A heightened awareness of the need for strengthened security on board aircraft surfaced in the aftermath of the events of 9/11 where armed hijackers took over several aircraft and deviated them to targets on the ground. Awareness of aviation security and the need for implementation of more stringent security measures inside the aircraft, both while it is on ground and when it is airborne, became critical determinants. One could well ask the question, if there are “bouncers” at night clubs, railway security in the trains, and hotel security in hotels to protect hapless staff who serve customers, why is there no such protection for the transportation industry? At any given time, aircraft of commercial airlines keep 1.2 million passengers aloft. In the process, these airlines carry thieves, pickpockets, drug addicts and con men, among other passengers. Most States do not have legislation to respond to crimes on board aircraft. A few years ago, there was concern in the airline industry for a stewardess who was critically wounded with a knife by a drunken passenger who was a British subject, on board an aircraft flying over German territory and registered in the Middle East. When the aircraft landed in its destination, the offender was only fined $1,000 and released, as there were no laws in that country which would apply to the offense. In September 2001 after the attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, the United States Government decided that most, if not all, domestic US flights are to have "air marshals" carrying firearms on board. In December 2003 the British Government decided to deploy armed undercover sky marshals to counter heightened fears of terrorist attacks. This measure involved the presence on board British aircraft of undisclosed, highly trained police marks-men with special low-veloocity arms. Other possible measures taken included changes to screening at airports, improving the protection of airliners on the ground and security systems to prevent hijacks.
Read full abstract