Bleeding Complications In Patients Research Articles

Association between Genetic Polymorphisms and Bleeding in Patients on Direct Oral Anticoagulants

Objectives: The purpose of our study is to investigate the effects of apolipoprotein B (APOB) and APOE gene polymorphisms on bleeding complications in patients receiving direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). Methods: A total of 16 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in 468 patients were genotyped. Six SNPs of ABCB1 (rs3842, rs1045642, rs2032582, rs1128503, rs3213619, and rs3747802), one SNP of CYP3A5 (rs776746), seven SNPs of APOB (rs1042034, rs2163204, rs693, rs679899, rs13306194, rs13306198, and rs1367117), and two SNPs of APOE (rs429358 and rs7412) were analyzed by a TaqMan genotyping assay. Multivariable logistic regression analysis with selected variables was performed for the construction of a risk scoring system. Two risk scoring systems were compared (demographic factors only vs. demographic factors and genetic factors). Results: In the multivariable analyses, two models were constructed; only demographic factors were included in Model I and both demographic factors and genetic factors in Model II. Rivaroxaban and anemia showed significant association with bleeding in both models. Additionally, ABCB1 rs3842 variant homozygote carriers (CC) and APOB rs13306198 variant allele carriers (AG, AA) had a higher risk of bleeding risk compared with that of wild-type allele carriers (TT, TC) and wild-type homozygote carriers (GG), respectively. Whereas the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) value using demographic factors only was 0.65 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.56–0.74), the AUROC increased to 0.72 by adding genetic factors (95% CI: 0.65–0.80). The predicted bleeding risks of bleeding in patients with 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 points from the logistic regression curve were 0.8%, 2.0%, 5.4%, 5.2%, 12.5%, 26.9%, 47.0%, 64.3% and 82.3%, respectively. Conclusions: The study results can be used for enhancing individualized treatment strategies in patients taking DOACs, helping clinicians predict the bleeding risk.

Bleeding complications in patients on new oral anticoagulants for venous thromboembolism in Kenya.

The incidence of bleeding complications in patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE) on new oral anticoagulants (NOACs) has not been widely studied in contemporary clinical practice in Africa. The purpose of this study was to determine the rates of major bleeding, clinically relevant non-major bleeding (CRNM) and minor bleeding associated with NOAC use. A retrospective review was carried out of patients diagnosed with venous thromboembolism and treated with NOACs at the Aga Khan University Hospital, Nairobi, from January 2014 to December 2019. Clinical and outcome data were collected from medical records and the hospital mortality database. All patients with VTE aged > 18 years and initiated on NOACS were recruited. Patients with missing information were excluded. They were followed up from the time of commencement of oral anticoagulation to completion of therapy, or to the time of the first major bleed, CRNM or minor bleeding. Data on bleeding were obtained from the hospital database and through telephone interviews. Unadjusted rates of the first major bleeding event or CRNM were calculated as the number of bleeding events per 100 person-years. Two hundred and forty-three patients with VTE were recruited and 222 (91.4%) were initiated on rivaroxaban, 12 (4.9%) on dabigatran and nine (3.7%) on apixaban, with a median follow up of 213 [interquartile range (IQR): 119-477] days. The median age of the patients was 57 (IQR: 45-71) years. A total of 64 bleeding events were identified in 50 (20.6%) patients. Overall, the incidence rate for bleeding events was 17.24 per 100 patient-years. The incidence rate of major bleeding was 3.79 per 100 person-years. Gastrointestinal bleeding was the most common major bleeding site. There were more females with bleeding events (70.7%) compared to males. Anaemia and the use of aspirin and other antiplatelets were associated with a higher incidence of major and CRNM bleeding [relative risk (RR) = 3.77, confidence interval (CI) = 1.37-10.39, p = 0.005 and RR = 8.89, CI = 2.06-38.33, p = 0.0003, respectively]. Most of these bleeds were minor, with the gastrointestinal tract being the most common source of major bleeding and menorrhagia being the commonest cause of bleeding. Anaemia and the use of aspirin were associated with a higher incidence of major bleeding.

TCT-3 Predictors of Major Bleeding Complications in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Contemporary System-Wide Analysis

TCT-3 Predictors of Major Bleeding Complications in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Contemporary System-Wide Analysis

Thrombotic and bleeding complications in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia and severe COVID-19: a study of ERIC, the European Research Initiative on CLL

BackgroundPatients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) may be more susceptible to COVID-19 related poor outcomes, including thrombosis and death, due to the advanced age, the presence of comorbidities, and the disease and treatment-related immune deficiency. The aim of this study was to assess the risk of thrombosis and bleeding in patients with CLL affected by severe COVID-19.MethodsThis is a retrospective multicenter study conducted by ERIC, the European Research Initiative on CLL, including patients from 79 centers across 22 countries. Data collection was conducted between April and May 2021. The COVID-19 diagnosis was confirmed by the real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay for SARS-CoV-2 on nasal or pharyngeal swabs. Severe cases of COVID-19 were defined by hospitalization and the need of oxygen or admission into ICU. Development and type of thrombotic events, presence and severity of bleeding complications were reported during treatment for COVID-19. Bleeding events were classified using ISTH definition. STROBE recommendations were used in order to enhance reporting.ResultsA total of 793 patients from 79 centers were included in the study with 593 being hospitalized (74.8%). Among these, 511 were defined as having severe COVID: 162 were admitted to the ICU while 349 received oxygen supplementation outside the ICU. Most patients (90.5%) were receiving thromboprophylaxis. During COVID-19 treatment, 11.1% developed a thromboembolic event, while 5.0% experienced bleeding. Thrombosis developed in 21.6% of patients who were not receiving thromboprophylaxis, in contrast to 10.6% of patients who were on thromboprophylaxis. Bleeding episodes were more frequent in patients receiving intermediate/therapeutic versus prophylactic doses of low-molecular-weight heparin (LWMH) (8.1% vs. 3.8%, respectively) and in elderly. In multivariate analysis, peak D-dimer level and C-reactive protein to albumin ratio were poor prognostic factors for thrombosis occurrence (OR = 1.022, 95%CI 1.007‒1.038 and OR = 1.025, 95%CI 1.001‒1.051, respectively), while thromboprophylaxis use was protective (OR = 0.199, 95%CI 0.061‒0.645). Age and LMWH intermediate/therapeutic dose administration were prognostic factors in multivariate model for bleeding (OR = 1.062, 95%CI 1.017–1.109 and OR = 2.438, 95%CI 1.023–5.813, respectively).ConclusionsPatients with CLL affected by severe COVID-19 are at a high risk of thrombosis if thromboprophylaxis is not used, but also at increased risk of bleeding under the LMWH intermediate/therapeutic dose administration.

Bleeding Complications in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is considered a relatively safe procedure associated with low rates of complications, but is inevitably associated with short and mid-to-long term increased bleeding risk. Besides the short term risk associated with the arterial access to perform PCI, enhanced bleeding risk persists for several months, given the need for antithrombotic therapy to prevent procedure-related thrombotic complications as well as ischemic recurrences. Bleeding is a powerful harbinger of adverse outcomes. This awareness has fuelled intense research on bleeding reduction strategies, including new PCI devices and techniques as well as new medications and antithrombotic regimens. We here review the mechanisms and prevalence of bleeding in PCI patients, discuss the available evidence from a practical point of view, and explore future perspectives on how to treat and prevent bleeding complications in these patients.

Correlation Between the Japanese Version of the High Bleeding Risk (J-HBR) Criteria and the PRECISE-DAPT Score, and Optimal J-HBR Cut-Off Score to Predict Major Bleeding.

Background: The correlation between the Japanese version of high bleeding risk (J-HBR) criteria and the Predicting Bleeding Complications in Patients Undergoing Stent Implantation and Subsequent Dual Antiplatelet Therapy (PRECISE-DAPT) score is unknown, as is the relationship of both risk scores with ischemic events.Methods and Results: This study enrolled 842 patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) between January 2016 and December 2020. The 2 bleeding risk scores at the time of PCI and the subsequent risk of bleeding and ischemic events over a 1-year follow-up were examined. The J-HBR score was significantly correlated with the PRECISE-DAPT score (r=0.731, P<0.001). However, 1 year after PCI, the J-HBR was not significantly associated with the incidence of major bleeding and ischemic events (log-rank, P=0.058 and P=0.351, respectively), whereas the PRECISE-DAPT score predicted both the incidence of major bleeding and ischemic events (log-rank, P=0.006 and P=0.019, respectively). According to receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, a J-HBR score ≥1.5 was significantly associated with a higher cumulative incidence of major bleeding, but not ischemic events (log-rank, P=0.004 and P=0.513, respectively).Conclusions: The J-HBR score is highly correlated with the PRECISE-DAPT score. A J-HBR score ≥1.5 can identify high bleeding risk patients without an increased risk of ischemic events.

Bleeding events in the emergency department with warfarin versus novel oral anticoagulants: A five-year analysis.

Although warfarin is the most effective treatment approved to prevent atrial fibrillation-associated stroke, it remains underused in clinical practice due to patient noncompliance. Therefore, novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) have been developed. This study aimed to identify bleeding complications in patients who were taking oral anticoagulants and compare the rates of major and minor bleeding events between NOACs and warfarin groups. We conducted a retrospective, observational study of warfarin- and NOAC-treated patients who presented to an emergency department between January 2015 and December 2019 with bleeding events. We compared patients with major and minor bleeding in terms of age, gender, comorbid diseases, type of anticoagulant, and site of bleeding. An electronic search yielded 95 (21.9%) cases of patients taking a NOAC (i.e., dabigatran [19], rivaroxaban [45], apixaban [29], or edoxaban [6]) and 354 taking warfarin. There were no significant differences between the warfarin and NOACs groups in the frequency of minor bleeding complications. Similarly, there were no significant differences between the groups in the frequency of major bleeding complications. No significant difference in intracranial bleeding was seen between the NOACs- and warfarin-treated patients, although the incidence of gastrointestinal bleeding was significantly higher in the NOACs (P = 0.102 and P = 0.021, respectively). Our findings indicate that rates of major and minor bleeding complications in patients taking NOACs are similar to those in patients taking warfarin. While warfarin was associated with fewer complications than NOACs in terms of gastrointestinal bleeding, the risk of intracranial bleeding, was similar between the groups.

Management of perioperative bleeding risk in patients on antithrombotic medications undergoing cardiac surgery-a systematic review.

BackgroundAntithrombotic drugs increase the risk of bleeding, especially in patients who need urgent surgery without an adequate wash-out period. This review aims to evaluate perioperative bleeding complications in patients on dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) or direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) undergoing high-bleeding risk cardiovascular surgery and to present currently available potential solutions to mitigate antithrombotic therapy-related bleeding complications.MethodsAs a first step, we searched for relevant articles, over the last 10 years, in Medline (PubMed) and abstracted clinical information based on pre-defined criteria for bleeding complications. In the next step, an additional search evaluating potential solutions to mitigate bleeding complications was performed. The literature screening and selection process followed the principles derived from the PRISMA statement.ResultsFrom all reviewed studies, a total of 19 articles could be included evaluating the risk for bleeding in cardiac surgery related to DAPT or DOACs and 10 papers evaluating antithrombotic drug reversal or removal in the setting of cardiovascular surgery. Reported bleeding rates ranged between 18% and 41%. The variability of the reported data is remarkable. Idarucizumab is reported to provide optimal perioperative hemostasis in up to 93% of patients. It has been observed that andexanet alfa causes unresponsiveness to the anticoagulant effects of heparin. Antithrombotic removal by intraoperative hemoadsorption is found to be associated with a significant decrease in re-thoracotomy rate, overall procedure duration, administered transfusion volumes, chest-tube drainage, and length of hospitalization.DiscussionBleeding complications in patients treated with DAPT or DOACs in cardiac surgery are high. New costly reversal agents are available but have not been sufficiently tested in the cardio-surgical setting so far. Interestingly, bleeding-related complications seem to be effectively reduced by applying innovative intraoperative hemoadsorption techniques. Expected results from the ongoing trials should provide better insights concerning the efficacy and safety of several potential solutions. Currently, the variability of reports and the deficit of high-quality studies in this specific setting represent the major limitation for the unbiased conclusion of this review.

Incidence and determinants of thrombotic and bleeding complications in patients with glioblastoma

BackgroundGlioblastoma patients are considered to be at high risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and major bleeding (MB), although reliable incidence estimates are lacking. Moreover, the risk of arterial thromboembolism (ATE) in these patients is largely unknown. Our aim was to assess the cumulative incidence, predictors, and prognostic impact of VTE, ATE, and MB on subsequent complications and mortality. MethodsCohort study of 967 consecutive patients diagnosed with glioblastoma between 2004–2020 in two hospitals. Patients were followed from 6 months before date of histopathological glioblastoma diagnosis up to 2 years after, or until an outcome of interest (VTE, ATE, and MB) or death occurred, depending on the analysis. Cumulative incidences were estimated with death as competing risk. Cox regression was used to identify predictors and the prognostic impact. ResultsA total of 101 patients were diagnosed with VTE, 50 with ATE, and 126 with MB during a median follow‐up of 15 months (interquartile range 9.0–22). The adjusted 1‐year cumulative incidence of VTE was 7.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] 5.9–9.3), of ATE 4.1% (95% CI 3.0–5.6), and of MB 12% (95% CI 9.6–14). Older age, type of surgery, and performance status were predictors of VTE. Incident VTE during follow‐up was associated with MB (adjusted HR 4.7, 95% CI 2.5–9.0). MB and VTE were associated with mortality (adjusted HR 1.7, 95% CI 1.3–2.1 and 1.3, 95% CI 1.0–1.7, respectively). ConclusionWe found considerable incidences of VTE and MB in glioblastoma patients, with both complications associated with poorer prognosis. Our observations emphasize the need for prospective studies to determine optimal thromboprophylaxis and VTE treatment strategy in these patients.

Acil Serviste Takılan Santral Venöz Kateterlerin Değerlendirilmesi

Objective &#x0D; In our study, we evaluated central venous catheter procedures performed by Adnan Menderes University, Department of Emergency Medicine in the emergency room and emergency intensive care units. We planned to investigate performing central venous catheter application with ultrasound guidance and the rate of bleeding complications in patients using anticoagulants or antiplatelet.&#x0D; Material and Method&#x0D; Between 15.11.2018-15.10.2019, central venous catheter application was performed 178 cases over the age of 18 and non-pregnant were included. Research data were evaluated by using SPSS 21.0 statistics program.&#x0D; Results&#x0D; A Central venous catheter procedure was performed in 78.7% of the patients with ultrasound guidance. 36.5% of the patients had a history of anticoagulant or antiplatelet drug use. The most common complications in our patients were ventricular dysrhythmia and subcutaneous hematoma. &#x0D; Conclusion&#x0D; In conclusion, when looking at the relationship between gender, anticoagulant and/or antiplatelet drug use, preferred vein and ultrasound use during the procedure, and complication status, no statistically significant results were found.

Risk Scores of Bleeding Complications in Patients on Dual Antiplatelet Therapy: How to Optimize Identification of Patients at Risk of Bleeding after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin and a P2Y12 receptor inhibitor in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) reduces the risk of ischemic events but reduces the risk of ischemic events but increases the risk of bleeding, which in turn is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. With the aim to offer personalized treatment regimens to patients undergoing PCI, much effort has been devoted in the last decade to improve the identification of patients at increased risk of bleeding complications. Several clinical scores have been developed and validated in large populations of patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) and are currently recommended by guidelines to evaluate bleeding risk and individualize the type and duration of antithrombotic therapy after PCI. In clinical practice, these risk scores are conventionally computed at the time of PCI using baseline features and risk factors. Yet, bleeding risk is dynamic and can change over time after PCI, since patients can worsen or improve their clinical status and accumulate comorbidities. Indeed, evidence now exists that the estimated risk of bleeding after PCI can change over time. This concept is relevant, as the inappropriate estimation of bleeding risk, either at the time of revascularization or subsequent follow-up visits, might lead to erroneous therapeutic management. Serial evaluation and recalculation of bleeding risk scores during follow-up can be important in clinical practice to improve the identification of patients at higher risk of bleeding while on DAPT after PCI.

Complication Rates in Patients Using Intracavernosal Injection Therapy for Erectile Dysfunction With or Without Concurrent Anticoagulant Use-A Single-Center, Retrospective Pilot Study.

BackgroundIntracavernosal injection therapy (ICI) is an effective intervention used to treat erectile dysfunction (ED). It has been proposed that caution should be exercised when prescribing ICI to patients currently taking anticoagulants (AC) due to the theoretical increased risk of bleeding, however, there is limited literature describing complication rates of actively anticoagulated patients utilizing ICI.AimWe sought to determine whether there was a difference in bleeding and other complications in a cohort of patients using ICI therapy with or without concurrent AC use.MethodsWe reviewed our institutional electronic health record and identified 168 patients who were seen in our clinic from January to August 2020 who had either currently or previously utilized ICI therapy for ED treatment. These patients were surveyed regarding their ICI therapy as well as given the erectile dysfunction inventory for treatment satisfaction questionnaire. Data from 85 patients was obtained; 43 concurrently using AC during ICI therapy and 42 with no AC use. Fisher's exact test for categorical variables and a 2-tailed t-test were used with P < .05 considered to be significant.OutcomeDocumented bleeding events (eg, bruising, hematoma), complications, and mean erectile dysfunction inventory for treatment satisfaction scores were compared between the 2 groups.ResultsThere were more absolute bleeding complications in the AC group vs the no AC group, with 3 of 43 AC patients (7%, 95% confidence interval: 2.4–18.6) and 0/42 no AC patients (0%, 95% confidence interval: 0–8.4) experiencing some type of bleeding complication on ICI. However, there was no statistically significant difference found in overall or stratified documented bleeding events and complications between the 2 groups.Clinical ImplicationsPatients with concurrent AC usage on ICI therapy reported a higher rate of absolute bleeding complications than our non-AC group.Strengths and LimitationsThe strength of this study is addressing question of safety of ICI therapy in patients with concurrent AC usage. Limitations include single-center retrospective study design and underpowered sample size limiting confidence with which conclusions from data should guide future patient counseling regarding ICI risks.ConclusionFindings from a single-center cohort of patients suggest that ICI therapy may be a safe and effective treatment modality for ED in patients with concurrent anticoagulant usage, however, given the higher rate of absolute bleeding events in our AC cohort, future assessment in a higher-powered study is warranted in determining a more accurate estimation of risk or propensity for bleeding complications in patients on AC using ICI therapy.Blum KA, Mehr JP, Green T, et al. Complication Rates in Patients Using Intracavernosal Injection Therapy for Erectile Dysfunction With or Without Concurrent Anticoagulant Use—A Single-Center, Retrospective Pilot Study. Sex Med 2022;10:100535.

Investigation of predictors of bleeding complications in COVID-19 using rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEMⓇ): A retrospective study.

BackgroundHemorrhagic complications in patients with coronavirus 19 disease (COVID‐19) are infrequent but associated with a prognosis. This study aimed to elucidate the risk factors for bleeding complications in patients with COVID‐19 using rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) parameters and blood tests performed at admission.MethodsIn total, 31 patients with severe COVID‐19 treated intensively at Saga University Hospital were included in this study. Patients were divided into two groups according to the presence or absence of hemorrhagic complications. Results from the blood tests performed at admission and during hospitalization, and ROTEM values acquired upon admission, were compared between the two groups.ResultsThere were significant differences in ROTEM values upon admission between the bleeding and non‐bleeding groups. Receiver operating curve analysis showed that the area under the curve for prothrombin time international normalized ratio (PT‐INR) and extrinsically‐activated test with tissue factor (EXTEM) amplitude at 10 min (A10) were 0.82 (0.52–0.92) and 0.81 (0.58–0.93), respectively. Logistic regression analysis with PT‐INR and EXTEM A10 as factors calculated an odds ratio of 1.94 (1.04–3.62) and EXTEM A10 0.86 (0.71–1.05) for bleeding complications occurrence.ConclusionROTEM may be a sensitive predictor for bleeding complications in patients with COVID‐19.

C-13 | Meta-analysis of Standard vs. Ultrasound-Assisted Thrombolysis in the Management of Acute Pulmonary Embolism

Standard catheter-directed thrombolysis (SCDT) harnesses the therapeutic benefit of systemic thrombolytics by infusing the lytic agent directly into the thrombus, thereby, minimizing the dose and bleeding complications in patients presenting with massive and sub-massive PE. Ultrasound-assisted thrombolysis (USAT) theoretically improves SCDT by disrupting fibrin and increasing the surface area exposed to the agent, but it comes at an increased cost. The purpose of this study is to determine if USAT improves outcomes compared to SCDT.

Medium-term outcomes from mitral valve surgery for rheumatic heart disease in young adults in Aotearoa New Zealand: a cohort study.

Rheumatic heart disease (RHD) remains an important cause of morbidity and mortality in New Zealand. Factors associated with the choice of surgical treatment for advanced RHD in young adults are poorly understood. We sought to review our local experience with the surgical management of young adults with rheumatic mitral valvular disease. From 2003 to 2016, all patients aged 15-24 years undergoing mitral valve surgery for rheumatic disease at Auckland City Hospital, New Zealand were retrospectively reviewed. During the 13-year study period, 73 young adults underwent mitral surgery; 85% were Maori or Pacific Islanders. Mitral repair was performed in 32 patients and replacement in 41 patients. Isolated mitral valve surgery was performed in 36%, double valve procedures in 47%, and triple valve procedures in 17% of patients. The 30-day mortality rate and stroke rate were 1.4% and 2.7% respectively. The medium-term mortality rate was 11.9% across a mean follow-up of 6 years (6.9% in the repair group, 15.8% in the replacement group, p=0.25). There were increased bleeding complications (p=0.04) in patients with mechanical mitral valve replacement. For patients on warfarin, across medium-term follow-up, the INR was in the therapeutic range only 23% of the time. Most young adults in New Zealand with severe RHD requiring surgery are of indigenous Maori or Pacific Island ethnicity. There is a trend towards improved survival with mitral repair. There is a significant tendency towards increased bleeding complications in patients on warfarin for mechanical mitral replacement. Warfarin compliance is poor.

Postoperative bleeding complications in patients with hemophilia undergoing major orthopedic surgery: A prospective multicenter observational study

BackgroundPersons with hemophilia (PWH) are at risk for chronic hemophilic arthropathy (HA). Joint replacement surgery may be used to relieve intractable pain and/or restore joint function. ObjectivesThis multicenter, prospective, observational cohort study evaluated the rate of bleeding during the postoperative period after total hip (THA) or knee arthroplasty (TKA). Patients/MethodsWe included PWH of any severity ≥18 years of age who were undergoing THA or TKA. Clinical decisions were made at the discretion of the treating physician according to local standards of care. Clinical data were prospectively recorded. Major bleeding was defined as bleeding in a critical site, bleeding that resulted in either a 2 g/dl or greater decrease in hemoglobin during any 24‐h period, or transfusion of two or more units of packed red blood cells. ResultsOne hundred thirty‐one procedures (98 TKA and 33 THA) were performed, 39 (29.8%) of which were complicated by major bleeding, including 46% of THA and 25% of TKA. The risk of major bleeding was increased in THA compared to TKA (OR 2.50, p = .05), and by the presence of an inhibitor (OR 4.29, p = .04), increased BMI (OR 4.49 and 6.09 for overweight and obese, respectively, compared to normal BMI, each p < .01), and non‐use of an antifibrinolytic medication (OR 3.00, p = .03). Neither continuous clotting factor infusion (versus bolus infusion) nor pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis were associated with bleeding risk. ConclusionsThe bleeding risk remains substantial after THA and TKA in PWH, despite factor replacement. Use of antifibrinolytic medications is associated with decreased risk.

Short-term effects of fibrinolytic therapy on the hemodynamic parameters of patients with intermediate- and high-risk pulmonary embolism.

ObjectiveWe aimed to determine the effect of fibrinolytic therapy on hemodynamic parameters at 4 hours after treatment and bleeding complications in patients with intermediate- and high-risk pulmonary embolism.MethodsThis single-center, retrospective, cohort study included patients with intermediate- and high-risk pulmonary embolism treated with fibrinolytics. Their demographic and clinical characteristics, complications, and vital signs at the initiation of and 4 hours after fibrinolytic therapy were evaluated. The primary outcome was the change in the patients’ vital signs at 4 hours after fibrinolytic therapy, compared by the Mann-Whitney U-test.ResultsSeventy-nine patients were included in this study. The systolic and diastolic blood pressures of the high-risk group at 4 hours after fibrinolytic therapy were higher than those at the initiation of fibrinolytic therapy (80 mmHg vs. 99 mmHg, P = 0.029; 49 mmHg vs. 67 mmHg, P = 0.011, respectively). In the intermediate-risk group, the oxygen saturation increased (94% vs. 96%, P = 0.004) and pulse rate decreased (104 beats/min vs. 91 beats/min, P < 0.001).ConclusionBlood pressure at 4 hours after fibrinolytic therapy increased in patients with high-risk pulmonary embolism. Also, oxygen saturation and pulse rate improved in intermediate-risk patients.

Systematic review with meta-analysis: incidence of variceal hemorrhage in patients with cirrhosis undergoing transesophageal echocardiography.

The presence of esophageal varices is considered a relative contraindication to transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) by cardiology professional societies, so gastroenterologists are often consulted to perform upper endoscopy prior to TEE in patients with cirrhosis. To perform a systematic review to quantify the risk of bleeding complications in patients with cirrhosis following TEE. Two reviewers searched Ovid MEDLINE, MEDLINE In-Process and EMBASE databases from January 1992 to May 2021 for studies reporting bleeding complications from TEE in patients with cirrhosis. We calculated the pooled incidence rate of bleeding events using the metaprop command with a random effect model. We identified 21 studies comprising 4050 unique patients with cirrhosis; 9 studies (n=3015) assessed the risk of intraoperative TEE during liver transplant (LT) and 12 studies (n=1035) assessed bleeding risk in patients undergoing TEE for other indications. The pooled incidence of bleeding post-TEE was 0.37% (95% CI 0.04-0.94%) across all studies. Bleeding complications were low among patients undergoing TEE during LT as well as those undergoing TEE for other diagnostic reasons (0.97% vs. 0.004%) and among studies with mean MELD >18 compared to those with mean MELD <18 (0.43% vs. 0.08%). Few studies had a comparator arm, and data on patient-level factors impacting bleeding complications (including degree of liver dysfunction and coagulopathy) were limited across studies. The risk of bleeding complications following TEE is low in patients with cirrhosis, suggesting TEE is safe and risk stratification with upper endoscopy may not be necessary.

Atrial fibrillation, liver cirrhosis, thrombosis, and bleeding: A Danish population‐based cohort study

ObjectivesWe examined the impact of liver cirrhosis on the risk of thromboembolic events and bleeding complications in patients with atrial fibrillation or flutter (AFF). MethodsThis population‐based cohort study used data from Danish health registries. We identified all patients with a first‐time diagnosis of AFF during 1995 to 2015, and followed them from their AFF diagnosis until the end of 2016. Patients were categorized according to the presence or absence of liver cirrhosis. We computed incidence rates per 1000 person‐years and hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) based on Cox regression analyses, adjusting for age, CHA2DS2VASc score, and Charlson Comorbidity Index score. ResultsWe identified 273 225 patients with AFF. Of these, 1463 (0.54%) had liver cirrhosis. During 0 to 5 years of follow‐up, compared to patients without liver cirrhosis, patients with liver cirrhosis had higher incidence rates and hazards of ischemic stroke (29.7 vs 21.6; HR, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.1‐1.6), venous thromboembolism (9.2 vs 5.5; HR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.2‐2.3), but not myocardial infarction (10.2 vs 11.2; HR, 0.9; 95% CI, 0.7–1.2). Patients with liver cirrhosis also had higher rates of hemorrhagic stroke (5.8 vs 3.3; HR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.1‐2.6), subdural hemorrhage (5.3 vs 1.6; HR, 3.2; 95% CI, 2.1‐4.9), hemorrhage of the lung or urinary tract (24.6 vs 15.2; HR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.3–2.0), and gastrointestinal hemorrhage (34.5 vs 10.4; HR, 3.3; 95% CI, 2.7–3.9). ConclusionIn patients with AFF, liver cirrhosis was associated with an elevated risk of ischemic stroke, venous thromboembolism, and all evaluated bleeding complications.

Desmopressin Acetate Before Percutaneous Ultrasound-Guided Kidney Biopsy in Patients with Renal Failure - Is it Really Beneficial?

The most common complication of percutaneous renal biopsy is bleeding, which can be seen in up to one-third of cases. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of prebiopsy administration of intranasal desmopressin acetate in reducing the incidence of biopsy-related bleeding complications in patients with significant renal dysfunction who underwent renal biopsy. This was a retrospective, observational study of percutaneous native renal biopsies performed at our center from July 2014 to June 2018. Bleeding complication rates of patients with renal failure (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] <30 mL/minute/1.73 m2) who received desmopressin and those who did not receive desmopressin were compared. Desmopressin administration before renal biopsy in patients with eGFR <30 mL/minute/1.73 m2 was associated with a significant reduction of bleeding complications (major and minor together; P = 0.025) and no significant reduction in major complications (P = 0.616) or intervention rates (P = 0.251) when compared with a group that did not receive desmopressin. While prebiopsy intranasal desmopressin use was associated with a significant reduction of overall bleeding complications including major and minor complications, there was no reduction in the rate of other major complications and interventions.