Barnes, Lawrence G. (Section of Vertebrate Paleontology, Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, Los Angeles, California 90007) 1976. Outline of eastern North Pacific fossil cetacean assemblages. Syst. Zool. 25:321-343.-Geologic formations on the west coast of North America from Baja California, Mexico to central California, U.S.A., provide fossil evidence for a succession of Tertiary cetacean assemblages. Formations representing time periods of stage magnitude from early Miocene to Pleistocene age produce diverse aggregates of Cetacea containing fewer species than can now be found in latitudes corresponding to the Californian Province in the Pacific Ocean. Most fossil assemblages include a sperm whale, several dolphin-like taxa, and 3 or 4 baleen whales, although taxonomy is unstable, and many specimens cannot be assigned to named genera and species. New records of the earliest North Pacific occurrence of the families Balaenidae, Ziphiidae, Monodontidae, Phocoenidae, and Delphinidae (sensu stricto) date from the Miocene, and of the Eschrichtiidae from the Pleistocene. Squalodontidae are notable by their rarity. Early Miocene assemblages are dominated by Eurhinodelphidae, and late Tertiary ones by Stenodelphininae and primitive Balaenopteridae. On the generic level, there is a high degree of endemism among small Odontoceti, and a low degree among Physeteridae and Mysticeti. Collecting biases and deficiencies prevent recognition of antitropical distributions of fossil taxa, and paleoclimatology can not yet be inferred from the fossils. The status of the knowledge of fossil Cetacea in marine sedimentary deposits along the western border of North America is such that a summary and prospectus can now be formulated. A variety of Cenozoic fossil cetaceans are documented in the existing paleontologic literature, but these in no way reflect the real abundance of taxa or of specimens in the field or in museum collections. This article is in part, therefore, a summary of previously unrecorded specimens under study by the author (Barnes, 1972b). Mitchell (1966b) presented an earlier, more popularized overview of marine mammal evolution in the North Pacific Ocean. More fossil species are now represented by skulls and skeletons than previously, and some new interpretations of taxonomy and morphology are forthcoming in more detailed studies. These more complete specimens provide, in some cases, an opportunity for more precise determinations of phylogenetic and taxonomic relationships than was possible in the past for taxa founded upon fragmentary specimens. Kellogg (1923:38) has pointed out that comparisons among many fossil Cetacea have been hampered because of the lack of directly comparable parts of skeletons. Additionally, some taxa are described from skeletal parts having dubious taxonomic value. Cope (1868a, 1868b), Leidy (1851, 1869), and Deraniyagala (1969) have used isolated vertebrae and teeth, and Kellogg (1931) has used isolated periotics. In reality, both convergence and evolutionary conservativism may cause vertebrae and even teeth to be non-diagnostic in cetaceans. Even the isolated periotic has been proven, among Recent Cetacea, to sometimes be only generically and not specifically identifiable (Kasuya, 1973:72). This is particularly true for species of Kogia Gray, 1846 and for Delphinus bairdi Dall, 1873 and Stenella attenuata Gray, 1846 (see Kasuya, 1973:figs. 71-72). Recently, Ginsburg and Janvier (1971); and Hatai, Hayasaka, and Masuda (1963), have used isolated teeth and auditory bullae as holotypes. In light of such recent digressions in the quality of fossil cetacean systematics, I recommend that all subsequent cetacean holotypes include at least skull parts,
Read full abstract