Bone Conduction Stimulation Research Articles

Bone conduction stimulation efficiency at coupling locations closer to the cochlea

Bone conduction implants enable patients to hear via vibrations transmitted to the skull. The main constraint of current bone conduction implants is their maximum output force level. Stimulating closer to the cochlea is hypothesized to increase efficiency and improve force transfer, addressing this limitation. This study evaluated stimulation at four positions in human cadaveric specimens: the cochlear promontory, the posterior wall of the outer ear canal, the lateral semi-circular canal, and the standard Bone-Anchored Hearing Aid (Baha) location. To assess potential hearing sensation, three objective measures were simultaneously recorded. For intracochlear pressure and promontory velocity, stimulating at the lateral semi-circular canal and promontory results in the highest response, with a gain of up to 20 dB. Ear canal pressure shows less conclusive results, with significant differences at only a few frequencies. These findings suggest that stimulation closer to the cochlea offers higher efficiency, which could benefit patients needing higher output force levels than currently available or those eligible for electro-vibrational stimulation, e.g. a cochlear implant combined with a bone conduction device.

Evaluating binaural hearing capabilities in individuals with sensorineural hearing loss through bilateral bone conduction stimulation

This study investigated the impact of bilateral bone conduction (BC) stimulation and sensorineural hearing loss on spatial release from masking, binaural intelligibility level difference, and lateralization. The study involved two groups of adults with mild to moderate sensorineural hearing loss: one group of 21 participants with symmetric hearing loss and another group of nine participants with asymmetric hearing loss. All tests were conducted through BC and air conduction (AC) headsets with non-individualized virtual positions of the sound sources and linear amplification based on individual hearing thresholds. The findings revealed a bilateral benefit for both groups of hearing-impaired individuals, with symmetric hearing loss yielding better results than asymmetric hearing loss. AC stimulation provided approximately twice the benefit in terms of dB compared to BC stimulation. A large part of this benefit originated from a favorable signal-to-noise ratio due to noise reduction from the head shadow. However, binaural processing was present in both hearing-impaired groups with bilateral BC stimulation. The ability to lateralize sounds based on interaural time delays was significantly impaired in participants with both types of hearing loss when stimulation was by BC. Despite these challenges, the study underscores the benefits of bilateral fitting of BC hearing aids, even in individuals with mild to moderate sensorineural hearing loss, whether symmetric or asymmetric.

Finite element analysis on the human and guinea pig cochlear vibration patterns under bone conduction stimulations

To compare the vibrational patterns of human and guinea pig cochleae accurately, we developed and validated a novel finite element model of the guinea pig, leveraging it to analyze vibrational patterns in the cochlea. This approach is mirrored in our examination of the human cochlear model, providing granular insights into the nuances of human bone conduction hearing. The comparative analysis reveals that the guinea pig cochlea mirrors human cochlear vibrational patterns, thus serving as an efficient proxy for exploring human cochlear function. The human mastoid and the upper region of the guinea pig’s skull are recommended as the convenient and comparable sites for bone conduction stimulation. The cochlear vibration pattern encompasses a mix of rigid, rotational, and compressive motion. Significantly, the guinea pig model demonstrates robust agreement with existing experimental data and other studies, these findings are confirming the validity of the model. Our study delineates the distinct roles of the three vibration types across various frequency spectrums. At lower frequencies, rigid motion is the dominant mechanism, supplemented by rotational motion. However, at higher frequencies, the influence of rigid motion wanes, ceding prominence to rotational and compressive motions. This trend is consistently observed in both human and guinea pig models.

Directional sensitivity of bone conduction stimulation on the otic capsule in a finite element model of the human temporal bone

Sound transmission to the human inner ear by bone conduction pathway with an implant attached to the otic capsule is a specific case where the cochlear response depends on the direction of the stimulating force. A finite element model of the temporal bone with the inner ear, no middle and outer ear structures, and an immobilized stapes footplate was used to assess the directional sensitivity of the cochlea. A concentrated mass represented the bone conduction implant. The harmonic analysis included seventeen frequencies within the hearing range and a full range of excitation directions. Two assessment criteria included: (1) bone vibrations of the round window edge in the direction perpendicular to its surface and (2) the fluid volume displacement of the round window membrane. The direction of maximum bone vibration at the round window edge was perpendicular to the round window. The maximum fluid volume displacement direction was nearly perpendicular to the modiolus axis, almost tangent to the stapes footplate, and inclined slightly to the round window. The direction perpendicular to the stapes footplate resulted in small cochlear responses for both criteria. A key factor responsible for directional sensitivity was the small distance of the excitation point from the cochlea.

3D finite element modeling of earplug-induced occlusion effect in the human ear

Poor utilization of earplugs among military personnel may be due to discomfort caused by the occlusion effect (OE). The OE occurs when an earplug occludes the ear canal, thereby changing bone conduction (BC) hearing and amplifying physiological noises from the wearer. There is a need to understand and reduce the OE in the human ear. A 3D finite element model of the human ear including a 3-chambered spiral cochlea was employed to simulate the OE caused by foam and aerogel earplugs. 90 dB sound pressure was applied at the ear canal entrance and BC sound was applied as vibration of the canal bony wall. The model reported the ear canal pressure and the displacements of the stapes footplate and cochlear basilar membrane with and without earplugs. Without BC stimulation, the foam earplug showed a greater pressure attenuation than the aerogel earplug. However, the foam earplug results were more affected by BC stimulation, with a maximum sound pressure increase of 34 dB, compared to the 21.0 dB increase with the aerogel earplug. The aerogel earplug's lower OE demonstrates its promise as an earplug material. Future work with this model will examine BC sound transmission in the cochlea.

The impact of round window reinforcement on middle and inner ear mechanics with air and bone conduction stimulation

The round window (RW) membrane plays an important role in normal inner ear mechanics. Occlusion or reinforcement of the RW has been described in the context of congenital anomalies or after cochlear implantation and is applied as a surgical treatment for hyperacusis. Multiple lumped and finite element models predict a low-frequency hearing loss with air conduction of up to 20 dB after RW reinforcement and limited to no effect on hearing with bone conduction stimulation. Experimental verification of these results, however, remains limited.Here, we present an experimental study measuring the impact of RW reinforcement on the middle and inner ear mechanics with air and bone conduction stimulation. In a within-specimen repeated measures design with human cadaveric specimens (n = 6), we compared the intracochlear pressures in scala vestibuli (PSV) and scala tympani (PST) before and after RW reinforcement with soft tissue, cartilage, and bone cement. The differential pressure (PDIFF) across the basilar membrane – known to be closely related to the hearing sensation - was calculated as the complex difference between PSV and PST.With air conduction stimulation, both PSV and PSTincreased on average up to 22 dB at frequencies below 1500 Hz with larger effect sizes for PST compared to PSV. The PDIFF, in contrast, decreased up to 11 dB at frequencies between 700 and 800 Hz after reinforcement with bone cement.With bone conduction, the average within-specimen effects were less than 5 dB for either PSV, PST, or PDIFF. The inter-specimen variability with bone conduction, however, was considerably larger than with air conduction.This experimental study shows that RW reinforcement impacts air conduction stimulation at low frequencies. Bone conduction stimulation seems to be largely unaffected. From a clinical point of view, these results support the hypothesis that delayed loss of air conduction hearing after cochlear implantation could be partially explained by the impact of RW reinforcement.

Objective preclinical measures for bone conduction implants.

The study evaluates the accuracy of predicting intracochlear pressure during bone conduction stimulation using promontory velocity and ear canal pressure, as less invasive alternatives to intracochlear pressure. Stimulating with a percutaneous bone conduction device implanted in six human cadaveric ears, measurements were taken across various intensities, frequencies, and stimulation positions. Results indicate that intracochlear pressure linearly correlates with ear canal pressure (R2 = 0.43, RMSE = 6.85 dB), and promontory velocity (R2 = 0.47, RMSE = 6.60 dB). Normalizing data to mitigate the influence of stimulation position leads to a substantial improvement in these correlations. R2 values increased substantially to 0.93 for both the ear canal pressure and the promontory velocity, with RMSE reduced considerably to 2.02 (for ear canal pressure) and 1.94 dB (for promontory velocity). Conclusively, both ear canal pressure and promontory velocity showed potential in predicting intracochlear pressure and the prediction accuracy notably enhanced when accounting for stimulation position. Ultimately, these findings advocate for the continued use of intracochlear pressure measurements to evaluate future bone conduction devices and illuminate the role of stimulation position in influencing the dynamics of bone conduction pathways.

Spatial Release From Masking With Bilateral Bone Conduction Stimulation at Mastoid for Normal Hearing Subjects.

This study investigates the effect of spatial release from masking (SRM) in bilateral bone conduction (BC) stimulation at the mastoid. Nine adults with normal hearing were tested to determine SRM based on speech recognition thresholds (SRTs) in simulated spatial configurations ranging from 0 to 180 degrees. These configurations were based on nonindividualized head-related transfer functions. The participants were subjected to sound stimulation through either air conduction (AC) via headphones or BC. The results indicated that both the angular separation between the target and the masker, and the modality of sound stimulation, significantly influenced speech recognition performance. As the angular separation between the target and the masker increased up to 150°, both BC and AC SRTs decreased, indicating improved performance. However, performance slightly deteriorated when the angular separation exceeded 150°. For spatial separations less than 75°, BC stimulation provided greater spatial benefits than AC, although this difference was not statistically significant. For separations greater than 75°, AC stimulation offered significantly more spatial benefits than BC. When speech and noise originated from the same side of the head, the "better ear effect" did not significantly contribute to SRM. However, when speech and noise were located on opposite sides of the head, this effect became dominant in SRM.

Measurements of bone-conducted sound in the chinchilla external ear

We measure bone-conduction (BC) induced skull velocity, sound pressure at the tympanic membrane (TM) and inner-ear compound-action potentials (CAP) before and after manipulating the ear canal, ossicles, and the jaw to investigate the generation of BC induced ear-canal sound pressures and their contribution to inner-ear BC response in the ears of chinchillas. These measurements suggest that in chinchilla: i.) Vibrations of the bony ear canal walls contribute significantly to BC-induced ear canal sound pressures, as occluding the ear canal at the bone-cartilaginous border causes a 10 dB increase in sound pressure at the TM (PTM) at frequencies below 2 kHz. ii.) The contributions to PTM of ossicular and TM motions when driven in reverse by BC-induced inner-ear sound pressures are small. iii.) The contribution of relative motions of the jaw and ear canal to PTM is small. iv.) Comparison of the effect of canal occlusion on PTM and CAP thresholds point out that BC-induced ear canal sound pressures contribute significantly to bone-conduction stimulation of the inner ear when the ear canal is occluded.

Evaluating temporal bone column density for optimized bone conduction implant placement

IntroductionAn optimal placement of bone conduction implants can provide more efficient mechanical transmission to the cochlea if placed in regions with greater bone column density. The aim of this study was to test this hypothesis and to determine the clinical potential of preoperative bone column density assessment for optimal implant placement.MethodsFive complete cadaver heads were scanned with quantitative computed tomography imaging to create topographic maps of bone density based on the column density index (CODI). Laser Doppler vibrometry was used to measure cochlear promontory acceleration under bone conduction stimulation in different locations on the temporal bone, using a bone-anchored hearing aid transducer at frequencies ranging from 355 Hz to 10 kHz.ResultsWe found a statistically significant association between CODI levels and the accelerance of the cochlear promontory throughout the frequency spectrum, with an average increase of 0.6 dB per unit of CODI. The distance between the transducer and the cochlear promontory had no statistically significant effect on the overall spectrum.DiscussionWe highlight the importance of bone column density in relation to the mechanical transmission efficiency of bone conduction implants. It may be worthwhile to consider column density in preoperative planning in clinical practice.

Bone Conduction Cervical Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials as an Alternative in Children with Middle Ear Effusion.

To compare the amplitude ratio and P-wave latency of cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (c-VEMPs) for bone conduction (BC) and air conduction (AC) stimulation in children with otitis media with effusion (OME). This is an observational study of a cohort of 27 children and 46 ears with OME. The c-VEMP amplitude ratio and P-wave latency were compared between BC and AC in children with OME and healthy age-matched children. The c-VEMP response rate in children with OME was 100% when using BC stimulation and 11% when using AC stimulation. The amplitude ratio for BC was significantly higher in the OME group than the age-matched healthy control group (p = 0.004). When focusing on ears with an AC c-VEMP response (n = 5), there was a significant difference in the amplitude ratio between the AC and BC stimulation modes, but there was no significant difference in the AC results between the OME group and the age-matched control group. BC stimulation allows for reliable vestibular otolith testing in children with middle ear effusion. Given the high prevalence of OME in children, clinicians should be aware that recording c-VEMPs with AC stimulation may lead to misinterpretation of otolith dysfunction in pediatric settings.

Hearing Aid in Vestibular-Schwannoma-Related Hearing Loss: A Review.

(1) Background: Several types of hearing aids are available for the rehabilitation of vestibular-schwannoma (VS)-related hearing loss. There is a lack of recently published papers regarding this theme. The aim of the present work is to organize current knowledge. (2) Methods: A review of the literature regarding the topics "vestibular schwannoma", "hearing loss", and "hearing aid" was performed. Nineteen studies were thus considered. (3) Results: Conventional hearing aids, contralateral routing of signal (CROS) aids, bone anchored hearing aids (BAHA), and others are available options for hearing rehabilitation in VS patients. The speech discrimination score (SDS) is considered the best measure to assess candidacy for rehabilitation with hearing aids. The best hearing rehabilitative conditions in VS patients when using conventional hearing aid devices are a mild-moderate hearing loss degree with good word recognition (more than 50% SDS). CROS-Aid and BAHA are reported to be beneficial. CROS-Aid expands on the area of receiving hearing. BAHA aids use direct bone-conduction stimulation. Unfortunately, there are no available studies focused specifically on VS patients that compare CROS and BAHA technologies. (4) Conclusions: Hearing aids, CROS, and BAHA are viable options for rehabilitating hearing impairment in VS, but require an accurate case-by-case audiological evaluation for rehabilitating hearing impairment in VS. Further studies are needed to prove if what is currently known about similar hearing illnesses can be confirmed, particularly in the case of VS.

Electro-vibrational stimulation results in improved speech perception in noise for cochlear implant users with bilateral residual hearing

A cochlear implant is a neuroprosthetic device that can restore speech perception for people with severe to profound hearing loss. Because of recent evolutions, a growing number of people with a cochlear implant have useful residual acoustic hearing. While combined electro-acoustic stimulation has been shown to improve speech perception for this group of people, some studies report limited adoption rates. Here, we present electro-vibrational stimulation as an alternative combined stimulation strategy that similarly targets the full cochlear reserve. This novel strategy combines the electrical stimulation by the cochlear implant with low-frequency bone conduction stimulation. In a first evaluation of electro-vibrational stimulation, speech perception in noise was assessed in 9 subjects with a CI and symmetrical residual hearing. We demonstrate a statistically significant and clinically relevant improvement for speech perception in noise of 1.9 dB signal-to-noise ratio. This effect was observed with a first prototype that provides vibrational stimulation to both ears with limited transcranial attenuation. Future integration of electro-vibrational stimulation into one single implantable device could ultimately allow cochlear implant users to benefit from their low-frequency residual hearing without the need for an additional insert earphone.

Inter-aural separation during hearing by bilateral bone conduction stimulation

Cross-head transmission inherent in bone conduction (BC) hearing is one of the most important factors that limit the performance of BC binaural hearing compared to air conduction (AC) binaural hearing. In AC, cross-head transmission is imperceptible leading to a clear understanding of the nature and position of the sound source(s). In this study, the prominence of cross-head transmission in BC hearing is addressed using the fact that ipsilateral cochlear excitation can be canceled by controlled bilateral BC stimulation.A cancellation experiment was conducted on twenty participants with normal hearing at thirteen third-octave frequencies between 250 and 4000 Hz. Both stationary and transient BC stimulation at the mastoid was used. The technique employed multiple stages of masking enabling adjustments of the stimulation level and phase until the tones got canceled in the ipsilateral ear. In addition, the ear canal sound pressure was obtained for ipsilateral and contralateral BC stimulation in isolation, and with bilateral BC stimulation at perceptual cancellation.The inter-aural level differences of both the types of stimulations were found to be the same. Crosstalk was found to be the lowest around 2 kHz and the highest around 1 kHz. The unwrapped inter-aural phase difference from stationary signal cancellation showed an overall increase with frequency starting at around no difference (35°) at 250 Hz to reach 607° at 4 kHz. Cycle-adjusted inter-aural time difference was very low (61 µs) at 250 Hz and increased to 1.1 ms at 800 Hz before falling to 0.6 ms at 4 kHz. It was also found that the ear canal sound pressure was not cancelled at the same phase as the sound in the cochlea.

Intracochlear pressure and temporal bone motion interaction under bone conduction stimulation

BackgroundUnder bone conduction (BC) stimulation, the otic capsule, and surrounding temporal bone, undergoes a complex 3-dimentional (3D) motion that depends on the frequency, location and coupling of the stimulation. The correlation between the resultant intracochlear pressure difference across the cochlear partition and the 3D motion of the otic capsule is not yet known and is to be investigated. MethodsExperiments were conducted in 3 fresh frozen cadaver heads, individually on each temporal bone, resulting in a total of 6 samples. The skull bone was stimulated, via the actuator of a BC hearing aid (BCHA), in the frequency range of 0.1–20 kHz. Stimulation was applied at the ipsilateral mastoid and the classical BAHA location via a conventional transcutaneous (5-N steel headband) and percutaneous coupling, sequentially. Three-dimensional motions were measured across the lateral and medial (intracranial) surfaces of the skull, the ipsilateral temporal bone, the skull base, as well as the promontory and stapes. Each measurement consisted of 130–200 measurement points (∼5–10 mm pitch) across the measured skull surface. Additionally, intracochlear pressure in the scala tympani and scala vestibuli was measured via a custom-made intracochlear acoustic receiver. ResultsWhile there were limited differences in the magnitude of the motion across the skull base, there were major differences in the deformation of different sections of the skull. Specifically, the bone near the otic capsule remained primarily rigid across all test frequency (above 10 kHz), in contrast to the skull base, which deformed above 1-2 kHz. Above 1 kHz, the ratio, between the differential intracochlear pressure and the promontory motion, was relatively independent of coupling and stimulation location. Similarly, the stimulation direction appears to have no influence on the cochlear response, above 1 kHz. ConclusionsThe area around the otic capsule appears rigid up to significantly higher frequencies than the rest of the skull surface, resulting in primarily inertial loading of the cochlear fluid. Further work should be focused at the investigation of the solid-fluid interaction between the bony walls of the otic capsule and the cochlear contents.

Contralateral bone conducted sound wave propagation on the skull bones in fresh frozen cadaver

The study aimed to investigate the efficient pathway for BC sound transmission by measuring vibrations on the opposite side of the skull bone, referred to as the mastoid position. The realistic contralateral transmission pathway of bone conduction (BC) vibrations is investigated through each osseous structure in the midlines of the fresh-frozen whole head. BC stimulation is applied to the mastoid using a bone vibrator, and acceleration responses are observed on the contralateral mastoid bone and seven midline points of skull bones using triaxial accelerometers. The study finds that the range showing the highest contralateral transmission efficiency of bone vibration is the intermediate frequency range with contralateral direction. Within this range, a significant amplitude of acceleration response is measured at the face-side points and the back and upper parts of the head. The thesis suggests that signal transmission from the specific midline to the mastoid can be more efficient than the conventional configuration of BC from the mastoid to the mastoid.

Analysis of cross-talk cancellation of bilateral bone conduction stimulation

When presenting a stereo sound through bilateral stimulation by two bone conduction transducers (BTs), part of the sound at the left side leaks to the right side, and vice versa. The sound transmitted to the contralateral cochlea becomes cross-talk, which can affect space perception. The negative effects of the cross-talk can be mitigated by a cross-talk cancellation system (CCS). Here, a CCS is designed from individual bone conduction (BC) transfer functions using a fast deconvolution algorithm. The BC response functions (BCRFs) from the stimulation positions to the cochleae were obtained by measurements of BC evoked otoacoustic emissions (OAEs) of 10 participants. The BCRFs of the 10 participants showed that the interaural isolation was low. In 5 of the participants, a cross-talk cancellation experiment was carried out based on the individualized BCRFs. Simulations showed that the CCS gave a channel separation (CS) of more than 50 dB in the 1–3 kHz range with appropriately chosen parameter values. Moreover, a localization test showed that the BC localization accuracy improved using the CCS where a 2–4.5 kHz narrowband noise gave better localization performance than a broadband 0.4–10 kHz noise. The results indicate that using a CCS with bilateral BC stimulation can improve interaural separation and thereby improve spatial hearing by bilateral BC.

Occlusion effects by bone-conducted sound to the facial parts assessed by hearing threshold and ear canal sound pressure

Bone conduction (BC) is used in devices such as hearing aids and earphones. Audio devices using BC on the face have been developed; however, limited research has addressed the perception of BC sounds on the face. BC also entails an occlusion effect (OE), wherein the loudness of low-frequency sounds is enhanced when the ear canal is occluded. We evaluated the characteristics of OE by measuring hearing thresholds and ear canal sound pressure (ECSP) during BC stimulation of several facial parts. We compared them with those of conventionally used parts. OE, the difference in hearing thresholds between the open and occluded ears, was equal to or larger than that of conventionally used parts. The difference in ECSP was smaller than that in OE, indicating that BC components transmitted to the middle and inner ears affected OE in these facial parts. The complicated structure of the face may have affected the results.

Cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potentials in healthy children: Normative values for bone and air conduction.

To characterize cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (c-VEMPs) in bone conduction (BC) and air conduction (AC) in healthy children, to compare the responses to adults and to provide normative values according to age and sex. Observational study in a large cohort of healthy children (n = 118) and adults (n = 41). The c-VEMPs were normalized with the individual EMG traces, the amplitude ratios were modeled with the Royston-Wright method. In children, the amplitude ratios of AC and BC c-VEMP were correlated (r = 0.6, p < 0.001) and their medians were not significantly different (p = 0.05). The amplitude ratio was higher in men than in women for AC (p = 0.04) and BC (p = 0.03). Children had significantly higher amplitude ratios than adults for AC (p = 0.01) and BC (p < 0.001). Normative values for children are shown. Amplitude ratio is age-dependent for AC more than for BC. Confidence limits of interaural amplitude ratio asymmetries were less than 32%. Thresholds were not different between AC and BC (88 ± 5 and 86 ± 6 dB nHL, p = 0.99). Mean latencies for AC and BC were for P-wave 13.0 and 13.2 msec and for N-wave 19.3 and 19.4 msec. The present study provides age- and sex-specific normative data for c-VEMP for children (6 months to 15 years of age) for AC and BC stimulation. Up to the age of 15 years, c-VEMP responses can be obtained equally well with both stimulation modes. Thus, BC represents a valid alternative for vestibular otolith testing, especially in case of air conduction disorders.

Estimating vibration artifacts in preclinical experimental assessment of actuator efficiency in bone-conduction hearing devices

ObjectivesTest feasibility of a means to distinguish artifact from relevant signal in an experimental method for pre-clinical assessment of bone conduction (BC) stimulation efficiency based on measurement of intracochlear pressure (ICP). MethodsExperiments were performed on fresh-frozen human temporal bones and cadaver heads. In a first step, fiber optic pressure sensors inserted into the cochlea through cochleostomies were intentionally vibrated to generate relative motion versus the stationary specimen, and the resulting ICP artifact recorded, before and after attaching the sensor fiber to the bone with glue. In a second step, BC stimulation was applied in the conventional location for a commercial bone anchored implant, as well as two alternative locations closer to the otic capsule. Again, ICP was recorded and compared with an estimated artifact, calculated from the previous measurements with intentional vibration of the fiber. ResultsIntentional vibration of the sensor fiber creates relative motion between fiber and bone, as intended, and causes an ICP signal. The stimulus does not create substantial promontory vibration, indicating that the measured ICP is all artifact, i.e. would not occur if the sensor were not in place. Fixating the sensor fiber to the bone with glue reduces the ICP artifact by at least 20 dB. BC stimulation also creates relative motion between sensor fiber and bone, as expected, from which an estimated ICP artifact level can be calculated. The ICP signal measured during BC stimulation is well above the estimated artifact, at least in some specimens and at some frequencies, indicating “real” cochlear stimulation, which would result in an auditory percept in a live subject. Stimulation at the alternative locations closer to the otic capsule appear to result in higher ICP (no statistical analysis performed), indicating a trend towards more efficient stimulation than at the conventional location. ConclusionsIntentional vibration of the fiber optic sensor for measurement of ICP can be used to derive an estimate of the artifact to be expected when measuring ICP during BC stimulation, and to characterize the effectiveness of glues or other means of reducing the artifact caused by relative motion of fiber and bone.