Burden Of Rare Diseases Research Articles

Patterns of the Health and Economic Burden of 33 Rare Diseases in China: Nationwide Web-Based Study.

Rare diseases (RDs) affect millions of individuals collectively worldwide, contributing to significant burdens on patients and families in various aspects. However, there is a lack of evidence on the underlying patterns of burdens among diverse RDs for informing targeted social and health policies to address the unmet needs of this vulnerable population. This study aimed to examine the underlying patterns of the health and economic burden of 33 different RDs in China and identify the potential determinants. A nationwide internet-based cross-sectional survey was conducted in China between 2019 and 2020. Physical and mental health burden was measured by health-related quality of life. Economic burden was evaluated based on the proportions of direct medical, direct nonmedical, and indirect costs relative to household income. We used cluster analysis to identify patterns of health and economic burdens and conducted multinomial logistic regression to explore potential predictors of cluster membership. The study included 8454 adults and 8491 children affected by 33 RDs. The following 3 clusters were identified: "extremely high burden" (representing 92/8454, 1.1% and 19/8491, 0.2% of adult and pediatric patients, respectively), "overall high burden" (5933/8454, 70.2% and 4864/8491, 57.3%, respectively), and "overall low burden" (2429/8454, 28.7% and 3608/8491, 42.5%, respectively). Wilson disease, Marfan syndrome, and Langerhans cell histiocytosis more likely resulted in an "extremely high burden" than others. Poverty was significantly associated with being in this extremely high burden group. Diseases causing neuromuscular symptoms and requiring long-term treatment (eg, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, spinocerebellar ataxia, and Dravet syndrome) were prevalent in the "overall high burden" group. Key predictors of this group included older age, lower socioeconomic status, diagnostic delay, and comorbidity. This study provides novel and valuable evidence on the burden of RDs in developing regions like China. The findings reveal significant disparities in the impact of RDs, emphasizing the need for targeted health care interventions and policies.

OP92 The Hidden Burden Of Patients And Families In Rare Diseases: A Scoping Review Of Economic Evaluations

IntroductionThere are more than 7,000 rare diseases (RDs), which are individually rare but have a large collective impact on patients and families, the health system, and society. There are few treatments for RD; where treatments do exist, they are often exceptionally expensive. Understanding the socioeconomic burden (SEB) of RD is crucial to properly valuing these treatments and informing health technology assessment. Our team has developed a framework of cost elements for inclusion in studies of the costs of RDs using an evidence-informed consensus-based approach.MethodsWe conducted a scoping review to identify published economic evaluations studies in RD, searching five electronic databases to identify English language RD studies published 2010-2021. We applied our framework of cost elements to assess studies regarding what cost elements were included.ResultsOf 4,890 records identified, 48 studies were screened for inclusion. Most were from the US (n=27), UK (n=6), and Canada (n=6), and focused on hemophilia (n=14) or cystic fibrosis (n=11). Healthcare system and payer perspectives were most often reported (n=41), with only seven studies reporting a societal perspective. Cost elements most often included were medications (n=41), hospitalizations (n=35), surgery (n=20) medical tests (n=16), and outpatient (unspecified) visits (n=16). Costs to patients, families, and society were less commonly included: productivity (n=5), travel/accommodation (n=3), government benefits (n=2), family impacts (n=0), or other costs relevant to RD (n=1). While unsurprising, given that most analyses focused on healthcare or payer perspectives, this finding illustrates the extent to which the burden of RD is largely unstudied.ConclusionsOur scoping review demonstrated that most studies are conducted from a healthcare system/payer perspective, and largely consider only medical costs. These studies undercount the hidden burden of rare disease borne by patients and families leading to a gap in our global understanding of the full impact of rare diseases on families. To properly account for the these and value emerging treatments for RD, patient- and family-borne costs must be considered in economic evaluations for health technology assessment.

Unmet needs in countries participating in the undiagnosed diseases network international: an international survey considering national health care and economic indicators.

Patients, families, the healthcare system, and society as a whole are all significantly impacted by rare diseases (RDs). According to various classifications, there are currently up to 9,000 different rare diseases that have been recognized, and new diseases are discovered every month. Although very few people are affected by each uncommon disease individually, millions of people are thought to be impacted globally when all these conditions are considered. Therefore, RDs represent an important public health concern. Although crucial for clinical care, early and correct diagnosis is still difficult to achieve in many nations, especially those with low and middle incomes. Consequently, a sizeable amount of the overall burden of RD is attributable to undiagnosed RD (URD). Existing barriers and policy aspects impacting the care of patients with RD and URD remain to be investigated. To identify unmet needs and opportunities for patients with URD, the Developing Nations Working Group of the Undiagnosed Diseases Network International (DNWG-UDNI) conducted a survey among its members, who were from 20 different nations. The survey used a mix of multiple choice and dedicated open questions covering a variety of topics. To explore reported needs and analyze them in relation to national healthcare economical aspects, publicly available data on (a) World Bank ranking; (b) Current health expenditure per capita; (c) GDP per capita; (d) Domestic general government health expenditure (% of GDP); and (e) Life expectancy at birth, total (years) were incorporated in our study. This study provides an in-depth evaluation of the unmet needs for 20 countries: low-income (3), middle-income (10), and high-income (7). When analyzing reported unmet needs, almost all countries (N = 19) indicated that major barriers still exist when attempting to improve the care of patients with UR and/or URD; most countries report unmet needs related to the availability of specialized care and dedicated facilities. However, while the countries ranked as low income by the World Bank showed the highest prevalence of referred unmet needs across the different domains, no specific trend appeared when comparing the high, upper, and low-middle income nations. No overt trend was observed when separating countries by current health expenditure per capita, GDP per capita, domestic general government health expenditure (% of GDP) and life expectancy at birth, total (years). Conversely, both the GDP and domestic general government health expenditure for each country impacted the presence of ongoing research. We found that policy characteristics varied greatly with the type of health system and country. No overall pattern in terms of referral for unmet needs when separating countries by main economic or health indicators were observed. Our findings highlight the importance of identifying actionable points (e.g., implemented orphan drug acts or registries where not available) in order to improve the care and diagnosis of RDs and URDs on a global scale.

Rarecare: A policy perspective on the burden of rare diseases on caregivers in Latin America.

In Latin America (LA), 40-50 million people live with rare diseases (RDs) that require constant monitoring, care, and attention. Caregivers help them with their basic life activities and medication administration, which they would otherwise be unable to perform. Family caregivers complement healthcare and social security systems; however, their unpaid work is often underappreciated and under-protected. Recognizing the need to address these unrecognized and undervalued women, the Americas Health Foundation (AHF) convened a panel of LA experts on caregiving for people with RDs to provide recommendations to support the undervalued family caregivers. A panel of LA experts in caregiving for RDs were given questions to address the challenges faced by family caregivers of people with RDs in LA. During a 3-day conference, the panelists' responses were discussed and edited until the panel agreed on recommendations to address the challenges. The identified challenges for caregivers included physical, emotional, and economical areas. Caregivers, primarily women, experienced physical pain, and social isolation, and were forced to pay substantial out-of-pocket expenses in their caregiving roles. Brazil and Colombia are at the forefront of policies to protect caregivers and their experiences in attempting to provide for this group are outlined as case studies for what is possible in LA. Finally, recognizing that caregivers must be included in formulating, executing, and evaluating care policies for people living with RDs and that the caregivers themselves require social assurances, the panel suggested policy objectives aimed at protecting caregivers of people living with RDs. The recommendations ranged from recognizing the role of the family caregiver as an essential supplement to the formal healthcare system to providing financial assistance, training, and workplace protection, among others. Finally, monitoring and evaluating the impact of policies is necessary to ensure that LA is moving forward in caring for family caregivers for people with RDs.

Recommendations from the IRDiRC Working Group on methodologies to assess the impact of diagnoses and therapies on rare disease patients

Rare disease patients face many challenges including diagnostic delay, misdiagnosis and lack of therapies. However, early access to diagnosis and therapies can modify the management and the progression of diseases, which in return positively impacts patients, families and health care systems. The International Rare Diseases Research Consortium set up the multi-stakeholder Working Group on developing methodologies to assess the impact of diagnoses and therapies on rare disease patients. Using the patients’ journey on the diagnostic paradigm, the Working Group characterized a set of metrics, tools and needs required for appropriate data collection and establishment of a framework of methodologies to analyze the socio-economic burden of rare diseases on patients, families and health care systems. These recommendations are intended to facilitate the development of methodologies and to better assess the societal impact of rare diseases.

The national economic burden of rare disease in the United States in 2019

BackgroundTo provide a comprehensive assessment of the total economic burden of rare diseases (RD) in the United States (U.S.) in 2019. We followed a prevalence-based approach that combined the prevalence of 379 RDs with the per-person direct medical and indirect costs, to derive the national economic burden by patient age and type of RD. To estimate the prevalence and the direct medical cost of RD, we used claims data from three sources: Medicare 5% Standard Analytical File, Transformed Medicaid Statistical Information System, and Optum claims data for the privately insured. To estimate indirect and non-medical cost components, we worked with the rare disease community to design and implement a primary survey.ResultsThere were an estimated 15.5 million U.S. children (N = 1,322,886) and adults (N = 14,222,299) with any of the 379 RDs in 2019 with a total economic burden of $997 billion, including a direct medical cost of $449 billion (45%), $437 billion (44%) in indirect costs, $73 billion in non-medical costs (7%), and $38 billion (4%) in healthcare costs not covered by insurance. The top drivers for excess medical costs associated with RD are hospital inpatient care and prescription medication; the top indirect cost categories are labor market productivity losses due to absenteeism, presenteeism, and early retirement.ConclusionsOur findings highlight the scale of the RD economic burden and call for immediate attention from the scientific communities, policy leaders, and other key stakeholders such as health care providers and employers, to think innovatively and collectively, to identify new ways to help improve the care, management, and treatment of these often-devastating diseases.

A retrospective review of the contribution of rare diseases to paediatric mortality in Ireland

AimsTo ascertain the number of paediatric deaths (0–14 years) with an underlying rare disease in the Republic of Ireland between the years 2006–2016, and to analyse bed usage by a paediatric cohort of rare disease inpatients prior to in-hospital death.BackgroundRare diseases are often chronically debilitating and sometimes life-threatening diseases, with the majority (69.9%) of rare diseases being of paediatric onset. The Orphanet database contains information on 6172 unique rare diseases. Under-representation of rare diseases in hospital healthcare coding systems leads to a paucity of rare disease epidemiological data required for healthcare planning. Studies have cited variable incidence rates for rare disease, however the burden of rare diseases to healthcare services still remains unclear. This study represents a thorough effort to identify the percentage of child mortality and paediatric bed usage attributable to rare diseases in the Republic of Ireland, thus addressing a major gap in the rare disease field.MethodsRetrospective analysis of paediatric death registration details for the Republic of Ireland in the 11-year period 2006–2016 from the National Paediatric Mortality Register. Data was subcategorised as Neonatal (0–28 days), Post Neonatal (29 days < 1 year) and older (1–14 years). Bed usage data (ICD-10 code, narrative and usage) of paediatric inpatients who died during hospitalisation from January 2015 to December 2016 was extracted from the National Quality Assurance Improvement System of in-patient data. Orphacodes were assigned to rare disease cases from ICD-10 codes or diagnostic narrative of both datasets.ResultsThere were 4044 deaths registered from 2006–2016, aged < 15 years, of these 2368 (58.6%) had an underlying rare disease. Stratifying by age group; 55.6% (1140/2050) of neonatal deaths had a rare disease, 57.8% (450/778) post-neonatal, and 64% (778/1216) of children aged 1–14 years. Mortality coding using ICD-10 codes identified 42% of rare disease cases with the remainder identified using death certificate narrative records. Rare disease patients occupied 87% of bed days used by children < 15 years who died during hospitalisation from January 2015 to December 2016.ConclusionAdditional routine rare disease coding is necessary to identify rare diseases within Irish healthcare systems to enable better healthcare planning. Rare disease patients are overrepresented in paediatric mortality statistics and in-patient length of stay during hospital admission prior to death.

The burden of rare diseases.

The subject of rare disease numbers is rife with misconceptions, not just in websites and other layman's literature, but also in the medical literature. Various websites mention numbers that are not validated by any solid data, while in turn the medical literature cites the aforementioned websites as sources, thus perpetuating a number of myths about rare diseases and their burden. We review the existing literature on rare disease numbers, in an attempt to demystify the subject. Specifically, we summarize data pertaining to: (a) known number and cumulative prevalence of rare diseases; (b) rare disease-associated mortality; (c) rare disease-associated morbidity, including numbers on health care services related to rare diseases; and (d) orphan drug numbers.

Substantial increase in economic burden of rare diseases in Taiwan

Substantial increase in economic burden of rare diseases in Taiwan

The Occurrence of 275 Rare Diseases and 47 Rare Disease Groups in Italy. Results from the National Registry of Rare Diseases.

Knowledge of rare diseases (RD) is often scattered among many data collections and registries of patient cohorts. Therefore, assessing the burden of RD in the general population, developing appropriate policies and planning services for the care of RD patients is difficult. This study aimed at providing a systematic picture of RD occurrence in a population as big as 60 million. Data of diagnoses were certified and collected by a network of 247 specialized centres covering the whole Italian territory. Data received (about 200,000 records) were validated according to formal criteria and, where necessary, corrected by the data sources. Data of age at onset and sex distribution are given for about 400 diseases. Incidence and/or birth prevalence are given for 275 diseases and 47 disease groups, which, altogether, comprise a substantial part of the known rare diseases. Data quality, internal consistency, and external validity of the database have also been assessed and ways to limit the impact of some discrepancies were devised. The information provided by RNMR, cutting across such a wide range of RD, represents a unique coherent basis allowing the prioritization of relevant public health measures and research activities.

Burden of rare diseases in Belgian general practice 2015

Burden of rare diseases in Belgian general practice 2015

Orphandev, French Clinical Trials Network dedicated to Orphan drugs and therapeutics development for rare diseases

Though rare diseases affect fewer patients than common diseases, developing drugs for them is subject to the same principles. But constructing and leading rare diseases clinical trials means also facing numerous difficulties which are more important in this field (methodology, little knowledge of the disease’s evolution, choice of the judgment’s criteria, small population’s size, logistical matters...) However during the last decade, France led several initiatives to improve the burden of rare diseases. Centres of Expertise were identified, ability centres have been appointed and a National Plan for rare diseases was developed. Nevertheless, in spite of the great dynamic created by France, development and availability of orphan therapeutics remain problematic regarding rare diseases specificities. In this context, it is important to gather skills and strengths to make patients benefit from fundamental research’s results and accelerate clinical trials. Orphandev is a French Clinical Trials Network based on a strong collaboration principle with all actors involved (academics, industries and patients) dedicated to orphan drugs development. It was created by academics to help academics but also others actors involved in rare diseases’ research. The Network’ skills have already been dedicated to orphan drugs’ trials: Charcot Marie Tooth (2004), Rett (2006) and Progeria (2008). Orphandev has intervened according to the mutualisation and translational research concepts from the experimental phase (in vitro and animals’ tests) to the results’ valorisation with every single actor involved in the study. With the experience gained and the successful results, we have developed an organisational concept in order to capitalise on the lessons learnt and optimise the trials process. In a time of great therapeutics development with solutions coming from gene breakthroughs but not only, Orphandev allows for further improvement of the interface between fundamental research, clinical research and drug developments in rare diseases in a more operational way.