Centromeric Chromatin Research Articles

Kinetochore dynein is sufficient to biorient chromosomes and remodel the outer kinetochore.

Multiple microtubule-directed activities concentrate on mitotic chromosomes to ensure their faithful segregation. These include couplers and dynamics regulators localized at the kinetochore, the microtubule interface built on centromeric chromatin, as well as motor proteins recruited to kinetochores and chromatin. Here, we describe an in vivo approach in the C. elegans one-cell embryo in which removal of the major microtubule-directed activities on mitotic chromosomes is compared to the selective presence of individual activities. Our approach reveals that the kinetochore dynein module, comprised of cytoplasmic dynein and its kinetochore-specific adapters, is sufficient to biorient chromosomes; by contrast, this module is unable to support congression. In coordination with orientation, the dynein module directs removal of outermost kinetochore components, including dynein itself, independently of the other microtubule-directed activities and kinetochore-localized protein phosphatase 1. These observations indicate that the kinetochore dynein module is sufficient to biorient chromosomes and to direct remodeling of the outer kinetochore in a microtubule attachment state-sensitive manner.

Structure and evolution of metapolycentromeres.

Metapolycentromeres consist of multiple sequential domains of centromeric chromatin associated with a centromere-specific variant of histone H3 (CENP-A), functioning collectively as a single centromere. To date, they have been revealed in nine flowering plant, five insect and six vertebrate species. In this paper, we focus on their structure and possible mechanisms of emergence and evolution. The metapolycentromeres may vary in the number of centromeric domains and in their genetic content and epigenetic modifications. However, these variations do not seem to affect their function. The emergence of metapolycentromeres has been attributed to multiple Robertsonian translocations and segmental duplications. Conditions of genomic instability, such as interspecific hybridization and malignant neoplasms, are suggested as triggers for the de novo emergence of metapolycentromeres. Addressing the "centromere paradox" - the rapid evolution of centromeric DNA and proteins despite their conserved cellular function - we explore the centromere drive hypothesis as a plausible explanation for the dynamic evolution of centromeres in general, and in particular the emergence of metapolycentromeres and holocentromeres. Apparently, metapolycentromeres are more common across different species than it was believed until recently. Indeed, a systematic review of the available cytogenetic publications allowed us to identify 27 candidate species with metapolycentromeres. Тhe list of the already established and newly revealed candidate species thus spans 27 species of flowering plants and eight species of gymnosperm plants, five species of insects, and seven species of vertebrates. This indicates an erratic phylogenetic distribution of the species with metapolycentromeres and may suggest an independent emergence of the metapolycentromeres in the course of evolution. However, the current catalog of species with identified and likely metapolycentromeres remains too short to draw reliable conclusions about their evolution, particularly in the absence of knowledge about related species without metapolycentromeres for comparative analysis. More studies are necessary to shed light on the mechanisms of metapolycentromere formation and evolution.

FBXO38 is dispensable for PD-1 regulation

SKP1-CUL1-F-box protein (SCF) ubiquitin ligases are versatile protein complexes that mediate the ubiquitination of protein substrates. The direct substrate recognition relies on a large family of F-box-domain-containing subunits. One of these substrate receptors is FBXO38, which is encoded by a gene found mutated in families with early-onset distal motor neuronopathy. SCFFBXO38 ubiquitin ligase controls the stability of ZXDB, a nuclear factor associated with the centromeric chromatin protein CENP-B. Loss of FBXO38 in mice results in growth retardation and defects in spermatogenesis characterized by deregulation of the Sertoli cell transcription program and compromised centromere integrity. Moreover, it was reported that SCFFBXO38 mediates the degradation of PD-1, a key immune-checkpoint inhibitor in T cells. Here, we have re-addressed the link between SCFFBXO38 and PD-1 proteolysis. Our data do not support the notion that SCFFBXO38 directly or indirectly controls the abundance and stability of PD-1 in T cells.

Regulation of outer kinetochore assembly during meiosis I and II by CENP-A and KNL-2/M18BP1 in C. elegans oocytes

During cell division, chromosomes build kinetochores that attach to spindle microtubules. Kinetochores usually form at the centromeres, which contain CENP-A nucleosomes. The outer kinetochore, which is the core attachment site for microtubules, is composed of the KMN network (Knl1c, Mis12c, and Ndc80c complexes) and is recruited downstream of CENP-A and its partner CENP-C. In C.elegans oocytes, kinetochores have been suggested to form independently of CENP-A nucleosomes. Yet kinetochore formation requires CENP-C, which acts in parallel to the nucleoporin MEL-28ELYS. Here, we used a combination of RNAi and Degron-based depletion of CENP-A (or downstream CENP-C) to demonstrate that both proteins are in fact responsible for a portion of outer kinetochore assembly during meiosis I and are essential for accurate chromosome segregation. The remaining part requires the coordinated action of KNL-2 (ortholog of human M18BP1) and of the nucleoporin MEL-28ELYS. Accordingly, co-depletion of CENP-A (or CENP-C) and KNL-2M18BP1 (or MEL-28ELYS) prevented outer kinetochore assembly in oocytes during meiosis I. We further found that KNL-2M18BP1 and MEL-28ELYS are interdependent for kinetochore localization. Using engineered mutants, we demonstrated that KNL-2M18BP1 recruits MEL-28ELYS at meiotic kinetochores through a specific N-terminal domain, independently of its canonical CENP-A loading factor activity. Finally, we found that meiosis II outer kinetochore assembly was solely dependent on the canonical CENP-A/CENP-C pathway. Thus, like in most cells, outer kinetochore assembly in C.elegans oocytes depends on centromeric chromatin. However, during meiosis I, an additional KNL-2M18BP1 and MEL-28ELYS pathway acts in a non-redundant manner and in parallel to canonical centromeric chromatin.

Molecular evolution of the mammalian kinetochore complex.

Mammalian centromeres are satellite-rich chromatin domains that serve as sites for kinetochore complex assembly. Centromeres are highly variable in sequence and satellite organization across species, but the processes that govern the co-evolutionary dynamics between rapidly evolving centromeres and their associated kinetochore proteins remain poorly understood. Here, we pursue a course of phylogenetic analyses to investigate the molecular evolution of the complete kinetochore complex across primate and rodent species with divergent centromere repeat sequences and features. We show that many protein components of the core centromere associated network (CCAN) harbor signals of adaptive evolution, consistent with their intimate association with centromere satellite DNA and roles in the stability and recruitment of additional kinetochore proteins. Surprisingly, CCAN and outer kinetochore proteins exhibit comparable rates of adaptive divergence, suggesting that changes in centromere DNA can ripple across the kinetochore to drive adaptive protein evolution within distant domains of the complex. Our work further identifies kinetochore proteins subject to lineage-specific adaptive evolution, including rapidly evolving proteins in species with centromere satellites characterized by higher-order repeat structure and lacking CENP-B boxes. Thus, features of centromeric chromatin beyond the linear DNA sequence may drive selection on kinetochore proteins. Overall, our work spotlights adaptively evolving proteins with diverse centromere-associated functions, including centromere chromatin structure, kinetochore protein assembly, kinetochore-microtubule association, cohesion maintenance, and DNA damage response pathways. These adaptively evolving kinetochore protein candidates present compelling opportunities for future functional investigations exploring how their concerted changes with centromere DNA ensure the maintenance of genome stability.

The Interaction of NF-κB Transcription Factor with Centromeric Chromatin.

Centromeric chromatin is a subset of chromatin structure and governs chromosome segregation. The centromere is composed of both CENP-A nucleosomes (CENP-Anuc) and H3 nucleosomes (H3nuc) and is enriched with alpha-satellite (α-sat) DNA repeats. These CENP-Anuc have a different structure than H3nuc, decreasing the base pairs (bp) of wrapped DNA from 147 bp for H3nuc to 121 bp for CENP-Anuc. All these factors can contribute to centromere function. We investigated the interaction of H3nuc and CENP-Anuc with NF-κB, a crucial transcription factor in regulating immune response and inflammation. We utilized atomic force microscopy (AFM) to characterize complexes of both types of nucleosomes with NF-κB. We found that NF-κB unravels H3nuc, removing more than 20 bp of DNA, and that NF-κB binds to the nucleosomal core. Similar results were obtained for the truncated variant of NF-κB comprised only of the Rel homology domain and missing the transcription activation domain (TAD), suggesting that RelATAD is not critical in unraveling H3nuc. By contrast, NF-κB did not bind to or unravel CENP-Anuc. These findings with different affinities for two types of nucleosomes to NF-κB may have implications for understanding the mechanisms of gene expression in bulk and centromere chromatin.

A non-canonical role of the inner kinetochore in regulating sister-chromatid cohesion at centromeres

The 16-subunit Constitutive Centromere-associated Network (CCAN)-based inner kinetochore is well-known for connecting centromeric chromatin to the spindle-binding outer kinetochore. Here, we report a non-canonical role for the inner kinetochore in directly regulating sister-chromatid cohesion at centromeres. We provide biochemical, X-ray crystal structure, and intracellular ectopic localization evidence that the inner kinetochore directly binds cohesin, a ring-shaped multi-subunit complex that holds sister chromatids together from S-phase until anaphase onset. This interaction is mediated by binding of the 5-subunit CENP-OPQUR sub-complex of CCAN to the Scc1-SA2 sub-complex of cohesin. Mutation in the CENP-U subunit of the CENP-OPQUR complex that abolishes its binding to the composite interface between Scc1 and SA2 weakens centromeric cohesion, leading to premature separation of sister chromatids during delayed metaphase. We further show that CENP-U competes with the cohesin release factor Wapl for binding the interface of Scc1-SA2, and that the cohesion-protecting role for CENP-U can be bypassed by depleting Wapl. Taken together, this study reveals an inner kinetochore-bound pool of cohesin, which strengthens centromeric sister-chromatid cohesion to resist metaphase spindle pulling forces.

Cdc48 and its co-factor Ufd1 extract CENP-A from centromeric chromatin and can induce chromosome elimination in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe.

CENP-A determines the identity of the centromere. Because the position and size of the centromere and its number per chromosome must be maintained, the distribution of CENP-A is strictly regulated. In this study, we have aimed to understand mechanisms to regulate the distribution of CENP-A (Cnp1SP) in fission yeast. A mutant of the ufd1+ gene (ufd1-73) encoding a cofactor of Cdc48 ATPase is sensitive to Cnp1 expressed at a high level and allows mislocalization of Cnp1. The level of Cnp1 in centromeric chromatin is increased in the ufd1-73 mutant even when Cnp1 is expressed at a normal level. A preexisting mutant of the cdc48+ gene (cdc48-353) phenocopies the ufd1-73 mutant. We have also shown that Cdc48 and Ufd1 proteins interact physically with centromeric chromatin. Finally, Cdc48 ATPase with Ufd1 artificially recruited to the centromere of a mini-chromosome (Ch16) induce a loss of Cnp1 from Ch16, leading to an increased rate of chromosome loss. It appears that Cdc48 ATPase, together with its cofactor Ufd1 remove excess Cnp1 from chromatin, likely in a direct manner. This mechanism may play a role in centromere disassembly, a process to eliminate Cnp1 to inactivate the kinetochore function during development, differentiation, and stress response.

KNL1 and NDC80 represent new universal markers for the detection of functional centromeres in plants.

Centromere is the chromosomal site of kinetochore assembly and microtubule attachment for chromosome segregation. Given its importance, markers that allow specific labeling of centromeric chromatin throughout the cell cycle and across all chromosome types are sought for facilitating various centromere studies. Antibodies against the N-terminal region of CENH3 are commonly used for this purpose, since CENH3 is the near-universal marker of functional centromeres. However, because the N-terminal region of CENH3 is highly variable among plant species, antibodies directed against this region usually function only in a small group of closely related species. As a more versatile alternative, we present here antibodies targeted to the conserved domains of two outer kinetochore proteins, KNL1 and NDC80. Sequence comparison of these domains across more than 350 plant species revealed a high degree of conservation, particularly within a six amino acid motif, FFGPVS in KNL1, suggesting that both antibodies would function in a wide range of plant species. This assumption was confirmed by immunolabeling experiments in angiosperm (monocot and dicot) and gymnosperm species, including those with mono-, holo-, and meta-polycentric chromosomes. In addition to centromere labeling on condensed chromosomes during cell division, both antibodies detected the corresponding regions in the interphase nuclei of most species tested. These results demonstrated that KNL1 and NDC80 are better suited for immunolabeling centromeres than CENH3, because antibodies against these proteins offer incomparably greater versatility across different plant species which is particularly convenient for studying the organization and function of the centromere in non-model species.

HJURP is recruited to double-strand break sites and facilitates DNA repair by promoting chromatin reorganization.

HJURP is overexpressed in several cancer types and strongly correlates with patient survival. However, the mechanistic basis underlying the association of HJURP with cancer aggressiveness is not well understood. HJURP promotes the loading of the histone H3 variant, CENP-A, at the centromeric chromatin, epigenetically defining the centromeres and supporting proper chromosome segregation. In addition, HJURP is associated with DNA repair but its function in this process is still scarcely explored. Here, we demonstrate that HJURP is recruited to DSBs through a mechanism requiring chromatin PARylation and promotes epigenetic alterations that favor the execution of DNA repair. Incorporation of HJURP at DSBs promotes turnover of H3K9me3 and HP1, facilitating DNA damage signaling and DSB repair. Moreover, HJURP overexpression in glioma cell lines also affected global structure of heterochromatin independently of DNA damage induction, promoting genome-wide reorganization and assisting DNA damage response. HJURP overexpression therefore extensively alters DNA damage signaling and DSB repair, and also increases radioresistance of glioma cells. Importantly, HJURP expression levels in tumors are also associated with poor response of patients to radiation. Thus, our results enlarge the understanding of HJURP involvement in DNA repair and highlight it as a promising target for the development of adjuvant therapies that sensitize tumor cells to irradiation.

Conserved chromatin and repetitive patterns reveal slow genome evolution in frogs

Frogs are an ecologically diverse and phylogenetically ancient group of anuran amphibians that include important vertebrate cell and developmental model systems, notably the genus Xenopus. Here we report a high-quality reference genome sequence for the western clawed frog, Xenopus tropicalis, along with draft chromosome-scale sequences of three distantly related emerging model frog species, Eleutherodactylus coqui, Engystomops pustulosus, and Hymenochirus boettgeri. Frog chromosomes have remained remarkably stable since the Mesozoic Era, with limited Robertsonian (i.e., arm-preserving) translocations and end-to-end fusions found among the smaller chromosomes. Conservation of synteny includes conservation of centromere locations, marked by centromeric tandem repeats associated with Cenp-a binding surrounded by pericentromeric LINE/L1 elements. This work explores the structure of chromosomes across frogs, using a dense meiotic linkage map for X. tropicalis and chromatin conformation capture (Hi-C) data for all species. Abundant satellite repeats occupy the unusually long (~20 megabase) terminal regions of each chromosome that coincide with high rates of recombination. Both embryonic and differentiated cells show reproducible associations of centromeric chromatin and of telomeres, reflecting a Rabl-like configuration. Our comparative analyses reveal 13 conserved ancestral anuran chromosomes from which contemporary frog genomes were constructed.

Differential Gene Regulation of the Human Blastocyst Trophectoderm and Inner Cell Mass by Progesterone.

Knowledge of action of progesterone (P4) on the human preimplantation embryo is lacking. The objective of this study was to determine expression of a mitochondrial P4 receptor (PR-M) in the trophectoderm (TE) and the inner cell mass (ICM) of the human blastocyst and to determine P4-induced gene expression during growth from the cleavage to the blastocyst stage. Previously cryopreserved cleavage stage embryos were treated with P4 (10-6 M) or vehicle until blastocyst development. Cells from the TE and the ICM of dissected euploid embryos underwent RNA-seq analysis, while other embryos were used for analysis of nuclear PR (nPR) and PR-M expression.PR-M expression was confirmed in the TE, the ICM, and a human embryonic stem cell line (HESC). Conversely, nPR expression was absent in the TE and the ICM with low expression in the HESC line. RNA-seq analysis revealed P4 effects greater in the TE with 183 significant pathway changes compared to 27 in the ICM. The TE response included significant upregulation of genes associated with DNA replication, cell cycle phase transition and others, exemplified by a 7.6-fold increase in the cell proliferation gene, F-Box Associated Domain Containing. The majority of ICM pathways were downregulated including chromosome separation, centromere complex assembly and chromatin remodeling at centromere. This study confirms that human blastocysts express PR-M in both the TE and the ICM, but lack expression of nPR. P4-induced gene regulation differs greatly in the two cell fractions with the predominant effect of cell proliferation in the TE and not the ICM.

Gross Chromosomal Rearrangement at Centromeres.

Centromeres play essential roles in the faithful segregation of chromosomes. CENP-A, the centromere-specific histone H3 variant, and heterochromatin characterized by di- or tri-methylation of histone H3 9th lysine (H3K9) are the hallmarks of centromere chromatin. Contrary to the epigenetic marks, DNA sequences underlying the centromere region of chromosomes are not well conserved through evolution. However, centromeres consist of repetitive sequences in many eukaryotes, including animals, plants, and a subset of fungi, including fission yeast. Advances in long-read sequencing techniques have uncovered the complete sequence of human centromeres containing more than thousands of alpha satellite repeats and other types of repetitive sequences. Not only tandem but also inverted repeats are present at a centromere. DNA recombination between centromere repeats can result in gross chromosomal rearrangement (GCR), such as translocation and isochromosome formation. CENP-A chromatin and heterochromatin suppress the centromeric GCR. The key player of homologous recombination, Rad51, safeguards centromere integrity through conservative noncrossover recombination between centromere repeats. In contrast to Rad51-dependent recombination, Rad52-mediated single-strand annealing (SSA) and microhomology-mediated end-joining (MMEJ) lead to centromeric GCR. This review summarizes recent findings on the role of centromere and recombination proteins in maintaining centromere integrity and discusses how GCR occurs at centromeres.

CENP-A and CENP-B collaborate to create an open centromeric chromatin state

Centromeres are epigenetically defined via the presence of the histone H3 variant CENP-A. Contacting CENP-A nucleosomes, the constitutive centromere associated network (CCAN) and the kinetochore assemble, connecting the centromere to spindle microtubules during cell division. The DNA-binding centromeric protein CENP-B is involved in maintaining centromere stability and, together with CENP-A, shapes the centromeric chromatin state. The nanoscale organization of centromeric chromatin is not well understood. Here, we use single-molecule fluorescence and cryoelectron microscopy (cryoEM) to show that CENP-A incorporation establishes a dynamic and open chromatin state. The increased dynamics of CENP-A chromatin create an opening for CENP-B DNA access. In turn, bound CENP-B further opens the chromatin fiber structure and induces nucleosomal DNA unwrapping. Finally, removal of CENP-A increases CENP-B mobility in cells. Together, our studies show that the two centromere-specific proteins collaborate to reshape chromatin structure, enabling the binding of centromeric factors and establishing a centromeric chromatin state.

DAXX promotes centromeric stability independently of ATRX by preventing the accumulation of R-loop-induced DNA double-stranded breaks.

Maintaining chromatin integrity at the repetitive non-coding DNA sequences underlying centromeres is crucial to prevent replicative stress, DNA breaks and genomic instability. The concerted action of transcriptional repressors, chromatin remodelling complexes and epigenetic factors controls transcription and chromatin structure in these regions. The histone chaperone complex ATRX/DAXX is involved in the establishment and maintenance of centromeric chromatin through the deposition of the histone variant H3.3. ATRX and DAXX have also evolved mutually-independent functions in transcription and chromatin dynamics. Here, using paediatric glioma and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor cell lines, we identify a novel ATRX-independent function for DAXX in promoting genome stability by preventing transcription-associated R-loop accumulation and DNA double-strand break formation at centromeres. This function of DAXX required its interaction with histone H3.3 but was independent of H3.3 deposition and did not reflect a role in the repression of centromeric transcription. DAXX depletion mobilized BRCA1 at centromeres, in line with BRCA1 role in counteracting centromeric R-loop accumulation. Our results provide novel insights into the mechanisms protecting the human genome from chromosomal instability, as well as potential perspectives in the treatment of cancers with DAXX alterations.

A role for β-1,6- and β-1,3-glucans in kinetochore function in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Chromosome segregation is crucial for the faithful inheritance of DNA to the daughter cells after DNA replication. For this, the kinetochore, a megadalton protein complex, assembles on centromeric chromatin containing the histone H3 variant CENP-A, and provides a physical connection to the microtubules. Here, we report an unanticipated role for enzymes required for β-1,6- and β-1,3-glucan biosynthesis in regulating kinetochore function in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. These carbohydrates are the major constituents of the yeast cell wall. We found that the deletion of KRE6, which encodes a glycosylhydrolase/ transglycosidase required for β-1,6-glucan synthesis, suppressed the centromeric defect of mutations in components of the kinetochore, foremost the NDC80 components Spc24, Spc25, the MIND component Nsl1, and Okp1, a constitutive centromere-associated network protein. Similarly, the absence of Fks1, a β-1,3-glucan synthase, and Kre11/Trs65, a TRAPPII component, suppressed a mutation in SPC25. Genetic analysis indicates that the reduction of intracellular β-1,6- and β-1,3-glucans, rather than the cell wall glucan content, regulates kinetochore function. Furthermore, we found a physical interaction between Kre6 and CENP-A/Cse4 in yeast, suggesting a potential function for Kre6 in glycosylating CENP-A/Cse4 or another kinetochore protein. This work shows a moonlighting function for selected cell wall synthesis proteins in regulating kinetochore assembly, which may provide a mechanism to connect the nutritional status of the cell to cell-cycle progression and chromosome segregation.

Quantitative Super-Resolution Microscopy Reveals the Relationship between CENP-A Stoichiometry and Centromere Physical Size.

Centromeric chromatin is thought to play a critical role in ensuring the faithful segregation of chromosomes during mitosis. However, our understanding of this role is presently limited by our poor understanding of the structure and composition of this unique chromatin. The nucleosomal variant, CENP-A, localizes to narrow regions within the centromere, where it plays a major role in centromeric function, effectively serving as a platform on which the kinetochore is assembled. Previous work found that, within a given cell, the number of microtubules within kinetochores is essentially unchanged between CENP-A-localized regions of different physical sizes. However, it is unknown if the amount of CENP-A is also unchanged between these regions of different sizes, which would reflect a strict structural correspondence between these two key characteristics of the centromere/kinetochore assembly. Here, we used super-resolution optical microscopy to image and quantify the amount of CENP-A and DNA within human centromere chromatin. We found that the amount of CENP-A within CENP-A domains of different physical sizes is indeed the same. Further, our measurements suggest that the ratio of CENP-A- to H3-containing nucleosomes within these domains is between 8:1 and 11:1. Thus, our results not only identify an unexpectedly strict relationship between CENP-A and microtubules stoichiometries but also that the CENP-A centromeric domain is almost exclusively composed of CENP-A nucleosomes.

CRISPR imaging reveals chromatin fluctuation at the centromere region related to cellular senescence

The human genome is spatially and temporally organized in the nucleus as chromatin, and the dynamic structure of chromatin is closely related to genome functions. Cellular senescence characterized by an irreversible arrest of proliferation is accompanied by chromatin reorganisation in the nucleus during senescence. However, chromatin dynamics in chromatin reorganisation is poorly understood. Here, we report chromatin dynamics at the centromere region during senescence in cultured human cell lines using live imaging based on the clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat/dCas9 system. The repetitive sequence at the centromere region, alpha-satellite DNA, was predominantly detected on chromosomes 1, 12, and 19. Centromeric chromatin formed irregular-shaped domains with high fluctuation in cells undergoing 5′-aza-2′-deoxycytidine-induced senescence. Our findings suggest that the increased fluctuation of the chromatin structure facilitates centromere disorganisation during cellular senescence.

Centromere-specifying nucleosomes persist in aging mouse oocytes in the absence of nascent assembly

Centromeres direct genetic inheritance but are not themselves genetically encoded. Instead, centromeres are defined epigenetically by the presence of a histone H3 variant, CENP-A.1 In cultured somatic cells, an established paradigm of cell-cycle-coupled propagation maintains centromere identity: CENP-A is partitioned between sisters during replication and replenished by new assembly, which is restricted to G1. The mammalian female germ line challenges this model because of the cell-cycle arrest between pre-meiotic S phase and the subsequent G1, which can last for the entire reproductive lifespan (months to decades). New CENP-A chromatin assembly maintains centromeres during prophase I in worm and starfish oocytes,2,3 suggesting that a similar process may be required for centromere inheritance in mammals. To test this hypothesis, we developed an oocyte-specific conditional knockout (cKO) mouse for Mis18α, an essential component of the assembly machinery. We find that embryos derived from Mis18α knockout oocytes fail to assemble CENP-A nucleosomes prior to zygotic genome activation (ZGA), validating the knockout model. We show that deletion of Mis18α in the female germ line at the time of birth has no impact on centromeric CENP-A nucleosome abundance, even after 6-8months of aging. In addition, there is no detectable detriment to fertility. Thus, centromere chromatin is maintained long-term, independent of new assembly during the extended prophase I arrest in mouse oocytes.

Centromere plasticity with evolutionary conservation and divergence uncovered by wheat 10+ genomes.

Centromeres are the chromosomal regions that play a crucial role in maintaining genomic stability. The underling highly repetitive DNA sequences can evolve quickly in most eukaryotes, and promote karyotype evolution. Despite their variability, it is not fully understood how these widely variable sequences ensure the homeostasis of centromere function. In this study, we investigated the genetics and epigenetics of centromeres in a population of wheat lines from global breeding programs. We captured a high degree of sequences, positioning, and epigenetic variations in the large and complex wheat centromeres. We found that the most CENH3-associated repeats are Cereba element of retrotransposons and exhibit phylogenetic homogenization across different wheat lines, but the less-associated repeat sequences diverge on their own way in each wheat line, implying specific mechanisms for selecting certain repeat types as functional core centromeres. Furthermore, we observed that CENH3 nucleosome structures display looser wrapping of DNA termini on complex centromeric repeats, including the repositioned centromeres. We also found that strict CENH3 nucleosome positioning and intrinsic DNA features play a role in determining centromere identity among different lines. Specific non-B form DNAs were substantially associated with CENH3 nucleosomes for the repositioned centromeres. These findings suggest that multiple mechanisms were involved in the adaptation of CENH3 nucleosomes that can stabilize centromeres. Ultimately, we proposed a remarkable epigenetic plasticity of centromere chromatin within the diverse genomic context, and the high robustness is crucial for maintaining centromere function and genome stability in wheat 10+ lines as a result of past breeding selections.