BackgroundTo investigate the contemporary comparative inpatient prognosis among US and Chinese patients with type A aortic dissection (TAAD).MethodsData from Chinese multi-institutional TAAD registry and the US National Inpatient Sample databases were analyzed. We used multivariable logistic regression models to compare in-hospital mortality and perioperative complication rates between the US and China. Length of stay and overall costs were fitted with quantile regression models. Independent prognostic factors associated with post-operative survival were assessed via Cox proportional hazards models.ResultsAmong 3,121 eligible TAAD patients, 1,073 were from China (25.0% female; mean ± SD age, 53.9 ± 12.4) and 2,048 were from the US (31.2% female; mean ± SE age, 59.8 ± 0.3). During the study period, the in-hospital mortality rates in China and the US were 15.5% and 13.3%, yet the difference was insignificant after adjustment (aOR, 1.16; 95% CI, 0.69–1.97). While there was no significant difference in overall perioperative complications (aOR, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.52–2.18), the patterns of complications differed between two cohorts. While Chinese TAAD patients experienced significantly longer duration of hospitalization (median difference, + 10.4 days; 95% CI, 9.2–11.5), the US TAAD cohort had significantly greater overall hospitalization costs (49.9; 95% CI, 55.4–44.5, in 1000 USD).ConclusionsNotwithstanding significant differences in demographic and clinical characteristics, TAAD patients from China and the US demonstrated comparable in-hospital mortality and overall perioperative complication rates. Future initiatives should focus on expanding surgical eligibility to the elderly Chinese TAAD patients and optimizing the duration of hospitalization without undermining meaningful clinical outcomes.Trial registrationKY20220425-05, April 5th 25 2022.
Read full abstract