Reviewed by: The Prophets Agree: The Function of the Book of the Twelve Prophets in Acts by Aaron W. White Linda M. Maloney aaron w. white, The Prophets Agree: The Function of the Book of the Twelve Prophets in Acts (BIS 184; Leiden: Brill, 2020). Pp. 259. €99/$119. Aaron W. White, pastor of First Presbyterian Church in South Charleston, Ohio, received his Ph.D. from the University of Bristol in 2017 (supervisor: John Nolland). This book is based on his dissertation. Its purpose is to show the rationale for the use of four quotations from the LXX version of the Book of the Twelve Prophets (Joel 3:1–5 [MT 2:28–32] in Acts 2:17–21; Amos 5:25–27 in Acts 7:42b–43; Hab 1:5 in Acts 13:41; and Amos 9:11–12 in Acts 15:16–18a). By comparing the reading and application of those texts in Acts with other roughly contemporary Jewish readings of the same texts (T. Jud. 24; CD-A 7.13–8.1; 1QpHab 1.16–2.10; 4QFlor 1.10–13), W. intends not only to demonstrate intertextuality but also to reflect on how the same text(s), read in different times and contexts, can yield different meanings. The effort is somewhat subverted by W.'s statement of his own conclusion on p. 2: "The aim is to show that Luke's use of the TP is instrumental in reflecting the early church's view of the universal lordship of Jesus, the Messiah, as it developed from Pentecost to the Council of Jerusalem (Acts 15)." In fact, the tried-and-true technique of "tell them what you are going to tell them; tell them; tell them what you told them" is so thoroughly applied in this book that there is little suspense—supposing that suspense is desirable. The Prophets Agree contains, besides its Introduction and Conclusion, four chapters on the four cited texts: (1) "I Will Pour Out My Spirit": Jesus the Lord and the Lukan Reading of LXX-Joel 3:1–5 in Acts 2; (2) "Forty Years": The Divided People of God and the Lukan Reading of LXX-Amos 5:25–27 in Acts 7:42–43; (3) "I Am Doing a Work": The Gentiles as God's People and the Lukan Reading of LXX-Habakkuk 1:5 in Acts 13; and (4) "All the Gentiles Who Are Called": Sending the Gentile Mission and the Lukan Reading of LXX-Amos 9:11–12 in Acts 15." Since at least (2) and (4) are among the "hottest topics" in Acts, this is valuable material. Citing Jacob Jervell ("The Future of the Past: Luke's Vision of Salvation History and His Writing of History," in History, Literature, and Society in the Book of Acts [ed. Ben Witherington III; Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996] 104–26), W. opines that "the difference between the Jewish reader and Christian reader originates in how one interprets Scripture in the context of the historical moment in which they stand—the time of Jesus' work and ascension to Lord and reigning king" (p. 33). That, of course, begs the question and also oversimplifies it. The period within which the interpretive texts in question were composed ranges somewhere between 20 c.e. and 120 c.e. and was a period of great upheaval in Judea and throughout the Levant, politically and religiously. Opinions differ greatly, at least nowadays, about the stance of various Jewish and "Christian" writers on the question of "who's in and who's out." Moreover, drawing a line between "Jewish" [End Page 149] and "Christian" in the first two centuries is a practice that many twenty-first-century readers (this reviewer among them) reject. That the Book of the Twelve was important to the author of Acts is unquestionable. The Twelve Prophets are quoted frequently in the NT, but only four such citations contain twenty or more words, and they are all in Acts. The issue is what the author of Acts intended by his use of those quotations. W.'s book provides one answer, based on a thorough analysis of the texts in question, but some conclusions presumed from...
Read full abstract