On the Side of the Angels makes two core arguments, first for the of politics, and second for the moral distinctiveness of partisanship (p. 7). By creativity, Rosenblum means that political parties are entrepreneurial and agonistic institutions that are essential to representative democracy because they create, not just reflect, political interests and opinions (p. 7). She derives from this notion a sharp rebuke to theorists of deliberative democracy who simply take it for granted that political parties have no role to play in reasoned exchange precisely because they are partisan. Rosenblum asserts, to the contrary, that parties do for democratic deliberation the work that philosophy cannot: They hone conflict so that it is politically pertinent and cast it in an oppositional frame to focus citizen choice (p. 307). She praises partisans, in turn, for lending urgency to public debate. They generate conflicting positions and advance opposing arguments within a framework designed for adversarial show (p. 307). Although their explicit partiality is likely aversive to some, it nonetheless lends interest and urgency that deliberation can have only when it is about choosing sides (p. 310). Rosenblum arrives at her first core argument, the party creativity thesis, in surprising ways. She finds initial inspiration for it in one of two glorious traditions of antipartyism, and then proceeds to elaborate it by an unusual but compelling synthesis of the ideas of J. S. Mill and E. E. Schattschneider (p. 25).
Read full abstract