IntroductionVascular dysfunction is a hallmark of hypertension and contributes to an increased risk of cardiovascular disease. Pharmacological interventions to treat hypertension generally result in improved blood pressure status and concomitant improvements in vascular function. However, recent findings have challenged this notion as vascular dysfunction appears to persist despite blood pressure control with antihypertensive medications. Importantly, medications differ in their vasoactive properties and may have direct effects on the vasculature independent of their impact on blood pressure. Therefore, it is difficult to discern if the potential improvements in vascular function are associated with lower blood pressure or a direct effect on vascular function. Utilizing the dietary approach of salt restriction this study examined the impact of reducing blood pressure on vascular function and peripheral hemodynamics in individuals with essential hypertension.MethodsHypertensive adults (male n=14, female n=8, 50±10 yr) completed two dietary phases: liberal sodium (LS) (200 mmol/d) followed by restricted sodium (RS) (10 mmol/day) diet for five days, respectively. Antihypertensive medications were withdrawn 2 weeks before the first intervention. Following each dietary phase, measurements of systolic (SBP), diastolic (DBP), and mean arterial blood pressure (MAP), arterial diameter and blood velocity (Doppler ultrasound) were assessed at rest, during brachial artery (BA) flow mediated dilation (FMD), and during progressive handgrip (HG) exercise performed at 15, 30 and 45% of maximal voluntary contraction (MVC).ResultsRS significantly lowered SBP (LS: 140±3, RS: 123±3 mmHg), DBP (LS: 85±2, RS: 79±2 mmHg) and MAP (LS: 103±2, RS: 94±2 mmHg) (all p<0.05). Despite improvements in blood pressure, conduit artery function, as measured by FMD, was similar between conditions (LS: 4.6±0.4%; RS: 5.1±0.5%). Similarly, the hyperemic response during FMD, an assessment of microvascular function, was not different between conditions (LS: 548±43; RS: 615±44 ml). During HG exercise, MAP was lower at all exercise intensities during RS compared to LS (15% MVC; LS: 109±2 vs. RS: 102±2 mmHg; 30% MVC; LS: 113±2 vs. RS: 105±2 mmHg; 45% MVC; LS: 122±3 vs. RS: 112±3 mmHg) while vascular conductance and BA vasodilation were not different between LS and RS (p>0.05).ConclusionDespite improvements in blood pressure at rest and during exercise, both conduit artery and microvascular function measured during FMD and HG exercise‐induced vasodilation were not improved. These findings support recent evidence that vascular dysfunction persists in individuals with hypertension independent of blood pressure status.This abstract is from the Experimental Biology 2018 Meeting. There is no full text article associated with this abstract published in The FASEB Journal.
Read full abstract