In contrast to the nonleptonic decays of charmed baryons ${B}_{c}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}B({\frac{1}{2}}^{+})+P({0}^{\ensuremath{-}})$, where the decay amplitude receives contributions both from the $s$-channel and $u$-channel ${J}^{P}={\frac{1}{2}}^{\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}}$ poles and from the factorization term, the Cabibbo-favored decays ${B}_{c}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}B({\frac{3}{2}}^{+},\mathrm{decuplet})+P({0}^{\ensuremath{-}}) or V({1}^{\ensuremath{-}})$ are much simpler to describe. In general, one finds that either the pole term (we confine ourselves to ${\mathrm{\textonehalf{}}}^{\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}}$ poles only) or the factorization term contributes, but not both. In this paper we have considered the Cabibbo-favored decays of ${\ensuremath{\Lambda}}_{c}^{+}$, ${\ensuremath{\Xi}}_{c}^{0A}$, ${\ensuremath{\Xi}}_{c}^{+A}$, and ${\ensuremath{\Omega}}_{c}^{0}$. In the model where only ${\mathrm{\textonehalf{}}}^{\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}}$ poles are kept, we find that ${\ensuremath{\Lambda}}_{c}^{+}$ and ${\ensuremath{\Xi}}_{c}^{0A}$ decays receive contributions from $s$-channel poles only and that ${\ensuremath{\Omega}}_{c}^{0}$ decays into $B({\frac{3}{2}}^{+},\mathrm{decuplet})+P({0}^{\ensuremath{-}}) or V({1}^{\ensuremath{-}})$ through the factorization process only. ${\ensuremath{\Xi}}_{c}^{+A}$ decays are forbidden. We make numerical estimates of decay rates and the asymmetry parameters. We emphasize that the decays ${B}_{c}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}B({\frac{3}{2}}^{+},\mathrm{decuplet})+P({0}^{\ensuremath{-}}) or V({1}^{\ensuremath{-}})$ are theoretically "clean" and simple to describe and that data in these decay modes will be very desirable.
Read full abstract