Nikki Giovanni: Literary Survivor Across Centuries Trudier Harris (bio) Followers of Nikki Giovanni recognize her easily in a variety of roles: poet, essayist, reader extraordinaire, proto-feminist, editor, cultural cheerleader, memoirist, conversationalist, scholar/critic, and professor/teacher. What cements all these roles together is the fact that Giovanni is a literary survivor. For more than forty years (noteworthy in the life of any artist, but especially in the context of Giovanni’s having first earned a reputation during the volatile 1960s), Giovanni has maintained a loyal following among readers and listeners as well as among a few faithful evaluators of her work.1 She has unquestionably managed to adjust with the times, to grow, and to retain a wide popularity among readers and listeners of her own generation as well as those much older and much younger than she is. From the distinctive—yet collective—voice she put forth early in her career in such works as Black Feeling Black Talk Black Judgement (1970) through her latest declarations of traveling to Mars with the assistance of nasa, Giovanni has remained impressively herself, a self that her audiences appreciate. From echoing the strands of militancy that guided the young artists of the Black Arts Movement of the 1960s to exhibiting a divergent strand of individualism that was at times in tune with that militancy and at times not, Giovanni has managed to earn accolades as a writer who could be sympathetic to a movement but who did not let that movement diminish her uniqueness. Giovanni’s career might be divided into a before and after—before her arrival as Commonwealth Visiting Professor of English at Virginia Tech University in Blacksburg, Virginia, in 1987 and her career since that monumental change. Before was defined by identification with militancy, especially manifested in the poetry, of the 1960s and its aftermath. From the beginning of her career, Giovanni was concerned with power and politics, which she interpreted in many ways, and which was informed by the lessons she learned from her family and friends. Throughout her career, she has focused on the emotional and political health of African Americans, which means that she has also, at times perhaps inadvertently, made [End Page 34] the health of the United States her focus as well. Communities in which she has lived and communities of which she is a part demographically have also influenced her writing, both creatively and in creative non-fiction. At times, she has served voluntarily as a spokesperson for sections of the African American community, and at other times she has been drafted into that role. She has always had integral emotional ties to social movements within African American communities, and that is perhaps one of the reasons she has managed to remain so engaged with members of the generations that were contemporary with her and that have followed her ascendency to national and international prominence. Controversy continues about whether or not Giovanni was truly a militant in the 1960s. Evidence from her poetry and essays can be used to suggest that she was quite militant. In turn, other of her poems can be used to suggest that she was more interested in friendship, love, and the relationships that accompanied both. Perusal of Black Feeling Black Talk Black Judgement will yield “Poem for Black Boys,” in which she declares that young black males should take to the streets in violent revolution instead of following Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.’s non-violence tactics; “For Saundra,” in which she avows “maybe I shouldn’t write / at all / but clean my gun / and check my kerosene supply / perhaps these are not poetic / times / at all” (BFBTBJ, 89); and “The True Import of the Present Dialogue, Black vs. Negro,” in which she advocates a militancy that leads to fatalities. And of course there is “Reflections on April 4, 1968,” in which Giovanni declares that, in retaliation for King’s assassination, most white people should have “at least two fingers” removed from both hands (bfbtbj, 54) and should be blinded or have their eyes removed. When she asserts that King’s blood should choke “ten hundred million whites” (bfbtbj, 55), the case for militancy seems to be...
Read full abstract