In the above-mentioned article, which appeared in Microwave and Optical Technology Letters, Volume 59#01, DOI 30226, a few typing errors were introduced by journal. The corrections are shown below: The correct caption of Figure 2 is the following: Simulation of effective permittivity at 6GHz of a bilayer as function of thickness of Rohacell® layer and conductivity of conductive layer. The conductive composite is 175 μm thick and . Effective permittivity must at least cross the 0 to 1 gap for a chosen conductivity of composite (e.g., S/m). The correct caption of Figure 3 is the following: Illustration of Rohacell®-CNT film bilayers and their effective permittivity characterized by PNAX. In subsection 2.3. EM Characterization, the word Rohacell should be written Rohacell®. In Table 1, the third column name is instead of . In the section 3. Results and discussion, the end of the first paragraph should be corrected as: Our implementation process provides a low thickness film of 175μm, while simulations give the lower bound of the composite conductivity to reach depending on the dielectric layer. The conductivity of the AquaCylTM CNT sandwich is fixed at S/m so that a realistic variation of the Rohacell® allows sweeping the range. In the same section 3, Results and discussion, the word Rohacell(g) should be Rohacell®. The correct caption of Figure 6 is the following: Near field characterization of a metallic cylinder in (a) which is cloaked by a stack of 5 Rohacell®-CNT composite bilayers in (b). The free space is characterized in (c) for comparison with cloaked system. In the acknowledgments, all the accents are missing. The correction is: […] This work is also supported by the MINATIS project co-funded by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) and the Walloon region, and by the Communauté Française de Belgique, through the project “Nano4waves” funded by its research program “Actions de Recherche Concertées.” […] We thank R. Berben, P. van Velthem, M. Sclavon, P. Danlée and P. Lipnik for assistance during processing and microscopic observations. In addition, incorrect reference writing were included. The correction is shown below: 16. Y. Danlée, C. Bailly, and I. Huynen, Compos Sci Technol 100 (2014), 182–188. 21. B. Kanté, D. Germain, and A. de Lustrac, Phys Rev B 80 (2009), 201104. The authors regret any confusion caused by these errors.