Clozapine Monitoring Research Articles

A Simple HPLC-DAD Method for the Therapeutic Monitoring of Clozapine and Related Metabolites in Human Plasma and Urine Samples.

Clozapine and its metabolites require close therapeutic monitoring (TDM) in patients due to poor correlation between the administrated doses and resulting plasma concentrations, the narrow therapeutic interval, high inter-individual variability, and the risk of serious side effects once toxic levels are exceeded. The aim of the study was to develop a simple (relatively cheap) LC-UV method for the quantification of clozapine and its metabolites in plasma and urine samples. For sample preparation, liquid-liquid extraction (LLE) in n-octanol was more efficient and less limiting in injection volumes compared to the in-situ formation of SUPRAS. When analyzing urine, an alkalinization step before extraction was required. The proposed method produced linear concentration responses with/without internal standard (IS) for the target analytes, with LLOQs within the targeted range of 50 ppb and %RSD within the acceptable 15% range. Furthermore, sample stability studies proved that pre-extracted samples were stable for the short term at room temperature and long-term when frozen.

Clozapine monitoring requirements: is it time for an update?

Oloyede and colleagues advocate for updating haematological monitoring requirements for clozapine, arguing that current protocols overestimate the risk of clozapine-induced agranulocytosis. Their research suggests that stringent monitoring may unnecessarily limit access to clozapine, a crucial treatment for resistant schizophrenia. The editorial supports calls for international consensus to carefully weigh the pros and cons of relaxing monitoring guidelines while ensuring comprehensive care for patients.

Clozapine levels and outcomes in Serbian patients with treatment-resistant psychotic disorders previously treated without measuring clozapine levels (CLOSER)

Clozapine remains the only pharmacological treatment option for treatment-resistant schizophrenia. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of clozapine is recommended, although evidence for the therapeutic range of 350–600 ng/ml is limited. In various countries including Serbia, TDM of clozapine is not routinely performed.This study evaluated the distribution of clozapine levels and their relationship with clinical outcomes in Serbian patients who had not undergone prior TDM. 140 Patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia and schizo-affective disorder were enrolled. Clozapine levels were measured by dried blood spot (DBS) analysis. Side effects were evaluated by GASS-c, severity of symptoms and functional impairment with WHODAS, CGI-S and GAF.Of the patients, 51.2% had subtherapeutic levels, 24.8% were in the therapeutic window, and 24% had supratherapeutic levels. Clozapine levels showed no association with side effects and a weak positive association with symptom severity and functional impairment. No serious side effects were observed in patients with clozapine levels surpassing 1000 ng/ml (n = 8).Based on these findings, we propose that the upper limit of the therapeutic range should not be regarded as an absolute barrier, and guidelines should allow for a personalized approach when prescribing clozapine.

Clozapine Monitoring in Older Adults: An Audit Evaluating Compliance With Clozapine Guidelines in Community Settings

Clozapine Monitoring in Older Adults: An Audit Evaluating Compliance With Clozapine Guidelines in Community Settings

Clozapine clinical toolkit optimizes inpatient clozapine monitoring.

Clozapine is the most effective antipsychotic in the management of treatment-resistant schizophrenia; however, its use is challenging due to the risk of severe adverse effects. Despite the risks associated with clozapine, there is no mandatory monitoring in Canada beyond hematologic testing for agranulocytosis surveillance. This study focuses on the development, implementation, and evaluation of a clozapine clinical toolkit (CTK) targeted at optimizing inpatient clozapine use. A comprehensive literature review was conducted to identify clozapine best practices, experts were consulted, and a comprehensive clozapine CTK was developed and implemented at a large Canadian tertiary hospital in December 2018. To evaluate the CTK, a retrospective chart review was conducted to assess for change in guideline-concordant monitoring pre- and post- CTK implementation. Patients were included if they were > 18 years of age and received clozapine during inpatient admission. Results were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics. Among the charts reviewed, 185 and 113 admissions met the pre- and post-CTK inclusion criteria, respectively. Staff used the CTK in the care of 96% of clozapine patients post implementation, and its use resulted in improvements in guideline-concordant monitoring for agranulocytosis and myocarditis. Implementation of the clozapine CTK increased the concordance of clozapine monitoring with best practice recommendations. Future research is necessary to assess the impact of the CTK on clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction.

Validation of Population Pharmacokinetic Models for Clozapine Dosage Prediction.

Clozapine is unique in its capacity to ameliorate severe schizophrenia but at high risk of toxicity. A relationship between blood concentration and clinical response and evidence for concentration-response relationships to some adverse effects justify therapeutic drug monitoring of clozapine. However, the relationship between drug dose and blood concentration is quite variable. This variability is, in part, due to inductive and inhibitory interactions varying the activity of cytochrome P450 1A2 (CYP1A2), the principal pathway for clozapine elimination. Several population pharmacokinetic models have been presented to facilitate dose selection and to identify poor adherence in individual patients. These models have faced little testing for validity in independent populations or even for persisting validity in the source population. Therefore, we collected a large population of clozapine-treated patients (127 patients, 1048 timed plasma concentrations) in whom dosing and covariate information could be obtained with high certainty. A population pharmacokinetic model was constructed with data collected in the first 6 weeks from study enrolment (448 plasma concentrations), to estimate covariate influences and to allow alignment with previously published models. The model was tested for its performance in predicting the concentrations observed at later time intervals up to 5 years. The predictive performances of 6 published clozapine population models were then assessed in the entire population. The population pharmacokinetic model based on the first 6 weeks identified significant influences of sex, smoking, and cotreatment with fluvoxamine on clozapine clearance. The model built from the first 6 weeks had acceptable predictive performance in the same patient population up to the first 26 weeks using individual parameters, with a median predictive error (PE) of -0.1% to -15.9% and median absolute PE of 22.9%-27.1%. Predictive performance fell progressively with time after 26 weeks. Bayesian addition of plasma concentration observations within each prediction period improved individual predictions. Three additional observations extended acceptable predictive performance into the second 6 months of therapy. When the published models were tested with the entire data set, median PE ranged from -8% to +35% with a median absolute PE of >39% in all models. Thus, none of the tested models was successful in external validation. Bayesian addition of single patient observations improved individual predictions from all models but still without achieving acceptable performances. We conclude that the relationship between covariates and blood clozapine concentrations differs between populations and that relationships are not stable over time within a population. Current population models for clozapine are not capturing influential covariates.

Therapeutic drug monitoring of clozapine in human serum by high-throughput paper spray mass spectrometry

IntroductionMonitoring the atypical antipsychotic drug clozapine is crucial to ensure patient safety. This article showcases a high-throughput analytical method for measuring clozapine and its primary metabolite norclozapine (N-desmethylclozapine) in serum using paper spray mass spectrometry (PS-MS). ObjectivesThis study aimed to assess the viability of a PS-MS method for the rapid measurement of clozapine and norclozapine in human serum samples as an alternative to liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (LC-MS). MethodsSerum samples were processed by protein precipitation followed by deposition of the supernatant containing labelled internal standards onto paper spray substrates mounted in cartridges. Analytes were then analyzed using a triple quadrupole mass spectrometer equipped with a commercial paper spray ionization source. The results obtained from the patient samples were compared to those from a validated LC-MS assay. ResultsPS-MS calibrations for clozapine and norclozapine were linear (R2 > 0.99) over five days. Between-run precision was below 8 %, and within-run precision did not exceed 10 %. When compared to a validated LC-MS method, the mean bias for 39 patient samples was −9% for clozapine and −1% for norclozapine, with no outliers. Mass spectrometry ion ratio comparisons indicated no interference for patient samples above the lower limit of quantification. There was less than 7 % change in the measured concentrations of both analytes over five days for samples dried on paper substrates. Notably, virtually no maintenance of the MS source was required during this study. ConclusionThis study illustrates the potential of PS-MS for serum drug monitoring in the clinical laboratory.

Magnetic solid-phase extraction-based surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy for label-free therapeutic drug monitoring of carbamazepine and clozapine in human serum

Determination of antiepileptic drugs and antipsychotics in human serum is significant in individualized drug administration and therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). In this study, we developed a rapid label-free TDM method for the antiepileptic drug carbamazepine (CBZ) and the antipsychotic clozapine (CLO) in human serum. This detection strategy is based on the combination of surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) and magnetic solid-phase extraction (MSPE). Initially, Fe3O4@SiO2@MIL-101(Fe) nanocomposites were synthesized by the layer-by-layer self-assembly method and characterized using scanning electron microscopy, transmission electron microscopy, X-ray diffraction, Brunauer–Emmett–Teller, ultraviolet–visible, and Fourier transform infrared analyses. Subsequently, CBZ and CLO were detected in human serum using Fe3O4@SiO2@MIL-101(Fe) as the solid-phase extraction adsorbent and Ag nanoparticles as SERS substrates. The potential of the MSPE–SERS method for the label-free TDM of CBZ and CLO was then investigated. Fe3O4@SiO2@MIL-101(Fe) prevents magnetic particle aggregation and demonstrates rapid magnetic separation capability that simplifies the pretreatment process and reduces interference from complex matrices. Its large surface area can effectively enrich targets in complex matrices, thereby improving the SERS detection sensitivity. The linearity between CBZ and CLO was excellent over the concentration range of 0.1–100 µg/mL (calculated as the intensity of the SERS characteristic peaks of CBZ and CLO at 728 cm and 1054 cm−1, respectively), with correlation coefficients (R2) of 0.9987 and 0.9957, and detection limits of 0.072 and 0.12 µg/mL, respectively. The recoveries of CBZ with CLO ranged from 94.0 % to 105.0 %, and their relative standard deviations were <6.8 %. Compared to other assays, the developed MSPE–SERS method has the advantages of simple sample pretreatment, rapid detection, and good reproducibility, which provides a novel approach for the TDM of other drugs.

A retrospective study of clozapine and norclozapine concentration in patients with schizophrenia: Data from the Therapeutic Drug Monitoring Service, 2019–2022

ObjectiveThe aim of this research was to assess the therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of clozapine (CLO) and norclozapine (NCLO). MethodsTDM results of CLO and NCLO in patients obtained from the Xi'an Mental Health Center were retrospectively analyzed. ResultsTDM of CLO and NCLO was typically conducted only once in the majority of patients, particularly those receiving outpatient care. The CLO plasma concentrations were higher in inpatients and female patients. The interquartile (25th–75th) CLO concentrations ranged from 129.83 to 397.53 ng/mL, nearly 68.63% of the samples had subtherapeutic concentrations (<350 ng/mL). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that inpatients achieved the therapeutic level concentration of 350–600 ng/mL when their daily CLO dose was > 125 mg. ConclusionsIt was surprising to find such a large number of patients with CLO levels below the therapeutic range, there is still a window of improvement for optimizing pharmacological treatments in clinical practice.

An expert review of clozapine in Latin American countries: Use, monitoring, and pharmacovigilance

There is growing interest in clozapine clinical use, monitoring, and research, particularly adverse drug reactions (ADRs) other than agranulocytosis. In this study we focused on clozapine pharmacovigilance. Hence, we contacted clinicians and researchers in Latin America and requested information about local psychiatric services, clozapine availability, clinical use, and ADR monitoring with the VigiBase system. Only two countries have the minimum recommended number of psychiatric beds (15 per 100,000 residents): Uruguay (N = 34.9) and Argentina (N = 17). Bolivia is the only country where clozapine is unavailable. Nine out of twenty countries (45 %) reported ADRs to VigiBase. Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, and Mexico published national guidelines for schizophrenia treatment. Chile is the sole country with clozapine clinics with drug serum monitoring. Ethnicity-related drug titration in not described in package inserts in any country. We examined in detail the 9 most frequent and important clozapine ADRs in the worldwide database (pneumonia, sudden death, cardiac arrest, agranulocytosis, myocarditis, constipation, arrhythmia, seizure, and syncope). These 9 ADRs led to 294 reports with fatal outcomes in Argentina (N = 3), Brazil (N = 3), Chile (N = 2), and Peru (N = 1). Agranulocytosis was reported from 7 countries: constipation or seizures from 8 countries. Only two countries reported pneumonia and one country reported myocarditis. The number of clozapine reports in VigiBase has no relationship to the country's population. All Latin American countries underreport clozapine associated ADRs. Latin American governments, along with clinicians, researchers, and educators, should optimize clozapine use and monitoring for the benefit of people with severe mental and some neurological disorders.

Clozapine monitoring at a specialised psychiatric hospital: A retrospective chart review

Background: Clozapine is the only Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and National Institute for Care and Excellence (NICE) approved drug for treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS). Its potentially life-threatening haematological side effects of neutropaenia and agranulocytosis mandate rigorous monitoring of neutrophil counts, presenting unique, Third-World population challenges.Aim: To describe the Clozapine white blood cell monitoring practice and outcomes in a local psychiatric hospital.Setting: At a specialist Psychiatry unit in Durban, KwaZulu-Natal, which follows a modified algorithm of the South African Standard Treatment Guidelines for Clozapine monitoring.Methods: A retrospective chart review composed of 120 patients on Clozapine treatment from 01 July 2018–31 December 2020. Demographic and clinical information was captured in a Redcap database. Descriptive statistics using categorical variables were used.Results: The study population was from a low socioeconomic background, with low levels of education and employment. A baseline neutrophil count was recorded in 58 files (48.3%). Clozapine was stopped in 6 out of the 120 patients due to ‘neutropaenia’ (absolute neutrophil counts ranging from 1.18 to 1.6); none developed agranulocytosis. Their duration of Clozapine treatment ranged from 2 weeks–15 years.Conclusion: Haematological monitoring frequency and documentation of patients receiving Clozapine were not in compliance with the hospital’s adapted guidelines and may have resulted in the termination of treatment before true neutropaenia developed. Patients developed neutropaenia at low doses of Clozapine and after many years of treatment.Contribution: These results suggest local Clozapine monitoring guidelines should be more strictly adhered to.

Infections associated with clozapine: a pharmacovigilance study using VigiBase®.

Introduction: Clozapine is primarily reserved for treatment-resistant schizophrenia due to safety concerns associated with its use. Infections have been reported with clozapine, which may lead to elevated serum levels of the drug. However, the existing literature on this topic is limited. Therefore, we conducted a study using VigiBase® to investigate the potential over-reporting of infections associated with clozapine, to explore the presence of dose-dependency, and to investigate the underlying mechanism. Methods: Disproportionality analyses were performed using VigiBase to assess the association between clozapine and all types of infections, the association between clozapine-associated infections and neutropenia, the association between clozapine-associated infections and agranulocytosis, the dose-effect relationship between clozapine and infections, and the interaction between clozapine and the main strong CYP450 inhibitors using reports carried out until 11 April 2023. Results: A statistically significant signal of infections was observed with clozapine, as indicated by an information component of 0.43 [95% CI: (0.41-0.45)]. The most commonly reported infections were respiratory and gastrointestinal in nature. Neutropenia showed weaker association with clozapine-associated reports of infections compared to other clozapine-associated reports [X2 (1, N = 204,073) = 454; p < 0.005], while agranulocytosis demonstrated a stronger association with clozapine-associated reports of infections [X2 (1, N = 204,073) = 56; p < 0.005]. No evidence of dose-dependency was observed. Among the 17 tested CYP inhibitors, significant drug-drug interactions were found with clarithromycin, metronidazole, valproic acid, lansoprazole, omeprazole, amiodarone, and esomeprazole. Discussion: Our study revealed a significant safety signal between clozapine use and infections, predominantly respiratory and gastrointestinal infections. The co-administration of clozapine with valproic acid or proton pump inhibitors may potentially contribute to an increased risk of infection. Further vigilance is warranted in clinical practice, and consideration of therapeutic drug monitoring of clozapine in cases involving concomitant use of these drugs or in the presence of infections may be beneficial.

Association of clozapine and norclozapine levels with patient and therapy characteristics-focus on interaction with valproic acid.

The goal of the study was to examine clozapine (CLZ) and norclozapine (NCLZ) therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) data and associated sources of pharmacokinetic variability, particularly the impact of valproic acid (VPA) use. This study included 126 patients with psychiatric disorders on mono- or co-therapy with CLZ. Patients' data during routine TDM were collected retrospectively from clinical records. The descriptive and statistical analysis was computed using IBM SPSS Statistics software (version 22, NY, USA). Multiple linear regression, based on the last observations, was used to assess correlation between demographic characteristics, life habits and co-therapy with dose-corrected serum levels (C/D) of CLZ and NCLZ, as well as CLZ/NCLZ. A total of 295 CLZ concentrations were measured in 126 patients, with a mean of 275.5 ± 174.4 µg/L, while 124 NCLZ concentrations were determined in 74 patients, with a mean of 194.6 ± 149.8 µg/L. A statistically significant effect on ln-transformed CLZ C/D was confirmed for sex and smoking, whereas sex, smoking and VPA therapy were associated with ln-transformed NCLZ C/D. According to the final models, lower values of NCLZ C/D for about 45.9% can be expected in patients receiving VPA. Concomitant use of VPA was the only factor detected to contribute in CLZ/NCLZ variability. The results of this study may help clinicians interpret TDM data and optimize CLZ dosing regimens, especially in patients concomitantly treated with VPA. Our results show that VPA primarily decreases NCLZ levels, while alteration of the parent drug is not statistically significant.

Early neutrophil trajectory following clozapine may predict clozapine response – Results from an observational study using electronic health records

BackgroundClozapine has unique effectiveness in treatment-resistant schizophrenia and is known to cause immunological side-effects. A transient spike in neutrophils commonly occurs in the first weeks of clozapine therapy. There is contradictory evidence in the literature as to whether neutrophil changes with clozapine are linked to treatment response. AimsThe current study aims to further examine the neutrophil changes in response to clozapine and explore any association between neutrophil trajectory and treatment response. MethodsA retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing their first treatment with clozapine and continuing for at least 2 years identified 425 patients (69% male/31% female). Neutrophil counts at baseline, 3 weeks and 1 month were obtained predominantly by linkage with data from the clozapine monitoring service. Clinical Global Impression- Severity (CGI-S) was rated from case notes at the time of clozapine initiation and at 2 years. Latent class growth analysis (LCGA) was performed to define distinct trajectories of neutrophil changes during the first month of treatment. Logistic regression was then conducted to investigate for association between the trajectory of neutrophil count changes in month 1 and clinical response at 2 years as well as between baseline neutrophil count and response. ResultsOf the original cohort, 397 (93%) patients had useable neutrophil data during the first 6 weeks of clozapine treatment. LCGA revealed significant differences in neutrophil trajectories with a three-class model being the most parsimonious. The classes had similar trajectory profiles but differed primarily on overall neutrophil count: with low, high-normal and high neutrophil classes, comprising 52%, 40% and 8% of the sample respectively. Membership of the high-normal group was associated with significantly increased odds of a positive response to clozapine, as compared to the low neutrophil group [Odds ratio (OR) = 2.10, p-value = 0.002; 95% confidence interval (95% CI) = 1.31–3.36]. Baseline neutrophil count was a predictor of response to clozapine at 2 years, with counts of ≥5 × 109/l significantly associated with positive response (OR = 1.60, p-value = 0.03; 95% CI = 1.03–2.49). ConclusionsOur data are consistent with the hypothesis that patients with low-level inflammation, reflected in a high-normal neutrophil count, are more likely to respond to clozapine, raising the possibility that clozapine exerts its superior efficacy via immune mechanisms.

Study: No adverse impact of decreased clozapine monitoring on patient safety

Extending the frequency of full blood count monitoring of patients receiving clozapine from every 4 weeks to every 12 weeks resulted in no increase in hematological adverse events, a one‐year study has found. The results lend support to reducing the frequency of monitoring and lessening the burden on patients receiving clozapine for treatment‐resistant psychosis, the investigators reported. Study results were published online April 24, 2023, in The British Journal of Psychiatry.

Reviewing the Effectiveness of Clozapine Monitoring in Community Patients: Including the Monitoring of Physical Health Through Blood Monitoring &amp; Reporting of Side Effects

AimsClozapine is an atypical antipsychotic used mainly in treatment resistant schizophrenia. Clozapine is known to have various side effects including neutropenia, agranulocytosis, constipation, hypersalivation, myoclonus, tachycardia, dry mouth, gastrointestinal reflux, and hypotension. Therefore, it is important that patients have regular monitoring of their physical health through blood tests and side effect monitoring. The Glasgow anti-psychotic side effect questionnaire allows patients to report side effects whilst on clozapine. This can then be used to review patients’ symptoms and treat them as required. The aim of our project was to review compliance of current blood monitoring of patients on clozapine with NICE guidelines and elucidate the effectiveness of the Glasgow anti-psychotic questionnaire in reporting of side-effects. Thirdly, we aimed to introduce a robust new monitoring system to ensure that clozapine monitoring was optimum.MethodsCompliance of the current blood monitoring was checked by reviewing the blood results for all 68 patients on clozapine. The latest blood results were compared to observe if they were within the required timeframe as per NICE. Secondly, the Glasgow antipsychotic questionnaire was distributed to patients on clozapine and then data collated. Following, this a new computer spreadsheet monitoring system was introduced to improve compliance. This allowed patients with overdue monitoring to be flagged up.ResultsThe overall compliance for the various blood parameters varied from 3% to 100% (glucose- 3%, prolactin- 19%, lipid profile- 68%, HbA1c- 69%, liver function- 72%, renal function- 74%, and full blood count- 100%). Following the introduction of a new monitoring system the overall compliance improved as follows (glucose- 8%, prolactin- 32%, lipid profile- 81%, HbA1c- 61%, liver function- 90%, renal function- 88% and full blood count- 100%). We observed a 41% uptake of the Glasgow antipsychotic questionnaire. The most common reported side effects included hypersalivation (86%), GI side effects (nausea and gastric reflux- 64%), postural hypotension (56%) and anticholinergic side effects (blurry vision and dry mouth- 46%).ConclusionThe findings show that the previous system was not effective. The introduction of a computer-based spreadsheet to flag up patients for clozapine monitoring has substantiality improved compliance with guidelines. The Glasgow anti-psychotic self-reporting questionnaire is effective in allowing patients to report the symptoms that they are experiencing. These changes continue to be utilised in our team.

The Association Between Clozapine Plasma Concentration, CYP2D6 (*10, *2) Polymorphisms and Risk of Adverse Reactions.

The aim of this article was to study the relationships between the risk of adverse reactions, plasma concentration, and cytochrome P450 2D6 rs1065852 (*10) and rs16947 (*2) polymorphisms for clozapine. The steady-state clozapine plasma concentration of 100 Chinese inpatients with schizophrenia was determined using 2-dimensional liquid chromatography. The polymorphisms of cytochrome P450 2D6 (*10 and *2) were determined using fluorescent in situ hybridization protocols. The decreased percentages of white blood cells and neutrophils and the elevated percentages of creatine kinase, alanine aminotransferase, and aspartate transferase in patients treated with clozapine for 6 months were linearly associated with clozapine plasma concentration. Compared with the corresponding groups, the clozapine plasma concentrations of individuals with the *10TT genotype and individuals with the *2CC genotype were the highest (P < .05). The decreased percentages of white blood cells and neutrophils and elevated percentages of creatine kinase, alanine aminotransferase, and aspartate transferase for patients with the *10TT genotype were significantly higher than those for patients with the *10CC and *10CT genotypes (P < .05). The decreased percentages of white blood cells and neutrophils and increased percentages of creatine kinase, alanine aminotransferase, and aspartate transferase for patients with the *2CC genotype were significantly higher than those of the other groups (P < .05). The therapeutic reference range of clozapine for Chinese patients with schizophrenia was defined as 102.5-483.1 ng/mL. This study demonstrated that the determination of cytochrome P450 2D6 polymorphisms and therapeutic drug monitoring of clozapine might be beneficial for identifying patients with a higher risk of adverse reactions.

Association Between Clozapine Plasma Concentrations and Treatment Response: A Systematic Review, Meta-analysis and Individual Participant Data Meta-analysis.

Although therapeutic drug monitoring of clozapine is recommended, its optimisation is often adjusted only on the basis of dosage. The aim of this study was to assess the link between clozapine plasma concentrations and clinical response by a meta-analysis of published studies and by an individual participant data meta-analysis. We conducted a computerised search of bibliographic databases (EMBASE, PubMed, Clinical Trials, and Web of Science) to identify studies that assessed the relationship between clozapine serum or plasma concentrations and clinical efficacy. Using pooled data, we investigated the association between improvement of clinical outcome and clozapine or norclozapine plasma concentrations, the sum of clozapine and norclozapine plasma concentrations, and the coefficient of variation of clozapine plasma concentrations. Using available individual data, we assessed the relationship between clozapine plasma concentrations and clinical response (changes in the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale score) and identified a threshold level for a favourable clinical response. Fifteen studies satisfied inclusion criteria. Our meta-analysis showed that responders had clozapine plasma concentrations that were, on average, 117 ng/mL higher than non-responders. The patients with plasma clozapine concentrations above the thresholds identified in each study had a higher likelihood of responding (odds ratio = 2.94, p < 0.001). Norclozapine plasma concentrations were not associated with a clinical response. The meta-analysis of individual data supported this result and confirmed the link between clozapine concentrations and a change in the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale score and/or the probability of clinical response. Finally, with the analysis of the coefficient of variation of clozapine plasma concentrations, we found that a greater inter-individual fluctuation in plasma concentrations was associated with a loss of clinical response. Our work confirmed that, in contrast to clozapine doses, clozapine plasma concentrations were related to a favourable clinical response, with a mean difference between responders and non-responders of 117 ng/mL. A threshold for a treatment response of 407 ng/mL was determined, with a high discriminatory capacity,and a sensitivity and specificity of 71% and 89.1%, respectively.

Clinical impact of reducing the frequency of clozapine monitoring: controlled mirror-image cohort study.

To minimise infection during COVID-19, the clozapine haematological monitoring interval was extended from 4-weekly to 12-weekly intervals in South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust. To investigate the impact of this temporary policy change on clinical and safety outcomes. All patients who received clozapine treatment with extended (12-weekly) monitoring in a large London National Health Service trust were included in a 1-year mirror-image study. A comparison group was selected with standard monitoring. The proportion of participants with mild to severe neutropenia and the proportion of participants attending the emergency department for clozapine-induced severe neutropenia treatment during the follow-up period were compared. Psychiatric hospital admission rates, clozapine dose and concomitant psychotropic medication in the 1 year before and the 1 year after extended monitoring were compared. All-cause clozapine discontinuation at 1-year follow-up was examined. Of 569 participants, 459 received clozapine with extended monitoring and 110 controls continued as normal. The total person-years were 458 in the intervention group and 109 in the control group, with a median follow-up time of 1 year in both groups. During follow-up, two participants (0.4%) recorded mild to moderate neutropenia in the intervention group and one (0.9%) in the control group. There was no difference in the incidence of haematological events between the two groups (IRR = 0.48, 95% CI 0.02-28.15, P = 0.29). All neutropenia cases in the intervention group were mild, co-occurring during COVID-19 infection. The median number of admissions per patient during the pre-mirror period remained unchanged (0, IQR = 0) during the post-mirror period. There was one death in the control group, secondary to COVID-19 infection. There was no evidence that the incidence of severe neutropenia was increased in those receiving extended monitoring.

Clozapine use at a specialised psychiatric hospital in Johannesburg.

Clozapine is the gold standard medication for treatment-resistant psychosis, with robust evidence supporting its efficacy in multiple symptom domains. However, clozapine's side effect profile contributes to its underutilisation and discontinuation. This study aimed to explore the magnitude of clozapine use and describe factors that impact on its effective use among in-patients. Tara Hospital, a specialised psychiatric hospital in Johannesburg. This was a retrospective, cross-sectional file review of clozapine-treated patients admitted over the 2-year study period. Data variables included: demographics, clinical information, discharge prescription, clozapine-related side effects and details of clozapine discontinuation, where applicable. A cohort of 33.2% of patients from Tara's biological wards received a trial of clozapine. Participants experienced anti-cholinergic clozapine-related side effects that included weight gain (79.5%), tachycardia (35.2%) and constipation (35.2%). Clozapine was discontinued in 13.7% of participants, and no life-threatening side effects or deaths occurred. Significantly more use of flupenthixol decanoate (64.3% vs. 30.7%; p = 0.0322) and anticholinergics (35.7% vs. 11.4%; p = 0.0474) occurred in the clozapine-discontinued group. Polypharmacy rates were high for psychiatric and non-psychiatric medications. One-third of patients received clozapine trials, most of whom continued at discharge. Although side effects occurred frequently, life-threatening side effects did not. Clozapine monitoring protocols, side effect rating scales, pre-emptive management of side effects, lifestyle interventions and clinician education may improve outcomes of clozapine use. The use of plasma clozapine levels may be beneficial. This study expands our limited knowledge regarding current clozapine prescribing trends in South Africa.