The conclusion of the 2011 Nobel meeting in Stockholm on Sustainability (http://globalsymposium2011.org/) was unambiguous: we need a change in collective mindset to achieve our vision and goal. As an anthropologist, therefore I ask myself: ‘‘What might be the barriers to such a change?’’ About 15 years ago, I visited the highlands of Papua New Guinea as a guest to my wife, who was doing research there. In these parts, because the climate is wet and cold at an elevation of over 2000 m, people’s lives focus on a fire that is maintained at all times in a central hearth pit. It serves to heat the dwelling and to cook. In one village, we observed that the inhabitants had devised a simple and very effective tool to help in cooking: a piece of bamboo had been heated over the fire and bent to create a pair of pincers much like one finds in our culture to serve salad. Whenever the food (mainly sweet potato and taro) was cooked, they would take the tubers out of the fire with this tool. Surprisingly, in a neighboring village, not more than a day’s walk distant, they did not have such a tool, and thus they burnt their fingers every time they had to fetch food from the fire. As the people in both villages interact regularly, I asked myself: ‘‘Why don’t the people in the second village adopt the very efficient and easy-to-make tool invented in the first?’’ I think the answer lies in the fact that a cultural or technical tradition, which we commonly define in our Western scientific culture by what is included in it (tools, know-how, institutions, etc.), is actually defined not by its content, but by the things the people concerned have never thought about—their ‘blind spots’, the questions they have never asked themselves, and to which they therefore have not devised any answers. The boundaries of the known are inherently the things not known, those never seen as interesting or relevant. Why is that important in the sustainability debate? First of all, because it explains to a large extent why it has proven impossible to deal with GHG emissions by means of a worldwide, ‘top-down’ treaty such as the Kyoto treaty or the UNFCCC. Every nation, every region, has a different perception of what needs to be done and how to do it. Whereas it was possible for nations in a phase of plenty to S. E. van der Leeuw (&) School of Human Evolution and Social Change, Arizona State University, Phoenix, USA e-mail: vanderle@asu.edu
Read full abstract