BackgroundBinge-eating disorder (BED) is thought of as a disorder of cognitive control, but evidence regarding its neurocognitive mechanisms is inconclusive. Key limitations of previous research include a lack of consistent separation between effects of BED and obesity and a disregard for self-report evidence suggesting that neurocognitive alterations may emerge primarily in loss- or harm-avoidance contexts. MethodsTo address these gaps, in this longitudinal study, we investigated behavioral flexibility and its underlying neurocomputational processes in reward-seeking and loss-avoidance contexts. Obese participants with BED, obese participants without BED, and healthy normal-weight participants (N = 96) performed a probabilistic reversal learning task during functional imaging, with different blocks focused on obtaining wins or avoiding losses. They were reinvited for a 6-month follow-up assessment. ResultsAnalyses informed by computational models of reinforcement learning showed that unlike obese participants with BED, obese participants without BED performed worse in the win than in the loss condition. Computationally, this was explained by differential learning sensitivities in the win versus loss conditions in the groups. In the brain, this was echoed in differential neural learning signals in the ventromedial prefrontal cortex per condition. The differences were subtle but scaled with BED symptoms, such that more severe BED symptoms were associated with increasing bias toward improved learning from wins versus losses. Across conditions, obese participants with BED switched more between choice options than healthy normal-weight participants. This was reflected in diminished representation of choice certainty in the ventromedial prefrontal cortex. ConclusionsOur study highlights the importance of distinguishing between obesity with and without BED to identify unique neurocomputational alterations underlying different styles of maladaptive eating behavior.