MLRy 98.1,2003 163 may well be right about Caxton, but I am not at all sure what he is right about. Miranda Griffinhas an interesting essay on the gender politics of some of the fabliaux, but the relentless citation of Kristeva's Powers ofHorror (firstpublished in 1980) and the uncritical assumption that Kristeva is correct in her assertions, lead the essay into overstatements that reduce the multivalence of the fabliaux into a rather simplistic misogyny. So too, Anne Birrell (discussing early medieval Chinese lyrics) and Sarah Kay (on the unseemly American squabble over the 'New Philology', whatever that is) adopt the psychoanalytic mode firstin fashion in the 1970s and early 1980s. Despite the inherent interest of their topics, and the intelligence everywhere apparent in their essays, there is an odd sense oideja vu here. One would have liked to hear more about the materials (how many European medievalists know anything about the literature of fifth-and sixth-century China?) and the issues (questions ofeditorial method are given short shriftin Kay's survey) rather than having familiar and, to some at least, dubious assertions recycled yet again. As psychoanalysis enters its second century, and has now largely disappeared from the therapeutic scene, can we really think of it as new? What the other essays lack in fashion they more than gain in clarity and interest. Alfred Hiatt brings to light documents showing the late medieval effortsof Cambridge University to provide for itself an ancient, if factitious, foundation; Scott-Morgan Straker argues that Lydgate's Troy Book is a warning to Henry V about his imperial ambitions; Nicolette Zeeman has a solid account of Studie in Piers Plozvman; and Helen Cooper surveys again, with much good sense, Chaucer's relation to Dante? arguing in passing that the 'English Gaufride' who is presented as a historian of Troy in the House of Fame is not Geoffrey of Monmouth but Chaucer himself, and so linking that poem to the Troilus. To this reader the most satisfying essays were Ralph Hanna's bracing discussion of gender in Piers Plowman and David Wallace's intriguing account of the fifteenth-centuryLatin translation of Dante that ended up at Wells Cathedral. Wallace is a great snapper-up of unconsideredtrifles, and ifhis essay often reads like sixty details in search of an argument it none the less starts hares that others will want to chase (yes, that sentence is meant to read like Wallace's essay). On the other hand, Hanna's piece, the shortest in the volume, shows with brisk efflciency,and with corroborating evidence from a near-contemporary manuscript, that Langland's ambivalence towards learning is a function of a pedagogical discipline that created a 'particularly insecure' maleness. The historical specificity of Hanna's argument, its careful grounding in both text and context, and the clarity of its presentation make learning anything but punitive. Yale University Lee Patterson Medievalism and the Academy, Vol. n: Cultural Studies. Ed. by David Metzger. (Studies in Medievalism, io, 1998) Cambridge: Brewer. 2000. 246 pp. ?35; $60. ISBN 0-85991-567-0. By design, this volume conflates academic medieval studies with the idea, influence, and presence ofthe Middle Ages in later centuries. That conffation,conforming to the policy of Studies inMedievalism but by no means accepted by all scholars, here magnifiesthe inherent diversity of cultural studies (including race, gender, and postcolonial experience) to produce a volume in which unifying threads are exceedingly elusive. Several of the essays are useful surveys of scholarship. They include Louise D'Arcens's 'Europe in the Antipodes: Australian Medieval Studies' (pp. 13-40), emphasizing the effectsof a 'Northern Hemisphere bias' (p. 15); Louise Sylvester's 'ReadingRapein Medieval Literature' (pp. 120-35);and Clay Kinsner's 'The Female Mystics, Women's Studies, and the Negotiations of Discourse' (pp. 164-83). 164 Reviews Michael Bernard-Donals treats postcolonialism in 'The Manichean Problem in Post-Colonial Criticism; or, Why the Subaltern Cannot Speak' (pp. 41-63); Charles E. Wilson, Jr,discusses the African American experience in 'Medievalism, Race, and Social Order in Gloria Naylor's Bailey's Cafey (pp. 74-91); and Timothy Richardson considers Brian Eno's theory and composition?of ambient music in particular?in 'Brian...
Read full abstract