ABSTRACT The discourse around chemical weapons (CW), and the need for a norm against their use, generally focuses on the threat they pose to the physical health and safety of nations and their populations. But this fear of physical harm does not account for all the damages that gas can cause. CW released in war zones have the potential to wound not just the physical body on far-off battlefields, but also the body politic on home fronts. Examining political wounds offers scholars an expansive way to study the limits and reach of anti-gas norms, identifying nuances not commonly considered. This article examines two case studies of nations possessing anti-gas reputations, which were solidified by avoiding gas use during the ‘good war’ of 1939–1945, but which were subsequently strained during the Cold War. In the 1960s and 1970s, the United States encountered criticism for its use of non-lethal tear gas in Vietnam, while 1980s Britain wrestled with repercussions from its policies surrounding the treatment of Second World War mustard gas victims. The similarities of the impact of CW in examples from different decades and nations serves both to prove the power of CW as a domestic and political weapon, and to illuminate nuances in the renewed commitment to the anti-gas norm in the late twentieth century.
Read full abstract