Coadministration Of Ezetimibe Research Articles

Increased coproporphyrin serum levels in healthy volunteers treated with the cholesterol uptake inhibitor ezetimibe.

Ezetimibe undergoes glucuronidation that results in the active metabolite ezetimibe phenoxy-glucuronide (ezetimibe-glucuronide). This phase-II metabolite was shown to interact with the clinically relevant hepatic transporter organic anion transporting polypeptide (OATP) 1B1. In recent years, coproporphyrin I (CPI) was established as a Tier 1 biomarker for OATP1B-mediated interactions among other endogenous substrates like CPIII. To evaluate whether levels of the biomarker are affected by ezetimibe treatment, we assessed the impact of ezetimibe and ezetimibe-glucuronide on OATP1B1-mediated transport of CPs invitro. Then, we quantified CP levels in serum samples of healthy volunteers treated with a single oral dose of ezetimibe (20 mg) alone or in combination with rifampin (600 mg). Results from our invitro experiments showed a significant reduction in cellular CPI accumulation in the presence of ezetimibe-glucuronide with an IC50 of 1.97 μM [95% CI: 1.04 to 3.96], while CPIII accumulation was impacted by 10 μM and above. In the invivo study, we observed peak CP concentrations 1.33 h after dosing, which is closest to the tmax of the ezetimibe metabolite. Co-administration of ezetimibe with rifampin resulted in even higher serum CP levels. The AUC0-24h of CPI and CPIII increased two- and threefold, respectively, after concomitant dosing compared to ezetimibe alone. Moreover, we quantified CP levels in cumulative urine from both study phases where the renally excreted amount (Ae) of CPI and CPIII increased after ezetimibe and rifampin co-administration compared to ezetimibe alone. In conclusion, our findings indicate that rifampin co-administration results in additional inhibition of OATP1B1 invivo.

Transport via Niemann-Pick C1 Like 1 contributes to the intestinal absorption of ubiquinone

Ubiquinone, which is a component in the electron-transport systems of mitochondria, is essential for various activities related to energy metabolism, but the detailed absorption mechanism of ubiquinone is not clear. On the other hand, Niemann-Pick C1 Like 1 (NPC1L1) is involved in the intestinal absorption of fat-soluble components such as cholesterol. In this study, we investigated whether the intestinal absorption of ubiquinone was transported by NPC1L1 as is cholesterol. In this study, coenzyme q10 (CoQ10) and coenzyme q9 (CoQ9) were used as models of ubiquinone. The transport activity of ubiquinone was increased significantly in NPC1L1-overexpressed Madin-Darby canine kidney (MDCK) cells compared with that in pMAM2-BSD vector-transfected MDCK cells and the uptake of ubiquinone was decreased in the presence of ezetimibe, an inhibitor of NPC1L1. These results indicate that NPC1L1 mediates the transport of ubiquinone. Furthermore, to clarify the effect of NPC1L1 on the intestinal absorption of CoQ10, emulsified CoQ10 was orally administered to Wistar rats, and the plasma concentration was measured. The plasma concentration of CoQ10 was significantly decreased by coadministration of ezetimibe and CoQ10 compared to that with administration of only CoQ10. This result indicates that the intestinal absorption of CoQ10 is mediated by NPC1L1.

Ezetimibe and Rosuvastatin Combination Treatment Can Reduce the Dose of Rosuvastatin Without Compromising Its Lipid-lowering Efficacy

PurposeThe goal of this study was to compare the lipid-lowering efficacy of the combination of ezetimibe and low- or intermediate-intensity statin therapy versus that of high-intensity statin monotherapy. MethodsThis study is a post hoc analysis of an 8-week, randomized, double-blind, Phase III trial. Patients who had hypercholesterolemia and required lipid-lowering treatment were randomly assigned to 1 of 6 treatment groups: rosuvastatin 5 mg (R5, n = 68), rosuvastatin 10 mg (R10, n = 67), rosuvastatin 20 mg (R20, n = 69), and ezetimibe 10 mg combined with rosuvastatin 5 mg (R5 + E10, n = 67), rosuvastatin 10 mg (R10 + E10, n = 68), and rosuvastatin 20 mg (R20 + E10, n = 68) daily. The effects of coadministration of ezetimibe and a low dose of rosuvastatin on lipid parameters and the target achievement rate were compared between the R5 + E10 and R10 treatment groups, the R5 + E10 and R20 treatment groups, and the R10 + E10 and R20 treatment groups. FindingsReductions in total cholesterol, LDL-C, apolipoprotein B, the apolipoprotein B/A1 ratio, and non–HDL-C were not different between the R5 + E10 and R10 treatment groups (all, P > 0.017), the R5 + E10 and R20 treatment groups (all, P > 0.017), and the R10 + E10 and R20 treatment groups (all, P > 0.017). R5 + E10 treatment showed efficacy comparable to that of R10 or R20 in affording LDL levels <50% of the baseline level (R5 + E10 vs R10, 73.13% vs 62.69% [P = 0.1952]; R5 + E10 vs R20, 73.13% vs 73.91% [P = 0.9180]), LDL-C levels <70 mg/dL (R5 + E10 vs R10, 64.18% vs 55.22% [P = 0.2906]; R5 + E10 vs R20, 64.18% vs 62.32% [P = 0.8220]), and LDL-C levels <50% of the baseline level or <70 mg/dL (R5 + E10 vs R10, 77.61% vs 70.15% [P = 0.3255]; R5 + E10 vs R20, 77.61% vs 78.26% [P = 0.9273]). The R10 + E10 treatment group was better than the R20 treatment group in achieving the target LDL-C level <70 mg/dL (83.82% vs 62.32%; P = 0.0046), even among participants with a baseline LDL-C level >135 mg/dL (77.5% vs 48.8%, respectively; P = 0.0074). ImplicationsEzetimibe combined with low- or intermediate-intensity statin therapy has lipid-lowering efficacy comparable to or better than that of high-intensity rosuvastatin monotherapy. The results of the present study indicate that the combination treatment with ezetimibe is advantageous in that it permits dose reduction of rosuvastatin without compromising the lipid-lowering efficacy of rosuvastatin. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02205606.

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interaction between ezetimibe and rosuvastatin in healthy male subjects.

Background and objectiveRosuvastatin and ezetimibe are commonly applied in lipid-lowering pharmacotherapy. However, the pharmacokinetic (PK) interaction was not clear by the coadministration of rosuvastatin and ezetimibe. This study investigated the pharmacodynamic (PD) and PK interactions between rosuvastatin and ezetimibe through a crossover clinical trial.Subjects and methodsA randomized, open-label, multiple-dose, two-treatment, two-period, two-sequence crossover study with two treatment parts was conducted in healthy male subjects. Study part A involved rosuvastatin, and study part B involved ezetimibe. A total of 25 subjects in both parts completed the PK and PD evaluations. Rosuvastatin (20 mg) or ezetimibe (10 mg) was administered once daily for 7 days as monotherapy or co-therapy. The plasma concentrations of rosuvastatin, total ezetimibe and free ezetimibe were measured for 72 h after day 7. Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and total cholesterol (TC) were investigated for the PD assessments on day 1 (pretreatment) and day 8.ResultsRosuvastatin and ezetimibe presented multiple peaks. The 90% confidence intervals (CIs) of the geometric mean ratios for the peak plasma concentration at steady state (Cmax,ss) and area under the plasma concentration–time curve during the dosing interval at steady state (AUCτ,ss) of rosuvastatin and total ezetimibe were within the range 0.8–1.25. However, the coadministration increased the systemic exposure of free ezetimibe. In the PD assessments, rosuvastatin and ezetimibe monotherapy reduced the LDL-C and TC levels effectively. In addition, the lipid-lowering effects of the coadministration corresponded to an approximate summation of the effects of rosuvastatin and ezetimibe monotherapy. However, no significant changes in HDL-C were observed with rosuvastatin or ezetimibe treatment. No significant safety issue was noted.ConclusionThe coadministration of rosuvastatin and ezetimibe revealed a bioequivalent PK interaction. Additional lipid-lowering effects, including decreased LDL-C and TC, were observed as expected in combination therapy without significant safety concern.

Comparison of Pharmacokinetics and Safety of a Fixed-dose Combination of Rosuvastatin and Ezetimibe Versus Separate Tablets in Healthy Subjects

PurposeRosuvastatin and ezetimibe are concomitantly used for dyslipidemia treatment. Compared with separate tablets, fixed-dose combination (FDC) tablets of rosuvastatin/ezetimibe could increase patient compliance. The aim of this study was to compare the pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles of an FDC tablet of rosuvastatin/ezetimibe and co-administration of rosuvastatin and ezetimibe as separate tablets in healthy Korean volunteers. MethodsThis trial was a randomized, open-label, single-dose, 2-way crossover study. The healthy subjects received an FDC tablet of rosuvastatin 20 mg/ezetimibe 10 mg (test) or co-administration of rosuvastatin 20 mg and ezetimibe 10 mg (reference) in each period (periods 1 and 2), with a 14-day washout period. The blood samples for PK analysis were collected predose and up to 96 hours after administration, and safety was assessed throughout the study. FindingsSixty-four healthy Korean subjects were enrolled, and 57 subjects completed the study. All subjects were men and mean age was 28.52 ± 5.93. The geometric least squares mean ratios (test/reference) and 90% CIs of Cmax and AUC0–last were 101.54% (94.03–109.65) and 97.71% (91.86–103.93) for rosuvastatin, 108.93% (98.55–120.40) and 102.90% (96.72–109.47) for free ezetimibe, and 106.74% (98.18–116.05) and 104.24 % (99.53–109.17) for total ezetimibe. Twenty-four adverse events (AEs) were reported in 22 subjects. Three cases were related to the study drugs; 2 cases were mild, and 1 case was severe. However, all AEs were resolved without any sequelae. In addition, there were no serious AEs throughout the study. ImplicationsThe FDC tablet of rosuvastatin/ezetimibe was well tolerated and resulted in comparable systemic exposure with co-administration of rosuvastatin and ezetimibe. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02941848.

Pharmacokinetic drug interaction between atorvastatin and ezetimibe in healthy Korean volunteers.

Atorvastatin and ezetimibe are frequently co-administered to treat patients with dyslipidemia for the purpose of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol control. However, pharmacokinetic (PK) drug interaction between atorvastatin and ezetimibe has not been evaluated in Korean population. The aim of this study was to investigate PK drug interaction between two drugs in healthy Korean volunteers. An open-label, randomized, multiple-dose, three-treatment, three-period, Williams design crossover study was conducted in 36 healthy male subjects. During each period, the subjects received one of the following three treatments for seven days: atorvastatin 40 mg, ezetimibe 10 mg, or a combination of both. Blood samples were collected up to 96 h after dosing, and PK parameters of atorvastatin, 2-hydroxyatorvastatin, total ezetimibe (free ezetimibe + ezetimibe-glucuronide), and free ezetimibe were estimated by non-compartmental analysis in 32 subjects who completed the study. Geometric mean ratios (GMRs) with 90% confidence intervals (CIs) of the maximum plasma concentration (Cmax,ss) and the area under the curve within a dosing interval at steady state (AUCτ,ss) of atorvastatin when administered with and without ezetimibe were 1.1087 (0.9799–1.2544) and 1.1154 (1.0079–1.2344), respectively. The corresponding values for total ezetimibe were 1.0005 (0.9227–1.0849) and 1.0176 (0.9465–1.0941). There was no clinically significant change in safety assessment related to either atorvastatin or ezetimibe. Co-administration of atorvastatin and ezetimibe showed similar PK and safety profile compared with each drug alone. The PK interaction between two drugs was not clinically significant in healthy Korean volunteers.

Ezetimibe in Combination With Statins Ameliorates Endothelial Dysfunction in Coronary Arteries After Stenting: The CuVIC Trial (Effect of Cholesterol Absorption Inhibitor Usage on Target Vessel Dysfunction After Coronary Stenting), a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.

We sought to investigate whether treatment with ezetimibe in combination with statins improves coronary endothelial function in target vessels in coronary artery disease patients after coronary stenting. We conducted a multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded-end point trial among 11 cardiovascular treatment centers. From 2011 to 2013, 260 coronary artery disease patients who underwent coronary stenting were randomly allocated to 2 arms (statin monotherapy, S versus ezetimibe [10 mg/d]+statin combinational therapy, E+S). We defined target vessel dysfunction as the primary composite outcome, which comprised target vessel failure during treatment and at the 6- to 8-month follow-up coronary angiography and coronary endothelial dysfunction determined via intracoronary acetylcholine testing performed in cases without target vessel failure at the follow-up coronary angiography. Coadministration of ezetimibe with statins further lowered low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels (83±23 mg/dL in S versus 67±23 mg/dL in E+S; P<0.0001), with significant decreases in oxidized low-density lipoprotein and oxysterol levels. Among patients without target vessel failure, 46 out of 89 patients (52%) in the S arm and 34 out of 96 patients (35%) in the E+S arm were found to have coronary endothelial dysfunction (P=0.0256), and the incidence of target vessel dysfunction at follow-up was significantly decreased in the E+S arm (69/112 (62%) in S versus 47/109 (43%) in E+S; P=0.0059). A post hoc analysis of post-treatment low-density lipoprotein cholesterol-matched subgroups revealed that the incidence of both target vessel dysfunction and coronary endothelial dysfunction significantly decreased in the E+S arm, with significant reductions in oxysterol levels. The CuVIC trial (Effect of Cholesterol Absorption Inhibitor Usage on Target Vessel Dysfunction after Coronary Stenting) has shown that ezetimibe with statins, compared with statin monotherapy, improves functional prognoses, ameliorating endothelial dysfunction in stented coronary arteries, and was associated with larger decreases in oxysterol levels.

SREBP-2/PNPLA8 axis improves non-alcoholic fatty liver disease through activation of autophagy.

Dysregulated autophagy is associated with steatosis and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), however the mechanisms connecting them remain poorly understand. Here, we show that co-administration of lovastatin and ezetimibe (L/E) significantly reverses hepatic triglyceride accumulation concomitant with an increase in SREBP-2 driven autophagy in mice fed a high-fat diet (HFD). We further show that the statin mediated increase in SREBP-2 directly activates expression of patatin-like phospholipase domain-containing enzyme 8 (PNPLA8) gene, and PNPLA8 associates with autophagosomes and is associated with a decrease in cellular triglyceride. Moreover, we show that over-expression of PNPLA8 dramatically decreases hepatic steatosis through increased autophagy in hepatocytes of HFD-fed mice. Live-cell imaging analyses also reveal that PNPLA8 dynamically interacts with LC3 and we suggest that the SREBP-2/PNPLA8 axis represents a novel regulatory mechanism for lipid homeostasis. These data provide a possible mechanism for the reported beneficial effects of statins for decreasing hepatic triglyceride levels in NAFLD patients.

Efficacy and safety of long-term coadministration of fenofibrate and ezetimibe in patients with combined hyperlipidemia: Results of the efectl trial

Efficacy and safety of long-term coadministration of fenofibrate and ezetimibe in patients with combined hyperlipidemia: Results of the efectl trial

Efficacy and Safety of Long-term Coadministration of Fenofibrate and Ezetimibe in Patients with Combined Hyperlipidemia: Results of the EFECTL Study.

Aim: We investigated the safety and efficacy of a long-term combination therapy with fenofibrate and ezetimibe in Japanese patients with combined hyperlipidemia, in comparison with fenofibrate or ezetimibe alone.Methods: The study was a three-arm parallel-group, open-label randomized trial. Eligible patients were assigned to a combination therapy with fenofibrate (200 mg/day in capsule form or 160 mg/day in tablet form) and ezetimibe (10 mg/day), the fenofibrate monotherapy, or the ezetimibe monotherapy, which lasted for 52 weeks. The changes in serum low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol and triglycerides were the primary outcomes.Results: A total of 236 patients were assigned to one of the three treatments, and the number of patients included in the final analysis was 107 in the combination therapy, 52 in the fenofibrate monotherapy, and 51 in the ezetimibe monotherapy. Mean ± SD changes in LDL cholesterol were −24.2% ± 14.7% with combination therapy, −16.0% ± 16.0% with fenofibrate alone, and −17.4% ± 10.1% with ezetimibe alone. The combination therapy resulted in a significantly greater reduction in LDL cholesterol as compared with each monotherapy (p < 0.01 for each). The corresponding values for triglycerides were −40.0% ± 29.5%, −40.1% ± 28.7%, and −3.4% ± 32.6%, respectively. Fenofibrate use was associated with some changes in laboratory measurements, but there was no differential adverse effect between the combination therapy and fenofibrate monotherapy.Conclusion: The combination therapy with fenofibrate and ezetimibe substantially reduces concentrations of LDL cholesterol and triglycerides and is safe in a long-term treatment in Japanese patients with combined hyperlipidemia.

Coadministration of ezetimibe with pegylated interferon plus ribavirin could improve early virological response in chronic hepatitis C obese Egyptian patients.

Ezetimibe has been reported to inhibit viral entry and to reduce BMI and has been proposed as a novel therapeutic agent for chronic hepatitis C (CHC), potentiating the effects of pegylated interferon and ribavirin (peg-IFN/RBV). The aim of the study was to assess the effects of ezetimibe coadministration with peg-IFN/RBV combination on the early virological response (EVR) rates in nonobese and obese patients with CHC genotype 4 (CHC-4). A total of 144 CHC-4 patients were divided into two groups; group 1 included nonobese patients (n=76) and group 2 included obese patients (n=68). Each group was further subclassified into equal control and treated groups. The control groups received peg-IFN/RBV combination for 24 weeks, and the treated groups received peg-IFN/RBV plus ezetimibe for 12 weeks and then only peg-IFN/RBV for the remaining 12 weeks. The study revealed that EVR significantly improved in the obese patients (85.3 vs. 64.7% in the treated and control groups, respectively, at P<0.05) without any significant improvement in the nonobese patients. Biochemical responses (defined as normalization of alanine aminotransferase at week 12) were markedly improved in the treated groups in both the nonobese and obese groups compared with their respective controls. The addition of ezetimibe to peg-IFN/RBV combination significantly improves EVR rates in obese patients compared with nonobese patients, and remarkably improves the biochemical responses in both obese and nonobese patients with CHC-4. This may shed light on a new strategy for the treatment of CHC, particularly in obese Egyptian patients.

Glucagon receptor antagonism induces increased cholesterol absorption

Glucagon and insulin have opposing action in governing glucose homeostasis. In type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), plasma glucagon is characteristically elevated, contributing to increased gluconeogenesis and hyperglycemia. Therefore, glucagon receptor (GCGR) antagonism has been proposed as a pharmacologic approach to treat T2DM. In support of this concept, a potent small-molecule GCGR antagonist (GRA), MK-0893, demonstrated dose-dependent efficacy to reduce hyperglycemia, with an HbA1c reduction of 1.5% at the 80 mg dose for 12 weeks in T2DM. However, GRA treatment was associated with dose-dependent elevation of plasma LDL-cholesterol (LDL-c). The current studies investigated the cause for increased LDL-c. We report findings that link MK-0893 with increased glucagon-like peptide 2 and cholesterol absorption. There was not, however, a GRA-related modulation of cholesterol synthesis. These findings were replicated using structurally diverse GRAs. To examine potential pharmacologic mitigation, coadministration of ezetimibe (a potent inhibitor of cholesterol absorption) in mice abrogated the GRA-associated increase of LDL-c. Although the molecular mechanism is unknown, our results provide a novel finding by which glucagon and, hence, GCGR antagonism govern cholesterol metabolism.

Safety of coadministration of ezetimibe and statins in patients with hypercholesterolaemia: a meta-analysis.

Hypercholesterolaemia is a pivotal risk factor for cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease and is treated with many effective lipid-lowering agents. Statins are often used alone or in combination with ezetimibe. Combination therapy is more effective because of its complementary approach, which has major benefits for patients with unmanageable lipid levels. Extensive application of combination therapy has resulted in an increased incidence of side-effects, which has raised our concern. To evaluate the evidence associated with the safety of coadministration of ezetimibe with statins. Three electronic databases were searched (PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library) from January 2002 to October 2014. Two independent reviewers critically identify randomised controlled trials (RCT), extracted the data and assessed trial quality. A total ot 20 RCT met inclusion criteria, including 14,856 patients. A fixed-effects model was used for meta-analysis to assess the safety of combination therapy. Coadministration of ezetimibe and statins did not result in significant increases in total adverse events (30% vs 29%, P = 0.34), serious adverse events (2% vs 1.6%, P = 0.81), treatment discontinuations (3.5% vs 2.9%, P = 0.22), gastrointestinal adverse events (5% vs 4%, P = 0.08), allergic reactions or rashes (0.9% vs 1.3%, P = 0.33), creatine kinase > 10 × upper limit of normal (ULN) (0.2% vs 0.2%, P = 0.86), alanine aminotransferase > 3 × ULN (0.5% vs 0.4%, P = 0.96) and aspartate aminotransferase > 3 × ULN (0.4% vs 0.4%, P = 0.58). The incidence of adverse events was similar between ezetimibe-statin combination therapy and statin monotherapy; thus, we recommend combination therapy for patients with hypercholesterolaemia at high risk for cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease.

Impact of Switching From High-Efficacy Lipid-Lowering Therapies to Generic Simvastatin on LDL-C Levels and LDL-C Goal Attainment Among High-Risk Primary and Secondary Prevention Populations in the United Kingdom

PurposeHigh cholesterol, especially high low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), is an important risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD) morbidity/mortality. Switching from high-efficacy lipid-lowering therapies (HETs) to simvastatin might lead to sub-optimal control of LDL-C. Our objective was to evaluate the impact of switching from HETs to generic simvastatin on LDL-C levels and LDL-C goal attainment among the high-risk primary and secondary prevention populations in the United Kingdom. MethodsThis retrospective cohort study was conducted using Clinical Practice Research Datalink database. Included were individuals with more than 2 months of prescriptions of the following HETs between August 1, 2004 and December 31, 2008: simvastatin/ezetimibe fixed dose (S/E), simvastatin and ezetimibe co-administration (S+E), atorvastatin and ezetimibe co-administration (A+E), rosuvastatin and ezetimibe co-administration (R+E), rosuvastatin monotherapy, and atorvastatin monotherapy. For each baseline HET, we used analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) to estimate the least squares mean (LSM) difference in the percentage change from baseline in LDL-C between switchers and non-switchers, and logistic regression to estimate the odds ratio of attaining the LDL-C goal (<3 mmol/L for primary prevention and <2 mmol/L for secondary prevention, by JBS2) at follow-up. Propensity score adjusted analyses were conducted to reduce selection bias. Findings30,148 patients met the eligibility criteria with 83.8% received atorvastatin, 9.5% rosuvastatin and 2.6% S/E and S+E combined. 89.1% of patients switching from atorvastatin switched to an equivalent or higher dose of simvastatin (dose equivalency was determined by relative efficacy of one statin to other statins), while 100% of those switching from simvastatin/ezetimibe and 96.8% of those switching from rosuvastatin switched to lower than equivalent dose of simvastatin. Compared to non-switchers, the adjusted least squares mean differences in the percentage change in LDL-C levels from baseline were 18.74% (p = 0.0003), 16.73% (p < 0.0001), and −0.11% (p = 0.9044) when switching from simvastatin/ezetimibe, rosuvastatin, and atorvastatin, respectively. The odds of LDL-C goal attainment at follow-up among switchers from simvastatin/ezetimibe, rosuvastatin, and atorvastatin were 0.40 (95% CI: 0.23–0.70), 0.36 (95% CI: 0.26–0.51) and 1.03 (95% CI: 0.92–1.15) relative to non-switchers respectively. ImplicationsAmong the high risk CVD population in UK, switching to simvastatin from HET, especially rosuvastatin and simvastatin/ezetimibe, resulted in an increase in LDL-C levels and lower goal attainment. These historical data reinforce the appropriateness of the changes in the new Joint British Guideline (JBS3) which no longer recommends starting simvastatin 40 mg.

Clinical study of pharmacodynamic drug interaction on the management of hyperlipidemic disease

This study was designed to investigate the pharmacodynamic interaction of co-administration of ezetimibe and omega-3-fatty acids on lipoproteins of mixed dyslipidemia in human subjects. Human male subjects were induced hyperlipidemia and they were divided into 4groups of 24 subjects in each group. The inclusion criteria were mixed dyslipidemia with a high triglyceride level (200-499mgper100ml) and a total cholesterol level more than 200mg per 100ml. Present study was conducted on dyslipidemic subjects receiving ezetimibe (10mg) alone, omega-3-fatty acids(4g) alone and combination of ezetimibe (10mg) and omega-3-fattyacids (4g) daily for 90days. After 90days treatment, (Tc, LDL ) was found decreased, Tg level reduced significantly and HDL level increased in the combination therapy ( ezetimibe and omega-3-fattyacids) than their mono therapies. From the result it was concluded that combination therapy of these two may be considered as an optimal treatment option for mixed dyslipidemia.

Simultaneous determination of ezetimibe and simvastatin in rat plasma by stable-isotope dilution LC-ESI–MS/MS and its application to a pharmacokinetic study

A simple, sensitive and specific liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry method was developed for simultaneous quantification of ezetimibe and simvastatin in rat plasma. The deuterium isotopes: ezetimibe d4 and simvastatin d6 were used as internal standards for ezetimibe and simvastatin, respectively. MS/MS detection involved a switch of electron spray ionization mode from negative to positive at retention time 3.01min. Samples were extracted from plasma by liquid–liquid extraction using tertiary butyl methyl ether. Chromatographic separation was achieved with Agilent Eclipse XBD-C18 column using mobile phase that consisted of a mixture of ammonium acetate (pH4.5; 10mM)–acetonitrile (25:75 v/v). The method was linear and validated over the concentration range of 0.2–40.0ng/mL for simvastatin and 0.05–15.0ng/mL for ezetimibe. The transitions selected were m/z 408.3→271.1 and m/z 412.0→275.10 for ezetimibe and ezetimibe d4, and m/z 419.30→285.20 and m/z 425.40→199.20 for simvastatin and simvastatin d6. Intra- and inter-batch precisions for ezetimibe were 1.6–14.8% and 2.1–13.4%; and for simvastatin 0.94–9.56% and 0.79–12%, respectively. The proposed method was sensitive, selective, precise and accurate for the quantification of ezetimibe and simvastatin simultaneously in rat plasma. The method was successfully applied to a pharmacokinetic study by oral co-administration of ezetimibe and simvastatin in SD rats.

Comparative evaluation of hypolipidemic activity of ezetimibe and atorvastatin in coronary artery disease patients

Statins are the first line drugs for the treatment of hypercholesterolemia patients. In the treatment of hyperlipidemia combination therapy has showed significant results. This study was conducted to find the efficacy of hypolipidemic drugs in cardiovascular diseases. 75 patients were included in the study. Randomly all the patients were divided in to three groups. Group-I (Ezetimibe 10mg/day), Group-II (Atorvastatin 10mg/day), Group-III (Ezetimibe 10mg/day+Atorvastatin 10mg/day) given for 4 weeks. Blood samples were collected from all the patients before and at the end of study to estimate lipid profile. Mono therapy with drugs decreased the lipid levels but combination therapy significantly showed 33.75% reduction in LDL-cholesterol level. Ezetimibe showed 21.9%, Atorvastation 31.54 reduction in LDL-cholesterol levels. There was significant reduction in other lipids and increase the HDL levels. Co-administration of Ezetimibe with statins shows significant results with less adverse effects. More studies required to find safety, efficacy of Ezetimibe with other hypolipidemic drugs.

Dyslipidemic drugs in metabolic syndrome.

Introduction:Metabolic syndrome predisposes to diabetes and atherosclerotic vascular disease. Statins reduce cardiovascular events, so all metabolic syndrome patients should be evaluated for dyslipidemia. Many patients fail to achieve lipid goals with statin monotherapy. Co-administration of ezetimibe (EZE) and atorvastatin (ATV) may enable more patients to achievelow-density lipoproteincholesterol (LDL-C) goal while avoiding risks of high-dose statin monotherapy.Materials and Methods:The present study compares rosuvastatin (Rsv) with a combination of (Atv) and (Eze). Metabolic syndrome patients, 30-70 years with LDL-C ≥130 mg/dl and a 10-year CHD risk score of 10% were randomized to double-blind treatment with (Rsv) 5 mg (n = 67) or (Atv) 10 mg+(Eze) 10 mg (n = 68) for 12 weeks.Results:LDL-C reduced significantly; (32.3% and 30.3%, P < 0.001) in (Atv)+(Eze) and (Rsv), respectively, but there was no significant difference between two arms. More patients achieved LDL-C goal of ≤100 mg/dl with (Atv)+(Eze) compared to (Rsv) (65% vs. 58%, P < 0.05). Triglycerides (TG) were reduced more with (Atv)+(Eze) compared to (Rsv) (28.1% and 21.4%, P < 0.001). Greater increase in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) was observed with (Atv)+(Eze). Both treatments were well tolerated.Conclusion:This study shows that the combination of (Atv)+(Eze) has more efficacy and comparable safety to that of (Rsv).

PCV23 Economic Evaluation of Ezetimibe Co-Administration for High Coronary Heart Disease (CHD) Risk Patients Not at Goal With Current Statin Therapy in Thailand

PCV23 Economic Evaluation of Ezetimibe Co-Administration for High Coronary Heart Disease (CHD) Risk Patients Not at Goal With Current Statin Therapy in Thailand

Estudio de las subfracciones lipoproteicas tras el tratamiento de simvastatina y ezetimiba, en monoterapia o combinado, en pacientes hiperlipidémicos

IntroductionCoadministration of drugs is common in the pharmacologic treatment of dyslipidemia, with statins and ezetimibe generally constituting the medication of choice. By acting at different levels, the combination of these drugs allows the therapeutic objective to be achieved. However, it is not known how these drugs qualitatively affect the composition of lipoprotein subfractions, which differ in size and atherogenic potential. We set out to evaluate this effect as well as their anti-inflammatory effects. MethodsThirty-nine hyperlipidemic patients were randomly assigned to one of 2 groups: one received simvastatin (40mg/day) and the other received ezetimibe (10mg/day) for 4 weeks, after which both groups were administered combined therapy for an additional 4-week period. Lipid profile, lipoprotein subfractions of LDL and HDL, and inflammatory parameters were evaluated. ResultsAn improvement was detected in most lipid parameters after administration of hypolipemic drugs as monotherapy. Treatment with simvastatin vs ezetimibe reduced LDLc by 40.2% vs 19.6% and non-HDLc by 37.1% vs 18.8%, respectively. Coadministration of the two pharmacological agents induced a reduction of LDLc of up to 57%. Only simvastatin induced alterations in the levels of triglycerides (−18.6%) and HDLc (+7.4%). Simvastatin also reduced the smaller HDL subfractions and increased the larger ones. In addition, it lowered the percentage of sdLDL and increased the diameter of the LDL particles, and produced a significant reduction in TNFα. ConclusionsThe coadministration of simvastatin and ezetimibe has an additive cholesterol-lowering effect. Furthermore, only simvastatin reduces atherogenic lipoprotein subfractions and exerts anti-inflammatory effects over longer periods of time.