Carcinoma Surveillance In Patients Research Articles

Prospective Study of Non-Contrast, Abbreviated MRI for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Surveillance in Patients with Suboptimal Hepatic Visualisation on Ultrasound.

Biannual ultrasound (US) is recommended for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) surveillance in patients with cirrhosis. However, US has limited sensitivity for early-stage HCC, particularly in overweight cohorts, where hepatic visualisation is often inadequate. Currently there are no robust imaging surveillance strategies in patients with inadequate US visualisation. We investigated the ability of non-contrast, abbreviated magnetic resonance imaging (aMRI) to adequately visualise the liver for HCC surveillance in patients with previously inadequate US. Patients undergoing US surveillance, where liver visualisation was inadequate (LI-RADS VIS-B and VIS-C), were prospectively recruited. Patients underwent non-contrast T2-weighted and diffusion-weighted aMRI. The images were reviewed and reported by an expert liver radiologist. Three independent, blinded radiologists assessed the aMRI visualisation quality using a binary score assessing five parameters (parenchymal definition, vascular definition, coverage of the liver, uniformity of liver appearance and signal-to-noise ratio). Thirty patients completed the aMRI protocol. The majority (90%) had underlying cirrhosis and were overweight (93.3%), with 50% obese and 20% severely obese. A total of 93.3% of the aMRI scans were of satisfactory quality. Six patients (20%) had hepatic abnormalities detected with aMRI that were not seen on their US: one HCC, one haemangioma and three clinically insignificant lesions. For the aMRI visualisation quality assessment, the coverage of the liver, vascular definition and parenchymal definition were consistently rated to be of sufficient quality by all three radiologists. Non-contrast aMRI provided good visualisation of the liver and detection of abnormalities in patients with inadequate US. aMRI should be further explored in a larger, prospective study as an alternative surveillance strategy in patients with inadequate US.

The Influence of Medical Subspecialty on the Adherence to Hepatocellular Carcinoma Surveillance in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis B

Objective: This study aimed to determine the adherence rate of HCC surveillance in CHB patients at the largest tertiary hospital in Southern Thailand and identify patient and physician factors that influence it. Materials and Methods: This retrospective cohort study included patients with CHB who were followed up for more than 1 year between 2011 and 2019 at a tertiary care hospital in Thailand. Patients diagnosed with HCC within 6 months of their first visit were excluded. The rate of adherence with HCC surveillance was calculated using percentage of time up-to-date with HCC surveillance (PTUDS). Results: The mean age of 531 eligible patients at the time HCC surveillance started was 55.5 ± 9.26 years. The most common indications for surveillance were male over 40 years of age (41.2%), female over 50 years of age (28.9%), and cirrhosis (22.6%). The median PTUDS was 70.6% (interquartile range 55.1 – 81.4%). The highest PTUDS was for cirrhosis (74.0%). For physicians’ subspecialties, the median PTUDS was 71.8% for gastroenterologists (IQR 58.3 – 81.6%) and 41.7% for internists (IQR 31.4 – 65.8%). Factors associated with increased PTUDS by multivariable analysis were having ≥2 clinical visits per year (±18.4%, p<0.001), civil servant reimbursement (±8.81%, p=0.001), cirrhosis (±6.06%, p=0.003), and being follow-up by gastroenterologists (±20.4%, p<0.001). Conclusion: The adherence with surveillance program in patients with CHB being followed up at a tertiary care setting in Thailand was good. This finding underscores the importance of education regarding indications for HCC surveillance, particularly in patients without cirrhosis.

2507. Sex and race disparities in hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance in patients with chronic hepatitis B: a single center retrospective review

Abstract Background The management of patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) is complex and involves interdisciplinary care across multiple medical specialties. As a result of this complexity, patients with CHB often do not receive adequate monitoring including HCC surveillance with abdominal ultrasonography (AUS). Previous studies have identified multiple factors associated with decreased HCC surveillance. We aimed to study race and sex disparities in HCC surveillance in patients with CHB during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods We performed a single center retrospective cohort study of patients treated for CHB between January 2018 and January 2022 in Gastroenterology and Infectious Diseases clinics at our institution. HCC surveillance trends for both sexes were further stratified by 6-month time intervals throughout the study period to compare surveillance during the COVID-19 surge at our region and after the surge. The COVID-19 pandemic surge was defined as time 1/1/2020-6/30/2021. Differences between sex and race were evaluated using the chi-square test, Fisher's exact test, and continuous variables were analyzed using analysis of variance (ANOVA). Results A total of 223 adult patient records between January 2018 and January 2022 were evaluated. In total 37% females were adequately screened for HCC in any of the 6-month time frames compared to 26% for males, p >0.05. During the COVID-19 surge, surveillance rates were reduced in both males and females; however, men had significantly reduced HCC screening compared to women (men 38% compared to women 47%, P = 0.011, Figure 1). When comparing COVID-19 HCC screening, stratified by race, 20% Asians, 34% African Americans, and 22% Caucasians were screened by AUS, P = 0.069(Figure 2). Patient Demographics ID, infectious diseases clinic; GI, gastroenterology clinic; SD, standard deviation Conclusion Males received significantly less HCC surveillance compared to females. These differences continued during the COVID-19 pandemic surge. Obtaining appropriate surveillance is important and identifying disparities enables treating physicians to work on measures to mitigate them. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Proportion of Time Covered by Hepatocellular Carcinoma Surveillance in Patients With Cirrhosis.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) surveillance is associated with improved early tumor detection, but effectiveness is limited by underuse. We characterized adherence to HCC surveillance using proportion of time covered (PTC) and estimated its association with clinical outcomes among patients with cirrhosis. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients diagnosed with HCC between January 2008 and December 2022 at 2 large US health systems. We characterized PTC by imaging in the 12 and 24 months before HCC diagnosis. We used multivariable logistic and Cox regression analyses to assess the association between PTC and early HCC detection, receipt of curative treatment, and overall survival. Among 2,027 patients with HCC, 331 (51.4% Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer 0/A) had been followed up for at least 12 months before diagnosis. The median PTC was 24.9% (interquartile range 1.1%-50.7%), with only 16.0% having semiannual imaging and 42.0% having annual surveillance. Semiannual and annual surveillance decreased to 6.3% and 29.6% when assessed over 24 months, although the median PTC remained unchanged at 24.9%. Receipt of gastroenterology/hepatology care had the strongest association with PTC, with median PTC of 36.7% and 3.8% for those with and without gastroenterology/hepatology care, respectively. PTC was independently associated with improved early HCC detection, curative treatment receipt, and overall survival. The median survival was 15.7, 26.8, and 32.7 months among those with PTC of <25% (n = 168 patients), PTC 25%-50% (n = 69 patients), and PTC >50% (n = 94 patients), respectively. The proportion of time covered by HCC surveillance in patients with cirrhosis remains low, highlighting a need for multilevel interventions.

Sex and Race Disparities in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Surveillance in Patients With Chronic Hepatitis B During COVID-19: A Single-Center Retrospective Review.

The management of patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) is complex and spans multiple medical specialties. As a result of this complexity, patients with CHB often do not receive adequate monitoring including hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) surveillance with abdominal ultrasonography. Previous studies have identified multiple factors associated with decreased HCC surveillance. We aimed to identify the impact of race and sex on HCC surveillance in patients with CHB. We performed a single health system chart review between January 2018 and January 2022. Differences between sex and race were evaluated using the Chi-square test and Fisher's exact test, and continuous variables were analyzed using analysis of variance (ANOVA). A total of 248 patient records between January 2018 and January 2022 were evaluated. In total 37% of females were adequately screened for HCC in any of the 6-month time frames compared to 26% of males. During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) surge, surveillance rates were reduced in both men and women. During the first 6 months of the COVID-19 surge, there was a significant difference in screening between men and women (19% vs. 35%, P = 0.026). There was a decrease in HCC screening across all races during the COVID-19 surge; however, no significant difference when comparing races was found. Men received less HCC surveillance compared to women. These differences were more pronounced during the COVID-19 pandemic surge. Obtaining appropriate surveillance is important and retrospective evaluations can help us determine the presence of health-related social needs so that progress can be made toward achieving health equity.

OS-080-YI - Platelet, elastography, age, sex and etiology for hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance in patients with advanced chronic liver disease: Please algorithm

OS-080-YI - Platelet, elastography, age, sex and etiology for hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance in patients with advanced chronic liver disease: Please algorithm

Hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) may progress to cirrhotic or non-cirrhotic hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and is currently recognized as the fastest growing cause of HCC worldwide. Accordingly, professional society guidelines recommend HCC surveillance in patients with cirrhosis from any etiology, and some may consider it beneficial in subgroups with non-cirrhotic NAFLD at higher risk for HCC. Notably, patients with NAFLD-related HCC are more likely to have HCC diagnosed at more advanced stages and have poorer outcomes when compared to other etiologies, and suboptimal effectiveness of HCC surveillance programs is a major culprit. In this review, we summarize the current guidelines for HCC surveillance and discuss its benefits versus potential harms for NAFLD patients. We also address the unique challenges of HCC surveillance in NAFLD, including higher proportion of NAFLD-related HCC without cirrhosis, poor recognition of at-risk patients, lack of consensus regarding the value of surveillance in non-cirrhotic NAFLD, subpar effectiveness of surveillance tools related to NAFLD phenotype, and preponderant surveillance underuse among NAFLD patients. Finally, we examine the effectiveness of currently used surveillance tools (i.e., ultrasound and alpha fetoprotein) and outline future perspectives including emerging risk stratification tools, imaging surveillance strategies (e.g., abbreviated magnetic resonance imaging protocols), blood-based biomarkers (e.g., GALAD and circulating tumor DNA panels), and interventions to improve surveillance adherence.

DETECT: Development of Technologies for Early HCC Detection

DETECT: Development of Technologies for Early HCC Detection

Plasma cell free DNA methylation markers for hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance in patients with cirrhosis: a case control study

BackgroundHepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the leading cause of death in patients with cirrhosis, primarily due to failed early detection. HCC screening is recommended among individuals with cirrhosis using biannual abdominal ultrasound, for earlier tumor detection, administration of curative treatment, and improved survival. Surveillance by imaging with or without biomarkers such as alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) remains suboptimal for early stage HCC detection. Here we report on the development and assessment of methylation biomarkers from liquid biopsies for HCC surveillance in cirrhotic patients.MethodsDNA methylation markers including the HCCBloodTest (Epigenomics AG) and a DNA-methylation panel established by next generation sequencing (NGS) were assessed using a training/testing design. The NGS panel algorithm was established in a training study (41 HCC patients; 46 cirrhotic non-HCC controls). For testing, plasma samples were obtained from cirrhotic patients (Child class A or B) with (60) or without (103) early stage HCC (BCLC stage 0, A, B). The assays were then tested using blinded sample sets and analyzed by preset algorithms.ResultsThe HCCBloodTest and the NGS panel exhibited 76.7% and 57% sensitivities at 64.1% and 97% specificity, respectively. In a post-hoc analysis, a combination of the NGS panel with AFP (20 ng/mL) achieved 68% sensitivity at 97% specificity (AUC = 0.9).ConclusionsMethylation biomarkers in cell free plasma DNA provide a new alternative for HCC surveillance. Multiomic panels comprising DNA methylation markers with other biological markers, such as AFP, provide an option to further increase the overall clinical performance of surveillance via minimally invasive blood samples.Trial Registration: Test set study—ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03804593) January 11, 2019, retrospectively registered.

International Liver Cancer Association (ILCA) White Paper on Biomarker Development for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

International Liver Cancer Association (ILCA) White Paper on Biomarker Development for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Provider Attitudes Toward Risk-Based Hepatocellular Carcinoma Surveillance in Patients With Cirrhosis in the United States

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) surveillance rates are suboptimal in clinical practice. We aimed to elicit providers' opinions on the following aspects of HCC surveillance: preferred strategies, barriers and facilitators, and the impact of a patient's HCC risk on the choice of surveillance modality. We conducted a web-based survey among gastroenterology and hepatology providers (40% faculty physicians, 21% advanced practice providers, 39% fellow-trainees) from 26 US medical centers in 17 states. Of 654 eligible providers, 305 (47%) completed the survey. Nearly all (98.4%) of the providers endorsed semi-annual HCC surveillance in patients with cirrhosis, with 84.2% recommending ultrasound ± alpha fetoprotein (AFP) and 15.4% recommending computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Barriers to surveillance included limited HCC treatment options, screening test effectiveness to reduce mortality, access to transportation, and high out-of-pocket costs. Facilitators of surveillance included professional society guidelines. Most providers (72.1%) would perform surveillance even if HCC risk was low (≤0.5% per year), while 98.7% would perform surveillance if HCC risk was ≥1% per year. As a patient's HCC risk increased from 1% to 3% to 5% per year, providers reported they would be less likely to order ultrasound ± AFP (83.6% to 68.9% to 57.4%; P < .001) and more likely to order CT or MRI ± AFP (3.9% to 26.2% to 36.1%; P < .001). Providers recommend HCC surveillance even when HCC risk is much lower than the threshold suggested by professional societies. Many appear receptive to risk-based HCC surveillance strategies that depend on patients' estimated HCC risk, instead of our current "one-size-fits all" strategy.

Acute kidney injury after multiphase imaging for lesions detected on hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance in patients with cirrhosis

ObjectiveThe risk difference between multiphase multidetector contrast-enhanced CT and MRI for developing acute kidney injury (AKI) has not been previously evaluated in patients with cirrhosis undergoing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) surveillance....

Surveillance for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Current Best Practice and Future Direction.

Hepatocellular cancer (HCC) is the fourth leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide and the fastest growing cause of cancer deaths in the United States. The overall prognosis of HCC remains dismal, except for the subset of patients who are diagnosed at early stage and receive potentially curative therapies, such as surgical resection and liver transplantation. Given this, expert society guidelines recommend HCC surveillance every 6 months in at-risk individuals. Despite these recommendations, the effectiveness of HCC surveillance remains a subject of debate. We discuss current best practices for HCC surveillance and the evidence that support these recommendations. We also describe several initiatives that are underway to improve HCC surveillance and outline areas that may serve as high-yield targets for future research. Overall, we believe these efforts will help the field move toward precision surveillance, where surveillance tests and intervals are tailored to individual HCC risk. Doing so can maximize surveillance benefits, minimize surveillance harms, and optimize overall value for all patients.

Physician Awareness of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Surveillance in Patients With Chronic Liver Disease

Physician Awareness of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Surveillance in Patients With Chronic Liver Disease

Integrative review: patient and provider factors related to hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance in patients with liver cirrhosis

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common primary cancer of the liver and the fifth most prevalent cancer worldwide, with cirrhosis being the main risk factor for the development of HCC. The American Association for Study of Liver Disease (AASLD) recommends surveillance of patients with cirrhosis for HCC using ultrasound (US) of the abdomen every 6 months as a cost-effective intervention to reduce mortality and improve survival. However, it is widely known that surveillance is not consistently completed, and the rates of HCC surveillance are very low. The purpose of this integrative review was to evaluate and summarize the available data related to provider and patient factors that are associated with surveillance and missed surveillance for HCC in patients with cirrhosis of the liver, and to recommend interventions to improve these rates of surveillance and subsequently improving survival in patients with cirrhosis.

Integrative review: patient and provider factors related to hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance in patients with liver cirrhosis

Integrative review: patient and provider factors related to hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance in patients with liver cirrhosis

An assessment of benefits and harms of hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance in patients with cirrhosis.

Over one fourth of patients with cirrhosis experience physical harm for false-positive or indeterminate surveillance tests-more often related to ultrasound than AFP. Interventions are needed to reduce surveillance-related harm to increase the value of HCC screening programs in clinical practice. (Hepatology 2017;65:1196-1205).

Predictors of adequate ultrasound quality for hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance in patients with cirrhosis.

Abdominal ultrasound fails to detect over one-fourth of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) at an early stage in patients with cirrhosis. Identifying patients in whom ultrasound is of inadequate quality can inform interventions to improve surveillance effectiveness. To evaluate and identify predictors of ultrasound quality in patients with cirrhosis. We performed a retrospective cohort study among patients who underwent ultrasound examination for a cirrhosis-related indication between April 2015 and October 2015. Three fellowship-trained abdominal radiologists collectively reviewed all ultrasound exams and categorised exam quality as definitely adequate, likely adequate, likely inadequate and definitely inadequate to exclude liver lesions. We performed multivariable logistic regression to determine characteristics associated with inadequate ultrasound quality. Among 941 patients, 191 (20.3%) ultrasounds were inadequate for excluding HCC- 134 definitely inadequate and 57 likely inadequate. In multivariable analysis, inadequate quality was associated with male gender (OR 1.68, 95% CI 1.14-2.48), body mass index category (OR 1.67, 95% CI 1.45-1.93), Child-Pugh B or C cirrhosis (OR 1.93, 95% CI 1.32-2.81), alcohol-related cirrhosis (OR 2.11, 95% CI 1.33-3.37), NASH cirrhosis (OR 2.87, 95% CI 1.71-4.80), and in-patient status (OR 1.55, 95% CI 1.01-2.37). Ultrasounds were inadequate in over one-third of patients with Child-Pugh C cirrhosis, BMI >35, or NASH cirrhosis. One in five ultrasounds in patients with cirrhosis are inadequate for exclusion of HCC, which can contribute to surveillance failure. Alternative surveillance modalities are needed in subgroups prone to inadequate ultrasounds including obese patients, those with Child Pugh B or C cirrhosis, and those with alcohol- or NASH-related cirrhosis.

Poor adherence and low persistency rates for hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance in patients with chronic hepatitis B

Our goal was to examine rates and predictors for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) surveillance adherence and persistency, since studies of such adherence and persistency in patients with chronic hepatitis (CHB) are currently limited.Consecutive CHB patients (N = 1329) monitored for ≥1 year at 4 US clinics from January 1996 to July 2013 were retrospectively studied. Surveillance adherence was evaluated based on the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases guidelines. Kaplan–Meier method was used to analyze surveillance persistency of 510 patients who had initially fair adherence (having at least annual surveillance imaging with further follow-up).Mean age was 48, with the majority being male (58%), Asian (92%), foreign-born (95%), and medically insured (97%). Patients with cirrhosis and those seen at university liver clinics were more likely to have optimal HCC surveillance than those without cirrhosis and those seen at community clinics (38.4% vs 21.6%, P <0.001 and 33.5% vs 14.4%, P < 0.001, respectively). HCC diagnosed in optimally adherent patients trended toward smaller tumor size (P < 0.08). On multivariate analysis also inclusive of age, sex, clinical visits, cirrhosis, clinic setting and antiviral therapy use, strong independent predictors for having at least annual imaging were a history of more frequent clinical visits (odds ratio [OR] = 2.5, P < 0.001) and university-based care (OR = 5.2, P < 0.001). Even for those with initially fair adherence, persistency dropped to 70% at 5 years.Adherence and persistency to HCC surveillance in CHB patients is generally poor. More frequent clinic visits and university-based settings were significant and strong predictors of at least annual HCC surveillance adherence.

PS116 - Prospective Evidence That Hepatocellular Carcinoma Surveillance in Patients with Compensated Viral Cirrhosis Increases the Probability of Curative Treatment and Survival Taking into Account Lead-Time Bias (Anrs Co12 Cirvir Cohort)

PS116 - Prospective Evidence That Hepatocellular Carcinoma Surveillance in Patients with Compensated Viral Cirrhosis Increases the Probability of Curative Treatment and Survival Taking into Account Lead-Time Bias (Anrs Co12 Cirvir Cohort)