses to incongruent probe items were slower, and this effect was reduced following trials with incongruent probe items. In ERPs, this behavioral marker of adaptive control was accompanied by two effects. First, congruency affected the amplitude of an N450, and this conflict effect was reduced after incongruent trials. Second, the posterior P3 amplitude varied with the congruency of the current and the previous trial. Both results resemble those found for the Stroop task and thus highlight the similarity between conflict and adaptive control in WM and selective attention tasks.

Effects of the number of competing responses on neural signatures of pre- and post-response conflict

The optimization of human performance requires the continuous monitoring of behavioral conflicts. According to conflict monitoring theory, the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex registers response conflict which is reflected by two electrophysiological signatures, the N2 and the Ne/ERN. The theory assumes that, if a stimulus activates an incorrect response that competes with the correct response, pre-response conflict on correct trials (reflected by the N2) is enhanced but post-response conflict on error trials (reflected by the Ne/ERN) is reduced. Here, we asked whether response conflict depends on the number of competing incorrect responses activated by a stimulus, that is, whether the N2 is further enhanced and the Ne/ERN is further reduced if two incorrect responses are activated as compared to one. To this end, we used a modified flanker paradigm, in which the two flankers were associated either with the same incorrect response or with different incorrect responses. Our results indicate an increased N2 on correct trials and a reduced Ne/ERN on error trials in the latter as compared to the former condition. These results confirm central predictions of conflict monitoring theory and demonstrate that response conflict is directly related to the number of competing incorrect responses.

Is conflict adaptation adaptive? An introduction to conflict monitoring theory and the ecological problems it faces.

Attending to a single stimulus (or dimension of a stimulus) requires filtering out distracting stimuli to avoid producing an incorrect response. The conflict monitoring (or conflict adaptation) account proposes that experience of conflict results in a shift of attention away from distracting stimuli and/or towards the target stimulus. The proportion congruent and congruency sequence effects are two findings often used to argue in favour of the conflict monitoring account. However, there are several potential limitations with conflict monitoring theory. This article explores some of the previously unarticulated (or rarely articulated) supplementary assumptions that must be made for the conflict monitoring account to be consistent with several important findings in the literature, some of which might undermine the initial intuitive appeal of the theory. Indeed, this opinion paper presents the view that conflict adaptation may not actually be particularly adaptive for performance. This article also discusses alternative interpretations of so-called "attentional control" phenomena. According to this view, participants may simply be learning regularities in the task structure that are unintentionally introduced when manipulating conflict (e.g., contingent regularities between distracting stimuli and responses). This sort of learning does benefit performance and is inherent for our functioning in the world, making this a more parsimonious view. Although simplicity is not everything, this article will present the case that the assumptions (often hidden or non-obvious) of conflict monitoring theory are non-trivial and, in many cases, imply relatively non-adaptive processes.

Posterior delta/theta EEG activity as an early signal of Stroop conflict detection.

The conflict monitoring theory postulates that conflict detection is initiated in the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), indexed by midfrontal theta oscillations in the electroencephalogram (EEG). Recent research suggested that distractor detection (in the Eriksen flanker task) can be initiated relatively early by attentional control processes in the occipital lobe. Whether attentional control is also involved in the detection of stimulus-response overlapping conflict in the Stroop task is yet unclear. In the present study, we analyzed EEG time-frequency data (N=47) to investigate the contribution of early attentional control processes to the detection of response conflict and semantic conflict in a lateralized version of the color-word Stroop task. The behavioral results showed significant conflict effects in response times (RT). The EEG results showed a prominent midfrontal response conflict effect in total theta power (4-8Hz). Importantly, detection of response conflict and semantic conflict was observed in posterior delta/theta power (2-8Hz), which was lateralized depending on the presentation side of the irrelevant Stroop words. In explorative regression analysis, both the midfrontal and the posterior response conflict effects predicted the size of response conflict errors. These results suggest that attentional control processes in posterior areas contribute to the initiation of response-conflict detection in the Stroop task. The findings are consistent with the idea of a representational link between stimulus and response features, known as the common coding principle.

Temporal dynamics of conflict adaptation across different conflict strengths.

Conflict adaptation is considered to reflect the adjustment of cognitive control, and it is critical for adaptive behavior. Despite intensive investigations on conflict adaptation, straightforward evidence on how changes in conflict strength influence the behavioral and neural dynamics of conflict adaptation remains scarce. To address this issue, we manipulated conflict strength by varying distractor-target congruency to investigate whether conflict strength per se or the expectancy of conflict strength triggers the adjustment of cognitive control. Behavioral and electroencephalographic (EEG) measures were recorded while participants performed a variant four-choice flanker task without feature repetitions. The behavioral results showed that reaction times increased with increasing conflict strength. Importantly, there were conflict adaptations between the congruent and incongruent-low, congruent and incongruent-high, and incongruent-low and incongruent-high conditions. Consistent with the behavioral results, the EEG results revealed that N2 and P3 were sensitive to conflict strength. Critically, there were typical conflict adaptations between every two conflict conditions on the early P3 amplitude related to the adjustment of attentional strategies. However, there were no differences among these conflict adaptation effects, both on reaction times and the early P3 amplitude, demonstrating that the expectancy of conflict strength rather than conflict strength per se may play a crucial role in conflict adaptation. Altogether, these results emphasize the functional role of expectancy based on previous conflict strength in the exertion of cognitive control, which is in accordance with the repetition expectation theory than with the conflict monitoring theory.

Conflict-monitoring theory in overtime: Is temporal learning a viable explanation for the congruency sequence effect?

In interference tasks (e.g., Stroop, 1935), congruency effects are larger following a congruent versus an incongruent trial. This "congruency sequence effect" has been traditionally explained in terms of a conflict-monitoring mechanism that focuses attention toward relevant information when conflict has recently been experienced. More recently, it has been suggested that effects of this sort result from differences in the temporal expectancies formed following congruent trials (fast responding) versus incongruent trials (slow responding). Evidence supporting this "temporal-learning" account was recently reported for a similar effect, the finding that congruency effects are larger in a mostly congruent list than in a mostly incongruent list. That is, consistent with the idea that this "proportion-congruent effect" is based on different temporal expectancies following congruent versus incongruent trials in interference tasks, the proportion-congruent effect was eliminated on normal (i.e., immediate-response) trials when temporal expectancies were equated by requiring a delayed response on the prior trial. In two experiments, we examined whether this delayed-response procedure would have a similar impact on the congruency sequence effect. Consistent with the temporal-learning account (but not inconsistent with conflict-monitoring accounts), the congruency sequence effect on immediate-response trials was eliminated when the previous trial required a delayed response. However, no evidence supporting the temporal-learning account emerged from reanalyses of experiments requiring only immediate responses in which the response latency in the previous trial functioned as the temporal-expectancy index. Overall, the present results and analyses do not provide much evidence favoring the temporal-learning account over conflict-monitoring accounts of the congruency sequence effect. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

Supplemental Material for Conflict-Monitoring Theory in Overtime: Is Temporal Learning a Viable Explanation for the Congruency Sequence Effect?

Supplemental Material for Conflict-Monitoring Theory in Overtime: Is Temporal Learning a Viable Explanation for the Congruency Sequence Effect?

Conflict monitoring and attentional adjustment during binocular rivalry.

To make sense of ambiguous and, at times, fragmentary sensory input, the brain must rely on a process of active interpretation. At any given moment, only one of several possible perceptual representations prevails in our conscious experience. Our hypothesis is that the competition between alternative representations induces a pattern of neural activation resembling cognitive conflict, eventually leading to fluctuations between different perceptual outcomes in the case of steep competition. To test this hypothesis, we probed changes in perceptual awareness between competing images using binocular rivalry. We drew our predictions from the conflict monitoring theory, which holds that cognitive control is invoked by the detection of conflict during information processing. Our results show that fronto-medial theta oscillations (5-7 Hz), an established electroencephalography (EEG) marker of conflict, increases right before perceptual alternations and decreases thereafter, suggesting that conflict monitoring occurs during perceptual competition. Furthermore, to investigate conflict resolution via attentional engagement, we looked for a neural marker of perceptual switches as by parieto-occipital alpha oscillations (8-12 Hz). The power of parieto-occipital alpha displayed an inverse pattern to that of fronto-medial theta, reflecting periods of high interocular inhibition during stable perception, and low inhibition around moments of perceptual change. Our findings aim to elucidate the relationship between conflict monitoring mechanisms and perceptual awareness.

The binding guided by attention: Toward an integrated approach on the investigations of conflict adaptation

<p indent=0mm>In the everyday life, internal goals guide us to focus on task-relevant information but inhibit task-irrelevant information that however could not be completely filtered out. Here, cognitive control is required to drive the attention in accordance with internal goals. As an important phenomenon in the field of cognitive control, conflict adaptation refers to the adaptability of cognitive control in goal-guided behaviors, which is of great significance for individuals to adapt to ever-changing environments. In the lab, conflict adaptation is indexed by a reduced conflict after conflict trials (i.e., Trial <italic>n</italic>–1 is incongruent stimulus) compared with after non-conflict trials (i.e., Trial <italic>n</italic>–1 is congruent stimulus). In order to explain this important effect, researchers have proposed a number of accounts, which could be classified into two kinds of perspectives: Attention-based control accounts and memory-based learning accounts. The former includes the well-known conflict monitoring theory, the activation-suppression theory, the negative affective theory, and the expectancy theory. Whereas, the feature-integration theory, the contingency learning hypothesis, and the temporal learning hypothesis belong to the latter. In short, the control accounts emphasize that attentional resources adjustment leads to conflict adaptation through allocating more resources to the target dimension while allocating fewer resources to the distractor dimension. On the other hand, the learning accounts propose that the binding and unbinding of memories between stimulus and responses result in conflict adaptation. Due to their different research focuses, however, the previous studies have discussed the two accounts separately, which is not conducive to the investigation and understanding of the full profiles of conflict adaptation. From our perspective, conflict adaptation in essence is a goal-directed adjustment process. Meanwhile, it is also a phenomenon of learning. Accordingly, in the present comprehensive review, we proposed a hypothesis of the binding guided by attention, which combines the control accounts and the learning accounts. Specifically, conflict adaptation does not only need to guide the allocation of attention resources through task demand, but also needs to enhance the memory representation of “stimulus-response” mapping through binding learning. The integration of the two processes should ultimately promote the occurrence of conflict adaptation. In fact, our hypothesis explains conflict adaptation by combining the Biased Competition model with the Parallel Distributed Processing model. Firstly, the Biased Competition model posits that top-down selective attention enhances neuronal activities that respond to target features and inhibits response-selective neuronal activities of distractor features. Thus, the competition between neurons is biased towards target characteristics. Secondly, the Parallel Distributed Processing model postulates that different stimulus dimensions (e.g., colors and spatial locations) are processed in parallel in different channels that however can activate the same response system, and selective attention can change the processing priority of different stimulus dimensions. To conclude, by integrating the control accounts and the learning accounts, the current hypothesis provides a comprehensive and interpretable mechanism to address conflict adaptation. To be more specific, this hypothesis proposes that conflict adaptation is ultimately generated through binding learning (i.e., the Hebbian learning) with the Parallel Distributed Processing model as the underlying mechanism. More importantly, the binding learning must be guided by the top-down attention-based control mechanism, which is achieved through the Biased Competition model. In summary, the attention-guided binding learning hypothesis provides an integrated reference frame for an in-depth understanding of the internal mechanism of conflict adaptation.

A facet theory approach for the psychometric measurement of conflict monitoring

We investigated psychometric parameters and the factorial validity of a newly developed conflict monitoring questionnaire (CMQ). Whereas the integrative conflict monitoring theory presumes that higher cognitive demand serves as a teaching signal that intensifies conflict monitoring, the revised reinforcement sensitivity theory predicts that more anxious individuals anticipate more negative consequences because of a more active behavioral inhibition system (BIS). Experimental paradigms on conflict and performance monitoring reveal that the determinants of conflict monitoring imply response patterns (e.g., response adaptation or decisions under uncertainty). Since information processing can be conceived as a combination of stimulus monitoring and response patterns, each item of the CMQ comprises a determinant and a response pattern in accordance with facet theory. A total of N = 666 participants (284 male) filled in the CMQ. We performed a bifactor multiple-indicator-multiple-cause (MIMIC) model to investigate the factorial structure and measurement equivalence for gender and place of research. Our data support a four-factor model with two latent factors demonstrating determinants of conflict monitoring and two latent factors revealing response patterns of conflict monitoring. Moreover, a general performance monitoring factor was confirmed. Measurement equivalence of the latent factors was tested for gender and place of research.

Evidence for trial-by-trial dynamic adjustment of task control in unmedicated adults with OCD

According to the conflict monitoring theory, executive control requires two separable processes: conflict-monitoring and conflict-resolution. Deficits in executive control have been observed in adults with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). However, it is not yet clear whether these deficits can be attributed to deficits in conflict-monitoring, in conflict-resolution, or in both. We examined this question by administrating the Simon task to 67 unmedicated adults with OCD and 67 matched controls. The interference effect (incongruent minus congruent) was used to measure conflict-resolution. Trial-by-trial dynamic adaptation (i.e., the Gratton effect), which is indicated by smaller interference effect after conflict-laden trials compared to after non-conflict-laden trials, was used to measure conflict-monitoring. A similar interference effect was found in both the OCD and HC groups with no significant between group differences. Following incongruent trials, the interference effect became smaller for the control group as expected, but was completely eliminated for the OCD group. These data add to the accumulating evidence indicating that conflict-resolution is not globally deficient in unmedicated OCD patients and provide direct evidence that conflict-monitoring is heightened in OCD patients. Our results challenge the assumption of cognitive inflexibility in OCD and highlight the importance of studying unmedicated subjects when investigating executive control.

Conflict monitoring and the affective-signaling hypothesis-An integrative review.

Conflict-monitoring theory proposes that conflict between incompatible responses is registered by a dedicated monitoring system, and that this conflict signal triggers changes of attentional filters and adapts control processes according to the current task demands. Extending the conflict-monitoring theory, it has been suggested that conflict elicits a negative affective reaction, and that it is this affective signal that is monitored and then triggers control adaptation. This review article summarizes research on a potential signaling function of affect for cognitive control. First, we provide an overview of the conflict-monitoring theory, discuss neurophysiological and behavioral markers of monitoring and control adaptation, and introduce the affective-signaling hypothesis. In a second part, we review relevant studies that address the questions of (i) whether conflict elicits negative affect, (ii) whether negative affect is monitored, and (iii) whether affect modulates control. In sum, the reviewed literature supports the claim that conflict and errors trigger negative affect and provides some support for the claim that affect modulates control. However, studies on the monitoring of negative affect and the influence of phasic affect on control are ambiguous. On the basis of these findings, in a third part, we critically reassess the affective-signaling hypothesis, discuss relevant challenges to this account, and suggest future research strategies.

It's more than just conflict: The functional role of congruency in the sequential control adaptation

According to the conflict monitoring theory (CMT), one of the most prominent theories of cognitive control, the exertion of cognitive control is triggered by the detection of conflicting response tendencies in the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC). Recent research has challenged this emphasis of response conflicts and has debated whether in addition to shielding after incongruent trials the relaxation after congruent trials also contributes to the sequential adaptation of control. To investigate the functionality of facilitative congruent trials in sequential adaptation of control, we conducted two experiments using a visual (Experiment 1) and an auditory (Experiment 2, preregistered) Simon task with stimuli presented laterally to the left or right (creating response congruent and incongruent trials) or without any particular spatial information (creating neutral trials). Both experiments showed converging results: in the error and reaction time data, the Simon effect was smaller following incongruent trials, larger following congruent trials, and the Simon effect following neutral trials was in-between. Results thus suggest that sequential control adaptations can originate from two processes: Increased shielding in response to incongruent trials and relaxation in response to congruent trials. Argumentations for a functional role of congruent and incongruent trials in the sequential adaptation of control suggest a more general theory of fluency monitoring instead of mere conflict monitoring. In addition, such extensions of the CMT provide theoretical explanations of how control is ever relaxed in response conflict tasks after being enhanced by conflict in the first place. Last but not least, the results may also be taken as a further hint that congruent stimuli may provide a positive affective signal for control relaxation just it has already been shown for incongruent stimuli as aversive signals for the up-regulation of control (shielding).

An Analysis of N2 Event-Related-Potential Correlates of Sequential and Response-Facilitation Effects in Cognitive Control

Abstract. According to conflict-monitoring theory ( Botvinick, Braver, Barch, Carter, &amp; Cohen, 2001 ), sequential adjustments in cognitive control indicate that encountering information-processing conflict engages cognitive-control mechanisms. With 20 participants in an event-related-potential (ERP) experiment, we found significant congruence-sequence effects (CSEs) for behavioral measures and for N2 amplitude, a negative-going ERP component established in previous work to be related to cognitive control. We also found an interaction between the Stroop-trajectory manipulation and a response-compatibility manipulation for behavioral measures and, to a lesser extent, for N2 amplitude, such that the Stroop-trajectory congruence effect was larger on response-compatible than on response-incompatible trials. This study is the first to identify N2 amplitude as a neural correlate of the CSE in a confound-minimized task. Accordingly, these results found N2 amplitude to be associated with adjustments in cognitive control as a function of sequential and response-facilitation effects while also validating the Stroop-trajectory task as a confound-minimized means of assessing neural correlates of CSEs.

Neural Evidence of Cognitive Conflict During Binocular Rivalry

To make sense of ambiguous and, at times, incomplete sensory input, the brain relies on a process of active interpretation. At any given moment, only one of several possible perceptual outcomes prevails in our conscious experience. Our hypothesis is that the competition between alternative representations induces cognitive conflict, eventually leading to fluctuations between different perceptual interpretations. We used binocular rivalry, a popular protocol to probe changes in perceptual awareness and drew on the conflict monitoring theory, which holds that cognitive control is invoked by the detection of conflict during information processing. We looked for an increase in power of fronto-medial theta oscillations (5-7 Hz), an established EEG marker of conflict detection. Our results show that fm-theta power increases right before perceptual alternations and decreases thereafter, suggesting that conflict monitoring is related to perceptual competition. Furthermore, to investigate conflict resolution via attentional engagement, as held by the conflict monitoring theory, we also looked for changes in parieto-occipital alpha oscillations (8-12 Hz) associated to perceptual switches. These oscillations have been associated to attention allocation via functional inhibition in sensory cortices. The power of parieto-occipital alpha was inversely related to that of fm-theta, reflecting periods of high inter-ocular inhibition during stable perception, and low inhibition around moments of perceptual change. Our findings validate a prediction made 20 years ago in the seminal paper formulating the conflict monitoring theory, and establish a previously unknown link between conflict mechanisms and the processes leading to perceptual awareness.

Evidence against conflict monitoring and adaptation: An updated review.

One of the most influential ideas in recent decades in the cognitive psychology literature is conflict monitoring theory. According to this account, each time we experience a conflict (e.g., between a colour word and print colour in the Stroop task), attentional control is upregulated to minimize distraction on subsequent trials. Though influential, evidence purported to support this theoretical model (primarily, proportion congruent and congruency sequence effects) has been frequently criticized. Furious debate has centered on whether or not conflict monitoring does or does not occur and, if so, under which conditions. The present article presents an updated review of this debate. In particular, the article considers new research that either (a) seems particularly damaging for the conflict monitoring view or (b) seems to provide support for the theory. The author argues that new findings of the latter sort are still not compelling, several of which have already-demonstrated confounds and others which are plausibly confounded. Further progress has, to a greater extent than not, provided even stronger support for the position that conflict monitoring is merely an illusion. Instead, the net results can be more coherently understood in terms of (relatively) simpler learning/memory biases unrelated to conflict or attention that confound the key paradigms.

Focused cognitive control in dishonesty: Evidence for predominantly transient conflict adaptation.

Giving a dishonest response to a question entails cognitive conflict due to an initial activation of the truthful response. Following conflict monitoring theory, dishonest responding could therefore elicit transient and sustained control adaptation processes to mitigate such conflict, and the current experiments take on the scope and specificity of such conflict adaptation in dishonesty. Transient adaptation reduces differences between honest and dishonest responding following a recent dishonest response. Sustained adaptation has a similar behavioral signature but is driven by the overall frequency of dishonest responding. Both types of adaptation to recent and frequent dishonest responses have been separately documented, leaving open whether control processes in dishonest responding can flexibly adapt to transient and sustained conflict signals of dishonest and other actions. This was the goal of the present experiments which studied (dis)honest responding to autobiographical yes/no questions. Experiment 1 showed robust transient adaptation to recent dishonest responses whereas sustained control adaptation failed to exert an influence on behavior. It further revealed that transient effects may create a spurious impression of sustained adaptation in typical experimental settings. Experiments 2 and 3 examined whether dishonest responding can profit from transient and sustained adaption processes triggered by other behavioral conflicts. This was clearly not the case: Dishonest responding adapted markedly to recent (dis)honest responses but not to any context of other conflicts. These findings indicate that control adaptation in dishonest responding is strong but surprisingly focused and they point to a potential trade-off between transient and sustained adaptation. (PsycINFO Database Record

Conflict monitoring mechanism at the single-neuron level in the human ventral anterior cingulate cortex

Life requires monitoring and adjusting behavior in the face of conflicts. The conflict monitoring theory implicates the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) in these processes; its ventral aspect (vACC) specializes in emotional conflict. To elucidate the underpinning neural mechanism, we recorded vACC extracellular activity from 12 patients with mood disorders or epilepsy who performed the face-emotional Stroop task. Behaviorally, both conflict detection and adaptation to conflict were evident. The firing rate of neurons in the vACC represented current conflict, i.e., current-congruency. The late onset of the effect is compatible with a role in monitoring. Additionally, early responses of some neurons represented the immediate history of conflicts, i.e., previous-trial-congruency. Finally, in some neurons the response to the current-trial was modulated by previous-trial-congruency, laying the ground for adjusting-to-conflicts. Our results uncover a single neuron level mechanism in the vACC that encodes and integrates past and present emotional conflicts, allowing humans to accommodate their responses accordingly.