This paper originated from a contribution to the Green Belt Seminar organised by the Association for the Protection of Rural Scotland, September 1999 in Glasgow. It is based on the understanding that many of those concerned about the protection of Rural Britain are apprehensive of the expansive development of cities. City and country are seen to be in conflict, and the culprit is the city, the growth of which has to be contained with the help of green belts. This paper is about the relationship between city and country; it argues that there is indeed a conflict to do with urbanisation and decentralisation but that today the green belt is an inadequate concept to deal with these processes. The paper investigates first the origin and objectives of the green belt concept and its application up to the inter-war period and examines then the immediate post World War II plans for London and Glasgow in which the green belt concept played an important role. It concludes that the combination of urbanisation on the one hand and of decentralisation, for which the green belt concept was partially responsible, on the other have generated metropolitan and conurbation structures which today require a new planning and urban design approach. The final part of the paper discusses shortly the two concepts that are suggested: (a) the return to the compact city or (b) the acceptance and improvement of the decentralised structure of the city region. It suggests that the return to the compact city is economically unmanageable and socially unacceptable; the structure of the conurbation that emerged needs to be made to work and the concept that might help achieve this is based on compact neighbourhoods, districts and towns as micro-structural elements of the city region and a mutually supportive, i.e. symbiotic relationship between built-up areas and open land.
Read full abstract