Entecavir Combination Research Articles

FRI-145 - Delayed Serologic Response in Multi-Drug Resistant CHB Patients with Tenofovir and Entecavir Combination Therapy in Real Clinical Practice

FRI-145 - Delayed Serologic Response in Multi-Drug Resistant CHB Patients with Tenofovir and Entecavir Combination Therapy in Real Clinical Practice

Comparable efficacy with entecavir monotherapy and tenofovir–entecavir combination in chronic hepatitis B patients

ObjectivesThe long-term goal for chronic hepatitis B patients is to maintain viral suppression in order to reduce disease progression risk. Because patients with previous treatment failure may have multiple viral...

Clinical investigation of entecavir combined with adefovir dipivoxil in the treatment of lamivudine-resistant hepatitis B cirrhosis

Objective To investigate the clinical effect of entecavir combined with adefovir dipivoxil in the treatment of lamivudine-resistant hepatitis B cirrhosis, to provide a reference for clinical treatment. Methods 117 cases of liver cirrhosis with lamivudine resistance were selected, they were divided into the control group and the observation group according to treatment.60 cases in the observation group used entecavir and adefovir combination therapy, 57 cases in the control group was given lamivudine combined with adefovir dipivoxil.The HBeAg conversion rate, HBV-DNA negative rate, liver function, liver function Child-pugh score were compared between two groups. Results After treatment for 24 weeks, 48 weeks, the HBV-DNA negative conversion rates in the observation group were 75.00%, 95.00%, which were higher than those in the control group, the differences were statistically significant (χ2=4.251, P=0.024; χ2=4.535, P=0.018). In the observation group, ALB, ALT, TBiL, PT improved better than the control group, the differences were statistically significant(t=4.229, P=0.025; t=6.214, P=0.008; t=5.514, P=0.014; t=5.233, P=0.017). After treatment, CTP of the observation group was (7.15 ± 1.05) points, which was significantly lower than the control group (8.86 ± 1.47) points, the difference was statistically significant (t=5.874, P=0.010). The incidence rate of adverse reactions between the two groups showed no statistically significant difference(P>0.05). Conclusion Entecavir combined with adefovir dipivoxil therapy has good effect for lamivudine-resistant liver cirrhosis, which will help to improve liver function, inhibit HBV replication, it is worthy of clinical application. Key words: Liver cirrhosis; Entecavir; Adefovir dipivoxil; Lamivudine

The Efficacy and Safety of Entecavir and Interferon Combination Therapy for Chronic Hepatitis B Virus Infection: A Meta-Analysis.

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of entecavir (ETV) and interferon (IFN) combination therapy in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) mono-infection via a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). All eligible RCTs evaluating combination therapy for treating CHB were identified from nine electronic databases. A meta-analysis was performed in accordance with the Cochrane Systemic Review handbook. Eleven trials encompassing 1010 participants were included in this meta-analysis. It showed that at 12 and ≥ 96 weeks of therapy, the combination of ETV and IFN was not better than ETV in improving the undetectable HBV DNA (12 weeks: RR=1.12, 95% CI=0.88-1.42; ≥ 96 weeks: RR = 0.64, 95% CI=0.21-1.98, respectively) and HBeAg seroconversion rates (12 weeks: RR=1.35, 95% CI=0.60-3.04; ≥ 96 weeks: RR=1.36, 95% CI=0.75-2.64, respectively). But at 48 weeks of therapy and approximately 2 years of follow up, combination therapy was superior to ETV in improving the undetectable HBV DNA (48 weeks: RR=1.46, 95% CI=1.13-1.90; follow up: RR=2.20, 95% CI=1.26-3.81, respectively) and HBeAg seroconversion rates (48 weeks: RR=1.82, 95% CI=1.44-2.30; follow up: RR=1.92, 95% CI=1.19-3.11, respectively). When compared to IFN group, at 24 and 48 weeks of therapy, combination group showed a greater undetectable HBV DNA (24 weeks: RR=2.14, 95% CI=1.59-2.89; 48 weeks: RR=2.28, 95% CI=1.54-3.37, respectively) and ALT normalization rate (24 weeks: RR=1.56, 95% CI= 1.24-1.96; 48 weeks: RR=1.55, 95% CI = 1.16-2.07, respectively). At 48 weeks of therapy, combination group achieved a greater HBeAg seroconversion rate than IFN (48 weeks: RR=1.58, 95% CI=1.24-2.00). No significant differences were observed in the side effects of the three therapies. So we can conclude that ETV and IFN combination therapy is more effective than ETV or IFN mono-therapy in CHB treatment. ETV, IFN, and the combination of the two are safe in CHB treatment.

Efficacy of HBV-pulsed DCs in combination with entecavir in patients with chronic hepatitis B infection

Dendritic cells (DCs) are multifunctional cells that initiate adaptive immune responses. Patients with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection have reduced numbers of DCs which may be functionally impaired, a defect that may contribute to viral persistence. Autologous DC-based immunotherapy is considered to be a treatment option for chronic HBV infection (CHB). We evaluated the therapeutic efficacy of HBV-pulsed DCs in combination with the antiviral drug entecavir in patients with CHB. Eighty patients were divided into four groups: HBV-pulsed DCs only, HBV-pulsed DCs plus entecavir, entecavir only, and an untreated control group. Patients on combination therapy exhibited greater antiviral responses than patients on either monotherapy. The combination of HBV-pulsed DCs and entecavir resulted in the largest reduction in serum viral DNA levels and the highest percentage of virologic response. In addition, combination therapy resulted in viral e antigen (HBeAg) loss and seroconversion. These results suggest that the combination of HBV-pulsed autologous DCs and entecavir could be therapeutically advantageous for patients with CHB.

Low-dose short-term hepatitis B immunoglobulin with high genetic barrier antivirals: the ideal post-transplant hepatitis B virus prophylaxis?

Low-dose hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) and nucleos(t)ides analogs (lamivudine/adefovir) used for the prevention of hepatitis B virus (HBV) recurrence after liver transplantation (LT) are associated with some risk of HBV recurrence and antiviral resistance. The study cohort included 176 patients (at least >12 months follow-up) with HBV cirrhosis/hepatocellular carcinoma who received secondary prophylaxis with indefinite entecavir/tenofovir after living-donor LT (LDLT). All patients received 10,000 IU intravenous HBIG in anhepatic phase followed by 600-1000 IU intramuscularly daily for 7 days, weekly for 3 weeks, and then monthly, to keep antiHBs levels >100 mIU/mL for 1 year. Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and HBV DNA were tested every 6 months. The study cohort is composed of 157 men and 19 women, mean age 47.9 ± 10.1 years, all HBsAg positive, 35 (19.8%) had HBV DNA >2000 IU/mL before LT. After LT, patients received entecavir (n = 126, 71.5%), tenofovir (n = 20, 11.3%), or a combination of entecavir and tenofovir (n = 30, 17% for 3 months), followed by entecavir alone. During follow-up of 43 (12-117) months, 2 patients (including 1 with non-compliance) had HBV recurrence. In a large cohort of LDLT recipients for HBV-related liver disease, use of low-dose short-term HBIG with high genetic barrier drugs results in a substantially lower incidence of HBV recurrence, even in high-risk patients.

Tenofovir monotherapy versus tenofovir and entecavir combination therapy in adefovir-resistant chronic hepatitis B patients with multiple drug failure: results of a randomised trial

ObjectiveLittle clinical data are available regarding the optimal treatment of patients who harbour adefovir-resistant HBV.DesignIn this multicentre trial, patients who had adefovir-resistant HBV with serum HBV DNA levels >60 IU/mL...

Tenofovir monotherapy versus tenofovir and entecavir combination therapy in patients with entecavir-resistant chronic hepatitis B with multiple drug failure: results of a randomised trial

ObjectiveLittle clinical data are available regarding the optimal treatment of patients who harbour entecavir (ETV)-resistant HBV.DesignIn this multicentre randomised trial, patients who had HBV with ETV resistance-associated mutations and serum...

A randomized, open-label clinical study of combined pegylated interferon Alfa-2a (40KD) and entecavir treatment for hepatitis B "e" antigen-positive chronic hepatitis B.

Treatment with pegylated interferon (peg-IFN) alfa-2a (40KD) results in hepatitis B "e" antigen (HBeAg) seroconversion 6 months after treatment in up to 36% of HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B patients. This study explored the efficacy of a novel combination of peg-IFN alfa-2a and entecavir (ETV), a potent nucleoside analogue. In total, 218 treatment-naive Chinese HBeAg-positive patients were randomized to peg-IFN alfa-2a (180 µg/week) for 48 weeks, either as monotherapy (n = 72), or with 24 weeks of ETV (0.5 mg/daily) added at week 13 (ETV add-on, n = 73), or pretreatment with a 24-week course of ETV, starting peg-IFN alfa-2a at week 21 (ETV pretreatment, n = 73). The primary endpoint was reduction in quantitative HBeAg from baseline to 24 weeks posttreatment. Significant reductions in HBeAg from baseline were achieved in all treatment groups 24 weeks posttreatment; reductions were comparable across treatment arms (shown as log10 Paul Ehrlich international units [PEIU]/mL): monotherapy: -1.4 (SD, 1.8); ETV add-on: -1.6 (SD, 1.8); ETV pretreatment: -1.3 (SD, 1.7). Rates of HBeAg seroconversion were similar across treatment groups posttreatment (monotherapy: 22 [31%]; ETV add-on: 18 [25%]; ETV pretreatment: 19 [26%]). Significantly greater reductions of hepatitis B virus DNA were achieved with ETV add-on while on treatment, but were not sustained posttreatment. Safety profiles were comparable between treatment groups; adverse events were experienced by 62 (86%) monotherapy, 65 (89%) ETV add-on, and 58 (81%) ETV pretreatment patients. Neither ETV add-on nor ETV pretreatment demonstrated superiority compared with 48 weeks of peg-IFN alfa-2a monotherapy. The optimal treatment strategy using nucleos(t)ide analogues and peg-IFN alfa-2a remains to be determined. Clinical Trials Registration. NCT00614471.

Entecavir plus adefovir combination therapy versus lamivudine add-on adefovir for lamivudine-resistant chronic hepatitis B: A meta-analysis.

To determine whether adefovir (ADV) in combination with entecavir (ETV) is more effective than with lamivudine (LAM) in patients with lamivudine-resistant chronic HBV infection, electronic databases were searched through May 10th, 2013 to obtain relevant trials which met the inclusion criteria. Meta-analysis was performed on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomized studies. Four trials containing a total of 323 patients were included. Serum HBV DNA reductions after 3 and 6 months of treatment in the ETV + ADV group were greater than that of LAM + ADV group (mean difference (MD) = 0.90, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.74-1.07, P < 0.00001; MD = 0.81, 95% CI: 0.57-1.06, P < 0.00001). The rate of 6 months HBV DNA undetectability with ETV and ADV was higher than that of LAM and ADV (relative risk (RR) = 1.63, 95% CI: 1.14-2.34, P < 0.007). There were higher rates of serum ALT normalization than those in LAM + ADV group after 6 months of treatment (RR = 1.40, 95% CI: 1.11-1.77, P < 0.005). The ETV + ADV group had lower viral breakthrough and genotypic mutation rates than LAM + ADV group after 12 months of treatment (RR = 0.24, 95% CI: 0.10-0.58, P = 0.002). The combination of ETV plus ADV is a more effective rescue therapy than LAM add-on ADV in patients with LAM-resistant HBV.

701 Tenofovir (TDF) Monotherapy Is Comparable to Tenofovir and Entecavir (TDF+ETV) Combination Therapy As Rescue Therapy for Patients With Partial Response to ETV: A Multicenter Study

701 Tenofovir (TDF) Monotherapy Is Comparable to Tenofovir and Entecavir (TDF+ETV) Combination Therapy As Rescue Therapy for Patients With Partial Response to ETV: A Multicenter Study

Clinical utility of entecavir for chronic hepatitis B in Chinese patients

The People’s Republic of China has one of the highest rates of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. This review summarizes recent data from studies of entecavir, one of the recommended first-line oral therapies for treating chronic hepatitis B, in Chinese HBV-infected patients. Long-term treatment with entecavir is efficacious and well tolerated, and studies comparing entecavir with other nucleos(t)ide therapies, such as lamivudine, adefovir, and telbivudine, demonstrate superior antiviral effects for entecavir therapy and comparable safety profiles. Entecavir monotherapy and combination treatment with other nucleos(t) ide analogs has been shown to be efficacious in the treatment of lamivudine-resistant and adefovir-resistant patients with HBV infection, as well as in patients with multidrug-resistant disease. Entecavir has also been shown to be effective in patients with HBV-associated clinical morbidity, including cirrhosis and liver failure, as well as in preventing recurrence of HBV following liver transplantation and in preventing reactivation of HBV after immunosuppres-sive therapy. Although the cost of anti-HBV therapy is a particular concern in the People’s Republic of China, a number of studies have recently demonstrated that entecavir (particularly long-term therapy) represents a more cost-effective treatment strategy compared with other nucleos(t)ide therapies. Further research is required to assess the effects of entecavir combination therapy on hepatitis B surface antigen clearance, and in drug-resistant patients in the People’s Republic of China.

Clinical Outcomes and Risk Factors of Hepatitis B Virus Recurrence in Patients Who Received Prophylaxis With Entecavir and Hepatitis B Immunoglobulin Following Liver Transplantation

IntroductionAlthough entecavir (ETV) and hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) have widely been used for prophylaxis of hepatitis B virus (HBV) recurrence following liver transplantation (OLT), there have been few studies about clinical outcomes and risk factors of HBV recurrence. Materials and methodsThis study retrospectively assessed clinical outcomes and identified risk factors of post-transplant HBV recurrence in 154 patients who received prophylaxis with both ETV and HBIG after OLT. ResultsThe median follow-up duration was 28.0 months (range, 1.0–57.8). Post-transplant HBV recurrence occurred in 5 patients (3.2%) without any ETV-resistant mutants. The overall rates of HBV recurrence at 1, 2, and 4 years were 0.6%, 1.6%, and 6.2%, respectively. We found that recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) was an independent risk factor of HBV recurrence (hazard ratio = 13.5, 95% confidence interval, 2.4–74.4; P = .006). ConclusionsProphylaxis with a combination of ETV and HBIG resulted in a low HBV recurrence rate following OLT without any emergence of ETV-resistant mutants. Recurrent HCC was an independent risk factor of HBV recurrence in patients who received prophylaxis with both ETV and HBIG for prophylaxis following OLT.

Antiviral treatment for hepatitis B virus recurrence following liver transplantation

The purpose of this study was to identify the factors associated with the recurrence of hepatitis B virus (HBV) following liver transplantation (LT) for HBV-related disease and to recognize the outcome of treatment for HBV recurrence with oral nucleos(t)ide analogues. Six hundred and sixty-seven LTs were performed for HBsAg-positive adult patients in our institute from 1996 to 2010. HBV prophylaxis was performed by hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) monotherapy or HBIG and entecavir combination therapy. There were 63 cases (11.4%) of HBV recurrences during a median follow-up of 51 months. The median time to HBV recurrence was 22 months. A preoperative HBV DNA load of more than 10(5) IU/mL, HBIG monotherapy, and hepatocellular carcinoma in the explant liver were independent risk factors for HBV recurrence following LT in multivariate analysis. Patient survival at 10 yr was 54.2% for HBV-recurrent patients. Among patients with HBV recurrence, HBsAg seroclearance was achieved in 13 patients (20.6%), but HBsAg seroclearance did not affect survival in these patients after the recurrence of HBV (p = 0.28). The recurrence of HBV led to graft failure in six cases. HBV recurrence should be prevented by strict management of pre-transplant HBV viremia and an effective post-transplant HBV prophylaxis.

Living related liver transplantation for hepatitis B-related liver disease without hepatitis B immune globulin prophylaxis

Hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIG) is routinely used in liver transplantation for hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related liver disease. With potent oral antivirals, HBIG may not be required. We conducted a prospective trial to evaluate living related liver transplantation (LRLT) without HBIG. Eighty-nine patients with HBV-related liver disease underwent LRLT between January 2005 and January 2012. All donors were vaccinated with the HBV vaccine. All patients were given oral antivirals for HBV before transplantation. Patients with HBV DNA levels ≤ 2000 IU/mL were not given HBIG, and patients with HBV DNA levels > 2000 IU/mL were given HBIG. Recurrence was defined as HBV DNA positivity 6 months after transplantation. Seventy-five of the 89 patients who underwent LRLT for HBV-related liver disease were not given HBIG. Nineteen patients received a combination of lamivudine and adefovir, 42 received entecavir, 12 received tenofovir, and 2 received a combination of entecavir and tenofovir. At the last follow-up (median = 21 months, range = 1-83 months), all patients were HBV DNA-negative. Sixty-six patients cleared hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), and 19 patients formed antibody to hepatitis B surface antigen (anti-HBs). The cumulative probabilities of clearing HBsAg were 90% and 92% at 1 and 2 years after transplantation, respectively. Nine patients were HBsAg-positive with undetectable DNA at the last follow-up. The recurrence rate in our series was 8% (6/75). Five of these 6 patients had stopped taking oral antivirals, and 1 had entecavir resistance. All recurrences were salvaged with changes in the oral antivirals. The actuarial probability of survival in this cohort was 73.7% at 83 months. There was no mortality due to HBV recurrence. In conclusion, HBV prophylaxis with oral antivirals and without HBIG is safe and effective in LRLT. A majority of the patients will clear HBsAg, and some will develop anti-HBs antibodies.

Update on rescue therapies in patients with lamivudine-resistant chronic hepatitis B

Chronic hepatitis B continues to be a global problem, with an estimated 240 million cases according to the World Health Organization. Chronic infection with the hepatitis B virus (HBV) is associated with cirrhosis, hepatic decompensation, and hepatocellular carcinoma. There are currently several US Food and Drug Administration-approved medications for treating chronic hepatitis B, with Lamivudine (LAM) being the first oral agent made available. The major problem with LAM is significantly decreased effectiveness over time due to the development of anti-HBV resistance that can lead to virologic and biochemical breakthrough as well as hepatitis B flare, progression of liver disease, and decompensation of pre-existing cirrhosis. Despite its high anti-HBV resistant rate, LAM remains widely used in underdeveloped countries due to its wide availability and low cost compared to other antiviral medications, including those that are more effective. Therefore, it is still clinically important to learn how to prevent and treat LAM resistant strains of HBV. Several regimens with the other available antiviral agents have been studied, including switching to monotherapy with either Adefovir, Entecavir, or Tenofovir, adding Adefovir to LAM, and switching to a combination of Adefovir and Entecavir. This review article will examine molecular mechanisms and diagnosis of LAM anti-HBV resistance, risks for and approaches to reduce LAM anti-HBV resistance, and currently available rescue therapy regimens for LAM resistance.

A case of anti-GBM glomerulonephritis superimposed on HBV-associated membranous nephropathy.

In September 2010, a 75-year-old hepatitis B virus (HBV)-positive man was admitted to our hospital because of fever, persistent cough, general fatigue, and leg edema. The patient was a hepatitis B surface antigen carrier with detectable HBV DNA level. On admission, laboratory examination revealed severe inflammatory signs, decreased serum albumin, and renal insufficiency with proteinuria. The patient had rapidly progressive renal insufficiency without pulmonary involvement over the few days after admission. Renal biopsy showed membranous nephropathy (MN) with crescent formation. Further serological study revealed a high titer of anti-glomerular basement membrane (GBM) antibody, suggestive of anti-GBM glomerulonephritis superimposed on HBV-associated MN. For both preventing HBV reactivation during immunosuppressive therapy and treating HBV-associated MN, the administration of entecavir was immediately initiated, and then treatment with plasma exchange (PE) and intravenous methylprednisolone administration was performed. Both HBV DNA level and an anti-GBM titer became undetectable, and clinical remission of MN was subsequently achieved. This was a rare case of an elderly patient with anti-GBM glomerulonephritis superimposed on HBV-associated MN, who was successfully treated with PE, corticosteroid, and entecavir combination therapy.

Resistance is no Longer a Problem with Entecavir and Tenofovir

The treatment of chronic hepatitis B has been transformed with the advent of nucleos(t)ide analogues. With this came the recognition of viral resistance which was defined as rebound of viral HBV DNA >1 log from nadir associated with genotypic mutations of viral resistance. Resistance was associated with loss of efficacy, with the clinical consequences of viral relapse, reactivation of chronic hepatitis B, increased risk of hepatitis B flares, liver decompensation, and increased mortality especially in cirrhotic patients. Resistance rates varied between different nucleos(t)ide analogues and were generally classified as low or high genetic barrier to resistance. Different pathways to development of viral resistance were recognized, with therapeutic options for rescue therapy determined by such pathways. The two high genetic barrier drugs, entecavir and tenofovir showed remarkably low or absence of viral resistance in treatment naive patients over 5 years or longer of therapy. However in treatment-experienced patients, particularly those with viral resistance, results were less optimal. For entecavir, prior lamivudine resistance conferred an entecavir resistance rate of 43 % over 5 years while with tenofovir, although resistance did not seem apparent, patients with prior adefovir resistance had suboptimal responses to tenofovir therapy. In cases of multiresistant hepatitis B virus defined as resistance to at least two nucleos(t)ide analogues in the same viral strain, rescue with a combination of tenofovir and entecavir appeared highly efficacious. Consequently, the optimistic view that these new drugs lead to absence of resistance needs to be tempered by the larger burden of drug experienced and drug resistant patients compared to treatment naive patients. Furthermore, it is unclear whether resistance may be a concern with high genetic barrier drugs after one or two decades of therapy. In time, it is possible that with the increasing use of high genetic barrier drugs, viral resistance will be a lesser problem, but unlikely to disappear completely.

Efficacy and safety of entecavir plus carnitine complex (GODEX®) compared to entecavir monotherapy in patient with ALT elevated chronic hepatitis B: randomized, multicenter open-label trials. The GOAL study

Background/AimsCarnitine and vitamin complex (Godex®) is widely used in patients with chronic liver disease who show elevated liver enzyme in South Korea. The purpose of this study is to identify the efficacy and safety of carnitine from entecavir combination therapy in Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) elevated Chronic Hepatitis B (CHB) patients.Methods130 treatment-naïve patients with CHB were enrolled from 13 sites. The patients were randomly selected to the entecavir and the complex of entecavir and carnitine. The primary endpoint of the study is ALT normalization level after 12 months.ResultsAmong the 130 patients, 119 patients completed the study treatment. The ALT normalization at 3 months was 58.9% for the monotherapy and 95.2% for the combination therapy (P<0.0001). ALT normalization rate at 12 months was 85.7% for the monotherapy and 100% for the combination group (P=0.0019). The rate of less than HBV DNA 300 copies/mL at 12 months was not statistically significant (P=0.5318) 75.9% for the monotherapy, 70.7% for the combination and it was. Quantification of HBsAg level was not different from the monotherapy to combination at 12 months. Changes of ELISPOT value to evaluate the INF-γ secretion by HBsAg showed the increasing trend of combination therapy compare to mono-treatment.ConclusionsALT normalization rate was higher in carnitine complex combination group than entecavir group in CHB. Combination group was faster than entecavir mono-treatment group on ALT normalization rate. HBV DNA normalization rate and the serum HBV-DNA level were not changed by carnitine complex treatment.

The Efficacy of Adefovir Plus Entecavir Combination Therapy in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis B Refractory to Both Lamivudine and Adefovir

The efficacy of adefovir (ADV) plus entecavir (ETV) combination in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) who developed multidrug refractoriness had not been fully evaluated. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of ADV plus ETV as compared to that of lamivudine (LAM) plus ADV in the patients with antiviral refractoriness to sequential LAM monotherapy and then ADV monotherapy. Twenty-seven patients were treated with a combination of ADV plus ETV and 63 patients were treated with a combination of LAM plus ADV. The virological and biochemical parameters were compared between the two groups, retrospectively. Treatment with a combination of ADV plus ETV produced significantly superior virological response than that of a combination of LAM plus ADV. At 12 months, the HBV DNA declined more in the ADV plus ETV group than in the LAM plus ADV (-4.52 ± 1.956 vs. -2.65 ± 1.723 log 10 IU/mL; p = 0.001). The rate of a complete response at 12 months was greater in the ADV plus ETV group than that in the LAM plus ADV group (63.16 vs. 14.81 %, p < 0.001). In the patients with CHB refractory to both LAM and ADV, the response to ADV plus ETV was significantly superior compared to that of the LAM plus ADV in suppressing HBV DNA. The result indicates that ADV plus ETV can be used as a bridging therapy in the patients with refractoriness to both LAM and ADV, especially in the areas where tenofovir is not yet available.