To improve upon current FAA noise policy, it seems reasonable to consider supplemental metrics. One of these is to include the annoyance impacts of low-frequency noise (LFN). It is established that LFN can cause rattle in homes near airports, causing annoyance. Current DNL 65 does not address LFN. In fact, most acoustical measurements do not include low frequencies due to the limitations of inexpensive measurement equipment. Hence, the FAA is genuinely missing these impacts from a physics point of view. The FAA has already paid for a very high quality LFN study through Project 1 in the PARTNER Center of Excellence (predecessor of the current ASCENT center). That project completed in 2007. The present author was not a participant in PARTNER Project 1, but he closely observed the amazing work done by the investigators from The Pennsylvania State University, Purdue University, and the University of Central Florida. If sufficient LFN data is regularly obtained at larger airports with improved noise monitoring equipment, then FAA could include supplemental metrics, such as the number of low-frequency noise events in a given period. [Work supported by the Penn State College of Engineering and its United Technologies Corporation Professorship.]
Read full abstract