Catheter Colonization Research Articles

Ume6-dependent pathways of morphogenesis and biofilm formation in Candida auris.

Candida auris is a yeast pathogen causing nosocomial outbreaks of candidemia. Its ability to adhere to inert surfaces and to be transmitted from one patient to another via medical devices is of particular concern. Like other Candida spp., C. auris has the ability to transition from the yeast form to pseudohyphae and to build biofilms. Moreover, some isolates have a unique capacity to form aggregates. These morphogenetic changes may impact virulence. In this study, we demonstrated the role of the transcription factor Ume6 in C. auris morphogenesis. Genetic hyperactivation of Ume6 induced filamentation and aggregation. The Ume6-hyperactivated strain (UME6HA) also exhibited increased adhesion to inert surface and formed biofilms of higher biomass compared to the parental strain. Transcriptomic analyses of UME6HA revealed enrichment of genes encoding for adhesins, proteins involved in cell wall organization, sterol biosynthesis, and aspartic protease activities. The three most upregulated genes compared to wild-type were those encoding for the agglutin-like sequence adhesin Als4498, the C. auris-specific adhesin Scf1, and the hypha-specific G1 cyclin-related protein Hgc1. The deletion of these genes in the UME6HA background showed that Ume6 controls filamentation via Hgc1 and aggregation via Als4498 and Scf1. Adhesion to inert surface was essentially triggered by Scf1. However, Als4498 and Hgc1 were also crucial for biofilm formation. Our data show that Ume6 is a universal regulator of C. auris morphogenesis via distinct modulators.IMPORTANCEC. auris represents a public health threat because of its ability to cause difficult-to-treat infections and hospital outbreaks. The morphogenetic plasticity of C. auris, including its ability to filament, to form aggregates or biofilms on inert surfaces, is important to the fungus for interhuman transmission, skin or catheter colonization, tissue invasion, antifungal resistance, and escape of the host immune system. This work deciphered the importance of Ume6 in the control of distinct pathways involved in filamentation, aggregation, adhesion, and biofilm formation of C. auris. A better understanding of the mechanisms of C. auris morphogenesis may help identify novel antifungal targets.

Differences in the Dwell Time of Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters between Patients with Catheter Colonization and Those Developing Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infection: A Single Centre Retrospective Cohort Study.

Substantial knowledge gaps exist concerning the varying durations of peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) placements that lead to either central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) or catheter colonization. We aimed to compare PICCs dwell time between patients who developed CLABSIs due to multidrug-resistant microorganisms (MDROs) and patients with catheter colonization by MDROs. Data from 86 patients admitted consecutively to a tertiary-care hospital from 2017 to 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. The mean dwell time was 25.73 ± 16.19 days in the PICC-CLABSI group and 16.36 ± 10.28 days in the PICC-colonization group (p = 0.002). The mean dwell time was 17.38 ± 9.5 days in the PICC-MDRO group and 22.48 ± 15.64 days in the PICC-non-MDRO group (p = 0.005). Within the PICC-CLABSI group, the mean dwell time for CLABSIs caused by MDROs was 21.50 ± 12.31 days, compared to 27.73 ± 16.98 days for CLABSIs caused by non-MDROs (p = 0.417). Within the PICC-colonization group, the mean dwell time was 15.55 ± 7.73 days in PICCs colonized by MDROs and 16.92 ± 11.85 days in PICCs colonized by non-MDROs (p = 0.124). The findings of the present study suggest that CLABSIs caused by MDROs in PICCs are associated with a shorter mean catheter dwell time compared to those caused by non-MDROs, underscoring the importance of considering infections by MDROs when evaluating PICC dwell times.

Insertion site and risk of peripheral intravenous catheter colonization and/or local infection: a post hoc analysis of the CLEAN 3 study including more than 800 catheters

AimAlthough uncommon, infections associated with peripheral intravenous catheters (PIVCs) may be responsible for severe life-threatening complications and increase healthcare costs. Few data are available on the relationship between PIVC insertion site and risk of infectious complications.MethodsWe performed a post hoc analysis of the CLEAN 3 database, a randomized 2 × 2 factorial study comparing two skin disinfection procedures (2% chlorhexidine-alcohol or 5% povidone iodine-alcohol) and two types of medical devices (innovative or standard) in 989 adults patients requiring PIVC insertion before admission to a medical ward. Insertion sites were grouped into five areas: hand, wrist, forearm, cubital fossa and upper arm. We evaluated the risk of risk of PIVC colonization (i.e., tip culture eluate in broth showing at least one microorganism in a concentration of at least 1000 Colony Forming Units per mL) and/or local infection (i.e., organisms growing from purulent discharge at PIVC insertion site with no evidence of associated bloodstream infection), and the risk of positive PIVC tip culture (i.e., PIVC-tip culture eluate in broth showing at least one microorganism regardless of its amount) using multivariate Cox models.ResultsEight hundred twenty three PIVCs with known insertion site and sent to the laboratory for quantitative culture were included. After adjustment for confounding factors, PIVC insertion at the cubital fossa or wrist was associated with increased risk of PIVC colonization and/or local infection (HR [95% CI], 1.64 [0.92—2.93] and 2.11 [1.08—4.13]) and of positive PIVC tip culture (HR [95% CI], 1.49 [1.02—2.18] and 1.59 [0.98—2.59]).ConclusionPIVC insertion at the wrist or cubital fossa should be avoided whenever possible to reduce the risk of catheter colonization and/or local infection and of positive PIVC tip culture.

Clinical Outcome of Patients with Escherichia coli Isolated from Catheter Lumens and/or Peripheral Blood Cultures: A Retrospective Analysis.

Escherichia coli commonly causes catheter-related bloodstream infection (C-RBSI) in specific populations. The differential time to positivity (DTTP) technique is the recommended conservative procedure for diagnosing C-RBSIs. We conducted a retrospective study of episodes in which E. coli was isolated from catheter lumens obtained using the DTTP technique. Microbiological and clinical data were obtained based on the DTTP technique as either catheter colonization, C-RBSI, or non-C-RBSI. A total of 89 catheter blood cultures were included, classified as follows: catheter colonization, 33.7%; C-RBSI, 9.0%; and non-C-RBSI, 57.3%. Only 15.7% of the catheters were withdrawn, with no positive catheter-tip cultures. We found no statistically significant differences in catheter type, antibiotic treatment, or clinical outcome among the groups, except for the frequency of catheter lock therapy or in the frequency of successful treatment. Mortality was associated with C-RBSI in only one patient. E. coli bacteremia diagnosed by the DTTP technique was classified as non-catheter-related in most patients. As the majority of the catheters were retained, E. coli bacteremia could not be microbiologically confirmed as catheter-related by the catheter-tip culture. Future studies are needed to assess the profitability of the DTTP technique for diagnosing E. coli C-RBSIs.

Systematic culture of central catheters and infections related to catheters in a neonatal intensive care unit: an observational study

Systematic culture of the tip of central lines is performed in many neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) to guide any subsequent antibiotic therapy. The clinical relevance of this procedure is debated, given the significant bacterial contamination during its removal. We aimed to describe infections related to catheters and assess the usefulness of central catheter systematic cultures for probabilistic antibiotic therapy in cases of suspicion of catheter-related infections in a NICU. A retrospective study in a NICU included all newborn patients hospitalized with a central catheter, between January 2018, and June 2019. The main outcome measures were bacterial catheter colonization, catheter-related infection rate, and simulation-based approach to antibiotic prescription. Three hundred and seventy-five newborns, with 634 central catheters were included. There were 273 (43%) catheters that were colonized by at least one microorganism. There were 183 cases of suspected sepsis, with 31 infections definitively related to the catheter. In our simulation antibiotic prescription approach, there was no significant difference in terms of the efficacy toward the microorganism(s) involved between the probabilistic antibiotic therapies proposed by the experts and those ultimately prescribed. Performing a catheter culture only if catheter-related infection is suspected could be an alternative to routine screening.

Adding vortexing to the Maki technique provides no benefit for the diagnosis of catheter colonization or catheter-related bacteremia.

A previous study compared vortexing and Maki techniques for the diagnosis of catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI), and concluded that vortexing was not superior to Maki method. To determine whether the combined use of vortexing and Maki techniques provides profitability versus the Maki technique for the diagnosis of catheter tip colonization (CTC) and CRBSI. Observational and prospective study carried out in an Intensive Care Unit. Patients with suspected catheter-related infection (CRI) and with one central venous catheter for at least 7 days were included. The area under the curve (AUC) of the Maki technique, the vortexing technique and the combination of both techniques for the diagnosis of CTC and CRBSI were compared. We included 136 episodes of suspected CRI. We found 21 cases of CTC of which 10 were also CRBSI cases. Of the 21 CTC episodes, 18 (85.7%) were diagnosed by Maki technique and vortexing technique, 3 (14.3%) only by the technique of Maki, and none only by technique of vortexing. Of the 10 CRBSI episodes, 9 (90.0%) were diagnosed by the techniques of Maki and vortexing, 1 (10.0%) was diagnosed only by the technique of Maki, and none only by the technique of vortexing. We no found differences in the comparison of AUC between the technique of Maki and the combination of Maki and vortexing techniques for the diagnosis of CTC (P = 0.99) and CRBSI (P = 0.99). The novel finding of our study was that the combined use of vortexing and Maki techniques did not provide profitability to the technique of Maki alone to CRBSI diagnosis of.

Indwelling pleural catheter infection and colonisation: a clinical practice review.

Indwelling pleural catheters (IPCs) are used in the management of malignant pleural effusions, but they can become infected in 5.7% of cases. This review aims to provide a summary of the development of IPC infections and their microbiology, diagnosis and management. IPC infections can be deep, involving the pleural space, or superficial. The former are of greater clinical concern. Deep infection is associated with biofilm formation on the IPC surface and require longer courses of antibiotic treatment. Mortality from infections is low and it is common for patients to undergo pleurodesis following a deep infection. The diagnosis of pleural infections is based upon positive IPC pleural fluid cultures, changes in pleural fluid appearance and biochemistry, and signs or symptoms suggestive of infection. IPCs can also become colonised, where bacteria are grown from pleural fluid drained via an IPC but without evidence of infection. It is important to distinguish between infection and colonisation clinically, and though infections require antibiotic treatment, colonisation does not. It is unclear what proportion of IPCs become colonised. The most common causes of IPC infection and colonisation are Staphylococcus aureus and Coagulase-negative Staphylococci respectively. The management of deep IPC infections requires prolonged antibiotic therapy and the drainage of infected fluid, usually via the IPC. Intrapleural enzyme therapy (DNase and fibrinolytics) can be used to aid drainage. IPCs rarely need to be removed and patients can generally be managed as outpatients. Work is ongoing to study the incidence and significance of IPC colonisation. Other topics of interest include topical mupirocin to prevent IPC infections, and whether IPCs can be designed to limit infection risk.

Effectiveness of nanoparticle-based antimicrobial agents in the prevention and treatment of Central Venous Catheter-Associated Bloodstream Infections

Background In healthcare settings, Central Venous Catheter-Associated Bloodstream Infections (CVC-BSIs) present a serious problem since they raise morbidity, mortality, and medical expense rates. The management of these illnesses is made more challenging by the development of antimicrobiotic resistance. Nanotechnology has attracted interest recently as a viable method for creating new antimicrobial agents. By putting antibacterial nanomaterials onto the catheter’s appear, that may reduce the likelihood of getting sick by stopping germs from adhering and growing. Antimicrobial additives can be released gradually finishes, protecting over time through bioengineering sectors. To prevent and treat CVC-BSIs, this study will assess the efficacy of antimicrobial medicines based on nanoparticles. Methods In the network Meta-Analyses (MA) and Systematic Review (SR), we looked for studies published from January 2010 to September 2021 using the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), EMBASE, MEDLINE, CINAHL, and Web of Science databases. Ten papers in all were included in the review following the screening of the publications using inclusion and exclusion criteria. Results In contrast to conventional catheters, the implementation of Antimicrobial Catheters (AC) and the use of chlorhexidine (CHG) or Silver Sulfadiazine (SS) demonstrated notably reduced occurrences of Central Venous Catheter-Associated Bloodstream Infections (CVC-BSIs) per 1000 Catheter Days (CD) (with Odds Ratios (ORs) and 95% Credibility Intervals (CrIs) of 0.66 and 0.54, respectively) by bioengineering sectors. Moreover, these interventions were linked to the lowest rate of Catheter Colonization (CC), with ORs as well as 95% CrIs of 0.45 and 0.31, respectively, underscoring their potential as effective strategies for minimizing the risk of infections associated with catheter use as well as bioengineering sectors innovations. Conclusions As a result, CVC-BSI has shown significant promise for prevention and treatment with nanoparticle-based antimicrobial medicines. Due to their special characteristics and modes of action, they are strong candidates for improving the security and effectiveness of central venous catheter use in clinical settings. Due to ongoing research and development in this area, nanoparticle-based coatings and therapies may be used to lessen the impact of CVC-BSIs and enhance patient outcomes.

Central Venous Catheters versus Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters: A Comparison of Indwelling Time Resulting in Colonization by Multidrug-Resistant Pathogens.

The use of peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) as an alternative to central venous catheters (CVCs) has steadily risen over the last two decades. However, there is an ongoing debate regarding research evidence that supports any clear advantages or disadvantages of them compared to traditional central venous lines. The present study was conducted to compare the indwelling time of CVC and PICC placements leading to microbial colonization by multidrug-resistant microorganisms (MDROs) in critically ill patients. A single-center retrospective descriptive study was performed that reviewed the medical records of critically ill patients with colonized CVCs and PICCs who were hospitalized during a 24-month period (May 2019-May 2021). To evaluate the association between indwelling time of catheter placement and colonization rates, events were categorized into three groups, each representing a one-week time interval of catheter indwelling time: group 1: ≤7 days, group 2: 8-14 days, and group 3: >14 days. A total of 207 hospitalized patients with colonized PICCs or CVCs were included in the study. Of these, 144 (69.5%) had a CVC placement and 63 (30.5%) had a PICC placement. The overall colonization rate (per 1.000 catheter/days) was 14.73 in the CVC and 5.67 in the PICC cohort (p = 0.003). In the group of PICCs, 12/63 (19%) of the pathogens were MDROs and 51/63 (81%) were non-MDROs, while in the group of CVCs, 86/144 (59.7%) were MDROs and 58/144 (40.3%) were non-MDROs (p < 0.001). The colonization rate in the CVC cohort, was 6.98 for group 1, 21.57 for group 2, and 21.6 for group 3 (p = 0.019). The colonization rate of MDROs was 3.27 for group 1, 14.47 for group 2, and 12.96 for group 3 (p = 0.025). Regarding the PICC cohort, the colonization rate was 1.49 for group 1, 3.19 for group 2, and 8.99 for group 3 (p = 0.047). No significant difference existed between the three groups in terms of MDRO pathogens, with the colonization rate being 0 for group 1, 0.8 for group 2, and 1.69 for group 3 (p = 0.78). Within the CVC cohort, the most common isolated microorganism was MDR Acinetobacter baumannii (n = 44; 30.6%), followed by MDR Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 27; 18.7%). In the PICC cohort, the predominant isolated microorganism was Candida non-albicans (n = 15; 23.8%), followed by Candida albicans, coagulase-negative staphylococci, and MDR Klebsiella pneumoniae in equal numbers (n = 6; 9.5%). Our findings show that while the indwelling time of PICC placement was longer compared to CVCs, its colonization rate was considerably lower. Furthermore, high colonization rates by microorganisms, especially MDROs, arose later during catheterization in PICCs compared to CVCs, suggesting that in terms of vascular infections, PICCs may be a safer alternative to conventional CVCs for long-term intravenous access.

Randomized controlled trial on healthy volunteers of pharmacokinetic and antimicrobial activity of a novel hydrogel-containing chlorhexidine dressing to prevent catheter-related bloodstream infection.

Catheter-related blood stream infection (CRBSI) is one of the most relevant complications associated to the use of intravascular catheters. In this context, chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) releasing dressings have been developed to reduce the catheter colonization rate and the risk of infection. The aim of this study is to analyze the release rate of CHG and the antimicrobial activity of a novel CHG-releasing dressing, Oper film® protect CHG, and to compare these parameters to those of the dressing Tegaderm™ CHG in healthy volunteers. The study was performed in a cohort of 25 healthy volunteers. Two commercially available chlorhexidine-containing dressings were evaluated and compared in this study, Oper film® protect CHG and Tegaderm™ CHG. The release of CHG and the antimicrobial capacity was determined for one week. HPLC analysis revealed that both dressings have an equivalent CHG release to the skin 2 days (Oper film® protect CHG, 321 μg/cm2; Tegaderm™ CHG, 279 μg/cm2) and 7 days (Oper film® protect CHG, 456 μg/cm2; Tegaderm™ CHG, 381 μg/cm2) after the placement of the products in the non-disinfected back of the subjects. On the other hand, Oper film® protect CHG and Tegaderm™ CHG similarly reduced colony forming units (CFU) in cultures obtained from the skin under the CHG-containing hydrogel compared to control cultures at both 2 days (control, 3.34 log10 cfu/cm2; Oper film® protect CHG, 0.64 log10 cfu/cm2; Tegaderm™ CHG, 0.7 log10 cfu/cm2) and 7 days (control, 3.95 log10 cfu/cm2; Oper film® protect CHG, 0.11 log10 cfu/cm2; Tegaderm™ CHG, 1 log10 cfu/cm2). Data confirm that the recent commercially available dressing Oper film® protect CHG maintains the release of CHG and the antimicrobial activity during at least 7 days, and possesses equivalent drug release and antimicrobial action to Tegaderm™ CHG.

1686. Bacteremia associated with intravascular catheter colonization with Gram-negative rods in children

Abstract Background Patients with Staphylococcus aureus colonization of an intravascular catheter, but without bacteremia, had a 14% chance of developing subsequent S. aureus bacteremia after removing the central venous catheter. However, information on the frequency and outcomes of subsequent bacteremia due to Gram-negative rods (GNRs) is limited, particularly in children. Methods We conducted a single-center, retrospective, case-control study. Clinical information including age, sex, immune status, bacterial culture results from both catheter tips and the blood, and outcomes were extracted from electronic medical records. Patients were included if the central venous catheter tip culture was positive for GNRs, but the concurrent blood culture (within one day before or after catheter removal) was negative. Subsequent bacteremia was defined as bacteremia caused by the same organism(s) as the catheter tip culture within six months of catheter removal. Clinical characteristics were compared between patients with and without subsequent GNR bacteremia. Results During the study period, 49 cases &amp;lt; 18 years of age that were positive for central venous catheter tip culture but negative for concurrent blood cultures were identified. Median (interquartile range) age was 0 (0-4.5) years and male sex was 44.9%. Pseudomonas aeruginosa was the most common isolate (n=18, 36.7%), followed by Escherichia coli (n=8, 16.3%) and Klebsiella spp. (n=8, 16.3%). Subsequent GNR bacteremia developed in 6 (12.2%) patients. The median (range) days between catheter removal and the occurrence of subsequent GNR bacteremia was 16.5 (3-35) days. The median age and the proportion of immunocompromised cases were higher in patients with subsequent bacteremia than in those without subsequent bacteremia (8 years vs 0 years, P=0.011 and 6 [100%] vs 21 [48.8%], P=0.027, respectively). The presence of antibiotic treatment at catheter removal was similar between these two groups (n=4 [66.7%] vs n=25 [58.1%], P=1.0). Conclusion The frequency of subsequent GNR bacteremia in children was 12.2%. Immunocompromised patients may be at higher risk for developing subsequent GNR bacteremia. Disclosures Kensuke Shoji, MD, PhD, AstraZeneca K.K.: Honoraria|Gilead Sciences, Inc.: Honoraria|KYORIN Pharmaceutical Co.,Ltd.: Honoraria|Meiji Seika Pharma Co., Ltd.: Honoraria|Nippon Becton Dickinson Company, Ltd.: Honoraria|Novartis Pharma Co., Ltd.: Honoraria|Viatrs, Inc: Honoraria

Correlation between catheter colonization of central venous catheters and clinical biochemical indicators: A retrospective analysis of the MIMIC‑IV database

Clinical studies have not fully assessed the potential impact of patients' biochemical indicators on the rate of positive for central venous catheter-tip microorganism culture (PCMC). Data were obtained from an online Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV database. Patients who were ≥18 years old and had central venous catheter-tip culture results without continuous renal replacement therapy were included in the study. A comparison of patient characteristics and their biochemical indicators was made between negative and positive culture results. A total of 5,323 patients were included in the analysis, including 612 positive (PCMC group) and 4,711 negative culture results (negative for central venous catheter tip catheter-tip microorganism culture [NCMC] group). The only influence factor on PCMC in this study was the serum creatinine (Scr) (odds ratio: 1.312, 95% confidence interval: 1.084-1.590, P=.005), according to a binary logistic regression analysis. The cut-off value of Scr was 3.25mg/dL. The prevalence of PCMC (27.1% vs 9.1%, P<.001) and Staphylococcus aureus (43.0% vs 18.6%, P<.001) for central venous catheter-tip culture results was much higher in patients with Scr≥3.25mg/dL than those Scr<3.25mg/dL. We used the large dataset collected from Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV to show that patients with Scr≥3.25mg/dL had an increased risk for PCMC.

Unresolved issues in the diagnosis of catheter related candidemia: A position paper.

The incidence and recent trends of candidemia and the contribution of the COVID-19 pandemic to its evolution are not well documented. The catheter is a major focus of Candida spp. infections, but the methods used to confirm the origin of candidemia are still based on the data generated for bacterial infection. The presence of Candida spp. on the tip of a removed catheter is the gold standard for confirmation but it is not always possible to remove it. Conservative methods, without catheter removal, have not been specifically studied for microorganisms whose times of growth are different from those of bacteria and therefore these results are not applicable to candidemia. The different Candida species do not have a particular tropism for catheter colonization and fungal biomarkers have not yet been able to contribute to the determination of the origin of candidemia. Techniques such Candida T2 Magnetic Resonance (T2MR) has not yet been applied for this purpose. Finally, there is not yet a consensus of how to proceed when Candida spp. is isolated from an extracted catheter and blood cultures obtained from simultaneous peripheral veins are negative. In this lack of firm data, a group of experts has formulated a series of questions trying to answer them based on the literature, indicating the current deficiencies and offering their own opinion. All authors agree with the conclusions of the manuscript and offer it as a position and discussion paper.

2% chlorhexidine gluconate aqueous versus 2% chlorhexidine gluconate in 70% isopropyl alcohol for skin disinfection prior to percutaneous central venous catheterisation: the ARCTIC randomised controlled feasibility trial

ObjectiveCatheter-related sepsis (CRS) is a major complication with significant morbidity and mortality. Evidence is lacking regarding the most appropriate antiseptic for skin disinfection before percutaneous central venous catheter (PCVC) insertion...

Comparison of microbial colonization rates between central venous catheters and peripherally inserted central catheters

BackgroundCentral venous catheters (CVCs) and peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs), have been widely used as intravascular devices in critically ill patients. However, they might evoke complications, such as catheter colonization that has been considered as predisposing factor for central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs). Although numerous studies have compared the risk of bloodstream infections between PICCs and CVCs, comparative studies on their colonization rates are limited.ObjectivesThe episodes of catheter colonization in critically ill patients with CVCs or PICCs were retrospectively analysed during a two-year period in a Greek tertiary care hospital and colonization rates, microbial profiles and antimicrobial susceptibility patterns were compared.MethodsClinical and laboratory data of consecutive hospitalized critically-ill patients who underwent PICC and CVC placement between May 2017–May 2019 were analysed. All catheters were examined by the semiquantitative culture technique for bacterial pathogens, either as a routine process after catheter removal or after suspicion of infection. Species identification and antimicrobial resistance patterns were determined by the Vitek2 automated system.ResultsDuring the survey period a total of 122/1187 (10.28%) catheter colonization cases were identified among CVCs and 19/639 (2.97%) cases among PICCs (p = 0.001). The colonization rate was 12.48/1000 catheter-days for the CVC group and 1.71/1000 catheter-days for the PICC group (p < 0.001). The colonization rate per 1000 catheter-days due to multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) was 3.85 in all study cases, 7.26 (71/122) in the CVC group and 0.63 (7/19) in the PICC group (p < 0.001). Within the CVC group, the most common microorganism isolated was MDR Acinetobacter baumannii (n = 38, 31.1%) followed by MDR Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 20, 16.4%). In the PICC group, the predominant microorganism isolated was Candida spp. (n = 5, 23.8%) followed by MDR K. pneumoniae and MDR A. baumannii in equal numbers (n = 3, 14.2%).ConclusionPICC lines were associated with significantly lower colonization rates comparing to the CVC ones. In addition, patterns of microbial colonization revealed a trend over the predominance of MDR gram-negatives in CVCs suggesting that PICCs might be a safer alternative for prolonged inpatient intravascular access. Prevention programs directed by local microbial ecology may diminish catheter colonization rates and CLABSIs.

Survey the Effect of Educational Intervention Based on Mobile Short Message Service (SMS) on Self-Care in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Referring to the Diabetes Clinic in Khorram Abad City

Background: The highlighting of possible risk factors for urinary colonization in patients with obstructive urolithiasis that needed double J catheters implanted to preserve renal function. Methods: We performed a descriptive, retrospective study, carried out in the Urology Department of the Bucharest Central Military Hospital, between January 2020 and January 2022 and included 168 patients with urolithiasis who required the insertion of double J catheters. We studied the bacteriological profile, using both urine and JJ catheter samples. Results: We obtained a double J catheter colonization rate of 32% (54 patients) and 29% of urinary colonization (49 patients). The rate of urinary colonization is higher in patients with colonized ureteral catheters regardless of sex, age, and associated comorbidities. At the same time, we noticed an increased rate of urinary colonization in patients associated with diabetes, hypertension, and chronic kidney disease. Conclusions: The prevalence of urinary colonization in patients with double J catheters was 29%. The colonization of the JJ catheters, as well as the association with chronic diseases, such as diabetes, hypertension, and CKD (Chronic Kidney Disease), show an increased risk of urinary colonization.

Prospective Comparative Study of External Ventricular Drain Catheter Colonization: Antibiotic-Impregnated versus Conventional Drains

Our aim was to compare the prevalence of biofilm formation on antibiotic-impregnated (AIC) versus standard (SC) external ventricular drain (EVD) catheters. From March 2018 to November 2020, all consecutive EVD catheters inserted in adult patients were included. After removal, EVD catheters were analyzed under scanning electronic microscopy, on both extraluminal and intraluminal faces. Standard culture of catheter tips was also performed. Overall, 114 catheters were included in 101 patients. There were 48 AICs and 66 SCs. Standard culture showed that ventriculostomy-related colonization was more frequent in SC than in AIC (26 vs. 10%; P= 0.06). Gram-negative rods accounted for 25% of ventriculostomy-related colonization in AICs, and none was documented in SCs. Scanning electronic microscopy observation showed mature biofilm on more than 80% of catheters, without significant difference between catheter type. Also, there was no difference between extraluminal and intraluminal colonization rate. There were 2 ventriculostomy-related infections in each group (5% and 3% among AICs and SCs respectively; P= 1). Mature biofilm presence on the intraluminal and the extraluminal faces is similar on AICs and SCs. Accordingly, AICs do not seem to efficiently prevent biofilm formation on EVD catheters. The impact of AICs on the microbiological epidemiology of colonizing biofilm should be further evaluated.

Accelerated bacteriological examination of urine and dialysate in the diagnosis of urinary tract infections in children

Aim. To evaluate the feasibility of an accelerated method for determining the etiology of infections in urine, dialysate and residual antimicrobial activity by using laser light scattering technology.Materials and methods. From January to September 2019, 106 urine samples and 42 dialysate samples from children aged 1–16 with various urinary pathologies and those on peritoneal dialysis underwent culture-based examination on an ALIFAX HB&amp;L LIGHT analyzer (Alifax, Italy) using laser light scattering technology.Results. Three hours after inoculation, 81 samples (76.4%) appeared to be negative and 25 samples (23.6%) proved to be positive. No microorganisms were detected in 38 dialysate samples (90.5%), two samples had Staphylococcus aureus (104 CFU/ml), and one dialysate sample had Corynebacterium sp. and associations of Escherichia coli + Candida albicans + Staphylococcus haemolyticus, associated with peritoneal catheter colonization. Bacteriuria was caused by Enterobacterales in 39.3% (E. coli, Morganella morganii, Citrobacter amalonaticus, Enterobacter cloacae), non-fermenting gram-negative bacteria – in 14.3% (Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Ralstonia picketii, Oligella sp., Acinetobacter baumannii), Enterococcus sp. – 21.4%, S. haemolyticus, Staphylococcus epidermidis – 10.7%, Candida albicans – 3.6%, contamination: Streptococcus viridians, Corynebacterium sp. – 7.1%. Residual antimicrobial activity in urine was detected in 30.1% of patients.Conclusion. The laser light scattering technology enables a minimal concentration of microorganisms to be detected in a smaller amount of urine or dialysate, which is very important for accelerated diagnosis of urinary tract infections and complications of peritoneal dialysis in children.

Candida lipolytica Bloodstream Infection in an Adult Patient with COVID-19 and Alcohol Use Disorder: A Unique Case and a Systematic Review of the Literature.

Candida lipolytica is an uncommon Candida species causing invasive fungemia. This yeast is mainly associated with the colonisation of intravascular catheters, complicated intra-abdominal infections, and infections in the paediatric population. Here, we report a case of C. lipolytica bloodstream infection in a 53-year-old man. He was admitted for an alcohol withdrawal syndrome and mild COVID-19. Among the primary risk factors for candidemia, only the use of broad-spectrum antimicrobials was reported. The empiric treatment was commenced with caspofungin and then targeted with intravenous fluconazole. Infective endocarditis was ruled out using echocardiography, and PET/TC was negative for other deep-seated foci of fungal infection. The patient was discharged after blood culture clearance and clinical healing. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case of C. lipolytica candidemia in a patient with COVID-19 and alcohol use disorder. We performed a systematic review of bloodstream infections caused by C. lipolytica. Clinicians should be aware of the possibility of C. lipolytica bloodstream infections in patients with alcohol use disorder, especially in a COVID-19 setting.

Effectiveness of Chlorhexidine-Impregnated Central Venous Catheter Dressing for Preventing Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infections in Pediatric Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Study

Abstract Objective The study's objective was to use meta-analysis to assess the effectiveness of a dressing impregnated with chlorhexidine in preventing catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs) in pediatric patients. Methods The study was conducted and reported using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. A comprehensive search of 18 databases was conducted up to 5 March 2020 to identify related studies. Following the evaluation of the methodological quality, 8 studies, 1,584 catheters in 1,556 patients were added to the meta-analysis. The odds ratio and Hedge's G effect size value were employed to analyze the data. Either a fixed-effects model or a random-effects model was used to compute the effect size value with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The heterogeneity of effect sizes was investigated using Cochrane Q statistics, I 2, and Tau2 tests. To test for publication bias, funnel plot, Orwin's safe n number, Begg and Mazumdar rank correlation, Egger test, and Duval and Tweedie's trim and fill procedures were all utilized. Results The catheter colonization risk was lowered by 50.7% by the chlorhexidine-impregnated (C-I) dressing (odds ratio [OR] = 0.493 [%95 CI: 0.360–0.675]; p &lt; 0.001). The use of C-I dressing was associated with a trend toward a decrease in CRBSIs, while this association was not statistically significant (OR = 0.858 [%95 CI: 0.567–1.300]; p = 0.471). Conclusion The use of C-I dressing can effectively reduce the risk of catheter colonization, and it is also a helpful tactic in lowering CRBSIs in pediatric patients with central venous catheters, according to the findings of this meta-analysis.