Abstract Background Due to advances in devices and techniques, the endovascular approach using fenestrated or branched endografts has emerged as a valid and safe alternative for patients with complex aortic aneurysms, especially if considered at high risk for surgery. The use of inner branch devices (iBEVAR) combining benefits of fenestrations and outer branches could offer an ideal configuration in this context. Aims The aim of our study was to report our monocentric experience with iBEVAR in the treatment of complex aortic aneurysms. Methods A retrospective analysis of prospective data retrieved from 1 center between January 2020 and January 2024 was done. Endpoints were immediate technical success, postoperative morbidity, rate of re-intervention and mortality. Results During this period, 72 patients with a mean age of 68.5 years (range 41-88) were identified. The maximum preoperative mean aortic diameter was 56 mm (44-71 mm). The majority of patients was asymptomatic. For diffuse thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysms, a 2-steps procedure was used. There were 34 off-the-shelf E-nside (47%) and the remaining 38 patients were treated with a custom-made Extra-Design graft (53%). Despite successful endograft deployment in all patients and branch catheterization in 69/72 cases (96%), the technical success was 94% due to an additional open conversion for ilio-mesenteric bypass. The 30-days mortality was 5.5%. During the post-operative period, 19% of patients presented complications with 1 case of mesenteric ischaemia requiring a visceral resection and 2 cases of paralytic ileus, treated conservatively. 5 cases (6.9) of spinal cord ischemia were observed. During the median follow-up, 22 patients (31%) had a re-intervention, for endoleaks, bridging-stent events or limbs problems. The overall target vessel patency was 94%. Conclusion The use of iBEVAR appears to be safe and effective for the treatment of complex aortic aneurysms with an acceptable rate of complications. Strict follow-up is mandatory and about one-third of patients required a re-intervention. Further patients and longer follow-up are needed.