Bleeding Academic Research Consortium Research Articles

Impact of Ticagrelor vs. Clopidogrel in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome Undergoing Left Main Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Abstract Objective: There is limited evidence regarding the choice of P2Y12 receptor inhibitors as a component of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in patients with left main (LM) disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). This study aimed to evaluate long-term clinical outcomes of ticagrelor- vs. clopidogrel-based DAPT strategy in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients undergoing LM PCI. Methods: This is a post-hoc analysis from a prospective, single-center, real-world PCI registry. A total of 1,163 patients discharged post-ACS who underwent LM PCI and received ticagrelor or clopidogrel between March 2016 and March 2019 were included in the study. The primary endpoint was ischemic events at 12 months, including cardiac death, myocardial infarction, or stroke. Secondary outcomes included all-cause death and Bleeding Academic Research Consortium types 2, 3, and 5, and types 3 and 5 bleeding. Propensity score matching was used to adjust for bias due to confounders between the 2 groups. Results: The ticagrelor and clopidogrel groups comprised 529 (45.49%) and 634 (54.51%) patients, respectively. During the follow-up period, ticagrelor significantly reduced the rate of ischemic events compared to clopidogrel before (1.32% (7/529) vs. 3.63% (23/634), P = 0.0136) and after propensity score matching (1.41% (6/425) vs. 4.00% (17/425), P = 0.0201). The rates of all-cause death, Bleeding Academic Research Consortium-defined type 2, 3, and 5 bleeding, and type 3 and 5 bleeding were similar between the ticagrelor group and clopidogrel group before or after propensity score matching adjustment (all P > 0.05). Conclusion: Among patients with ACS undergoing LM PCI, ticagrelor use was associated with ischemic events benefit without excessive risk of bleeding at 12 months compared with clopidogrel.

Renal Function-Stratified Comparison of Short- and Long-Term Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Third-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents - Post Hoc Analysis From the HOST-IDEA Randomized Clinical Trial.

The optimal duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in patients with chronic kidney disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially with third-generation drug-eluting stents (DES), remains unknown. We conducted a prespecified post hoc analysis of the HOST-IDEA trial, randomizing patients undergoing PCI with third-generation DES to 3- to 6-month or 12-month DAPT. In all, 1,997 patients were grouped by their estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR): high (>90 mL/min/1.73 m2), intermediate (60-90 mL/min/1.73 m2), and low (<60 mL/min/1.73 m2). The primary outcome was net adverse clinical events (NACE), a composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, clinically driven target lesion revascularization, stent thrombosis, or major bleeding (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium Type 3 or 5) at 12 months. Secondary outcomes were target lesion failure (TLF) and major bleeding. The low eGFR group had the highest rates of NACE, TLF, and major bleeding compared with the other 2 groups (P<0.001). Rates of NACE were similar in the 3- to 6-month and 12-month DAPT in the high (2.9% vs. 3.2%; P=0.84), intermediate (2.1% vs. 2.8%, P=0.51), and low (8.9% vs. 9.1%; hazard ratio 0.99; P=0.97; Pinteraction=0.88) eGFR groups. TLF and major bleeding events showed similar trends. In patients undergoing PCI with third-generation DES, 3- to 6-month DAPT was comparable to 12-month DAPT for clinical outcomes regardless of renal function.

Development and Validation of Prognostic Models for Bleeding and Ischemia in Elderly Patients With Comorbid Acute Coronary Syndrome and Atrial Fibrillation.

Acute coronary syndrome and atrial fibrillation are common cardiovascular diseases in elderly individuals. Patients with comorbidities face increased risks of bleeding and ischemia; however, there is a lack of prognostic models for quantifying these risks in this special population. In this retrospective cohort study, 1851 patients (≥65 years old) with acute coronary syndrome and atrial fibrillation from 2 hospitals in China were included in the development cohort (1252 individuals) and 2 external validation cohorts (284 and 315 individuals). During 1-year follow-up, 96 Bleeding Academic Research Consortium type 3 or 5 bleeding events and 245 thromboembolic events were observed. In the development cohort, the concordance indexes for bleeding at 3, 6, and 12 mo ranged from 0.737 to 0.845 and for ischemia ranged from 0.723 to 0.777. The calibration curve and decision curve analysis indicated adequate calibration and clinical practicability. The concordance indexes varied from 0.679 to 0.809 in the validation cohorts. Subgroup analyses focusing on anticoagulant drugs and antithrombotic therapy were conducted, revealing similar discrimination and calibration. Kaplan-Meier curves demonstrated significant differences (log-rank P<0.001). Additionally, the models outperformed conventional models in concordance indexes, integrated discrimination improvement, and net reclassification improvement. Our study provides 2 robust prognostic models with easily available clinical factors for predicting bleeding and ischemia in elderly patients with acute coronary syndrome and atrial fibrillation. Furthermore, we provide online calculators to facilitate individualized risk evaluation and clinical decision-making. URL: www.chictr.org.cn/. Unique Identifier: ChiCTR2200067185.

Cangrelor versus crushed ticagrelor in patients with acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock: rationale and design of the randomised, double-blind DAPT-SHOCK-AMI trial.

Cardiogenic shock (CS) is a devastating and fatal complication of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). CS can affect the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of medications. The unique properties of cangrelor make it the optimal P2Y12 inhibitor for CS-AMI, in terms of both efficacy and safety. The DAPT-SHOCK-AMI trial (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03551964; EudraCT: 2018-002161-19) will assess the benefits of cangrelor in patients with an initial CS-AMI undergoing primary angioplasty. This randomised, multicentre, placebo-controlled trial of approximately 550 patients (with an allowed 10% increase) in 5 countries using a double-blind design will compare initial P2Y12 inhibitor treatment strategies in patients with CS-AMI of (A) intravenous cangrelor and (B) ticagrelor administered as crushed tablets at a loading dose of 180 mg. The primary clinical endpoint is a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), or stroke within 30 days. The main secondary endpoints are (1) the net clinical endpoint, defined as death, MI, urgent revascularisation of the infarct-related artery, stroke, or major bleeding as defined by the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium criteria; (2) cardiovascular-related death, MI, urgent revascularisation, or heart failure; (3) heart failure; and (4) cardiovascular-related death, all (1-4) within 1 year after study enrolment. A platelet reactivity study that tests the laboratory antiplatelet benefits of cangrelor, when given in addition to standard antiplatelet therapy, will be conducted using vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein phosphorylation. The primary laboratory endpoints are the periprocedural rate of onset and the proportion of patients who achieve effective P2Y12 inhibition. The DAPT-SHOCK-AMI study is the first randomised trial to evaluate the benefits of cangrelor in patients with CS-AMI.

Randomized Trial of COBRA PzF Stenting to Reduce the Duration of Triple Therapy: The COBRA-REDUCE Trial.

Patients with an indication for oral anticoagulation who undergo percutaneous coronary intervention require a combination of oral anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapy. The use of a coronary stent with a thromboresistant and pro-healing coating may allow an abbreviated duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) without an increase in the risk of thromboembolic events. Patients with an indication for oral anticoagulation undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention were randomized to treatment with the COBRA polyzene F (PzF) stent followed by 14 days of DAPT or a Food and Drug Administration-approved new-generation drug-eluting stent followed by 3 or 6 months of DAPT. The bleeding coprimary end point was Bleeding Academic Research Consortium type ≥2 beyond 14 days (or after hospital discharge) until 6 months. The thromboembolic coprimary end point was the composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, definite or probable stent thrombosis, or ischemic stroke at 6 months. The trial hypothesis was that the COBRA PzF stent strategy would be superior with respect to bleeding events and noninferior with respect to thromboembolic events. A total of 996 patients underwent randomization. The bleeding end point occurred in 37 of 475 patients (7.8%) in the COBRA PzF group and 47 of 482 patients (9.8%) in the control group (difference, -2.0 [95% CI, -5.6 to 1.6]; P=0.14). The thromboembolic end point occurred in 37 of 492 patients (7.5%) in the COBRA PzF group and 24 of 490 patients (4.9%) in the control group (difference, 2.6%; prespecified noninferiority margin 5%, upper limit of 1-sided 95% CI of the difference, 5.2%; Pnoninferiority=0.07). In patients with an indication for oral anticoagulation undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, treatment with the COBRA PzF stent plus 14 days of DAPT was not superior with respect to bleeding events and was not noninferior with respect to thromboembolic events at 6 months compared with treatment with standard Food and Drug Administration-approved drug-eluting stent plus 3 to 6 months of DAPT. URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02594501.

Bivalirudin versus heparin in patients with or without bail-out GPI use: a pre-specified subgroup analysis from the BRIGHT-4 trial

BackgroundConflicting results comparing bivalirudin versus heparin anticoagulation in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), in part due to the confounding effect of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (GPI). The aim of the study was to compare the safety and effectiveness of bivalirudin plus a post-PCI high-dose infusion vs heparin with or without bail-out GPI use.MethodsWe conducted a pre-specified subgroup analysis from the BRIGHT-4 trial that randomized 6016 STEMI patients who underwent primary PCI to receive either bivalirudin plus a post-PCI high-dose infusion for 2–4 h or heparin monotherapy. GPI use was only reserved as bail-out therapy for procedural thrombotic complications. The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause death or Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) types 3–5 bleeding at 30 days.ResultsA total of 5250 (87.4%) patients received treatment without GPI while 758 (12.6%) received bail-out GPI. Bail-out GPI use was associated with an increased risk of the primary outcome compared to non-GPI use (5.28% vs. 3.41%; adjusted hazard ratio (aHR), 1.62; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.13–2.33; P = 0.009) and all-cause death (5.01% vs. 3.12%; aHR, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.20–2.52; P = 0.004) but not in the risk of BARC types 3–5 bleeding (0.53% vs. 0.48%; aHR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.31–2.66; P = 0.85). Among patients without GPI use, bivalirudin was associated with lower rates of the primary outcome (2.63% vs. 4.21%; aHR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.39–0.77; P = 0.0005), all-cause death (2.52% vs. 3.74%; aHR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.41–0.83; P = 0.003), and BARC types 3–5 bleeding (0.15% vs. 0.81%; aHR, 0.19; 95% CI, 0.06–0.57; P = 0.003) compared with heparin. However, among patients requiring bail-out GPI, there were no significant differences observed in the rates of the primary outcome (5.76% vs. 4.87%; aHR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.36–1.66; P = 0.50; Pinteraction = 0.07) or its individual components between bivalirudin and heparin groups.ConclusionsBivalirudin plus a post-PCI high-dose infusion was associated with significantly reduced 30-day composite rate of all-cause death or BARC types 3–5 bleeding compared with heparin monotherapy in STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI without GPI use. However, these benefits might be less pronounced in patients requiring bail-out GPI due to thrombotic complications during primary PCI.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT03822975.

A retrospective study of the safety and efficacy of clopidogrel versus aspirin monotherapy one year after coronary stent implantation

BackgroundThe ideal single antiplatelet therapy for long-term maintenance after coronary stenting remains uncertain. In a head-to-head comparison, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety profile of aspirin and clopidogrel as monotherapies in this patient cohort.MethodWe reviewed 1044 patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stents (DES) at the Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Jinshan Hospital of Fudan University, between January 2019 and December 2021 and completed a 12-month Dual Antiplatelet Therapy (DAPT) treatment. They were divided into two groups: 582 were assigned to the aspirin group (100 mg/day) and 422 to the clopidogrel group (75 mg/day). The primary endpoint was the composite cardiac death, ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction, and Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) bleeding type 3 or greater. Secondary endpoint events included all-cause death, ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction, bleeding (defined as a BARC type ≥ 2 bleeding), and gastrointestinal complications.ResultsAfter a mean observation period of 25 ± 8.4 months, the primary endpoint event occurred in 29 (6.8%) patients in the clopidogrel group and 30 (5.1%) in the aspirin group, with no difference between the two groups (P = 0.253). In BARC type 2 or greater bleeding events, there were 9 (1.5%) in the aspirin group compared to 7 (1.7%) in the clopidogrel group, with no difference between the two groups (P = 0.160).ConclusionAfter 12-month DAPT in Chinese patients undergoing DES implantation, aspirin monotherapy versus clopidogrel monotherapy showed no significant difference between the two drugs in terms of safety and efficacy in terms of hemorrhage, myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, cardiac death, and bleeding with BARC type 2 or greater.

Percutaneous coronary intervention vs. medical therapy in patients on dialysis with coronary artery disease in China.

The available evidence regarding the benefits of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) on patients receiving dialysis with coronary artery disease (CAD) is limited and inconsistent. This study aimed to evaluate the association between PCI and clinical outcomes as compared with medical therapy alone in patients undergoing dialysis with CAD in China. This multicenter, retrospective study was conducted in 30 tertiary medical centers across 12 provinces in China from January 2015 to June 2021 to include patients on dialysis with CAD. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), defined as a composite of cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and non-fatal stroke. Secondary outcomes included all-cause death, the individual components of MACE, and Bleeding Academic Research Consortium criteria types 2, 3, or 5 bleeding. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard models were used to assess the association between PCI and outcomes. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) and propensity score matching (PSM) were performed to account for potential between-group differences. Of the 1146 patients on dialysis with significant CAD, 821 (71.6%) underwent PCI. After a median follow-up of 23.0months, PCI was associated with a 43.0% significantly lower risk for MACE (33.9% [n=278] vs. 43.7% [n=142]; adjusted hazards ratio 0.57, 95% confidence interval 0.45-0.71), along with a slightly increased risk for bleeding outcomes that did not reach statistical significance (11.1% vs. 8.3%; adjusted hazards ratio 1.31, 95% confidence interval, 0.82-2.11). Furthermore, PCI was associated with a significant reduction in all-cause and cardiovascular mortalities. Subgroup analysis did not modify the association of PCI with patient outcomes. These primary findings were consistent across IPTW, PSM, and competing risk analyses. This study indicated that PCI in patients on dialysis with CAD was significantly associated with lower MACE and mortality when comparing with those with medical therapy alone, albeit with a slightly increased risk for bleeding events that did not reach statistical significance.

Dynamics of Thrombogenicity and Platelet Function and Correlation with Bleeding Risk in Patients Undergoing M-TEER Using the PASCAL System.

Transcatheter mitral valve repair is performed in a patient population at risk for thrombotic and bleeding events. The effects on platelet function and reactivity and their association with bleeding events after mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge therapy (M-TEER) have not been systematically examined. We sought to investigate the association of different parameters of platelet function and thrombogenicity with bleeding events post M-TEER. In this single-center study, 100 consecutive patients with mitral regurgitation receiving TEER were analyzed. Blood was taken directly from the guide-catheter in the left atrium before and after placing the device. Blood samples were analyzed using impedance aggregometry (Multiplate) and TEG6s. The results were compared pre- and postprocedural. The primary outcome was any bleeding complication according to the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium classification within 6 months. A total of 41 patients experienced bleeding events. TEG analysis showed a significant decrease in ADP aggregation and increase in ADP inhibition. In ROC-analysis, TEG ADP aggregation and inhibition and Multiplate ADP aggregation showed moderate predictive values for bleeding events. The delta-ADP-Test (Multiplate) showed the strongest prediction of bleeding (area under the curve: 0.69). Adding platelet function and TEG markers to a model of clinical bleeding risk factors improved the prediction for bleeding events. This study indicates that thrombogenicity might be affected immediately after M-TEER probably due to changes in flow conditions. In particular, platelet aggregation involving the ADP receptor pathway significantly correlated with postprocedural bleeding events. Whether these results could guide peri-interventional antithrombotic therapy and improve peri- and postprocedural outcome requires further investigation.

ICARUS score for predicting peri-procedural bleeding in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with cangrelor

BackgroundTools for precise prediction of bleeding risk in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with cangrelor are lacking. MethodsConsecutive patients undergoing PCI and treated with cangrelor in 7 centers were retrospectively enrolled. The primary endpoint was Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) BARC 2, 3, or 5 bleeding 48 h after PCI. Predictors of BARC 2–5 bleeding were identified in a derivation cohort and combined into a numerical risk score. Discrimination and calibration were assessed in the derivation and validation cohorts. A threshold to define high bleeding risk (HBR) was identified and its diagnostic accuracy was compared with that of currently recommended bleeding risk scores. Results1071 patients undergoing PCI with cangrelor were included. Fifty-four patients (5 %) experienced a BARC 2–5 bleeding, of whom 24 (44 %) from the access site. Age ≥ 75 years (odds ratio [OR] 2.58, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.21–5.48, p = 0.01), acute coronary syndrome at presentation (OR 8.14, 95 % CI 2.28–52, p = 0.01), and femoral access (OR 6.21, 95 % CI 2.71–14, p < 0.001) independently predicted BARC 2–5 bleeding at 48 h after PCI. The three items were combined to form a new risk score, the ICARUS score, showing good discrimination in both the derivation (area under the curve [AUC] 0.78) and internal validation (AUC 0.77) cohorts, and excellent calibration. An ICARUS score > 9 points accurately identified patients at HBR, showing better discrimination than other risk scores. ConclusionsA risk score based on age, clinical presentation and access site, predicts the risk of periprocedural bleeding in patients receiving cangrelor (ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT05505591).

Comparative incidence and risk factors for gastrointestinal bleeding following percutaneous coronary intervention for coronary artery disease: Insights from the Keio Cardiovascular Registry in Japan

BackgroundIn patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), antiplatelet medication usage is crucial for preventing thrombotic events. However, it requires careful monitoring, especially because of the risk of life-threatening bleeding complications. In hemorrhagic complications, assessment of patient background and risk of gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) remain limited for GIB that develops during long-term observation after hospital discharge. This study aimed to examine the incidence of GIB and patient characteristics in CAD post-PCI. MethodsAll CAD patients undergoing PCI for urgent, emergent, or elective indications were enrolled in the Keio Interhospital Cardiovascular Studies (JCD-KiCS)-PCI registry (January 2009 and December 2017) and followed up to 2 years after PCI discharge. From the JCD-KiCS PCI registry, 8864 patients (median [interquartile range [IQR]] age: non-GIB: 69.0 y [16 y], upper GIB (UGI): 72.0 y [15.5 y], lower GIB (LGI): 73.0 y [IQR: 13 y]) were categorized based on the occurrence of hospitalization-requiring GIB. Patient characteristics and detailed information regarding these GIB events, including the location (upper vs lower GI) and bleeding severity, were analyzed. ResultsOverall, 36 patients experienced UGI, while 85 patients experienced LGI. The rates of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) and triple therapy were significantly different among the non-GIB (n = 8734), UGI (n = 36) and LGI (n = 85) groups (DAPT [aspirin + P2Y12 (clopidogrel/prasugrel/ticlopidine)]: 64 [76.2 %] in the LGI group vs 24 [68.6 %] in the UGI group vs 7330 [84.6 %] in the non-GIB group; triple therapy [aspirin + P2Y12 (clopidogrel/prasugrel/ticlopidine)] + oral anticoagulant (OAC) (warfarin/direct oral anticoagulant [DOAC]): 17 [20.2 %] in the LGI group vs 8 [22.9 %] in the UGI group vs 836 [9.6 %] in the non-GIB group; p < 0.001). In the LGI and UGI groups, aspirin and warfarin were used in 2 (2.4 %) and 2 (5.7 %) patients, respectively, but not in combination with DOAC. The 2-year post-PCI hospitalization incidence for GIB was 1.4 % (LGI, 1.0 %; UGI, 0.4 %). The most common causes were colonic diverticular hemorrhage (43.5 %) for LGI and duodenal ulcer (21.9 %) for UGI. No significant differences were found in the cumulative 2-year post-PCI risks between the LGI and UGI groups (log-rank p = 0.97). Most GIB events were Bleeding Academic Research Consortium 2-equivalent (hemoglobin decrease <3 g/dL). Notably, the use of OACs at PCI discharge, bleeding complications within 72 h, and preprocedural anemia were significantly correlated with an increased GIB risk. ConclusionsThe real-world incidence of LGI is two times higher than that of UGI in CAD patients undergoing PCI, and most events are mild. OAC use at PCI discharge is the strongest potential risk factor for GIB development.

Clopidogrel Versus Aspirin as Chronic Maintenance Antiplatelet Monotherapy in Patients After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Chronic Kidney Disease: A Post Hoc Analysis of the HOST-EXAM Trial.

Clopidogrel monotherapy improved clinical outcomes compared with aspirin monotherapy during a chronic maintenance period in patients who underwent coronary stenting in the HOST-EXAM (Harmonizing Optimal Strategy for Treatment of Coronary Artery Stenosis-Extended Antiplatelet Monotherapy) trial. However, it is uncertain whether the beneficial effect of clopidogrel over aspirin is different according to the renal function. We conducted a post hoc analysis of the HOST-EXAM trial. Chronic kidney disease (CKD) was defined as baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/min per 1.73 m2. The primary end point was a composite of all-cause death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, stroke, readmission due to acute coronary syndrome, and Bleeding Academic Research Consortium bleeding type ≥3, during the 2-year follow up. Among the 5438 patients enrolled in the HOST-EXAM trial, 4844 patients (mean age, 63.3±10.6 years; 74.9% men) with a baseline creatinine value were analyzed in this study. A total of 508 (10.5%) patients had CKD, who were at higher risk of the primary end point compared with those without CKD (hazard ratio [HR], 2.01 [95% CI, 1.51-2.67]). Clopidogrel monotherapy was associated with a lower rate of the primary end point in both patients with CKD (HR, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.44-1.25]) and patients without CKD (HR, 0.71 [95% CI, 0.56-0.91]). No significant interaction was observed between the treatment effect and CKD status (P for interaction=0.889). During the chronic maintenance period after coronary stenting, the risk of thrombotic and bleeding events was significantly higher in patients with CKD compared with those without CKD. There was no statistical difference in the treatment effect of clopidogrel monotherapy in those with versus without CKD.

Real-World Implementation of a Genotype-Guided P2Y12 Inhibitor De-Escalation Strategy in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients.

CYP2C19 genotype-guided de-escalation from ticagrelor or prasugrel to clopidogrel may optimize the balance between ischemic and bleeding risk in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). This study sought to compare bleeding and ischemic event rates in genotyped patients vs standard care. Since 2015, ACS patients in the multicenter FORCE-ACS (Future Optimal Research and Care Evaluation in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome) registry received standard dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). Since 2021, genotype-guided P2Y12 inhibitor de-escalation was recommended at a single center, switching noncarriers of the loss-of-function allele CYP2C19∗3 or CYP2C19∗2 from ticagrelor or prasugrel to clopidogrel, whereas loss-of-function carriers remained on ticagrelor or prasugrel. The primary ischemic endpoint, a composite of cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction, or stroke, and the primary bleeding endpoint, Bleeding Academic Research Consortium 2, 3, or 5 bleeding, were compared between a genotyped cohort and a cohort treated with standard DAPT after 1year. Among 5,321 enrolled ACS patients, 406 underwent genotyping compared with 4,915 nongenotyped ACS patients on standard DAPT. In the genotyped cohort, 65.3% (n=265) were noncarriers, 88.7% (n=235) of whom were switched to clopidogrel. The primary ischemic endpoint occurred in 5.2% (n=21) of patients in the genotyped cohort compared to 6.9% (n=337) in the standard care cohort (adjusted HR: 0.82; 95%CI: 0.53-1.28). The primary bleeding rate was significantly lower in the genotyped cohort compared to the standard care cohort (4.7% vs 9.8%; adjusted HR: 0.47; 95%CI: 0.30-0.76). The implementation of a CYP2C19 genotype-guided P2Y12 inhibitor de-escalation strategy in a real-world ACS population resulted in lower bleeding rates without an increase in ischemic events compared to a standard DAPT regimen.

Outcomes of Ticagrelor Versus High-dose Clopidogrel in CYP2C19 Intermediate Metabolizer Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Acute Coronary Syndromes.

Guidelines on antiplatelet recommendation for CYP2C19 intermediate metabolizer (IM) havenotcometoanagreement. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical benefit of ticagrelor when compared with high-dose clopidogrel in CYP2C19 IM after percutaneous coronary intervention for acute coronary syndromes. Patients were enrolled according to CYP2C19 genotype and individual antiplatelet therapy. Patient characteristics and clinical outcomes were collected through electronic medical record system. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular event (MACCE), namely a composite of death from cardiovascular causes, myocardial infarction, stroke, and stent thrombosis within 12 months. The secondary outcome was Bleeding Academic Research Consortium scale bleeding events within 12 months. The Cox proportional hazards regression model was performed, with inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) adjusting for potential confounders. A total of 532 CYP2C19 IM were enrolled in this retrospective single-center study. No statistically significant difference in incidence rate of MACCE was found between patients receiving ticagrelor versus clopidogrel (7.01 vs. 9.52 per 100 patient-years; IPTW-adjusted hazard ratio 0.71; 95% confidence interval: 0.32-1.58; adjusted log-rank P = 0.396), but the incidence rate of Bleeding Academic Research Consortium type 2, 3, or 5 bleeding events was statistically higher in the loss of function-ticagrelor group than in the loss of function-clopidogrel group (13.53 vs. 6.16 per 100 patient-years; IPTW-adjusted hazard ratio: 2.29; 95% confidence interval: 1.10-4.78; adjusted log-rank P = 0.027). Ticagrelor treatment in CYP2C19 IM resulted in a statistically higher risk of bleeding compared with high-dose clopidogrel, whereas a clear association between treatments and MACCE warrants further investigations.

Aspirin versus Clopidogrel Monotherapy After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: 1-Year Follow-up of the STOPDAPT-3 Trial.

There was no previous trial comparing aspirin monotherapy with a P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy following short dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stents (DES). In the STOPDAPT-3, patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) or high bleeding risk (HBR) were randomly assigned to either 1-month DAPT with aspirin and prasugrel followed by aspirin monotherapy (aspirin group) or 1-month prasugrel monotherapy followed by clopidogrel monotherapy (clopidogrel group). This secondary analysis compared aspirin monotherapy with clopidogrel monotherapy by the 30-day landmark analysis. The co-primary endpoints were the cardiovascular endpoint defined as a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, definite stent thrombosis, or ischaemic stroke, and the bleeding endpoint defined as Bleeding Academic Research Consortium 3 or 5. Of 6002 assigned patients, 5833 patients (aspirin group: N = 2920 and clopidogrel group: N = 2913) were included in the 30-day landmark analysis. Median age was 73 (interquartile range 64-80) years, women 23.4%, ACS 74.6%, and HBR 54.1%. The assigned monotherapy was continued at 1 year in 87.5% and 87.2% in the aspirin and clopidogrel groups, respectively. The incidence rates beyond 30 days and up to 1 year were similar between the aspirin and clopidogrel groups for both cardiovascular endpoint (4.5 and 4.5 per 100 person-year, hazard ratio [HR] 1.00 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.77-1.30], P = .97), and bleeding endpoint (2.0 and 1.9, HR 1.02 [95% CI 0.69-1.52], P = .92). Aspirin monotherapy compared to clopidogrel monotherapy was associated with similar cardiovascular and bleeding outcomes beyond 1 month and up to 1 year after PCI with DES.

Novel insights on dual antiplatelet therapy duration following stenting for angiography-detected moderate-to-severe calcified coronary lesions

Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), comprising both aspirin and the P2Y12 receptor inhibitor, is crucial in managing patients with coronary artery disease following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The optimal duration for DAPT in patients with angiography-detected moderate-to-severe calcified coronary (MSCC) lesions who underwent PCI with drug-eluting stents (DES) implantation remains uncertain. We recruited patients with angiography-detected MSCC lesions who received DES implantation from the prospective Fuwai Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Registry. Patients were classified into two groups according to the duration of DAPT: those with a DAPT duration of one year or less, and those with a DAPT duration of more than one year. The primary endpoint was the major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular event, which was defined as composed of all-cause death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke. The key-safety endpoint was bleeding type 2, 3, or 5 according to the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium criteria. There were 1730 patients included in the study, and 470 (27.17 %) continued DAPT for more than one year after undergoing MSCC-PCI with DES implantation. The median follow-up time was 2.5 years. DAPT>1-year versus ≤1-year DAPT was significantly associated with a reduced risk of the primary outcome (1.59 % versus 3.19 %; adjusted hazard ratio=0.44; 95 % CI: 0.22–0.88). Similar trends were observed for all-cause death (0.16 % versus 1.91 %; P<0.001) and cardiovascular death (0.08 % versus 1.06 %; P=0.001). There was no significant difference in the key-safety endpoint between 2 regimens (1.75 % versus 0.85 %; adjusted hazard ratio=1.95; 95 % CI: 0.65–5.84). In conclusion, long-term DAPT after DES implantation in patients with MSCC lesions resulted in improved clinical outcomes at 2.5 years. This was achieved by reducing the risk of ischemia without increasing clinically significant bleeding.

Impact of Operator Experience on Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Outcomes.

The relationship between long-term outcomes and operator experience for left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) is still unknown. This study sought to explore the association between operator LAAO experience and one-year clinical outcomes. The RECORD study (Registry to Evaluate Chinese Real-World Clinical Outcomes in Patients With AF Using the WATCHMAN Left Atrial Appendage Closure Technology; NCT03917563) was a multicenter, prospective registry that included patients with the WATCHMAN LAAO device (Boston Scientific) in China from April 1, 2019, to October 31, 2020. The current analyses included patients with solely LAAO from the registry; those who had concomitant LAAO and ablation/other procedures were excluded. The primary outcome was a composite endpoint of death, stroke, systemic embolism, and Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC)-defined type 3 or 5 bleeding at 1 year. A total of 1,547 LAAO patients and 111 operators were included. The mean ± SD CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED scores of patients were 4.0 ± 1.8 and 2.5 ± 1.1, respectively. The mean ± SD age of operators was 47.0 ± 7.2 years, 15(13.5%) were female, and 52 (46.8%) were electrophysiologists. Utilizing maximally selected log-rank statistics, the thresholds to categorize an experienced operator were performing≥32 LAAOs annually or≥134 LAAOs in total. Performing≥32 LAAOs annually is the better criterion than≥134 LAAOs in total (absolute net reclassification index: 25.79%; P< 0.001). Compared with the≥32 LAAO annually group, the<32 group was associated with a 1.8-fold (HRadjusted: 1.79; 95%CI: 1.16-2.78; P=0.009) increase in the risk of the primary endpoint, and such risk in the<32 group can be reduced by ∼12% after performing each additional 5 cases (HRadjusted per 5 cases: 0.88; 95%CI: 0.78-0.99; P=0.033). Performing≥32 LAAOs annually could be a threshold to categorize an experienced operator. Before reaching this threshold, the risk of death, stroke, systemic embolism, and BARC-defined type 3 or 5 bleeding decreased by 12% after every 5 cases performed.

Impact of proton pump inhibitor use on clinical outcomes in East Asian patients receiving clopidogrel following drug-eluting stent implantation

BackgroundConcomitant use of clopidogrel and proton pump inhibitor (PPI) is common, but PPI may reduce the antiplatelet effects of clopidogrel in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We evaluated the impact of PPI use on clinical outcomes in post-PCI patients, by incorporating P2Y12 reaction unit (PRU) and CYP2C19 genotyping results.MethodsFrom a multicenter registry of patients who underwent PCI with drug-eluting stent implantation and received clopidogrel-based dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), patients who were prescribed a PPI at the time of PCI (PPI users) were compared to those who were not (non-users). The primary outcome included all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, or cerebrovascular accident at 12 months. Major bleeding (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium [BARC] types 3–5) and gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding (BARC types 3–5) were important secondary outcomes. The adjusted outcomes were compared using a 1:1 propensity-score (PS) matching and competing risk analysis.ResultsOf 13,160 patients, 2,235 (17.0%) were prescribed PPI, with an average age of 65.4 years. PPI users had higher on-treatment PRU levels than non-users. After PS matching, the primary outcome occurred in 51 patients who were PPI users (cumulative incidence, 4.7%) and 41 patients who were non-users (cumulative incidence, 3.7%; log-rank p = 0.27). In carriers of both CYP2C19 loss-of-function alleles, PPI use was linked to an increased risk of the primary outcome (hazard ratio, 3.22; 95% confidence interval, 1.18–8.78). The incidence of major bleeding and GI bleeding (BARC types 3–5) was comparable between PPI users and non-users in the PS-matched cohort.ConclusionsIn post-PCI patients receiving clopidogrel-based DAPT, PPI use was not linked to an increased risk of adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events, but there was a small but significant increase in on-treatment PRU. Future research using a more individualized approach would further elucidate these interactions and guide evidence-based clinical practices.

One-Month Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in High Bleeding Risk Asian Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - Onyx ONE Clear 2-Year Results.

One-month dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in high bleeding risk (HBR) patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with the Resolute OnyxTM zotarolimus-eluting stents (ZES) is safe and effective. Asian patients have a unique ischemia/bleeding risk profile. Here, we compare the outcomes between Asian and non-Asian patients after PCI and 1-month DAPT. Onyx ONE Clear was a prospective, multicenter study enrolling HBR patients undergoing PCI with the Resolute Onyx ZES (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT03647475). Event-free patients after 1-month DAPT transitioned to single antiplatelet therapy. Clinical outcomes between 1 month and 2 years were compared between patients from Asian and non-Asian countries after 1 : 1 propensity score matching accounting for baseline differences. Patients from Asian countries represented 18% (n=273) of the study group (n=1,507). Non-Asian patients had greater clinical complexity; however, these differences were minimal after matching. There were no significant differences in ischemic outcomes between matched cohorts from 1 month to 2 years, including the primary composite endpoint of cardiac death or myocardial infarction (12% vs. 12%; P>0.99). However, there were significantly fewer Bleeding Academic Research Consortium types 3-5 bleeding events in the Asian vs. non-Asian cohort (4% vs. 9%; P=0.007), despite similar bleeding risk profiles after matching. After propensity score matching, HBR patients from Asian countries undergoing PCI treated with 1-month DAPT had similar ischemic outcomes but fewer bleeding events between 1 month and 2 years compared with patients from non-Asian countries.

One-month DAPT after biodegradable-polymer everolimus-eluting stent implantation in patients at high-bleeding risk: an individual patient data pooled analysis of the SENIOR and POEM trials.

Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) can be shortened up to 1 month in high-bleeding risk (HBR) patients receiving a contemporary biodegradable-polymer sirolimus-eluting stent. We aimed to summarize the evidence on a similar DAPT regimen after biodegradable-polymer everolimus-eluting stent (EES) implantation in patients at HBR. We pooled the individual participant data from the available trials evaluating this strategy, namely, the SENIOR and the POEM trials. Inclusion criteria were ≥1 biodegradable-polymer EES implantation and ≤1-month duration of DAPT. The primary endpoint was the 1-year composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke. Major bleeding was defined as Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) type 3-5 bleeding. Landmark analyses were performed at 1 month, the time point for intended DAPT interruption. We included 766 participants (age 77.5 ± 8.2 years, women 31.9%), 323 from the SENIOR and 443 from the POEM trial. The primary endpoint occurred in 45 participants (6.0%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.3-7.7%) through 1 year of follow-up, with 21 (2.8%; 95% CI, 1.6-3.9%) events during the first month and 24 (3.4%; 95% CI, 2.0-4.7%) thereafter. The incidences of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, and stroke were 2.2% (95% CI, 0.36-2.50%), 3.1% (95% CI, 1.8-4.3%), and 1.2% (95% CI, 0.4-2.0%), respectively. BARC type 3-5 bleeding ocuurred in 1.1% (95% CI, 0.3-1.8%) at 1 month and 2.9% (95% CI, 1.6-4.1%) at 1 year. HBR patients receiving biodegradable-polymer EES had few ischemic and bleeding events when given 1 month of DAPT. One-month DAPT after biodegradable-polymer EES implantation seems safe in patients at HBR.