Adam W. Nevi&, Richard A. Kozarek2, Reiley Kidd1 O all cases of gastroesophageal carcinoma. fewer than half are resectable. and only a small number of those resections will lead to cure. Even after ‘ curative” surgery. about 2Oc4 of these patients will have further dysphagia caused by either recurrence or anastomotic stricture. For these reasons. palliative measures have come to the forefront of therapy. Treatments include palliative resection or bypass. irradiation, periodic bougienage. chemotherapy. tumor ablation with a neodymium-yttriumaluminum-garnet (Nd-YAG) laser. placement of a conventional rigid esophageal stent, placement of a feeding gastrostomy tube. or a combination of these measures I I I. Malignant esophageal obstructions have been treated palliatively with esophageal prostheses for more than 1(X) years. The first prostheses. fashioned out of ivory and boxwood. were passed orally and fixed externally. including tying the prosthesis to a mustache in one case 12). Blind placement of prostheses ultimately evolved into open insertion of Celestin tubes. which required laparotomy. These procedures were plagued by high procedure-related niorbidity and nx)rtality. The advent of fiberscopic endoscopy and fluoroscopic guidance signiticantly improved the safety of placement of rigid esophageal stents. However, the placement of these rigid stents was by no means risk-free. Preparatory esophageal bougienage to 2to 4-French sizes larger than the prostheses over 4-5 days before placement of the rigid stent was the standard; acute procedure-related complications approached 20c/ ith death reported 8.f{k of the time ill a meta-analysis of published series 131Acute complications included bleeding. perforation. dyspnea (from tracheal compression ). and tube malposition. Long-term complications. in turn. have included migration. erosion with bleeding. or esophagotracheal fistulas, tumor overgrowth of the proximal or distal end, chronic aspiration. and tube occlusion by a food bolus. Expandable esophageal stents have been introduced in the hope of diminishing procedural and subsequent stent-related complications. The Food and Drug Administration has recently approved four metallic expandable prostheses that are now commercially available on the United States market for the treatnient of malignant dysphagia (Fig. I ): Gianturco Zstent (Wilson-Co k, Winston-Salem, NC), Wallstent (Schneider. Minneapolis. MN). Ultraflex nitinol mesh stent (Microvasive, Natick, MA). and the EsophaCoil (Instent. Eden Prairie. MN). The theoretic advantages of expandable metal prostheses over conventional rigid stents include easier placement of the stent in an acutely angled stenosis and an overFig. 1.-The four currently available metallic stents on the United States market: Ultraflex nitinol mesh stent )Microvasive, Natick, MA) (A), Wallstent Schneider, Minneapolis, MN) (B), Gianturco Z-stent (WilsonCook, Winston-Salem, NC) (C), and EsophaCoil (Instent, Eden Prairie, MN) (D). Each prosthesis is available in various lengths and diameters.
Read full abstract