Collector Strips Research Articles

A xenon ionization detector for scanned projection radiography: 95-channel prototype evaluation.

We have designed, constructed, and tested a 95-channel prototype xenon ionization detector for use in scanned projection radiography (SPR). This detector has higher spatial resolution, is more dose efficient, and is easier to construct than computed tomography (CT) xenon ionization detectors. It consists of two parallel plates separated by a 2-mm gap filled with xenon gas at 2 MPa (20 atm). One plate is a high-voltage electrode while the other is a circuit board etched to form an array of metal collector strips focused on the x-ray source. The resulting detector channels are 0.5 mm wide and 6 cm long. In this paper we present results from measurements of system noise and detector channel calibration. We compared the detector system to a screen/film system and found that it allows the detection of structures with 0.17% radiographic contrast compared to 2% contrast required for detection with screen/film when tested by imaging a 10-cm-thick Lucite phantom with a 10 X 10(-6) C/kg exposure. From images of resolution test patterns, the limiting resolution of the detector is 2.0 1p/mm at 1.6 magnification. Images of reduction mammoplasty tissue samples, obtained with 1/17 the exposure of screen/film images, had the same low-contrast sensitivity but contained less high-contrast detail than the film images.

A xenon ionization detector for digital radiography

Xenon gas x-ray detectors have been used successfully in CT scanners; however, they have been found to be unsuitable for digital radiography. We have designed and built a new type of xenon x-ray detector array and tested its suitability for digital radiography. The detector consists of two parallel plates separated by a 0.5-mm gap, filled with xenon gas at a pressure of about 30 atm. One of the plates is the high-voltage electrode, while the other is a circuit board etched to form an array of metal collector strips focused on the x-ray source. Since there are no metal septa separating the individual detector elements, the dose efficiency of the detector is high, but image degradation will occur due to cross-talk between detector elements. Measurements of the cross-talk show that about an 18% reduction in contrast will occur, when a low contrast object, subtending one detector element, is imaged. We have also measured a detector MTF of 14% at 2 lp/mm, a signal of 10 pC for a 1-mR x-ray exposure at the detector entrance, a 6% nonlinearity in the detector signal over about 3 orders of magnitude in x-ray exposure, and a charge collection time (time response) of about 0.1 ms. From these results it is concluded that this new detector design is feasible for digital radiography.