Calprotectin Test Research Articles

N05 IBDoc® Faecal calprotectin self-test retrospective audit in a District General Hospital (DGH)

Abstract Background In 2016, a DGH in England commenced the IBDoc® Faecal calprotectin test. Using smart phone technology, the test can provide results as quickly as 2 hrs. An audit of patients who trialled the test was presented at ECCO in 2017; this abstract looked at the value of the tests and helped to show the investigations worth to the DGH trust. The continued use of the test at the trust has recently been audited and these data are presented by the authors to help further understand the benefit. Methods A retrospective audit of patients enrolled on the IBDoc® between July 2017 and October 2019 was carried out by the IBD nursing team. Electronic patient records were searched and corresponding endoscopic assessments that had been carried out within 6 months of the most recent IBDoc® results, were documented for each patient. The terms normal/mild, moderate and severe were used to categorise inflammation seen at colonoscopy, flexible-sigmoidoscopy (C/FS) and/or histopathology (HP). The IBDoc® uses the categories normal (<150) moderate (<400), and high (>400); these values have been set locally easy comparison of these data is possible due to the three levels of stratification. The reason for the endoscopic investigation was also documented. In the sample where no endoscopic investigation was recorded, outcomes were categorised into three groups; well (W), increase monitoring (IM), and treatment adjustment required (TAR). Results 134 patients are signed up to the IBDoc®, 23 patients failed to carry out the test successfully (CD 14 and UC 9). 6 did not accept a test in clinic due to changing their mind or failure in smart phone technology, 12 did not do the test before expiry* and 5 failed to give a result due to difficulties completing the test. *Myriad of reasons were given for not doing the test and another paper could be written to attempt to understand the persons motivation for not completing the test. Of the 111 patients’ (CD 55, UC 56, IBDU 2 and non-IBD 2), 80 patients did not undergo a C/FS, of the 31 that did, correlation between calprotectin, C/FS and/or HP result was 84%. at 100% best correlation was seen in the severe C/FS results and high IBDoc® results. C/FS were carried out for diagnosis (n =10) surveillance (n =4) and disease assessment (n = 17). In the 80 patients with no colonoscopy’s were assessed for outcomes and are: W. n = 39; IM. n = 19; TAR. n = 23. Conclusion The above data shows continuing value of the IBDoc® faecal calprotectin self-test, and there is correlation seen in the comparative results. This data also helps separate well from unwell patients, offering further opportunities to promote supported self-management in people with IBD and prioritisation of clinic appointments.

P471 What is the appropriate cut-off value of CRP to predict endoscopic remission in ulcerative colitis patients with clinical remission?

Abstract Background A noninvasive and reliable markers for predicting endoscopic remission (ER) in ulcerative colitis (UC) patients with clinical remission (CR) provide important information in predicting disease progression and in determining treatment. Faecal calprotectin test is known to be the most accurate to predict ER, but patients are reluctant to handle faecal materials. C-reactive protein (CRP) is one of the surrogate markers for assessing disease activity, but it is known to have low sensitivity and specificity of normal CRP value (<0.3 mg/dl). The sensitivity of the CRP test has been improved, and even fine values within the normal range can be measured. The aim of this study was to determine appropriate CRP cut-off values for the prediction of ER in UC patients with CR even though within normal CRP range. Methods A total of 132 UC patients who underwent endoscopic evaluation in CR were retrospectively reviewed. Serum biomarkers including haemoglobin, leukocytes, platelets, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and CRP were evaluated within 1 week period from endoscopic evaluation. The clinical and endoscopic activity was measured by simple clinical colitis activity index and endoscopic Mayo subscore. Results In UC patient with CR, CRP level was significantly lower in ER (median 0.05, 0.03–2.57) vs. non-ER (median 0.11 0.03-2.81). (p < 0.005) The proportion of males in non-ER was slightly higher than in ER (24, 72.7% vs. 52, 52.5 %; p = 0.042), and only gender and CRP showed statistical differences in baseline clinical characteristics. CRP had predictive value of ER [Area under the curve (AUC = 0.760)] and the sensitivity was 71.4%, specificity was 71.7 % at cut-off value of 0.09mg/dl. In contrast, the sensitivity and specificity of normal CRP (0.3mg/dl) were low. (sensitivity 27.3%, specificity 90.9%). Conclusion Norma CRP cut-off values are not sufficient to reflect ER. It may be helpful to change the CRP cut-off value that predicts ER in CR to value other than 0.3 mg/dl.

P531 A retrospective audit of the inflammatory bowel disease specialist nurse-led telephone advice service

Abstract Background Inflammatory bowel disease affects more than 300 000 people in the UK. The aims of the audit were to review the current use of a telephone service provided by the IBD specialist nursing team in a DGH with a view to better funding and further development of the facility. Methods The letters generated from each phone call between January and February 2018 were collected and a sample assessed for outcomes directly related to the consultation. Outcomes were subtyped into a change in medical treatment, referral for investigation, referral to another specialist or arrangement of an urgent clinic appointment or hospital admission. Each phone consultation was also assessed as to whether it had avoided an attendance to the GP or hospital via A&E or acute medicine. Results The two-month period yielded 491 phone calls, of which 100 letters were reviewed of which 56 (56%) had ulcerative colitis (UC), 44 (44%) had Crohn’s disease (CD). Male users comprised 36% (vs. 64% females) and the age of callers ranged from 19 to 84 years (median age 44 years). Of the UC patients, 45 patients (80.4%) had been diagnosed over 2 years previously with two (3.6%) having been diagnosed within the preceding 3 months (CD patients 34 (77.3%) >2 years previously and three (6.8%) within the last 3 months). The phone consultations led to a change in medication in 49 cases (49%). Phlebotomy and/or faecal calprotectin testing was requested for 59 patients (59%) following the phone call and a further 17 (17%) were discussed with a consultant, although only 8 (8%) required an IBD nurse-led or gastroenterology consultant-led clinic (six and two patients, respectively). Nine patients (9%) went on to have cross-sectional imaging or ultrasound with contrast and 7 (7%) were referred for endoscopic assessment. The overall complexity of the consultation was assessed by the number of services referred to/requested. Thirty-four patients (34%) merely required reassurance or verbal advice whereas two cases (2%) led to five distinct referrals or investigation requests (one service 33 (33%), two service 20 (20%), three service 9 (9%), four service 3 (3%)). Each phone call was assessed as to whether it had likely avoided attendance elsewhere. This included general practice (25 cases (25%)), accident and emergency (2 (2%)), IBD nurse clinic appointment (41 (41%)) or consultant clinic appointment (6 (6%)). Conclusion (1) Our audit shows that the IBD nurse-led telephone service is extremely demanding, with a large volume of calls. (2) Remote management of patients could be facilitated by the telephone nurse-led hotline advice service leading to a reduction in healthcare costs, avoiding face-to-face consultations and managing patients as per their personalised needs.

The Association of Introducing a Faecal Calprotectin Testing Pathway for Suspected Inflammatory Bowel Disease in Primary Care and Time to Diagnosis or Treatment

Background: Primary care faecal calprotectin (FC) was introduced in Leeds in 2014 to distinguish inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) from irritable bowel syndrome and with the hope that it may reduce time to IBD diagnosis and treatment. This study examines the association of FC with referral routes, time to diagnosis, and time to treatment. Methods: All patients newly referred to IBD clinics in 2013 and 2016 were studied. Data on referral routes and dates, FC, date of first treatment, and proxy outcomes for disease severity were collected. Results: In 248 patients, there were no differences between 2013 and 2016 cohorts regarding baseline data and disease severity. The number of direct referrals to gastroenterology rose from 3% (2013) to 17% (2016), whilst 10% were diagnosed during emergency admissions. Referrals via suspected cancer pathways remained high (38% in 2013, 28% in 2016), whilst many had initial investigations at independent centres (16% in 2013, 24% in 2016). Time from referral to diagnosis was similar between 2013 (0.77 month) and 2016 (1.10 months, p = 0.2). A total of 48 (33.3%) patients had FC checked prior to referral, and 37.5% of these were referred directly to gastroenterology. Time from diagnosis to treatment reduced from 1.37 months (2013) to 0.72 month (2016, p = 0.01). Conclusion: Patients present via a multitude of referral pathways, but FC was associated with increased direct referrals to gastroenterology. We found a variation in time to diagnosis and treatment depending on referral routes. Further work is required to ensure patients with suspected IBD get referred to IBD services in a timely manner.

Diagnostic Yield Variation with Colonoscopy among Pediatric Endoscopists

Background: The primary aim of our study was to determine provider variation in diagnostic yield in a pediatric endoscopy center. Secondary aims were to examine ileal intubation rates as well as procedural complications at the provider level. Methods: A retrospective review of sequential pediatric patients who underwent a colonoscopy, completed by June 2018, determined the rates of endoscopically abnormal (EA) and isolated histologically abnormal (IHA) colonoscopies; the overall diagnostic yield was the combination of EA and IHA. Results: In total, 374 charts were reviewed. This study found high variability in diagnostic yield among the 16 clinicians ranging from as low as 22% to as high as 86% (p = 0.11) with an overall diagnostic yield of 48% for colonoscopy; excluding follow-up colonoscopies, the diagnostic yield was 42%. Abnormal calprotectin and abnormal blood tests were associated with higher diagnostic yields of 83 and 65%, respectively, compared with symptoms such as abdominal pain, diarrhea, and rectal bleeding which had yields of 39, 43, and 61%. Ileal intubation rates averaged 90% (range ­63–100%, p = 0.06). In patients with a normal colon, there were 21 (6%) patients with an EA ileum and an additional 16 (4%) with an IHA ileum. Prep quality was rated excellent, good, or average in 97%. In addition, there was a low rate of serious complications (1 of 374). Conclusions: This study highlights the individual variability in diagnostic yield and ileal intubation rates in a pediatric gastroenterology practice. Goals for pediatric endoscopy could include ileal intubation rates of >90% and provider diagnostic yields of >40%.

Faecal calprotectin testing for identifying patients with organic gastrointestinal disease: systematic review and meta-analysis.

To assess the clinical effectiveness of faecal calprotectin (FC) testing for distinguishing between organic gastrointestinal diseases (organic GID), such as inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), and functional gastrointestinal disorders (functional GIDs). Studies that assessed the accuracy of FC testing for differentiating between IBD or organic GID and functional GIDs were reviewed. Articles published in English during January 1998 - June 2018 that compared diagnostic FC testing in primary care and outpatient hospital settings with a reference test and employed the standard enzyme-linked immunosorbent FC assay method with a cut-off of 50 or 100μg/g faeces were included. Study quality was assessed with QUADAS-2, an evidence-based quality assessment tool for diagnostic accuracy studies. MEDLINE and EMBASE; reference lists of screened articles. Eighteen relevant studies were identified. For distinguishing patients with organic GID (including IBD) from those with functional GIDs (16 studies), the estimated sensitivity of FC testing was 81% (95% CI, 74-86%), the specificity 81% (95% CI, 71-88%); area under the curve (AUC) was 0.87. For distinguishing IBD from functional GIDs (ten studies), sensitivity was 88% (95% CI, 80-93%), specificity 72% (95% CI, 59-82%), and AUC 0.89. Assuming a population prevalence of organic GID of 1%, the positive predictive value was 4.2%, the negative predictive value 100%. The difference in sensitivity and specificity between FC testing cut-offs of 50μg/g and 100μg/g faeces was not statistically significant (P=0.77). FC testing is clinically useful for distinguishing organic GID (including IBD) from functional GIDs, and its incorporation into clinical practice for evaluating patients with lower gastrointestinal symptoms could lead to fewer patients with functional GIDs undergoing colonoscopy, reducing costs for both patients and the health system. CRD4201810507.

Trends of Fecal Calprotectin and Lactoferrin Results for Infants

Abstract Calprotectin and lactoferrin can be measured in stool to test for inflammation in the gastrointestinal tract associated with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) versus irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). The clinical specificity of these markers decreases in children versus adults because of the broader differential diagnosis for intestinal inflammation in children. Surprisingly, these tests are frequently ordered for infants (age = 0 years). Therefore, we wanted to assess our historical data in order to understand how infant calprotectin and lactoferrin concentrations change over time and review literature for the potential differential diagnosis for intestinal inflammation in infants. Data were analyzed on 19,543 infants/toddlers ages 0 to 2 years who had a stool test result of either the quantitative ELISA calprotectin PhiCal assay (Eurospital) or qualitative ELISA Lactoferrin Chek assay (Techlab). For the quantitative calprotectin test, the averages and medians were graphed over time in infants. And for the qualitative lactoferrin test, the positivity rate was graphed over time in infants. Both were compared to toddlers of ages 1 to 2 years old. The average level of calprotectin in neonates (0-1 months old) was 336 ± 348 μg/g with a median of 192 μg/g. While these values were dramatically above the adult normal reference range of 0 to 50 μg/g, the average level decreased over time to 119 ± 218 μg/g with a median of 39 μg/g for toddlers 2 years old. The presence of elevated lactoferrin was detected in 89% of neonates versus 34% of toddlers age 2 years. These trends demonstrate that both calprotectin and lactoferrin may be elevated early in life for many infants, but rapidly decline with time. Ordering trends show that, for infants/toddlers age 0 to 2 years, fecal calprotectin ordering has grown rapidly, whereas fecal lactoferrin has remained stable. In conclusion, while fecal calprotectin and lactoferrin are widely used markers of pathologic intestinal inflammation in adults, results in infants must be interpreted with great care. An elevated calprotectin or lactoferrin concentration in infant stool may be pathological, perhaps due to necrotizing enterocolitis or food-associated enteropathy, but is also associated with nonpathological reasons such as intestinal exposure to food antigens or commensal bacteria. Literature studies have shown associations of elevated calprotectin or lactoferrin with diet, gestational age at birth, and even mode of delivery. Thus, it is essential that clinicians interpret calprotectin levels or the presence of elevated lactoferrin in the context of the entire clinical picture and understand the lack of specificity of these markers for pathological conditions in infants.

Clinical implications of fecal calprotectin and fecal immunochemical test on mucosal status in patients with ulcerative colitis.

Although fecal calprotectin (Fcal) and the fecal immunochemical test (FIT) have been associated with endoscopic activity in ulcerative colitis (UC), the clinical implications of each marker depending on the mucosal status are not well known.A total of 174 results obtained from 128 patients with UC who simultaneously underwent colonoscopy and fecal tests were retrospectively evaluated from March 2015 to February 2018. The correlation and predictability of fecal markers as a surrogate marker of endoscopic activity, and the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value of fecal tests for mucosal healing were statistically evaluated.Both fecal tests showed a statistically significant correlation with Mayo Endoscopic Subscore (MES) (Fcal: r = 0.678, P < .001 and FIT: r = 0.635, P < .001) and Ulcerative Colitis Endoscopic Index of Severity (UCEIS) (Fcal: r = 0.711, P < .001 and FIT: r = 0.657, P < .001). Fcal was statistically superior to FIT in predictive accuracy for endoscopic activity (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.863 vs 0.765 with MES, P < .001 and AUC; 0.847 vs 0.757 with UCEIS, P < .001). FIT was superior to Fcal in sensitivity for mucosal healing (98.0% vs 78.4% with MES, 94.9% vs 74.6% with UCEIS).Fcal and FIT were well correlated with endoscopic activity in UC and can be surrogate markers of mucosal inflammation. Depending on mucosal status, Fcal was more accurate in predicting the endoscopic activity in active inflammation, whereas FIT was more sensitive in predicting the achievement of mucosal healing.

Significance of Conducting 2 Types of Fecal Tests in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis

We compared the diagnostic accuracy of the fecal calprotectin (FCP) test vs the fecal immunochemical blood test (FIT) in determining the endoscopic severity and predicting outcomes of patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). We performed a nationwide study of 879 patients with UC, enrolled at medical centers across Japan, from March 2015 to March 2017. We collected data on fecal biomarkers, endoscopic severities, and other clinical indices from Cohort 1 (n = 427) and assessed the diagnostic accuracy of FCP measurement and FIT results in determining clinical severity, based on Mayo score, and endoscopic remission, based on Mayo endoscopic sub-score (MES) or UC endoscopic index of severity. We also followed 452 patients in clinical remission from UC (Cohort 2) for 12 months and evaluated the associations of FCP levels and FIT results with clinical recurrence. The levels of FCP and FIT each correlated with the MES and UC endoscopic index of severity. There were no significant differences in the areas under the curve of FCP vs FIT in distinguishing patients with MES≤1 from those with MES≥2 (P = .394) or in distinguishing patients with MES=0 from those with MES≥1 (P = .178). Among 405 patients in clinical remission at baseline, 38 (9.4%) had UC recurrences within 3 months and 90 (22.2%) had recurrences within 12 months. FCP≥146 mg/kg (hazard ratio [HR], 4.83; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.80-8.33) and FIT≥77 ng/mL (HR, 2.92; 95% CI, 1.76-4.83) were independently associated with clinical recurrence within 12 months. UC recurred within 12 months in 69% of patients with levels of FCP≥146 mg/kg and FIT ≥77 ng/mL; this value was significantly higher than the rate of recurrence in patients with levels of FCP≥146 mg/kg and FIT <77 ng/mL (31.5%, P < .001) or patients with levels of FCP<146 mg/kg and FIT ≥77 ng/mL (30.0%, P< .001). In a nationwide study of patients with UC in Japan, we found that the level of FCP and FIT could each identify patients with endoscopic markers of disease severity (MES≥2). The combination of FCP and FIT results can identify patients in remission who are at risk for disease recurrence. Clinical Trials Registry no: UMIN000017650 (http://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/).

Is home monitoring of inflammatory bowel disease feasible? A randomized controlled study

Objectives: The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the home monitoring with a rapid fecal calprotectin test combined with a symptom questionnaire in patients with colonic IBD in real-life setting.Methods: We randomized 180 patients with colonic IBD in a study or a control group. The home monitoring patients performed the fecal calprotectin test and filled in a symptom questionnaire every second month and in cases with increasing symptoms. The control patients filled in the symptom questionnaire at baseline and at 6 and 12 months as well as for the appointment at the outpatient clinic. The study duration was 12 months.Results: The patient adherence to the self-monitoring program was low. Patients with a higher disease burden were more adherent than patients with better health-related quality of life, but otherwise, there were no significant factors predicting the adherence. The home monitoring patients had fewer contacts with the outpatient clinic, but otherwise, the disease course between the home monitoring and the control group were similar.Conclusions: The self-monitoring of IBD activity with a combination of a rapid fecal calprotectin home test and a symptom questionnaire provides an option for individualized care for IBD patients. However, adherence to the self-monitoring program remains a challenge.

Improved monitoring of inflammatory activity in patients with ulcerative colitis by combination of faecal tests for haemoglobin and calprotectin

Faecal calprotectin (FC) tests and faecal immunological tests (FIT) for haemoglobin have been used to monitor disease activity in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) but used alone they have some limitation concerning the predictive ability. We aimed to test if an FC test used in combination with FIT could improve the predictive ability. Consecutive out-patients with UC (n = 93) who were admitted for colonoscopy completed a single faecal sample before the start of bowel preparation. A quantitative CALPRO® calprotectin ELISA test and a qualitative FIT (cut-off < 40 ng/mL) were analyzed. An estimated Mayo score and a score of histological inflammation was performed blinded to the result of the faecal tests. The sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value and positive predictive value for endoscopic inflammation (Mayo score > 1) was for FIT 85%, 83%, 96%, 57% and for FC > 186 µg/g 73%, 87%, 87%, 54%. Corresponding results for FIT*FC > 186 µg/g (at least one test positive) were 92%, 69%, 97%, 43%. For detecting moderate/severe histological inflammation the results were for FIT 69%, 79%, 92%, 43%, for FC > 75 µg/g 95%, 62%, 98%, 41%, and for FIT*FC > 75 µg/g 100%, 60%, 100%, 36%. None of the markers alone or in combination were useful to predict deep remission (Mayo score = 0 and no histological inflammation). We conclude that using the combination of an FC test and FIT shows minor improvement in predictive ability for inflammatory activity and remission in patients with UC.

Faecal calprotectin testing good value in diagnosis of IBD

Faecal calprotectin testing good value in diagnosis of IBD

The Influence of Maternal-Foetal Parameters on Concentrations of Zonulin and Calprotectin in the Blood and Stool of Healthy Newborns during the First Seven Days of Life. An Observational Prospective Cohort Study.

Background: It can be hypothetically assumed that maternal and perinatal factors influence the intestinal barrier. Methods: The study was conducted with 100 healthy, full-term newborns breastfed in the first week of life, with similar analyses for their mothers. Zonulin and calprotectin levels were used as intestinal permeability markers. Results: The median (range) zonulin concentrations (ng/mL) were in mothers: serum, 21.39 (6.39–57.54); stool, 82.23 (42.52–225.74); and newborns: serum cord blood, 11.14 (5.82–52.34); meconium, 54.15 (1.36–700.65); and stool at age seven days, 114.41 (29.38–593.72). Calprotectin median (range) concentrations (µg/mL) in mothers were: stool, 74.79 (3.89–211.77); and newborns: meconium, 154.76 (6.93–8884.11); and stool at age seven days 139.12 (11.89–627.35). The use of antibiotics during pregnancy resulted in higher zonulin concentrations in umbilical-cord serum and calprotectin concentrations in newborn stool at seven days, while antibiotic therapy during labour resulted in higher zonulin concentrations in the stool of newborns at seven days. Zonulin concentrations in the stool of newborns (at seven days) who were born via caesarean section were higher compared to with vaginal birth. With further analyses, caesarean section was found to have a greater effect on zonulin concentrations than prophylactic administration of antibiotics in the perinatal period. Pregnancy mass gain >18 kg was associated with higher calprotectin concentrations in maternal stool. Body Mass Index (BMI) increase >5.7 during pregnancy was associated with decreased zonulin concentrations in maternal stool and increased calprotectin concentrations in stool of mothers and newborns at seven days. There was also a negative correlation between higher BMI increase in pregnancy and maternal zonulin stool concentrations and a positive correlation between BMI increase in pregnancy and maternal calprotectin stool concentrations. Conclusion: Maternal-foetal factors such as caesarean section, antibiotic therapy during pregnancy, as well as change in mother’s BMI during pregnancy may increase intestinal permeability in newborns. Changes in body mass during pregnancy can also affect intestinal permeability in mothers. However, health consequences associated with increased intestinal permeability during the first days of life are unknown. Additionally, before the zonulin and calprotectin tests can be adopted as universal diagnostic applications to assess increased intestinal permeability, validation of these tests is necessary.

Consecutive fecal calprotectin measurements for predicting relapse in pediatric Crohn's disease patients.

BACKGROUNDAsymptomatic children with Crohn’s disease (CD) require ongoing monitoring to ensure early recognition of a disease exacerbation.AIMIn a cohort of pediatric CD patients, we aimed to assess the utility of serial fecal calprotectin measurements to detect intestinal inflammatory activity and predict disease relapse.METHODSIn this prospective longitudinal cohort study, children with CD on infliximab therapy in clinical remission were included. Fecal calprotectin levels were assessed at baseline and at subsequent 2-5 visits. Clinical and biochemical disease activity were assessed using the Pediatric Crohn’s Disease Activity Index, C-reactive protein and erythrocyte sedimentation rate at baseline and at visits over the following 18 mo.RESULTS53 children were included and eighteen patients (34%) had a clinical disease relapse during the study. Baseline fecal calprotectin levels were higher in patients that developed symptomatic relapse [median (interquartile range), relapse 723 μg/g (283-1758) vs 244 μg/g (61-627), P = 0.02]. Fecal calprotectin levels > 250 μg/g demonstrated good predictive accuracy of a clinical flare within 3 mo (area under the receiver operator curve was 0.86, 95% confidence limits 0.781 to 0.937).CONCLUSIONRoutine fecal calprotectin testing in children with CD in clinical remission is useful to predict relapse. Levels > 250 μg/g are a good predictor of relapse in the following 3 mo. This information is important to guide monitoring standards used in this population.

Faecal calprotectin to detect inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic review and exploratory meta-analysis of test accuracy

ObjectiveTest accuracy of faecal calprotectin (FC) testing in primary care is inconclusive. We aimed to assess the test accuracy of FC testing in primary care and compare it to secondary...

The role of fecal calprotectin in the diagnosis and treatment of gastrointestinal diseases

The diagnostics of gastrointestinal diseases have evolved significantly in the past few decades. Besides endoscopy and conventional imaging modalities, there is a growing interest for rapid point-of-care laboratory tests to help discriminate between diseases with similar clinical symptoms and/or help the follow-up of chronic conditions, predicting relapses. The fecal calprotectin testing is a routine diagnostic tool in many countries. It is also more and more accessible in Hungary as well. We aim to present a short review on the role and performance of fecal calprotectin test in the diagnosis and follow-up of gastrointestinal diseases, especially inflammatory bowel diseases, gastrointestinal infections, irritable bowel syndrome and pediatric conditions. By presenting the different cut-off values, sensitivity and specificity rates representative for each disease, we hope to further aid clinicians in decision-making regarding these conditions. Orv Hetil. 2019; 160(9): 322-328.

P729 Faecal calprotectin and faecal immunochemical test have different values depending on mucosal status in patients with ulcerative colitis

P729 Faecal calprotectin and faecal immunochemical test have different values depending on mucosal status in patients with ulcerative colitis

P625 Head-to-head comparison of three stool calprotectin tests for home use

Calprotectin concentrations measured by 1440 smartphone readings and 120 ELISA tests on 40 stool samples. Treatment decisions in inflammatory bowel diseases are increasingly based on longitudinal tracking of calprotectin results. Many hospital laboratories measure calprotectin levels in sent-in stool samples with an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Several manufacturers introduced a lateral flow–based test with software application that turns a smartphone camera into a reader for quantitative measurements. We compared three home tests (IBDoc, QuantonCal and CalproSmart) and companion ELISA tests (fCAL, IDK-Calprotectin and Calprotectin-ALP) to see if measurement pairs agreed sufficiently.

P355 Diagnostic accuracy and usability of home calprotectin testing

P355 Diagnostic accuracy and usability of home calprotectin testing

Predictors of mucosal healing during induction therapy in patients with acute moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis.

The treat-to-target strategy has emerged in ulcerative colitis management. Mucosal healing is the best target, albeit not in induction therapy of acute diseases as clinical conditions vary over a short duration. To determine the targets during induction therapy for acute ulcerative colitis, we identified markers to predict mucosal healing at 3 and 12months of initiating the induction therapy. This single-center prospective observational study enrolling 61 adult patients hospitalized for disease exacerbation collected the partial Mayo scores, ulcerative colitis endoscopic index of severity, fecal markers, and laboratory data (0day, 2weeks, and 3 and 12months) of initiating induction therapy. At 2weeks, patients with mucosal healing at 3months had had lower partial Mayo and ulcerative colitis endoscopic index of severity scores and higher white blood cell count and total cholesterol than those without mucosal healing. At 3months, patients with mucosal healing at 12months had had lower partial Mayo and ulcerative colitis endoscopic index of severity scores than those without mucosal healing. A kinetic analysis demonstrated a difference in the partial Mayo scores and total cholesterol and albumin levels at 2weeks and in the ulcerative colitis endoscopic index of severity, fecal calprotectin, and fecal immunochemical tests at 3months between patients who achieved mucosal healing at 12months and those who did not. Partial Mayo scores and total cholesterol levels act as short-term therapeutic targets during induction therapy in patients with acute ulcerative colitis. Mucosal healing at 3months correlates to longer time mucosal healing.